Search

Up to 30% of patients undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer are in need for re-excision due to either close or involved margins. We evaluated the yield of Margin Probe© (MP; Dilon Technologies, USA) in a cohort of patients undergoing lumpectomy for both palpable and non-palpable tumors.Following lumpectomy, margins were evaluated with MP and readings were compared to the lumpectomies' pathological evaluation irrespective of whether additional margins were removed during surgery. Involved margins or the presence of DCIS within 1 mm of the resection margins were considered as positive margins.48 patients with 51 tumors underwent lumpectomy. Thirteen of the 51 lumpectomies had pathological close or involved margins. MP identified 3 out of the 13 positive margins. False-positive readings were recorded in 97 out of 287 margins. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 23.1% (95%CI 5.0% 53.8%), 66.4% (95%CI 60.7%-71.9%), 3% (95%CI 0.6%-8.5%), and 95.1% (95%CI 91.1%-97.6%) respectively.MP cancer detection rate is relatively low while high false-positive rate leads to unnecessary shavings in almost all patients. Evaluation of MP performance should be based on comparing MP read to pathology report.

Current practice allows for surgery for acute appendicitis to be delayed up to 24 h in the belief that there will be no increase in complicated appendicitis rates. We evaluated the combined effect of Patient Time (between symptom onset and hospital admission) and Hospital Time (between hospital admission and surgery) on the surgical outcome. We hypothesized that in patients with a short Patient Time, increased Hospital Times will be associated with a higher rate of complicated appendicitis, even in patients operated within 24 h.Retrospective evaluation of medical files of patients operated for acute appendicitis between 12/2006 and 12/2016.Of 2749 patients with acute appendicitis included in this analysis, 818 (29.8%) were admitted with symptom onset the same day as admission, 577 (21.0%) reported symptom onset had started the previous day but less than 24 h before admission, and 1354 (49.3%) had over 24 h of symptoms. In patients with symptom onset the same day, a gradual increase in the rate of complicated appendicitis was noted with increasing Hospital Times (≤ 6 h-6.3%; 6-12 h-9.9%; 12-18 h-14.7%; and 18-24 h-12.7%; p = 0.017). In all other patients no differences in the rate of complicated appendicitis were noted as long as the patients were operated within 24 h of admission.In patients with a short Patient Time, delaying operation is associated with an increased rate of complicated appendicitis and this group of patients should be prioritized for early surgery.Study registered as ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04689906 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04689906?term=ashkenazi+itamardraw=2rank=2 ).

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on healthcare systems worldwide. The fear of seeking medical attention to avoid the possibility of being infected may have altered the course of some diseases.To describe our experience with the management of patients with acute cholecystitis during the pandemic at our medical center.We compared patients treated for acute cholecystitis between 1 March and 31 August 2020 (Group I) to patients admitted with the same diagnosis during the same months in 2019 (Group II). We evaluated demographics, presenting symptoms, laboratory and imaging findings at presentation, the disease's clinical course, management, and outcome.Group I consisted of 101 patients and group II included 94 patients. No differences were noted for age (66 years, IQR 48-78 vs. 66 years, IQR 47-76; P = 0.50) and sex (57.4% vs. 51.1% females; P = 0.39) between the two groups. The delay between symptom onset and hospital admission was longer for Group I patients (3 days, IQR 2-7 vs. 2 days, IQR 1-3; P = 0.002). Moderate to severe disease was more commonly encountered in Group I (59.4% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.003). Group I patients more often failed conservative management (36% vs. 6%, P = 0.001) and had a higher conversion rate to open surgery (15.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.025).Patients presenting with acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic more often presented late to the emergency department and more showed adverse outcomes.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative contributions of different mechanisms of assault to injury and mortality in women in Israel.We identified females hospitalized between 2011 and 2020 following an assault, secondary to blunt, stabbing, or shooting mechanisms of injury, in the Israeli Program for Registration of Trauma Patients (National Trauma Registry). To avoid bias due to temporary hospitalizations for non-medical reasons, we included patients with injuries graded as Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 2.Females accounted for 8.1% (926/11,486) of assault patients in the study population. Compared to males, females were older (40.7 vs. 31.0 years; p 0.001), more commonly injured by the blunt trauma mechanism (72.1 vs. 48.6%; p 0.001), and more commonly injured at a place of residence (50.9 vs. 8.2%; p 0.001). There were no differences in the number of body areas injured, severe Injury Severity Score, and median hospitalization. Males were operated more commonly (44.6 vs. 40.0%; p = 0.008). Mortality in females and males was similar (2.8 vs. 2.3%; p = 0.43). Secondary analysis revealed that blunt injuries were responsible for 61.2% of the severe cases (ISS ≥ 16), 61.4% of the operations, 54.9% of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, and 53.8% of the mortality observed in females. When compared to males injured by blunt trauma, females injured by this mechanism were older (43.0 ± 24.7 vs. 32.8 ± 16.1 years; p 0.001) and had higher mortality (2.1 vs. 0.9%; p = 0.007).Assault by mechanisms other than stabbing and shooting should be recognized as a source of severe morbidity and mortality in females.

Background: Blunt traumatic brain injury (bTBI) and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UCHS) are common causes of mortality in polytrauma. We studied the influence of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) resuscitation in a rat model with both bTBI and UCHS before achieving hemorrhage control. Methods: The bTBI was induced by an external weight drop (200 g) onto the bare skull of anesthetized male Lewis (Lew/SdNHsd) rats; UCHS was induced by resection of two-thirds of the rats’ tails. Fifteen minutes following trauma, bTBI+UCHS rats underwent resuscitation with FFP or lactated Ringer’s solution (LR). Eight groups were evaluated: (1) Sham; (2) bTBI; (3) UCHS; (4) UCHS+FFP; (5) UCHS+LR; (6) bTBI+UCHS; (7) bTBI+UCHS+FFP; and (8) bTBI+UCHS+LR. Bleeding volume, hematocrit, lactate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and mortality were measured. Results: The study included 97 rats that survived the immediate trauma. Mean blood loss up to the start of resuscitation was similar among UCHS only and bTBI+UCHS rats (P=0.361). Following resuscitation, bleeding was more extensive in bTBI+UCHS+FFP rats (5.2 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7, 6.6) than in bTBI+UCHS+LR rats (2.5 mL, 95% CI 1.2, 3.8) and bTBI+UCHS rats (1.9 mL, 95% CI -0.2, 3.9) (P=0.005). Similarly, non-significant increases in blood loss were observed in UCHS+FFP rats (P=0.254). Overall mortality increased if bleeding was above 4.5 mL (92.3% versus 8%; P