Search

Your search keyword '"Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD)"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD)" Publication Year Range Last 3 years
6 results on '"Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD)"'

1. Assessing Long-term Treatment Benefits Using Complementary Statistical Approaches: An In Silico Analysis of the Phase III Keynote-045 and Checkmate-214 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials

Author

Ana Cavillon, Damien Pouessel, Nadine Houédé, Fanny Mathevet, Jean Yves Dauxois, Christine Chevreau, Stéphane Culine, Jean-Pierre Delord, Raphael Porcher, Thomas Filleron, Institut Claudius Regaud, Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD), Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse UMR5219 (IMT), Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse (INSA Toulouse), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut Curie [Paris], Equipe 5 : METHODS - Méthodes de l’évaluation thérapeutique des maladies chroniques (CRESS - U1153), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS (U1153 / UMR_A_1125 / UMR_S_1153)), Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] (CNAM), HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] (CNAM), HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université (HESAM)-Université Sorbonne Paris Cité (USPC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Centre d'épidémiologie Clinique [Hôtel-Dieu], and Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Hôpital Hôtel Dieu

Subjects
[STAT]Statistics [stat], Long-term benefit, Flexible parametric survival model with cure, Urology, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Milestone survival, [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, [SDV.MHEP.UN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Urology and Nephrology
Abstract

International audience; BackgroundThe Keynote-045 trial illustrates that the long-term benefit (LTB) of treatment does not always translate to improved progression-free survival (PFS). Milestone survival and flexible parametric survival model with cure (FPCM) have been proposed as complementary statistical approaches to more comprehensively evaluate LTBs of treatments.ObjectiveThe current study compares milestone survival and FPCM analyses to evaluate treatment effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) phase III trials.Design, setting, and participantsIndividual patient data, from initial and follow-up analyses of Keynote-045 (urothelial cancer) and Checkmate-214 (advanced renal cell carcinoma), were reconstructed for PFS.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisEach trial was reanalyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression and two complementary methods (milestone survival and FPCM) to estimate treatment impact on the LTB.Results and limitationsFor each trial, there was evidence of nonproportional hazards. For the long-term analysis of the Keynote-045 trial, FPCM identified a time-dependent effect on PFS, but the Cox model found no statistical difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.75–1.08). Milestone survival and FPCM identified improvements in the LTB fractions. This was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of Keynote-045, based on the shorter follow-up, although the LTB fraction was not retained. The increase in PFS in Checkmate-214 was identified by both Cox model and FPCM. Experimental treatment-dependent improvement in the LTB fraction was demonstrated using milestone survival and FPCM. The LTB fraction estimated with FPCM was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of the shorter follow-up period.ConclusionsAlthough ICIs show substantial shifts toward LTBs in terms of PFS, based on a conventional Kaplan-Meier or Cox model analysis, our approach provides an alternative assessment of benefit-risk ratios for new therapeutics and facilitates communicating risk to patients. Kidney patients treated with ICIs can be counseled that they are potentially cured, but future work will need to definitively validate this conclusion.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Cancer de la vessie localement avancé ou métastatique : identification des freins et leviers du parcours des patients en France

Author

Nadine, Houédé, Cécile, Flahault, Marine, Gross-Goupil, Solenn, Le Clanche, Yann, Le Goff, Frédérick, Merlier, Géraldine, Pignot, Bertrand, Pourroy, Constance, Thibault, Evanguelos, Xylinas, Marie-Noelle, Solbes, Gwenael, Dénéchère, Morgan, Roupret, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD), Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé (LPPS (URP_4057)), Université Paris Cité (UPCité), CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC), Service Pharmacie [Hôpital de la Timone - APHM], Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM)- Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] (TIMONE), Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO), AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Pfizer Oncology, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], and Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)

