Search

Background: To estimate the protection that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses conferred to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 against adverse outcomes and longer length of stay during the Omicron BA.2 and BA.5 subvariant epidemics in Greece., Methods: The study was conducted from November 2022 to May 2023. Multivariable logistic and negative binomial regression models were applied to estimate the association between any adverse outcomes and length of stay with the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses., Results: We studied 962 patients (median age: 78 years; mean length of stay: 9.2 days), of whom 847 (88.0%) had ≥ 1 comorbidity. Of these, 39 (4.0%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, 44 (4.6%) received invasive mechanical ventilation, and 110 (11.4%) died in hospital. There were 184 (19.1%) unvaccinated patients, 125 (13.0%) with one or two vaccine doses, and 653 (67.9%) with ≥ 3 doses. In multivariable analyses, patients with ≥ 3 doses had lower odds of experiencing any adverse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.86) compared with unvaccinated patients. On average, patients with one or two doses and those with ≥ 3 had decreased length of hospital stay (-1.5 days [95% CIs: -2.6 to -0.4] and -2.8 days [95% CIs: -4.1 to -1.4], respectively] compared with unvaccinated patients. Other characteristics consistently associated with adverse outcomes and longer length of stay included older age, having three or more comorbidities compared with none, and being admitted to the hospital two or more weeks post-diagnosis., Conclusions: A history of ≥ 3 vaccine doses conferred significant protection against any adverse outcome and longer length of stay in hospitalized patients with COVID-19., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Aim: We estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) of full (booster) vaccination against severe outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the Delta and Omicron waves., Methods: The study extended from November 15, 2021 to April 17, 2022. Full vaccination was defined as a primary vaccination plus a booster ≥ 6 months later., Results: We studied 1138 patients (mean age: 66.6 years), of whom 826 (72.6 %) had ≥ 1 comorbidity. Of the 1138 patients, 75 (6.6 %) were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), 64 (5.6 %) received mechanical ventilation, and 172 (15.1 %) died. There were 386 (33.9 %) fully vaccinated, 172 (15.1 %) partially vaccinated, and 580 (51 %) unvaccinated patients. Unvaccinated patients were absent from work for longer periods compared to partially or fully vaccinated patients (mean absence of 20.1 days versus 12.3 and 17.3 days, respectively; p-value = 0.03). Compared to unvaccinated patients, fully vaccinated patients were less likely to be admitted to ICU [adjusted relative risk (ARR: 0.49; 95 % CI: 0.29-0.84)], mechanically ventilated (ARR: 0.43; 95 % CI: 0.23-0.80), and die (ARR: 0.57; 95 % CI: 0.42-0.78), while they were hospitalized for significantly shorter periods (ARR: 0.79; 95 % CI: 0.70-0.89). The adjusted full VE was 48.8 % (95 % CI: 42.7 %-54.9 %) against ICU admission, 55.4 % (95 % CI: 52.0 %-56.2 %) against mechanical ventilation, and 22.6 % (95 % CI: 7.4 %-34.8 %) against death. For patients with ≥ 3 comorbidities, VE was 56.2 % (95 % CI: 43.9 %-67.1 %) against ICU admission, 60.2 % (95 % CI: 53.7 %-65.4 %) against mechanical ventilation, and 43.9 % (95 % CI: 19.9 %-59.7 %) against death., Conclusions: Full (booster) COVID-19 vaccination conferred protection against severe outcomes, prolonged hospitalization, and prolonged work absenteeism., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive (R+) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a survival disparity compared with CMV-seronegative recipient/donor (R-D-) pairs. We hypothesized that primary letermovir prophylaxis (LET) may abrogate this disparity. We investigated the relationship between LET and mortality at 1 year post-HCT., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included adult R-D- or R+ patients who received HCT pre-LET (between 1 January 2013 through 15 December 2017) and post-LET (between 16 December 2017 through December 2019). R+ were categorized by LET receipt as R+/LET or R+/no-LET. