Search

Methylation profiling has radically transformed our understanding of tumors previously called central nervous system primitive neuro-ectodermal tumors (CNS-PNET). While this marks a momentous step toward defining key differences, reclassification has thrown treatment into disarray. To shed light on response to therapy and guide clinical decision-making, we report outcomes and molecular features of children with CNS-PNETs from two multi-center risk-adapted studies (SJMB03 for patients ≥ 3 years; SJYC07 for patients 3 years) complemented by a non-protocol institutional cohort. Seventy patients who had a histological diagnosis of CNS-PNET or CNS embryonal tumor from one of the new categories that has supplanted CNS-PNET were included. This cohort was molecularly characterized by DNA methylation profiling (n = 70), whole-exome sequencing (n = 53), RNA sequencing (n = 20), and germline sequencing (n = 28). Clinical characteristics were detailed, and treatment was divided into craniospinal irradiation (CSI)-containing (SJMB03 and SJMB03-like) and CSI-sparing therapy (SJYC07 and SJYC07-like). When the cohort was analyzed in its entirety, no differences were observed in the 5-year survival rates even when CSI-containing therapy was compared to CSI-sparing therapy. However, when analyzed by DNA methylation molecular grouping, significant survival differences were observed, and treatment particulars provided suggestions of therapeutic response. Patients with CNS neuroblastoma with FOXR2 activation (CNS-NB-FOXR2) had a 5-year event-free survival (EFS)/overall survival (OS) of 66.7% ± 19.2%/83.3% ± 15.2%, and CIC rearranged sarcoma (CNS-SARC-CIC) had a 5-year EFS/OS both of 57.1% ± 18.7% with most receiving regimens that contained radiation (focal or CSI) and multidrug chemotherapy. Patients with high-grade neuroepithelial tumor with BCOR alteration (HGNET-BCOR) had abysmal responses to upfront chemotherapy-only regimens (5-year EFS = 0%), but survival extended with salvage radiation after progression [5-year OS = 53.6% ± 20.1%]. Patients with embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) or high-grade glioma/glioblastoma multiforme (HGG/GBM) did not respond favorably to any modality (5-year EFS/OS = 10.7 ± 5.8%/17.9 ± 7.2%, and 10% ± 9.0%/10% ± 9.0%, respectively). As an accompaniment, we have assembled this data onto an interactive website to allow users to probe and query the cases. By reporting on a carefully matched clinical and molecular cohort, we provide the needed insight for future clinical management.

Background The incidence and biology of IDH1/2 mutations in pediatric gliomas are unclear. Notably, current treatment approaches by pediatric and adult providers vary significantly. We describe the frequency and clinical outcomes of IDH1/2-mutant gliomas in pediatrics. Methods We performed a multi-institutional analysis of the frequency of pediatric IDH1/2-mutant gliomas, identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS). In parallel, we retrospectively reviewed pediatric IDH1/2-mutant gliomas, analyzing clinico-genomic features, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Results Incidence: Among 851 patients with pediatric glioma who underwent NGS, we identified 78 with IDH1/2 mutations. Among patients 0–9 and 10–21 years old, 2/378 (0.5%) and 76/473 (16.1%) had IDH1/2-mutant tumors, respectively. Frequency of IDH mutations was similar between low-grade glioma (52/570, 9.1%) and high-grade glioma (25/277, 9.0%). Four tumors were graded as intermediate histologically, with one IDH1 mutation. Outcome: Seventy-six patients with IDH1/2-mutant glioma had outcome data available. Eighty-four percent of patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) were managed observantly without additional therapy. For low-grade astrocytoma, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.9% (95%CI:20.3–63.8) and, despite excellent short-term overall survival (OS), numerous disease-related deaths after year 10 were reported. Patients with high-grade astrocytoma had a 5-year PFS/OS of 36.8% (95%CI:8.8–66.4) and 84% (95%CI:50.1–95.6), respectively. Patients with oligodendroglioma had excellent OS. Conclusions A subset of pediatric gliomas is driven by IDH1/2 mutations, with a higher rate among adolescents. The majority of patients underwent upfront observant management without adjuvant therapy. Findings suggest that the natural history of pediatric IDH1/2-mutant glioma may be similar to that of adults, though additional studies are needed.

