Search

Background: Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide and therefore there has been a growing demand for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) protocols. Purpose: To investigate and evaluate the dose and image quality of patients undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS) using LDCT in Norway. Materials and Methods: Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP), from 70 average-size and 70 large-size patients who underwent LDCT scan for LCS were included in the survey. Effective dose and size-specific dose were calculated for each examination and were compared with the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) requirement. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were determined for different regions in the chest with two iterative reconstruction techniques, iDose and Iterative Model Reconstruction. Differences in dose and image quality between average-size and large-size patients were evaluated by Independent sample t test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test within the same patient group. Results: The independent sample t test revealed significant differences (p <.05) in dose values between average-size and large-size patients. Mean CTDIvol and DLP for average-size patients were 2.8 mGy and 115 mGy.cm, respectively, with appropriate increment for the large-size patients. Image quality (image noise, SNR, and CNR) did not significantly differ between patient groups when images were reconstructed with a model based iterative reconstruction algorithm. Conclusion: The screening protocol assessed in this study resulted in CTDIvol values that were compliant with AAPM recommendation. No significant differences in objective image quality were found between patient groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Administration of contrast medium (CM) is an important image quality factor in computed tomography (CT) of the chest. There is no clear evidence or guidelines on CM strategies for chest CT, thus a consensus approach is needed. Purpose: To survey the potential impact on differences in chest CT protocols, with emphasis on strategies for the administration of CM. Material and Methods: A total of 170 respondents were included in this survey, which used two different approaches: (i) an online survey was sent to the members of the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI); and (ii) an email requesting a copy of their CT protocol was sent to all hospitals in Norway, and university hospitals in Sweden and Denmark. The survey focused on factors affecting CM protocols and enhancement in chest CT. Results: The overall response rate was 24% (n = 170): 76% of the respondents used a CM concentration of ≥350 mgI/mL; 52% of the respondents used a fixed CM volume strategy. Fixed strategies for injection rate and delay were also the most common approach, practiced by 73% and 57% of the respondents, respectively. The fixed delay was in the range of 20–90 s. Of the respondents, 56% used flexible tube potential strategies (kV). Conclusion: The chest CT protocols and CM administration strategies employed by the respondents vary widely, affecting the image quality. The results of this study underline the need for further research and consensus guidelines related to chest CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]