Search

The precise preoperative evaluation of radiologic tumor size with extensive intraductal component (EIC) is important. This study compared the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure invasive breast cancer with EIC.Between 2007 and 2012, we collected data from 6816 patients who underwent surgery for invasive breast cancer at our institution. We reviewed the postoperative surgical reports of the tumors, in which the invasive tumor size and EIC were measured separately. Finally, we included 370 women who underwent preoperative mammography, US, and MRI. Each modality was retrospectively reviewed to measure the size of invasive breast cancer with EIC. The reference standard was surgical pathologic size and the accuracies of the image were evaluated.Spearman's correlation coefficient for the size of invasive cancer with EIC was good between MRI (r = 0.741) and pathology, and moderate between mammography (r = 0.661) or US (r = 0.514) and pathology. Both mass and nonmass lesions showed good correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.672 and 0.612, respectively) in MRI. Furthermore, the subgroup of tumors without microcalcifications showed a higher correlation with MRI (ICC = 0.796) than with mammography (ICC = 0.620). However, the subgroup with microcalcifications showed a good correlation with mammography (ICC = 0.702) compared to MRI (ICC = 0.680) and US (ICC = 0.532).The lesion on mammography, US, and MRI reflected preoperative size of invasive cancer with EIC. MRI shows a higher correlation than mammography and US. However, cancer with calcifications of mammography shows a more accurate size than MRI or US.

We evaluated the features of breast cancers initially assessed as probably benign at ultrasound (US). Of the 7098 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at our institution between 2014 and 2016, 179 lesions in 178 patients who had both a prior US with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 assessment and a recent US with a diagnosis of breast cancer were enrolled. Prior and recent US findings and category were retrospectively reassessed in line with the BI-RADS Atlas and analyzed. Of the 179 BI-RADS 3 lesions, 105 (59%) were retrospectively reassessed to category 4 and 74 (41%) retained category 3. Noncircumscribed margin, irregular shape, posterior enhancement, and nonparallel orientation were more frequently observed in the reassessment category 4 group than in the reassessment category 3 group (94% vs 43%, 81% vs 19%, 16% vs 4%, 14% vs 0%, respectively). The recent US revealed that 150 of the 179 lesions (84%) had20% size increase, and 121 (68%) showed morphologic changes. Margin was the most frequently observed morphologic feature to change (41%, 73/179). Care should be taken to look for subtle but suspicious US features and changes in mass, especially of margin, for early diagnosis of breast cancer.