Search

Objective: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low- and intermediate-risk patients from a Japanese public healthcare payer perspective., Methods: A Markov model cost-effectiveness analysis was developed. Clinical and utility data were extracted from a systematic literature review. Cost inputs were obtained from analysis of the Medical Data Vision claims database and supplemented with a targeted literature search. The robustness of the results was assessed using sensitivity analyses. Scenario analyses were performed to determine the impact of lower mean age (77.5 years) and the effect of two different long-term mortality hazard ratios (TAVI versus SAVR: 0.9-1.09) on both risk-level populations. This analysis was conducted according to the guidelines for cost-effectiveness evaluation in Japan from Core 2 Health., Results: In intermediate-risk patients, TAVI was a dominant procedure (TAVI had lower cost and higher effectiveness). In low-risk patients, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for TAVI was ¥750,417/quality-adjusted-life-years (QALY), which was below the cost-effectiveness threshold of ¥5 million/QALY. The ICER for TAVI was robust to all tested sensitivity and scenario analyses., Conclusions: TAVI was dominant and cost-effective compared to SAVR in intermediate- and low-risk patients, respectively. These results suggest that TAVI can provide meaningful value to Japanese patients relative to SAVR, at a reasonable incremental cost for patients at low surgical risk and potentially resulting in cost-savings in patients at intermediate surgical risk.

The Robot-assisted Cardiac Surgery Council (RACSC) was established in 2015, and consists of the members of three closely related surgical societies and associations. The RACSC conducts the review and approval of applicant surgeons and institutions. A registry system has also been established through the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database-National Clinical Database( JCVSD-NCD). For the last five years, including the time when robotic mitral valve surgery was first approved as a procedure covered by the Japanese social insurance system in 2018, a total of 1,161 patients were enrolled in the JCVSDNCD, with an increase of nearly 500 cases per year. These cases underwent operations in 25 approved hospitals. The mean patient age was 59±13 years( range:20-90 years), and the male to female patient ratio was 1.8 male dominant. The most common procedure was mitral valve reconstruction, and 79% of all patients underwent annuloplasty. The mean operative time was 238±100 min, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 158±69 min, and the mean aortic cross-clamp (AXC) time was 102±49 min. When these results were compared with those of the Cleveland Clinic, which treated more than 1,000 cases as an initial institutional experience, both CPB and AXC times were nearly the same. It is believed that 200 cases are needed to stabilize the CPB and AXC time. Currently in Japan, only 3 or 4 out of the 25 approved hospitals have performed more than 200 cases over the past 5 years. The 30-day hospital mortality and redo operation rate for persisting mitral regurgitation was 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively, almost equivalent to that of the Cleveland Clinic. We believe that the 5-year result for robotic mitral surgery in Japan is acceptable. It is of note, however, that the length of hospital stay was 10.8±7.6 days, much longer than that of patients at the Cleveland Clinic( 5.2±2.8 days), and the homologous blood transfusion rate was 40.3%, twofold higher than that of the Cleveland Clinic( 20.5%). Therefore, the full benefits of less invasive robotic mitral repair surgery have not yet been achieved. Further improvements in results are both essential and anticipated.

Background: This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term patient outcomes and durability of the Mosaic mitral porcine bioprosthesis in the Japan Mosaic valve long-term multicenter study., Methods and results: The medical records of 390 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis at 10 centers in Japan (1999-2014) were reviewed. Patient data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture software. Patient survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) and valve-related reoperation and death were determined using actuarial methods. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the cohort was 73 (69-77) years. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 4.83 (1.84-8.26) years. The longest follow-up period was 15.8 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.4%. The 12-year actuarial survival rate was 54.1±4.5%, and the freedom from valve-related death was 85.3±3.4%. The freedom from reoperation at 12 years was 74.3±5.7%. The freedom from SVD at 12 years was 81.4±6.6% for patients aged ≥65 years and 71.6±11.1% for those aged <65 years. The median (IQR) mean pressure gradient was 4.1 (3.0-6.0) and 5.6 (4.0-6.7) mmHg at 1 and 10 years, respectively. The median (IQR) effective orifice area was 1.7 (1.4-2.0) and 1.4 (1.2-1.6) cm 2 at 1 and 10 years, respectively., Conclusions: The Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis offered satisfactory long-term outcomes for up to 12 years.