Choong K, Fraser DD, Al-Farsi A, Awlad Thani S, Cameron S, Clark H, Cuello C, Debigaré S, Ewusie J, Kennedy K, Kho ME, Krasevich K, Martin CM, Thabane L, Nanji J, Watts C, Simpson A, Todt A, Wong J, Xie F, Vu M, and Cupido C
Objectives: To implement an early rehabilitation bundle in two Canadian PICUs., Design and Setting: Implementation study in the PICUs at McMaster Children's Hospital (site 1) and London Health Sciences (site 2)., Patients: All children under 18 years old admitted to the PICU were eligible for the intervention., Interventions: A bundle consisting of: 1) analgesia-first sedation; 2) delirium monitoring and prevention; and 3) early mobilization., Measurements and Main Results: Primary outcomes were the duration of implementation, bundle compliance, process of care, safety, and the factors influencing implementation. Secondary endpoints were the impact of the bundle on clinical outcomes such as pain, delirium, iatrogenic withdrawal, ventilator-free days, length of stay, and mortality. Implementation occurred over 26 months (August 2018 to October 2020). Data were collected on 1,036 patients representing 4,065 patient days. Bundle compliance was optimized within 6 months of roll-out. Goal setting for mobilization and level of arousal improved significantly (p < 0.01). Benzodiazepine, opioid, and dexmedetomidine use decreased in site 1 by 23.2% (95% CI, 30.8-15.5%), 26.1% (95% CI, 34.8-17.4%), and 9.2% (95% CI, 18.2-0.2%) patient exposure days, respectively, while at site 2, only dexmedetomidine exposure decreased significantly by 10.5% patient days (95% CI, 19.8-1.1%). Patient comfort, safety, and nursing workload were not adversely affected. There was no significant impact of the bundle on the rate of delirium, ventilator-free days, length of PICU stay, or mortality. Key facilitators to implementation included institutional support, unit-wide practice guidelines, dedicated PICU educators, easily accessible resources, and family engagement., Conclusions: A rehabilitation bundle can improve processes of care and reduce patient sedative exposure without increasing patient discomfort, nursing workload, or harm. We did not observe an impact on short-term clinical outcomes. The efficacy of a PICU-rehabilitation bundle requires ongoing study. Lessons learned in this study provide evidence to inform rehabilitation implementation in the PICU setting., Competing Interests: Drs. Choong’s and Cupiodo’s institutions received funding from the Alternate Funding Plan (AFP) Innovation Fund: Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization. Drs. Fraser’s and Martin’s institutions received funding from the AFP Innovation Fund: Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario. Dr. Choong’s institution received funding from Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation. Drs. Choong and Kennedy received funding from McMaster University. Dr. Cameron received funding from London Health Sciences Center. Dr. Kennedy received funding from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine; he disclosed work for hire. Dr. Kho’s institution received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chairs, and Canada Foundation for Innovation; she disclosed that Restorative Therapies loaned three RT300 supine cycle ergometers for an ongoing research project. Dr. Simpson received funding from Hamilton Health Sciences-McMaster Children’s Hospital. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)