1. Final Results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Women With Clinically Aggressive Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Lu YS, Mahidin EIBM, Azim H, Eralp Y, Yap YS, Im SA, Rihani J, Gokmen E, El Bastawisy A, Karadurmus N, Lim YN, Lim CS, Duc LT, Chung WP, Babu KG, Penkov K, Bowles J, Alfaro TD, Wu J, Gao M, Slimane K, and El Saghir NS
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Adult, Premenopause, Progression-Free Survival, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 antagonists & inhibitors, Aminopyridines administration & dosage, Aminopyridines adverse effects, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Receptor, ErbB-2 metabolism, Receptor, ErbB-2 analysis, Purines administration & dosage, Purines adverse effects, Receptors, Estrogen metabolism, Receptors, Estrogen analysis, Receptors, Progesterone metabolism
- Abstract
Purpose: A head-to-head comparison of efficacy between a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus combination chemotherapy (CT) has never been reported in patients with clinically aggressive hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)., Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial, pre/perimenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line ribociclib (600 mg once daily; 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus letrozole/anastrozole and goserelin or investigator's choice of combination CT (docetaxel plus capecitabine, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine plus vinorelbine). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: Among 222 patients randomly assigned to ribociclib plus ET (n = 112) or combination CT (n = 110), 150 (67.6%) had symptomatic visceral metastases, 41 (18.5%) had rapid disease progression per investigator's judgment, and 31 (14.0%) had symptomatic nonvisceral disease. Overall, 106 (47.7%) patients had investigator-assessed visceral crisis. The median follow-up time was 37.0 months. At data cutoff, 31.3% (ribociclib arm) and 15.5% (CT arm) of patients had completed study treatment and transitioned to post-trial access. The median PFS was 21.8 months (ribociclib plus ET; [95% CI, 17.4 to 26.7]) and 12.8 months (combination CT; [95% CI, 10.1 to 18.4); hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87]; P = .003. The overall response rates and the median time to response in the ribociclib versus CT arms, respectively, were 66.1% and 61.8% and 4.9 months and 3.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.06]). Lower rates of symptomatic adverse events were observed in the ribociclib versus CT arm., Conclusion: First-line ribociclib plus ET showed a significant PFS benefit, similar response rates, and better tolerability over combination CT in patients with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2- ABC.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF