Search

Background: High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may reduce ablation time. Concerns that catheter-mounted thermocouples (TCs) can underestimate tissue temperature, resulting in elevated risk of steam pop formation, potentially limit widespread adoption of HPSD ablation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of HPSD and low-power, long-duration (LPLD) RFA in the context of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: An open-irrigated ablation catheter with a contact force sensor and a flexible-tip electrode containing a TC at its distal end (TactiFlexTM Ablation Catheter, Sensor EnabledTM, Abbott) was used to isolate the left pulmonary veins (PVs) in 12 canines with HPSD RFA (50 W for 10 seconds) and LPLD RFA (30 W for a maximum of 60 seconds). PVI was assessed at 30 minutes and 28 ± 3 days postablation. Computed tomographic scans were performed to assess PV stenosis after RFA. Lesions were evaluated with histopathology. Results: A total of 545 ablations were delivered: 252 with LPLD (0 steam pops) and 293 with HPSD RFA (2 steam pops) (P = .501). Ablation time required to achieve PVI was >3-fold shorter for HPSD than for LPLD RFA (P = .001). All 24 PVs were isolated 30 minutes after ablation, with 12/12 LPLD-ablated and 11/12 HPSD-ablated PVs still isolated at follow-up. Histopathology revealed transmural ablations for HPSD and LPLD RFA. No major adverse events occurred. Conclusion: An investigational ablation catheter effectively delivered RFA lesions. Ablation time required to achieve PVI with HPSD with this catheter was >3-fold shorter than with LPLD RFA.

Background Takotsubo syndrome (TS) and myocardial infarction (MI) share similar clinical and laboratory characteristics but have important differences in causes, demographics, management, and outcomes. Methods and Results In this observational study, the National Inpatient Sample and National Readmission Database were used to identify patients admitted with TS, type 1 MI, or type 2 MI in the United States between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. We compared patients hospitalized with TS, type 1 MI, and type 2 MI with respect to key features and outcomes. Over the 27‐month study period, 2 035 055 patients with type 1 MI, 639 075 patients with type 2 MI, and 43 335 patients with TS were identified. Cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia were more prevalent in type 1 MI (4.02%, 3.2%, and 7.2%, respectively) compared with both type 2 MI (2.8%, 0.8%, and 5.4% respectively) and TS (2.7%, 1.8%, and 5.3%, respectively). Risk of mortality was lower in TS compared with both type 1 MI (3.3% versus 7.9%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.3; P

Background Most published reports describing outcomes of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device–related infective endocarditis (CIED‐IE) are single‐center studies with small patient sample sizes. The goal of this study was to utilize population‐based data to assess trends in CIED‐IE hospitalization and to compare outcomes between patients hospitalized with CIED‐IE, prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), and native valve endocarditis (NVE). Methods and Results A query of the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2003 and 2017 identified 646 325 patients hospitalized with infective endocarditis in the United States of whom 585 974 (90%) had NVE, 27 257 (4.2%) had CIED‐IE, and 26 111 (4%) had PVE. There was a 509% increase in CIED‐IE hospitalizations in the United States from 2003 to 2017 (P trend