Search

To evaluate of hepatitis serology and reactivation frequency in patients with rheumatic disease receiving biologic agents. Our study included patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases from 23 centers, who were followed up with biological therapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, duration of drug use and hepatitis serology and the state of viral reactivation were analyzed. A total of 4060 patients, 2095 being males, were included in our study. Of the patients, 2463 had Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), 1154 had Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), 325 had Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), and 118 had other inflammatory rheumatic diseases. When the viral serology of the patients was evaluated, 79 patients (2%) who were identified as HBs Ag positive, 486 (12%) patients who were HBs Ag negative and anti-HBc IgG positive and 20 patients (0.5%) who were anti-HCV positive. When evaluated on a disease-by-disease basis, the rate of HBsAg was found to be 2.5% in RA, 2% in AS and 0.9% in PsA. Viral reactivation was detected in 13 patients while receiving biologic agents. HBs Ag was positive in nine patients with reactivation and negative in four patients. Anti-HBc IgG, however, was positive. Six of these patients had AS, four had RA, and three had PsA. The development of hepatitis reactivation in 11.4% of HBs Ag positive patients and 0.82% of anti-HBc IgG positive patients due to the use of biologic agents is an important problem for this group of patients. Antiviral prophylaxis is recommended to be started especially in patients who are HBs Ag positive and who are using biologic agents due to viral reactivation. Therefore, it is important to carry out hepatitis screenings before biologic agent treatment and to carefully evaluate the vaccination and prophylaxis requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of fibromyalgianess, fibromyalgia syndrome (FS), and widespread pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and their relationship with clinical and demographic parameters. Patients and methods: This cross-sectional multicenter trial was performed in 14 centers across Türkiye between June 2018 and November 2019. Out of 685 patients recruited from the accessible population, 661 patients (342 RA, 319 AS; 264 males, 397 females; mean age: 48.1±12.9 years; range, 17 to 88 years) met the selection criteria. In these cohorts, those who did not meet the criteria for FS and had widespread pain (widespread pain index =7) were evaluated as a separate group. Clinical status and demographic parameters of patients in both cohorts were evaluated as well as the evaluations of RA and AS patients with widespread pain (widespread pain index =7) and RA and AS patients with FS groups. In addition, correlations between polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD) scores and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts for RA patients and VAS, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for AS patients were analyzed. Results: Frequencies of patients with FS and patients who had PSD scores =12 were 34.1% and 44.4% in all RA patients, respectively. Moreover, FS and PSD scores =12 were found in 29.2% and 36.9% of all AS patients, respectively. PSD scores of RA patients with FS were higher than all RA patients and RA patients with widespread pain. SDAI and CDAI scores of RA patients with FS were higher than all RA patients and RA patients with widespread pain. Similarly, PSD scores of AS patients with FS were higher than all AS patients and AS patients with widespread pain. ASDAS-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and BASDAI scores of AS patients with FS were found higher than all AS patients and AS patients with widespread pain. Conclusion: Disease activity scores, including pain in RA and AS, were higher in the presence of FS or fibromyalgianess. It may be related to clinical parameters, but cohort studies with long-term follow-up are needed to reveal causality. Additionally, to avoid overtreatment, coexistence of fibromyalgianess should be kept in mind in patients who have inflammatory diseases such as RA and AS, particularly with intractable widespread pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) by comparing them with non-IRD (nIRD) and healthy controls (HC). Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, subjects were screened for contact with COVID-19, new-onset symptoms, and adherence to precautionary measures against COVID-19. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21) were used to evaluate the psychological effect of the pandemic and health status. Additionally, therapy adherence and clinical characteristics were noted. Results: A total of 279 subjects were recruited (IRD 47.3%; nIRD 29.7%). The number of patients who believed that the risk of COVID-19 increased due to their diseases or received therapy was higher in IRD than nIRD (38.6% vs 7.2%). Maintaining physical distancing was highest in the IRD and lowest in HC (p=0.037). Approximately 40% of the patients discontinued or extended the dose interval of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor (TNFi) without obtaining physician's advice. DASS-21 anxiety, depression and stress rates were lowest in IRD. COVID-19 contact history was an independent risk factor for DASS-21 stress and anxiety, while female gender was an independent risk factor for DASS-21 anxiety. Conclusion: Confirmed COVID-19 infection was similar in HC, IRD, and nIRD. HC were substantially more likely to experience mental health issues than other groups. Most patients with IRD discontinued or extended the ongoing treatment without physician's recommendation during the COVID-19 outbreak. Therefore, patient adherence and disease control could be improved through closer monitoring and recognition of early signs of psychological discomfort during the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]