Search

Background: Different Circle of Willis (CoW) variants have variable prevalences of aneurysm development, but the hemodynamic variation along the CoW and its relation to presence and size of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are not well known. Purpose: Gain insight into hemodynamic imaging markers of the CoW for UIA development by comparing these outcomes to the corresponding contralateral artery without an UIA using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Type: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects: Thirty-eight patients with an UIA, whereby 27 were women and a mean age of 62 years old. Field Strength/Sequence: Four-dimensional phase-contrast (PC) MRI with a 3D time-resolved velocity encoded gradient echo sequence at 7 T. Assessment: Hemodynamic parameters (blood flow, velocity pulsatility index [vPI], mean velocity, distensibility, and wall shear stress [peak systolic (WSSMAX), and time-averaged (WSSMEAN)]) in the parent artery of the UIA were compared to the corresponding contralateral artery without an UIA and were related to UIA size. Statistical Tests: Paired t-tests and Pearson Correlation tests. The threshold for statistical significance was P < 0.05 (two-tailed). Results: Blood flow, mean velocity, WSSMAX, and WSSMEAN were significantly higher, while vPI was lower, in the parent artery relative to contralateral artery. The WSSMAX of the parent artery significantly increased linearly while the WSSMEAN decreased linearly with increasing UIA size. Conclusions: Hemodynamic parameters and WSS differ between parent vessels of UIAs and corresponding contralateral vessels. WSS correlates with UIA size, supporting a potential hemodynamic role in aneurysm pathology. Level of Evidence: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

Objective:In counselling patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA), quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes are important for informed decision-making. We evaluated QoL outcomes in patients with and without preventive aneurysm occlusion at multiple time points during the first year after UIA diagnosis and studied predictors of QoL outcomes.Methods:We performed a prospective cohort study in patients ≥18 years old with a newly diagnosed UIA in two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands between 2017 and 2019. Patients were sent QoL questionnaires at 7 (aneurysm occlusion) or 5 (no occlusion) moments during the first year after diagnosis. We collected baseline data on patient and aneurysm characteristics, passive coping style (Utrecht Coping List), occlusion modality, and neurological complications. We assessed health-related QoL (HRQoL) with the EuroQol 5-dimensions (EQ-5D), emotional functioning with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and restrictions in daily activities with the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). We used a linear mixed effects model to assess the course of QoL over time and to explore predictors of QoL outcomes.Results:Of 153 eligible patients, 99 (65%) participated, of whom 30/99 (30%) underwent preventive occlusion. Patients undergoing occlusion reported higher baseline levels of passive coping, anxiety and depression, and restrictions than patients without occlusion. During recovery after occlusion, patients reported more restrictions compared to baseline (adjusted USER-P decrease one-month post-occlusion: -12.8 (95%CI:-23.8- -1.9). HRQoL and emotional functioning gradually improved after occlusion (EQ-5D increase at one-year: 8.6 (95%CI:0.1-17.0) and HADS decrease at one-year: -5.4 (95%CI:-9.4- -1.5)). In patients without occlusion, the largest HRQoL improvement occurred directly after visiting the outpatient aneurysm clinic (EQ-5D increase: 9.2 (95%CI:5.5-12.8)). At one-year, QoL outcomes were comparable in patients with and without occlusion. Factors associated with worse QoL outcomes were a passive coping style in all patients, complications in patients with occlusion and higher rupture risks in patients without occlusion.Conclusions:After UIA diagnosis, QoL improves gradually after preventive occlusion and directly after counselling at the outpatient clinic in patients without occlusion, resulting in comparable one-year QoL outcomes. A passive coping style is an important predictor of poor QoL outcomes in all UIA patients.

Objective:Preventive unruptured intracranial aneurysm occlusion can reduce the risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage, but both endovascular and microneurosurgical treatment carry a risk of serious complications. To improve individualized management decisions, we developed risk scores for complications of endovascular and microneurosurgical treatment based on easily retrievable patient, aneurysm, and treatment characteristics.Methods:For this multicenter cohort study, we combined individual patient data from unruptured intracranial aneurysm patients ≥18 years undergoing preventive endovascular treatment (standard, balloon-assisted or stent-assisted coiling, Woven EndoBridge-device, or flow-diverting stent) or microneurosurgical clipping at one of 10 participating centers from three continents between 2000-2018. The primary outcome was death from any cause or clinical deterioration from neurological complications ≤30 days. We selected predictors based on previous knowledge about relevant risk factors and predictor performance and studied the association between predictors and complications with logistic regression. We assessed model performance with calibration plots and concordance (c) statistics.Results:Of 1282 included patients, 94 (7.3%) had neurological symptoms that resolved c-statistic was 0.72 (95%CI:0.67-0.77) and the absolute complication risk ranged from 3.2% (95%CI:1.6%-14.9%;≤1 point) to 33.1% (95%CI:25.4%-41.5%;≥6 points). For microneurosurgical treatment (n=530), the c-statistic was 0.72 (95%CI:0.67-0.77) and the complication risk ranged from 4.9% (95%CI:1.5%-14.9%;≤1 point) to 49.9% (95%CI:39.4%-60.6%;≥6 points).Conclusions:The SAFETEA risk scores for endovascular and microneurosurgical treatment are based on seven easily retrievable risk factors to predict the absolute risk of procedural complications in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The scores need external validation before the predicted risks can be properly used to support decision making in clinical practice.