Background The prognosis for patients with pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is poor despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Objective responses to targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors have been reported in some patients with recurrent BRAF-mutant pHGG but are rarely sustained. Methods We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG treated with off-label BRAF +/– MEK inhibitors as part of their initial therapy. Results Nineteen patients were identified, with a median age of 11.7 years (range, 2.3–21.4). Histologic diagnoses included HGG (n = 6), glioblastoma (n = 3), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n = 4), diffuse midline glioma (n = 3), high-grade neuroepithelial tumor (n = 1), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 1), and anaplastic astroblastoma (n = 1). Recurrent concomitant oncogenic alterations included CDKN2A/B loss, H3 K27M, as well as mutations in ATRX, EGFR, and TERT. Eight patients received BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Eleven patients received combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Most patients tolerated long-term treatment well with no grade 4–5 toxicities. Objective and durable imaging responses were seen in the majority of patients with measurable disease. At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range, 0.3–6.5), three-year progression-free and overall survival for the cohort were 65% and 82%, respectively, and superior to a historical control cohort of BRAF-mutant pHGG patients treated with conventional therapies. Conclusions Upfront targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG is feasible and effective, with superior clinical outcomes compared to historical data. This promising treatment paradigm is currently being evaluated prospectively in the Children’s Oncology Group ACNS1723 clinical trial.

Supplementary Methods

Tumor proliferation measured as Ki67 index in (A) mSEP-CR(-)RTBDNb and (B) mCPC treated with the indicated dose and route of administration of gemcitabine.

information on drugs used in preclinical studies

Purpose: Curing all children with brain tumors will require an understanding of how each subtype responds to conventional treatments and how best to combine existing and novel therapies. It is extremely challenging to acquire this knowledge in the clinic alone, especially among patients with rare tumors. Therefore, we developed a preclinical brain tumor platform to test combinations of conventional and novel therapies in a manner that closely recapitulates clinic trials.Experimental Design: A multidisciplinary team was established to design and conduct neurosurgical, fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy studies, alone or in combination, in accurate mouse models of supratentorial ependymoma (SEP) subtypes and choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC). Extensive drug repurposing screens, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy studies were used to triage active compounds for combination preclinical trials with “standard-of-care” surgery and radiotherapy.Results: Mouse models displayed distinct patterns of response to surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy that varied with tumor subtype. Repurposing screens identified 3-hour infusions of gemcitabine as a relatively nontoxic and efficacious treatment of SEP and CPC. Combination neurosurgery, fractionated irradiation, and gemcitabine proved significantly more effective than surgery and irradiation alone, curing one half of all animals with aggressive forms of SEP.Conclusions: We report a comprehensive preclinical trial platform to assess the therapeutic activity of conventional and novel treatments among rare brain tumor subtypes. It also enables the development of complex, combination treatment regimens that should deliver optimal trial designs for clinical testing. Postirradiation gemcitabine infusion should be tested as new treatments of SEP and CPC. Clin Cancer Res; 24(7); 1654–66. ©2018 AACR.

