Search

Background: Children and adolescents with HIV taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) have high rates of viraemia. We assessed if genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to inform onward treatment improved treatment outcomes in Lesotho and Tanzania, two countries with little access to GRT., Methods: The Genotype-Informed Versus Empirical Management of Viremia (GIVE MOVE) open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial enrolled children and adolescents with HIV between the ages of 6 months and 19 years, taking ART, and with a viral load at least 400 copies per mL. Participants were recruited from ten clinical centres and hospitals in Lesotho and Tanzania. Participants were electronically randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either GRT with expert recommendation (GRT group) or repeat viral-load testing and empirical onward treatment (usual care group). Participants and study staff were not masked, but the endpoint committee and laboratory staff conducting viral-load testing were. Participants in both groups received at least three sessions of enhanced adherence counselling, and in the GRT group, blood for GRT assessed via Sanger sequencing was drawn at enrolment. The composite primary endpoint was death, hospitalisation, a new WHO HIV clinical stage 4 event, or not having documented viral suppression of less than 50 copies per mL at 36 weeks in the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded participants who were retrospectively found to be ineligible after randomisation. Serious adverse events were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04233242) and the trial status is completed., Findings: Between March 3, 2020, and July 5, 2022, 286 participants were enrolled and 284 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (144 in the GRT group and 140 in the usual care group). Of these participants, 158 (56%) were female and 126 (44%) were male. Five (3%) in the GRT group and four (3%) in the usual care group did not complete follow-up but were included in the primary analysis. The median age across both groups was 14 years (IQR 9-16). The composite primary endpoint occurred in 67 (47%) participants in the GRT group and 73 (52%) in the usual care group (adjusted odds ratio 0·79 [95% CI 0·49 to 1·27]; adjusted risk difference -0·06 [95% CI -0·17 to 0·06]; p=0·34); all participants reaching the composite primary endpoint had no documented viral suppression at 36 weeks. No deaths were recorded, and only one clinical stage 4 event requiring hospitalisation occurred (in the usual care group); this was the only serious adverse event recorded in the study., Interpretation: GRT-informed management did not significantly improve treatment outcomes for children and adolescents with viraemia while taking ART., Funding: Fondation Botnar, Swiss National Science Foundation, and Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation., Translations: For the Sesotho and Swahili translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NDL reports having received travel grants to conferences from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare, and his division received honoraria for consultancies from ViiV Healthcare and for participation in a data safety monitoring board from Pharming. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In global health, international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) frequently hire, train, and partner with host-country clinicians who manage public outreach and patient care. Purpose and Research Design: We conducted a general interpretivist study of Basotho clinicians hired by NGOs and academic affiliates in Lesotho to identify cultural barriers and facilitators to community and patient education. Data Collection and Analysis: We conducted 13 interviews involving 16 participants (one physician, one nutritionist, 14 nurses). Using an inductive and iterative approach, we analyzed interview transcripts through the lens of social cognitive theory and identified 15 themes. Results: Major findings highlighted: 1) patient and community learners may view Basotho clinicians as authority figures; 2) family and community power dynamics affect healthcare access for vulnerable patient groups; and 3) village leaders may refuse community education when excluded from problem-solving and early planning. Conclusions: Although local clinicians and community members may identify with the same cultural group, clinicians can encounter cultural barriers to patient and community education.