Search

Testing for developmental toxicity according to the current regulatory guidelines requires large numbers of animals, making these tests very resource intensive, time-consuming, and ethically debatable. Over the past decades, several alternative in vitro assays have been developed, but these often suffered from low predictability and the inability to provide a mechanistic understanding of developmental toxicity.To identify embryotoxic compounds, we developed a human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-based biomarker assay. The assay is based on the differentiation of hiPSCs into functional cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Proper stem cell differentiation is investigated by morphological profiling and assessment of time-dependent expression patterns of cell-specific biomarkers. In this system, a decrease in the expression of the biomarker genes and morphology disruption of the differentiated cells following compound treatment indicated teratogenicity.The hiPSCs-based biomarker assay was validated with 21 well-established in vivo animal teratogenic and non-teratogenic compounds during cardiomyocyte and hepatocyte differentiation. The in vivo teratogenic compounds (e.g., thalidomide and valproic acid) markedly disrupted morphology, functionality, and the expression pattern of the biomarker genes in either one or both cell types. Non-teratogenic chemicals generally had no effect on the morphology of differentiated cells, nor on the expression of the biomarker genes. Compared to the in vivo classification, the assay achieved high accuracy (91%), sensitivity (91%), and specificity (90%).The assay, which we named ReproTracker®, is a state-of-the-art in vitro method that can identify the teratogenicity potential of new pharmaceuticals and chemicals and signify the outcome of in vivo test systems.

Figure S1: Characterisation of CAPAN1-B2S* Figure S2: Characterisation of SUM149-B1S* Figure S3: Sensitivity of ddPCR assay. Figure S4: Olaparib and talazoparib select for secondary mutant tumour cells. Figure S5: DLD1 tumour cells have a fitness advantage over DLD1.BRCA2-/- cells in vitro. Figure S6: Olaparib has little efficacy in mixed CAPAN-1 xenografts. Figure S7: Exome sequencing of CAPAN-1.B2.S* shows retention of TP53 mutations. Figure S8: Exome sequencing of SUM149.B1.S* show retention of TP53 mutation. Figure S9: BRCA-proficient and -deficient cells exhibit sensitivity to additional DNA damaging agents. Figure S10: AZD-1775 causes an active S phase reduction in both CAPAN1 and CAPAN-1.B2.S* cells.

ddPCR probe and primer design

Aneuploidy is characterized by the presence of an abnormal number of chromosomes and is a common hallmark of cancer. However, exposure to aneugenic compounds does not necessarily lead to cancer. Aneugenic compounds are mainly identified using the in vitro micronucleus assay but this assay cannot standardly discriminate between aneugens and clastogens and cannot be used to identify the exact mode-of-action (MOA) of aneugens; tubulin stabilization, tubulin destabilization, or inhibition of mitotic kinases. To improve the classification of aneugenic substances and determine their MOA, we developed and validated the TubulinTracker assay that uses a green fluorescent protein-tagged tubulin reporter cell line to study microtubule stability using flow cytometry. Combining the assay with a DNA stain also enables cell cycle analysis. Substances whose exposure resulted in an accumulation of cells in G2/M phase, combined with increased or decreased tubulin levels, were classified as tubulin poisons. All known tubulin poisons included were classified correctly. Moreover, we correctly classified compounds, including aneugens that did not affect microtubule levels. However, the MOA of aneugens not affecting tubulin stability, such as Aurora kinase inhibitors, could not be identified. Here, we show that the TubulinTracker assay can be used to classify microtubule stabilizing and destabilizing compounds in living cells. This insight into the MOA of aneugenic agents is important, eg, to support a weight-of-evidence approach for risk assessment, and the classification as an aneugen as opposed to a clastogen or mutagen, has a big impact on the assessment.

The toxicity of co-formulants present in glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) has been widely discussed leading to the European Union banning the polyoxyethylene tallow amine (POEA). We identified the most commonly used POEA, known as POE-15 tallow amine (POE-15), in the widely used US GBH RangerPro. Cytotoxicity assays using human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 and hepatocyte HepG2 cell lines showed that RangerPro and POE-15 are far more cytotoxic than glyphosate alone. RangerPro and POE-15 but not glyphosate caused cell necrosis in both cell lines, and that glyphosate and RangerPro but not POE-15 caused oxidative stress in HepG2 cells. We further tested these pesticide ingredients in the ToxTracker assay, a system used to evaluate a compound's carcinogenic potential, to assess their capability for inducing DNA damage, oxidative stress and an unfolded protein response (endoplasmic reticulum, ER stress). RangerPro and POE-15 but not glyphosate gave rise to ER stress. We conclude that the toxicity resulting from RangerPro exposure is thus multifactorial involving ER stress caused by POE-15 along with oxidative stress caused by glyphosate. Our observations reinforce the need to test both co-formulants and active ingredients of commercial pesticides to inform the enactment of more appropriate regulation and thus better public and environmental protection.

Nucleoside analogues have long been designed and tested in cancer treatment and against viral infections. However, several early compounds were shown to have mutagenic properties as a consequence of their mode-of-action. This limited their use, and several have been discontinued for lengthy treatments or altogether. Nonetheless, nucleoside analogues remain an attractive modality for virally driven diseases, of which many still are without proper treatment options. To quantitatively assess the genotoxic mode-of-action of a panel of nucleoside analogues, we applied the ToxTracker® reporter assay. Many of the early nucleoside analogues showed a genotoxic response. The more recently developed nucleoside analogues, Remdesivir and Molnupiravir that are currently being repurposed for Covid-19 treatment, had a different profile in ToxTracker and did not induce the genotoxicity reporters. Our analyses support the metabolite GS-441524 over the parent analogue Remdesivir. In contrast, Molnupiravir was devoid of clear cellular toxicity while its active metabolite (EIDD-1931) was cytotoxic and induced several biomarkers. Nucleoside analogues continue to be attractive treatment options upon viral infections. ToxTracker readily distinguished between the genotoxic analogues and those with different profiles and provides a basis for clustering and potency ranking, offering a comprehensive tool to assess the toxicity of nucleoside analogues.