Pediatric pan-cancer genome analyses do not capture the full range of diagnoses encountered in clinical practice. To inform basket trial design and real-world precision oncology practice, we classified diagnoses and assessed the landscape of mutations, including trial-matching, in an unselected cohort of pediatric solid tumors. Since 2013 all Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s patients have been offered participation in the Profile study. Participant tumor samples were sequenced with DFCI-OncoPanel, a targeted panel test sequencing exons of up to 447 cancer genes for single nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions and copy number alterations, and introns and exons of up to 60 genes for rearrangements. Patient diagnosis was classified according to ICD-O, version 3.2. Genomic alterations were analyzed for matching to the actionable mutation lists of precision oncology basket trials (NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH, NCI-MATCH, and the ASCO TAPUR Study v.3). Data will be shared with the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative. There were 888 pediatric patients with sequencing enrolled in Profile between January 2013 and March 2019; 512 (58%) with solid tumors and 376 (42%) with CNS tumors. Fifty-five percent (491/888) of patients had one of ten common pediatric cancer diagnoses: neuroblastoma (n=80), low-grade glioma (n=72), Wilms tumor (n=57), medulloblastoma (n=55), pilocytic astrocytoma (n=47), rhabdomyosarcoma (n=44), osteosarcoma (n=42), ependymoma (n=39), Ewing sarcoma (n=28) and glioblastoma (n=27). The remaining 45% (397/888) had one of 85 distinct rare malignancies with less than 25 cases per diagnosis. Most (80/85) of these rare diagnoses are not represented in prior pediatric pan-cancer sequencing studies. Recurrent (>5%) pathogenic alterations were, in common and rare diagnoses, TP53 mutations(m) and deletions(del) and BRAFm and rearrangements(r), in common diagnoses, MYC/MYCN amplification (amp) and EWSR1r and, in rare diagnoses, CTNNB1m, CDKN2A/Bdel and NF1m/del. We found that 31% (n=271/888) of patients had at least 1 variant matching a basket trial treatment arm. Genes with matching alterations include BRAF (10%), NF1 (4%), PI3KCA (3%), NRAS (2%), BRCA2 (2%), ALK (1%), and FGFR1 (1%). Sequencing of pediatric malignancies is increasing. This study highlights opportunities to use the resulting genomic data to inform genome-selected clinical trial design and uncover drivers in pediatric cancers. The proportion of cases in this cohort with genomic alterations meeting eligibility for basket trials is equivalent to that seen in the pediatric MATCH screening study. Due to the low prevalence of the diagnoses in the long tail of cancer types in this study, defining the genomic landscape of ultra-rare cancers will require data sharing. Classifying pediatric cancer diagnoses using the ICD-O standard ontology system is feasible and will facilitate data sharing. Citation Format: Suzanne J. Forrest, Hersh Gupta, Abigail Ward, Yvonne Li, Duong Doan, Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi, Sanda Alexandrescu, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, Suzanne Shusterman, Elizabeth A. Mullen, Natalie Collins, Susan N. Chi, Karen D. Wright, Priti Kumari, Tali Mazor, Keith L. Ligon, Priyanka Shivdasani, Phani Davineni, Monica Manam, Richard L. Schilsky, Suanna S. Bruinooge, Jaime M. Guidry Auvil, Ethan Cerami, Barrett J. Rollins, Matthew L. Meyerson, Neal I. Lindeman, Laura MacConaill, Bruce E. Johnson, Andrew D. Cherniack, Alanna J. Church, Katherine A. Janeway. Sequencing of 888 pediatric solid tumors informs precision oncology trial design and data sharing initiatives in pediatric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3890.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for pediatric high-grade glioma (pHGG) is poor despite aggressive multi-modal therapy. Objective responses to targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors have been reported in some patients with recurrent BRAF-mutant pHGG but are rarely sustained. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG treated with off-label BRAF +/- MEK inhibitors as part of their initial therapy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified, with a median age of 10.7 years (range: 1.8–20.3). Histologic diagnoses included HGG (n=6), glioblastoma (n=3), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n=4), diffuse midline glioma (n=3), high-grade neuroepithelial tumor (n=1), anaplastic astrocytoma (n=1), and anaplastic astroblastoma (n=1). Recurrent concomitant oncogenic alterations included CDKN2A/B loss, H3 K27M, as well as mutations in ATRX, EGFR and TERT. Eight patients received BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Eleven patients received combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Most patients tolerated long-term treatment well with no grade 4–5 toxicities. Objective and durable imaging responses were seen in the majority of patients with measurable disease. At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range,0.3–6.5), three-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the cohort were 65% and 82%, respectively, and superior to a historical control cohort treated with conventional therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutant pHGG is feasible and effective, with superior clinical outcomes observed compared to historical data. This promising treatment paradigm is currently being evaluated prospectively in the Children’s Oncology Group ACNS1723 clinical trial.