Subjects
Initiatives, MESH: Humans, Prise en charge, Health Personnel, Accompagnement psychologique, Cancer de la vessie localement avancé, Family caregivers, MESH: Quality of Life, Locally advanced bladder cancer, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, MESH: Caregivers, Cancer de la vessie métastatique, Metastatic bladder cancer, MESH: Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, MESH: France, Caregivers, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Parcours de soins, Humans, MESH: Health Personnel, France, Aidants, Psychological support, Healthcare pathway
Abstract

International audience; Introduction: Bladder cancer is currently ranked as the 8th most common cancer in France. However, the patient care pathway for this cancer is still not well known.Methods: A telephone survey was conducted with fifteen healthcare professionals, ten patients, and five family caregivers between November 2020 and March 2021. The objectives of this survey were to identify the major steps in the care pathway according to the medical, emotional and societal dimensions, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer, the associated barriers, and the initiatives to be implemented to improve it.Results: Several barriers were identified at different stages of the overall care pathway, including lack of knowledge of risk factors and warning signs of the disease by the general population and some healthcare professionals, difficulties linked to the announcement consultation, lack of psychological support for patients and their caregivers, and lack of information given about the disease and supportive care.Discussion: These results allowed us to identify three major initiatives which could improve the overall care pathway and the quality of life of patients and their caregivers: 1/implementation of a public awareness campaign on bladder cancer; 2/creation of booklets for patients and their caregivers to provide them with a source of reliable information; and 3/the creation of communication tools between healthcare professionals and patients to facilitate exchanges during consultations.; Introduction > Le cancer de la vessie est aujourd'hui classé en huitième position des cancers lesplus fréquents en France. Le parcours de soins de ce cancer est, cependant, mal connu.Méthodes > Une enquête téléphonique a été menée en France auprès de quinze professionnels desanté, dix patients et cinq aidants entre novembre 2020 et mars 2021. Les objectifs de cetteenquête étaient d'identifier les grandes étapes du parcours de soins des patients atteints d'uncancer de la vessie localement avancé ou métastatique, selon l'angle médical, émotionnel etsociétal, les freins y étant associés et les initiatives à mettre en place pour l'améliorer. IntroductionLe cancer d'origine vésicale est dans 90 % des cas un carcinomeurothélial, dont l'incidence est de 13 000 nouveaux cas diag-nostiqués chaque année en France [1], le plaçant en huitièmeposition des cancers les plus fréquents. Il arrive au quatrièmerang des cancers masculins et au quatorzième rang des cancersféminins et est responsable d'environ 5000 décès par an enFrance (3778 décès chez les hommes et 1235 décès chez lesfemmes, observés en 2017). Il est ainsi le septième cancer leplus mortel en France [1].Les principaux facteurs de risque du cancer de la vessie sontl'âge, avec une moyenne d'âge au diagnostic de 73 ans chezl'homme et 78 ans chez la femme [2], et le tabagisme [3]. Unfumeur a, en effet, environ 5,5 fois plus de risque de développerla maladie par rapport à un non-fumeur. En France, le tabagismeserait responsable de 53 % des cas de tumeurs de la vessie chezles hommes et de 39 % chez les femmes [4]. Les autres facteursde risque sont l'exposition professionnelle à des substances,comme les amines aromatiques, à des agents infectieux (ex :schistosome), ou à certains médicaments (ex : traitement anté-rieur à base de cyclophosphamide). Les facteurs de risqueassociés au carcinome urothélial en font historiquement uncancer principalement masculin [5].Le diagnostic de ce cancer peut être retardé, à cause de symp-tômes cliniques non spécifiques pouvant laisser penser, notam-ment, à une infection urinaire, tels qu'une augmentation de lafréquence urinaire, de l'urgence mictionnelle et une dysurie, quiRésultats > Plusieurs freins ont été identifiés à différentes étapes du parcours, notamment lemanque de connaissance des facteurs de risque et signes d'alerte de la maladie par le grand publicet certains professionnels de santé, les difficultés liées à la consultation d'annonce, le manqued'accompagnement psychologique pour les patients et aidants, le manque d'informations don-nées sur la maladie et les soins de support.Discussion > Ces résultats ont permis d'identifier ainsi trois grandes initiatives qui permettraientd'améliorer le parcours de soins dans sa globalité et la qualité de vie des patients et de leursaidants : 1/mise en place d'une campagne de sensibilisation du grand public sur le cancer de lavessie ; 2/création de livrets à destination des patients et de leurs aidants pour leur fournir unesource d'informations fiables ; et 3/la création d'outils de communication entre soignants etpatients pour faciliter les échanges lors des consultations.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Preliminary tolerance analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients after resection of stage III colon cancer from the PRODIGE 34-FFCD randomized trial

