Search

Introduction: The standard complete evaluation of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has included a staging exam under anesthesia (EUA) since the 1970s. The EUA for all sites of HNSCC has historically consisted of panendoscopy for the purpose of diagnostic biopsy, accurate staging of primary disease, and identification of second primary tumors. However, due to the accessibility of the oral cavity, the sole purpose of EUA for tumors of this site is to identify second primary tumors. Since the EUA became the gold standard for evaluation of HNSCC, there have been significant advancements in less invasive technologies such as CT, PET-CT, MRI, and fiberoptic examination. In this study, we sought to determine the value to patient care and cost-effectiveness of EUA in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 77 patients who underwent EUA for OCSCC. Results: The most common subsites were the oral tongue and floor of mouth (59.7% and 24.7% respectively). All underwent direct laryngoscopy, 94.8% underwent esophagoscopy, and 20.8% underwent flexible transnasal examination in clinic prior to EUA. For 90.9% of patients, the EUA did not change initial T-staging based on clinical examination and imaging. The remaining 9.1% of patients were upstaged after EUA, however this change did not impact the treatment plan. Second primary tumors were identified in 3.9% of patients, all were found in either the oral cavity or oropharynx, and were also identified with clinical examination or imaging. Analysis of patient charges determined an average cost of $8,022.93 per patient under the current paradigm involving EUA, however with a new algorithm eliminating mandatory EUA average cost decreases to $1,448.44. Conclusion: Formal EUA has historically been the gold standard for all HNSCC tumors. However, when performed for cases of oral cavity carcinoma, it is safe and cost effective to limit its use to select clinical scenarios.

Recent years have seen increase in individuals pursuing postgraduate fellowships in head and neck (HN) surgery. This has presented concerns about insufficient jobs where graduates can apply their scope of specialized training.Data was collected in two manners- a survey and a manual online search of American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) fellowship graduates. A 25-question survey was sent in 2021 to approximately 400 HN fellows who graduated between 2010 and 2020. The AHNS list of graduates from the same years were searched online to collect information including gender, graduation year, fellowship training, and current job practice.Of the 78 survey responses, 64.1 % were male and 34.6 % female. 96.2 % reported ablative, 84.6 % microvascular, and 82.1 % TORS training. Mean number of interviews was 4 with most interviewing during the 3rd quarter (January to March). Majority reported being in academic and university-based practices (79.6 %). Online search was done on 393 graduates. Since 2010 the number of graduates almost doubled. There was a statistically significant increase in females by year (p = 0.022). There was a significant decrease (p = 0.022) in graduates with additional fellowship training from that of their AHNS fellowship. There was also a statistically significant increase in graduates being in academic practices (p = 0.022).Despite growing numbers, there appears to be more graduates entering an academic practice, although the definition of an academic HN practice may be evolving. These results provide guidance on how to approach the job search in a select market.II.