Search

Biodiversity patterns are shaped by the interplay between geodiversity and organismal characteristics. Superimposing genetic structure onto landscape heterogeneity (i.e., landscape genetics) can help to disentangle their interactions and better understand population dynamics. Previous studies on the sub‐Antarctic Prince Edward Islands (located midway between Antarctica and Africa) have highlighted the importance of landscape and climatic barriers in shaping spatial genetic patterns and have drawn attention to the value of these islands as natural laboratories for studying fundamental concepts in biology. Here, we assessed the fine‐scale spatial genetic structure of the springtail, Cryptopygus antarcticus travei, which is endemic to Marion Island, in tandem with high‐resolution geological data. Using a species‐specific suite of microsatellite markers, a fine‐scale sampling design incorporating landscape complexity and generalised linear models (GLMs), we examined genetic patterns overlaid onto high‐resolution digital surface models and surface geology data across two 1‐km sampling transects. The GLMs revealed that genetic patterns across the landscape closely track landscape resistance data in concert with landscape discontinuities and barriers to gene flow identified at a scale of a few metres. These results show that the island's geodiversity plays an important role in shaping biodiversity patterns and intraspecific genetic diversity. This study illustrates that fine‐scale genetic patterns in soil arthropods are markedly more structured than anticipated, given that previous studies have reported high levels of genetic diversity and evidence of genetic structing linked to landscape changes for springtail species and considering the homogeneity of the vegetation complexes characteristic of the island at the scale of tens to hundreds of metres. By incorporating fine‐scale and high‐resolution landscape features into our study, we were able to explain much of the observed spatial genetic patterns. Our study highlights geodiversity as a driver of spatial complexity. More widely, it holds important implications for the conservation and management of the sub‐Antarctic islands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research explores intra-gully sediment volume changes of a massive gully network (42 ha) located in the Eastern Cape, RSA, in response to high rainfall events during a three-year study period (2017–2020). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and photogrammetric processing were used to generate high resolution digital surface models (DSMs). Volumetric calculations were run to estimate the extent of gully expansion within the system to determine intra-gully changes and sediment erosion over the study period. The gully was categorised into four zones based on predominant structure and processes. These are the Extension Zone, Expansion Zone, Transport/Deposition Zone and the Side Branches. Rainfall data from a rainfall station (10 km away) was used to investigate the correlation between rainfall depth, rainfall intensity, and flow accumulation over two wetter years and one drier year with gully expansion experienced during these periods. The gully network encountered a total gully sediment volume erosion of 104,489 m3 (6.01%) over the study period. Nineteen high to extreme intensity (>20 mm per day) rainfall events produced the runoff necessary for gully expansion during the 2017 and 2018 hydrological years. Notably, lower gully growth was recorded in the Expansion and Transport/Deposition Zones during the subsequent below average hydrological year in 2019–2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One manifestation of the glaring lack of equality, diversity, and inclusion in higher education relates to the underrepresentation of certain individuals and/or regions in the scholarly publication process. Here, we analyse the affiliations of editorial board members in 126 Geography journals. Specifically, we examine editorial board membership by region and determine the extent to which the regional representation of editorial board members is associated with journal impact factor as a measure of journal reach and quality. Of the 5,202 editorial board members examined, almost 80% are located in mainland Europe, North America, and the British Isles, while roughly five percent are located in Central America, South America, the Middle East, and Africa combined. Moreover, editorial board members located in these four regions from the Global South are most often editorial board members of journals in the lowest quartile (by impact factor). These findings highlight the outdated and exclusionary practices that pervade the scholarly publication process in science in general, and Geography specifically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]