Author

Aparicio, T., Bouché, O., Etienne, P. L., Barbier, E., Mineur, L., Desgrippes, R., Guerin-Meyer, V., Hocine, F., Martin, J., Le Brun-Ly, V., Cretin, J., Desramé, J., Rinaldi, Y., Cany, L., Falandry, C., Lefevre, L. B., Marous, M., Terrebonne, E., Mosser, L., Turpin, J., Turpin, A., Bauguion, L., Reichling, C., Eynde, M., Carola, E., Hiret, S., UCL - SSS/IREC/MIRO - Pôle d'imagerie moléculaire, radiothérapie et oncologie, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'oncologie médicale, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'hépato-gastro-entérologie, CarMeN, laboratoire, Hopital Saint-Louis [AP-HP] (AP-HP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Hôpital Robert Debré, Hôpital Robert Debré-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims (CHU Reims), Hôpital Privé des Côtes d'Armor (HPCA), Lipides - Nutrition - Cancer (U866) (LNC), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Biologie Appliquée à la Nutrition et à l'Alimentation de Dijon (ENSBANA), Service Biostatistiques et Informatique Médicale (CHU de Dijon) (DIM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon), Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Institut Sainte Catherine [Avignon], CH de Saint-Malo [Broussais], Service d'Oncologie Médicale [Angers], Centre Paul Papin, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest [Angers/Nantes] (UNICANCER/ICO), UNICANCER, Centre Hospitalier Simone Veil de Beauvais [Beauvais], Clinique François Chénieux, Hôpital Dupuytren [CHU Limoges], Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD), Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz [Lyon], Hôpital Européen [Fondation Ambroise Paré - Marseille], Clinique Francheville [Périgueux], Cardiovasculaire, métabolisme, diabétologie et nutrition (CarMeN), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] (CHLS), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Service d'oncogénétique [Centre georges-François Leclerc], Centre Régional de Lutte contre le cancer Georges-François Leclerc [Dijon] (UNICANCER/CRLCC-CGFL), UNICANCER-UNICANCER, CHU de la Martinique [Fort de France], Hôpital Haut-Lévêque [CHU Bordeaux], CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Hôpital Jacques Puel - Bourran [Rodez] (HJPB), Clinique Sainte Isabelle [Abbeville, France], Service d'oncologie médicale (CHRU Lille), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille), Centre Hospitalier Départemental - Hôpital de La Roche-sur-Yon (CHD Vendée), CH Colmar, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc [Bruxelles], Groupe Hospitalier Public du Sud de l'Oise [Creil] (GHPSO), CRLCC René Gauducheau, and Département d'oncologie médicale [Saint Herblain]

Subjects
Geriatric evaluation, [SDV.AEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition, Hepatology, Older, Gastroenterology, [SDV.AEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition, Adjuvant chemotherapy, Colon cancer
Abstract