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of LET with all-cause mortality at 1 year after transplantation., Results: Of 848 patients analyzed, 305 were R-D-, 364 R+/no-LET, and 160 R+/LET. Because of similar mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.29 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .76-2.18]; P = .353]) between pre-LET/R-D- and post-LET/R-D-, R-D- were combined into 1 group. Compared with R-D-, the aHR for mortality was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.01-1.93) for R+/no-LET and 0.89 (95% CI, .57-1.41) for R+/LET. Among R+, LET was associated with decreased risk of death (aHR, 0.62 [95% CI, .40-.98]); when conventional HCT and T-cell depleted HCT were analyzed separately, the aHR was 0.86 (95% CI, .51-1.43) and 0.21 (95% CI, .07-.65), respectively., Conclusions: At 1 year post-HCT, LET was associated with closing the mortality disparity between R-D- and R+. Among all R+, LET was associated with decreased mortality, driven by 79% reduced incidence of death in T-cell depleted HCT., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S. G. has received research funding from Miltenyi Biotec, Takeda, Celgene, Amgen, Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson, and Actinium Pharmaceuticals, and is on the advisory boards for Kite Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Sanofi, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Amgen, Takeda, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Actinium Pharmaceuticals. M.-A. P. has received institutional research support for clinical trials from Incyte, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, and Novartis; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Bellicum, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Nektar Therapeutics, Celgene, Equilium, Karyopharm, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, MorphoSys, Omeros, OrcaBio, VectivBio AG, Vor Biopharma, and Takeda; has served on data and safety monitoring boards for Servier, Cidara Therapeutics, Sallas Life Sciences, and Medigene and scientific advisory boards for MolMed and NexImmune; and holds ownership interests in NexImmune and Omeros. G. P. has served as an investigator for Merck & Co and Shire/Takeda; has received research grant support from Merck & Co; has received consulting and other fees from Chimerix, Astellas, Merck, Cidara, Amplyx, AlloVir, Takeda/Shire, Behring, Octapharma, SymBio, Shionogi, Partners Therapeutics, ADMA Biologics, Vera, and Siemens Healthineers; has received payment and honoraria for continuing medical education programs from PeerView, PeerVoice, Vindico, and Medscape; has received speaker’s fees from Merck & Co; and has served as a data safety and monitoring committee (DSMC) member for Amplyx and Vera, DCSM chair for AlloVir, Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC) Chair for Octapharma, and advisory board member for ADMA Biologics, Astellas Pharma, Cidara, Octapharma, Partners Therapeutics, Shionogi, Behring, Takeda, and Siemens Healthineers. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Outcomes of refractory (Rf) cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (CMVi) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are poor owing to limited treatment options and treatment related toxicities. Maribavir, an orally bioavailable CMV antiviral, was recently approved for treatment of Rf-CMVi. Real-world studies quantifying the burden of Rf-CMVi prior to maribavir provide a benchmark for evaluating the net value of novel treatments. Here we report the incidence, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with Rf-CMVi in the first year post-HCT in a cohort of CMV-seropositive HCT recipients (R+) who underwent HCT between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and were managed exclusively by preemptive therapy. CMVi was defined as CMV viremia treated preemptively. Rf-CMVi was defined as a <1 log 10 decrease and CMV viral load >1000 U/mL after ≥14 days of appropriately dosed therapy. Welldays were defined as alive days not hospitalized and off CMV antivirals by 1 year post-HCT. The impact of Rf-CMVi on mortality and HRU was examined in multivariable models. Of the 286 R+ patients, 145 (50.7%) developed CMVi (99 no Rf-CMVi and 46 Rf-CMVi). Compared with the no Rf-CMVi group, the Rf-CMVi group had higher rates of CMV EOD (23.9% versus 10.1%; P = .030), CMV-related mortality (9.5% versus .0%; P = .002), and all-cause mortality (33.3% versus 15.6%; adjusted P = .049). Rf-CMVi was an independent predictor for readmission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19 to 4.87; P < .0001); CMV-related readmission (aOR, 9.48; 95% CI, 5.83 to 15.80; P < .0001), and decreased well days (adjusted arithmetic mean ratio, .72; 95% CI, .58 to .89; P = .001) in the first year post-HCT. Rf-CMVi is associated with increased mortality and increased HRU at 1 year after HCT. Improved therapies for Rf-CMVi have the potential of improving HCT outcomes and reducing HRU., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)