Search

Due to anatomical changes between pre-planning and implantation, there exists a need for tools that can streamline the adjustment of needle and seed configurations in low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Specifically, upon taking a second ultrasound on the day of treatment, the distribution of seeds and needles will differ drastically from the original plan. Clinics that employ this method must then spend time and resources to generate a workflow to manipulate the original configuration to the new configuration. ONCOSEED extracts data from VariSeed treatment plans, calculating a labor score (LScore) to optimize adjustments to needle configurations. A case study of three simulated VariSeed treatment plans was used to compare the ONCOSEED software to the manual method of generating a workflow. In the same method that was used at the authors’ clinic, several assistants annotated by hand the original plan to convert it to the new plan. The time taken to do so was recorded and compared to the runtime of the software when generating a workflow for the same plan. Results showed that ONCOSEED was on average 28 times faster than generating a workflow by hand. ONCOSEED enhances the efficiency of seed replacement in LDR brachytherapy, promoting the adoption of adaptive brachytherapy practices.

Purpose: Herein, we developed a deep learning algorithm to improve the segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) on daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in breast cancer radiation therapy. By leveraging the Intentional Deep Overfit Learning (IDOL) framework, we aimed to enhance personalized image-guided radiation therapy based on patient-specific learning. Methods and Materials: We used 240 CBCT scans from 100 breast cancer patients and employed a 2-stage training approach. The first stage involved training a novel general deep learning model (Swin UNETR, UNET, and SegResNET) on 90 patients. The second stage used intentional overfitting on the remaining 10 patients for patient-specific CBCT outputs. Quantitative evaluation was conducted using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and independent samples t test with expert contours on CBCT scans from the first to 15th fractions. Results: IDOL integration significantly improved CTV segmentation, particularly with the Swin UNETR model (P values < .05). Using patient-specific data, IDOL enhanced the DSC, HD, and MSD metrics. The average DSC for the 15th fraction improved from 0.9611 to 0.9819, the average HD decreased from 4.0118 mm to 1.3935 mm, and the average MSD decreased from 0.8723 to 0.4603. Incorporating CBCT scans from the initial treatments and first to third fractions further improved results, with an average DSC of 0.9850, an average HD of 1.2707 mm, and an average MSD of 0.4076 for the 15th fraction, closely aligning with physician-drawn contours. Conclusion: Compared with a general model, our patient-specific deep learning-based training algorithm significantly improved CTV segmentation accuracy of CBCT scans in patients with breast cancer. This approach, coupled with continuous deep learning training using daily CBCT scans, demonstrated enhanced CTV delineation accuracy and efficiency. Future studies should explore the adaptability of the IDOL framework to diverse deep learning models, data sets, and cancer sites.

Purpose: To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. Methods and materials: In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification. Results: Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5–19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs. Conclusion: DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation.

Abstract Background Adjuvant radiation therapy improves the overall survival and loco-regional control in patients with breast cancer. However, radiation-induced heart disease, which occurs after treatment from incidental radiation exposure to the cardiac organ, is an emerging challenge. This study aimed to generate synthetic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (SCECT) from non-contrast CT (NCT) using deep learning (DL) and investigate its role in contouring cardiac substructures. We also aimed to determine its applicability for a retrospective study on the substructure volume-dose relationship for predicting radiation-induced heart disease. Methods We prepared NCT-CECT cardiac scan pairs of 59 patients. Of these, 35, 4, and 20 pairs were used for training, validation, and testing, respectively. We adopted conditional generative adversarial network as a framework to generate SCECT. SCECT was validated in the following three stages: (1) The similarity between SCECT and CECT was evaluated; (2) Manual contouring was performed on SCECT and CECT with sufficient intervals and based on this, the geometric similarity of cardiac substructures was measured between them; (3) The treatment plan was quantitatively analyzed based on the contours of SCECT and CECT. Results While the mean values (± standard deviation) of the mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity index measure between SCECT and CECT were 20.66 ± 5.29, 21.57 ± 1.85, and 0.77 ± 0.06, those were 23.95 ± 6.98, 20.67 ± 2.34, and 0.76 ± 0.07 between NCT and CECT, respectively. The Dice similarity coefficients and mean surface distance between the contours of SCECT and CECT were 0.81 ± 0.06 and 2.44 ± 0.72, respectively. The dosimetry analysis displayed error rates of 0.13 ± 0.27 Gy and 0.71 ± 1.34% for the mean heart dose and V5Gy, respectively. Conclusion Our findings displayed the feasibility of SCECT generation from NCT and its potential for cardiac substructure delineation in patients who underwent breast radiation therapy.

Purpose: Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) requires accurate and efficient auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) in mostly conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) images, which often have severe artifacts and lack soft-tissue contrast, making direct segmentation very challenging. Propagating expert-drawn contours from the pretreatment planning CT through traditional or deep learning (DL)-based deformable image registration (DIR) can achieve improved results in many situations. Typical DL-based DIR models are population based, that is, trained with a dataset for a population of patients, and so they may be affected by the generalizability problem. Methods: In this paper, we propose a method called test-time optimization (TTO) to refine a pretrained DL-based DIR population model, first for each individual test patient, and then progressively for each fraction of online ART treatment. Our proposed method is less susceptible to the generalizability problem and thus can improve overall performance of different DL-based DIR models by improving model accuracy, especially for outliers. Our experiments used data from 239 patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to test the proposed method.First,we trained a population model with 200 patients and then applied TTO to the remaining 39 test patients by refining the trained population model to obtain 39 individualized models. We compared each of the individualized models with the population model in terms of segmentation accuracy. Results: The average improvement of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) of segmentation can be up to 0.04 (5%) and 0.98 mm (25%), respectively, with the individualized models compared to the population model over 17 selected OARs and a target of 39 patients. Although the average improvement may seem mild, we found that the improvement for outlier patients with structures of large anatomical changes is significant. The number of patients with at least 0.05 DSC improvement or 2 mm HD95 improvement by TTO averaged over the 17 selected structures for the state-of -the-art architecture VoxelMorph is 10 out of 39 test patients. By deriving the individualized model using TTO from the pretrained population model, TTO models can be ready in about 1 min. We also generated the adapted fractional models for each of the 39 test patients by progressively refining the individualized models using TTO to CBCT images acquired at later fractions of online ART treatment. When adapting the individualized model to a later fraction of the same patient, the model can be ready in less than a minute with slightly improved accuracy. Conclusions: The proposed TTO method is well suited for online ART and can boost segmentation accuracy for DL-based DIR models, especially for outlier patients where the pretrained models fail. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]