International audience; BACKGROUND: Colon adenocarcinoma mainly occurs in older patients. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival after stage III colon cancer resection, but this improvement was not demonstrated in older patients. METHODS: The purpose of ADAGE-PRODIGE 34, randomized open phase III trial is to compare in patients over 70 years oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with fluoropyrimidine alone in fit patients (Group 1) and fluoropyrimidine with observation in frail patients (Group 2) after resection of stage III colon adenocarcinoma. We report a preliminary tolerance analysis on 50% of the first patients enrolled. RESULTS: The analysis was conducted on 491 patients (378 in Group 1 and 113 in Group 2). Patients in Group 2 were older and showed more frailty criteria than those in Group 1. Cumulative grade 3-5 toxicities were more frequent in patients treated with oxaliplatin in Group 1 or with fluoropyrimidine in Group 2 than in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine in Group 1. At least one course was deferred in more than half of the patients in all groups. Early treatment cessation was more frequent in Group 2. CONCLUSION: No safety concerns were raised for the continuation of accrual. The frailty criteria distribution suggests that the investigator's evaluation for group allocation was accurate.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Nivolumab, nivolumab–ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (BIONIKK): a biomarker-driven, open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial

Author

Yann-Alexandre Vano, Réza Elaidi, Mostefa Bennamoun, Christine Chevreau, Delphine Borchiellini, Diane Pannier, Denis Maillet, Marine Gross-Goupil, Christophe Tournigand, Brigitte Laguerre, Philippe Barthélémy, Elodie Coquan, Gwenaëlle Gravis, Nadine Houede, Mathilde Cancel, Olivier Huillard, Philippe Beuzeboc, Laure Fournier, Arnaud Méjean, Xavier Cathelineau, Nicolas Doumerc, Philippe Paparel, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Alexandre de la Taille, Karim Bensalah, Thibault Tricard, Thibaut Waeckel, Géraldine Pignot, Elena Braychenko, Stefano Caruso, Cheng-Ming Sun, Virginie Verkarre, Guillaume Lacroix, Marco Moreira, Maxime Meylan, Antoine Bougouïn, Letuan Phan, Christelle Thibault-Carpentier, Jessica Zucman-Rossi, Wolf Herman Fridman, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Stéphane Oudard, Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine - CARPEM [Paris], Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Association pour la Recherche de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Cancérologie [Paris] (ARTIC), Institut Mutualiste de Montsouris (IMM), Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole (IUCT Oncopole - UMR 1037), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Antoine Lacassagne [Nice] (UNICANCER/CAL), UNICANCER-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] (UNICANCER/Lille), Université de Lille-UNICANCER, Service d'Oncologie Médicale [Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud - HCL], Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] (CHLS), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Hôpital Saint-André, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12), Centre Eugène Marquis (CRLCC), Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer François Baclesse [Caen] (UNICANCER/CRLC), Normandie Université (NU)-UNICANCER-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD), Clinique d'Oncologie et de Radiothérapie [Tours] (CORAD), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours)-Hôpital Bretonneau, Hôpital Foch [Suresnes], Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles Physiologiques [CHU Toulouse], Pôle Urologie - Néphrologie - Dialyse - Transplantations - Brûlés - Chirurgie plastique - Explorations fonctionnelles et physiologiques [CHU Toulouse], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Nouvel Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation rénale [CHU Caen], Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-CHU Caen, Normandie Université (NU)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN), Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers (CRC (UMR_S_1138 / U1138)), École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris-Centre de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (PARCC (UMR_S 970/ U970)), and Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)

Subjects
MESH: Humans, MESH: Carcinoma, Renal Cell / drug therapy, MESH: Angiogenesis Inhibitors / adverse effects, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, MESH: Neoplasm Staging, MESH: Male, MESH: Prospective Studies, MESH: Ipilimumab, MESH: Lipase, Oncology, MESH: Tumor Microenvironment, MESH: Sunitinib, MESH: Biomarkers, MESH: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects, MESH: Female, MESH: Nivolumab / adverse effects, MESH: Protein Kinase Inhibitors / adverse effects
Abstract

