Search

Purpose: IFN-α is a pleiotropic cytokine possessing immunomodulatory properties that may improve the efficacy of therapeutic cancer vaccines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and compatibility of combining recombinant IFN-α with poxvirus vaccines targeting the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in murine models of colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinomas, where CEA is a self-antigen.Experimental Design: The phenotypic and functional effects of IFN-α were evaluated in the draining inguinal lymph nodes of tumor-free mice. We studied the effect of the site of IFN-α administration (local versus distal) on antigen-specific immune responses to poxvirus vaccination. Mechanistic studies were conducted to assess the efficacy of IFN-α and CEA-directed poxvirus vaccines in tumor-bearing CEA transgenic mice.Results: We identified a dose and schedule of IFN-α that induced a locoregional expansion of the draining inguinal lymph nodes and improved cellular cytotoxicity (natural killer and CD8+) and antigen presentation. Suppression of the vaccinia virus was avoided by administering IFN-α distal to the site of vaccination. The combination of IFN-α and vaccine inhibited tumor growth, improved survival, and elicited CEA-specific CTL responses in mice with CEA+ adenocarcinomas. In mice with pancreatic tumors, IFN-α slowed tumor growth, induced CTL activity, and increased CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.Conclusions: These data suggest that IFN-α can be used as a biological response modifier with antigen-directed poxvirus vaccines to yield significant therapeutic antitumor immune responses. This study provides the rationale and mechanistic insights to support a clinical trial of this immunotherapeutic strategy in patients with CEA-expressing carcinomas.

Supplementary Figures S1-S7 from The Antitumor and Immunoadjuvant Effects of IFN-α in Combination with Recombinant Poxvirus Vaccines

Supplementary Figure 1 from Intravesical Immunotherapy of Superficial Bladder Cancer with Chitosan/Interleukin-12

Supplementary Figure Legends 1-2 from Intravesical Immunotherapy of Superficial Bladder Cancer with Chitosan/Interleukin-12

Intravesical BCG has been used successfully to treat superficial bladder cancer for three decades. However, 20% to 30% of patients will fail initial BCG therapy and 30% to 50% of patients will develop recurrent tumors within 5 years. Alternative or complementary strategies for the management of superficial bladder cancer are needed. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a potent TH1 cytokine with robust antitumor activity and the ability to potentiate immunologic memory. Unfortunately, intravesical IL-12 did not show antitumor efficacy in a recent clinical study of patients with recurrent superficial bladder cancer. We hypothesized that coformulation of IL-12 with chitosan, a biocompatible, mucoadhesive polysaccharide, could improve intravesical IL-12 delivery and provide an effective and durable alternative for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer. In antitumor studies, 88% to 100% of mice bearing orthotopic bladder tumors were cured after four intravesical treatments with chitosan/IL-12. In contrast, only 38% to 60% of mice treated with IL-12 alone and 0% treated with BCG were cured. Antitumor responses following chitosan/IL-12 treatments were durable and provided complete protection from intravesical tumor rechallenge. Urinary cytokine analysis showed that chitosan/IL-12 induced multiple TH1 cytokines at levels significantly higher than either IL-12 alone or BCG. Immunohistochemistry revealed moderate to intense tumor infiltration by T cells and macrophages following chitosan/IL-12 treatments. Bladder submucosa from cured mice contained residual populations of immune cells that returned to baseline levels after several months. Intravesical chitosan/IL-12 is a well-tolerated, effective immunotherapy that deserves further consideration for testing in humans for the management of superficial bladder cancer. [Cancer Res 2009;69(15):6192–9]

BackgroundIn recent years, a regulatory network involving nectin/nectin-like immune receptors has emerged as a potential point of manipulation for cancer immunotherapy. Central to this axis, CD226 (DNAM-1) is a T and NK cell co-stimulatory receptor that competes for ligand (CD155 and CD112) binding with multiple inhibitory receptors (TIGIT, CD96, and PVRIG [CD112R]). Despite a large body of literature for TIGIT, detailed cellular characterization of the entire axis is still lacking. Therefore, we used mass cytometry (CyTOF) to systematically evaluate expression of the CD226 axis in tumors from a range of indications.MethodsTo thoroughly characterize the CD226 axis in the tumor microenvironment, we immunophenotyped approximately 100 tumor samples derived from a variety of cancer types using a bespoke 46-parameter CyTOF panel. Human biological samples were sourced ethically and their research use was in accord with the terms of the informed consents under an IRB/EC approved protocol. Using a suite of high-dimensional analytical tools, including FlowSOM, UMAP, and tSNE, we revealed distinct expression profiles for each receptor; a finding that was previously obscured due to a lack of sufficient resolution.ResultsWe observed a notable divergence in expression profiles between the CD226 axis members across tumor indications. For example, TIGIT expression was found to be highest on activated CD4+ regulatory T (Treg) cells, where its expression correlated strongly with ICOS, FoxP3, CD25, and CCR8. By contrast, CD96 and PVRIG exhibited broad expression across intratumoral T and NK cell populations. Other receptors (e.g., CD226) demonstrated variegated expression profiles across T and NK cell subsets. Finally, despite relatively consistent expression profiles of certain CD226 axis (i.e., TIGIT on Treg cells) across tumors, we also found several cell subsets/clusters unique to specific indications.ConclusionsUsing high-parameter CyTOF analysis, we were able to thoroughly characterize the CD226 axis (CD226, TIGIT, CD96, PVRIG) and related immune receptors across a range of tumor indications. These analyses revealed divergent expression profiles for each CD226 axis member, suggesting distinct/contextual biological role(s) for each receptor. However, future studies will need to dissect the importance of the distinct cellular representation for each CD226 axis member.Ethics ApprovalAll samples were purchased from Discovery Life Sciences (DLS). DLS represents and warrants that it has ownership of all Products available for sale and has properly obtained, where required under HHS/OHRP 45 CFR 46.102 (d) (f), IRB approval (or appropriate research approval for institutions outside the U.S.) for study protocols and informed consent documents for all human subject derived biological materials.