International audience; Background: We previously reported a 35-gene expression classifier identifying four clear-cell renal cell carcinoma groups (ccrcc1 to ccrcc4) with different tumour microenvironments and sensitivities to sunitinib in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Efficacy profiles might differ with nivolumab and nivolumab-ipilimumab. We therefore aimed to evaluate treatment efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab, nivolumab-ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in patients according to tumour molecular groups.Methods: This biomarker-driven, open-label, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial included patients from 15 university hospitals or expert cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had previously untreated metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of varying sizes to receive either nivolumab or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc1 and ccrcc4 groups), or either a VEGFR-TKI or nivolumab-ipilimumab (ccrcc2 and ccrcc3 groups). Patients assigned to nivolumab-ipilimumab received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to nivolumab received intravenous nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Patients assigned to VEGFR-TKIs received oral sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks every 6 weeks) or oral pazopanib (800 mg daily continuously). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the population who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02960906, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2016-003099-28, and is closed to enrolment.Findings: Between June 28, 2017, and July 18, 2019, 303 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment (61 to nivolumab, 101 to nivolumab-ipilimumab, 40 to a VEGFR-TKI). In the nivolumab group, two patients were excluded due to a serious adverse event before the first study dose and one patient was excluded from analyses due to incorrect diagnosis. Median follow-up was 18·0 months (IQR 17·6-18·4). In the ccrcc1 group, objective responses were seen in 12 (29%; 95% CI 16-45) of 42 patients with nivolumab and 16 (39%; 24-55) of 41 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (odds ratio [OR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·25-1·56]). In the ccrcc4 group, objective responses were seen in seven (44%; 95% CI 20-70) of 16 patients with nivolumab and nine (50% 26-74) of 18 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·78 [95% CI 0·20-3·01]). In the ccrcc2 group, objective responses were seen in 18 (50%; 95% CI 33-67) of 36 patients with a VEGFR-TKI and 19 (51%; 34-68) of 37 patients with nivolumab-ipilimumab (OR 0·95 [95% CI 0·38-2·37]). In the ccrcc3 group, no objective responses were seen in the four patients who received a VEGFR-TKI, and in one (20%; 95% CI 1-72) of five patients who received nivolumab-ipilimumab. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were hepatic failure and lipase increase (two [3%] of 58 for both) with nivolumab, lipase increase and hepatobiliary disorders (six [6%] of 101 for both) with nivolumab-ipilimumab, and hypertension (six [15%] of 40) with a VEGFR-TKI. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (3%) patients in the nivolumab group, 38 (38%) in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group, and ten (25%) patients in the VEGFR-TKI group. Three deaths were treatment-related: one due to fulminant hepatitis with nivolumab-ipilimumab, one death from heart failure with sunitinib, and one due to thrombotic microangiopathy with sunitinib.Interpretation: We demonstrate the feasibility and positive effect of a prospective patient selection based on tumour molecular phenotype to choose the most efficacious treatment between nivolumab with or without ipilimumab and a VEGFR-TKI in the first-line treatment of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Comprehensive biomarkers analysis to explain resistances to PD1-L1 ICIs: The precision immuno-oncology for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (PIONeeR) trial

Author

Greillier, Laurent, Monville, Florence, Leca, Vanina, Vely, Frédéric, Garcia, Stephane, Ciccolini, Joseph, Sabatier, Florence, Ferrani, Gilbert, Boudai, Nawel, Ghezali, Lamia, Landri, Marcellin, Marin, Clémence, Hamimed, Mourad, Arnaud, Laurent, Karlsen, Melanie, Atsou, Kevin, Bokobza, Sivan, Fleury, Pauline, Boyer, Arnaud, Audigier-Valette, Clarisse, Martinez, Stéphanie, Pegliasco, Hervé, Ray, Patrice, Falchero, Lionel, Serre, Antoine, Cloarec, Nicolas, Lebas, Louisiane, Hominal, Stephane, Barre, Patricia, Zahi, Sarah, Frikha, Ahmed, Bory, Pierre, Ray, Maryannick Le, Laborde, Lilian, Martin, Virginie, Malkoun, Richard, Roumieux, Marie, Mazieres, Julien, Perol, Maurice, Vivier, Eric, Benzekry, Sébastien, Fieschi, Jacques, Barlesi, Fabrice, Service d'oncologie multidisciplinaire innovations thérapeutiques [Hôpital Nord - APHM], Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM)- Hôpital Nord [CHU - APHM], Veracyte SAS, Aix Marseille Université (AMU), Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM), Méthodes computationnelles pour la prise en charge thérapeutique en oncologie : Optimisation des stratégies par modélisation mécaniste et statistique (COMPO), Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée (CRISAM), Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Innate Pharma, Hôpital Saint-Joseph [Marseille], Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon-La Seyne sur Mer - Hôpital Sainte-Musse, Centre Hospitalier d'Aix en Provence [Aix-en-Provence] (CHIAP ), Hôpital Européen [Fondation Ambroise Paré - Marseille], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), Hôpital Nord-Ouest de Villefranche-sur-Saône, Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD), Centre Hospitalier Henri Duffaut (Avignon), Centre Hospitalier du Val d'Ariège, Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Genevois [Saint-Julien-en-Genevois], Centre hospitalier Jean Rougier, Centre hospitalier de Montauban (CH Montauban), Polyclinique Maymard, Centre Hospitalier de Bastia, Partenaires INRAE, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC), Hôpitaux de Toulouse, Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon], Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), and Université Paris-Saclay

Subjects
[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, [SDV.IMM.IMM]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology/Immunotherapy
Abstract

International audience; Abstract Background: Resistance to PD1/L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC patients is observed in about 80% of individuals with no robust predictive biomarker yet. The PIONeeR trial (NCT03493581) aims to predict such resistances through a comprehensive multiparametric biomarkers analysis. Methodology: Among the >300 advanced NSCLC patients (pts) recruited in PIONeeR, we focused on the first 137 ≥2nd line ECOG PS0-1 pts treated with single-agent nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. Tumor tissue was collected at baseline and pts were re-biopsied at 6 weeks, and blood-sampled every cycle throughout the 24 weeks post C1D1. Response to PD1/L1 ICIs was assessed by RECIST 1.1 every 6 weeks. Immune contexture was characterized in tumor & blood of each pt through FACS for circulating immune cell subtypes quantification and endothelial activation, blood soluble factors dosage, dual- & multiplex IHC/digital pathology to quantify immune cells infiltrating the tumor, WES for TMB & ICI plasma dosage, leading to 331 measured biomarkers in addition to routine clinical parameters. Multivariable (MV) logistic regression was used to examine the association of each biomarker (controlled by sex, age, smoking status, histological type & PDL1+ Tumor Cells) with the risk of Early Progression (EP), i.e. within 3.5 months of treatment. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted for association with PFS and OS. Results: Overall, the 137 pts were mainly male (64%), smokers (92%) and 1% PDL1+ TC in 36% of the cases, and 21% of pts were still on treatment at data cut-off. Archived samples were available for 80% of pts at inclusion and re-biopsy was available in 52.9% of these cases. The median follow up was 19.8 months, 22.5% of pts did not progress at data cut-off while 62% presented EP. Tumor Cytotoxic T-cells density, especially PD1+ were lower in EP (MV OR=0.45, p=0.022); conversely, higher proportions of circulating cytotoxic T-cells and activated T-cells (HLA-DR+) were observed in EP (MV OR=3.8, p65% inter-pt variability was observed in plasma exposures for all ICIs, with 8-10% of pts displaying trough levels below the target engagement threshold. Data will be presented through unsupervised clustering algorithms & multi-modal supervised learning methods. Changes after 6 weeks of treatment will be analyzed to further investigate drugs mechanisms of action. Conclusion: The PIONeeR trial provides with the 1st comprehensive biomarkers’ analysis to establish predictive models of resistance in advanced NSCLC pts treated with PD1/L1 ICIs and highlights how tumor and circulating biomarkers are complementary.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Cabozantinib-nivolumab sequence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The CABIR study

Author

Yann‐Alexandre Vano, Letuan Phan, Gwenaelle Gravis, Iphigénie Korakis, Friederike Schlürmann, Denis Maillet, Mostefa Bennamoun, Nadine Houede, Delphine Topart, Delphine Borchiellini, Philippe Barthelemy, Raffaele Ratta, Thomas Ryckewaert, Ali Hasbini, Sophie Hans, Sheik Emambux, Sandra Cournier, Elena Braychenko, Réza‐Thierry Elaidi, Stéphane Oudard, Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine - CARPEM [Paris], Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Service d'Oncologie Médicale [Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud - HCL], Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] (CHLS), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Institut Mutualiste de Montsouris (IMM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), CHU Montpellier, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Antoine Lacassagne [Nice] (UNICANCER/CAL), UNICANCER-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), ChemBioPharm, Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret [Lille] (UNICANCER/Lille), Université de Lille-UNICANCER, Département de Radio-Oncologie [Brest] (Clinique Pasteur), Clinique Pasteur [Brest], Département de radiologie, Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), Centre hospitalier universitaire de Poitiers (CHU Poitiers), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO), Paris-Centre de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (PARCC (UMR_S 970/ U970)), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole (IUCT Oncopole - UMR 1037), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (UNICANCER/CRCL), Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon]-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Service d'Oncologie Médicale [Montsouris], Institut de Cancérologie du GARD ICG - CHU Nîmes (Instit Cancéro - GARD), Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM - U1194 Inserm - UM), CRLCC Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Pôle de Chirurgie Oncologique générale, Gynécologique et Mammaire [Centre Antoine-Lacassagne], UNICANCER-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)-UNICANCER-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Interface de Recherche Fondamentale et Appliquée en Cancérologie (IRFAC - Inserm U1113), Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre Paul Strauss : Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer (CRLCC)-Fédération de Médecine Translationelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Hôpital Foch [Suresnes], Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12), and PSEN Pharm

Subjects
Cancer Research, Pyridines, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Antineoplastic Agents, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, MESH: Anilides, Humans, MESH: Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Anilides, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Retrospective Studies, MESH: Humans, MESH: Pyridines, Cabozantinib, MESH: Retrospective Studies, MESH: Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Kidney Neoplasms, Renal cell carcinoma, Nivolumab, Oncology, Matching-adjusted study, MESH: Antineoplastic Agents, MESH: Nivolumab, Immunotherapy, MESH: Kidney Neoplasms
Abstract

International audience; Nivolumab and cabozantinib are approved agents in mRCC patients after sunitinib/pazopanib (TKI) failure. However, the optimal sequence, cabozantinib then nivolumab (CN) or nivolumab then cabozantinib (NC), is still unknown. The CABIR study aimed to identify the optimal sequence between CN and NC after frontline VEGFR-TKI. In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected data from mRCC pts receiving CN or NC, after frontline VEGFR-TKI. A propensity score (PrS) was calculated to manage bias selection, and sequence comparisons were carried out with a cox model on a matched sample 1:1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second line to progression in third line (PFS2-3 ). Key secondary endpoints included overall survival from second line (OS2 ). Out of 139 included mRCC patients, 38 (27%) and 101 (73%) received CN and NC, respectively. Overlap in PrS allowed 1:1 matching for each CN pts, with characteristics well balanced. For both PFS2-3 and OS2 , NC sequence was superior to CN (PFS2-3 : HR = 0.58 [0.34-0.98], P = .043; OS2 : 0.66 [0.42-1.05], P = .080). Superior PFS2-3 was in patients treated between 6 and 18 months with prior VEGFR-TKI (P = .019) and was driven by a higher PFSL3 with cabozantinib when given after nivolumab (P

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results