Search

Objective Accurate documentation of patient care and acuity is essential to determine appropriate reimbursement as well as accuracy of key publicly reported quality metrics. We sought to investigate the impact of standardized note templates by inpatient advanced practice providers (APPs) on evaluation and management (E/M) charge capture, including outside of the global surgical package (GSP), and quality metrics including case mix index (CMI) and mortality index (MI). We hypothesized this clinical documentation initiative as well as improved coding of E/M services would result in increased reimbursement and quality metrics. Methods A documentation and coding initiative on the heart and vascular service line was initiated in 2016 with focus on improving inpatient E/M capture by APPs outside the GSP. Comprehensive training sessions and standardized documentation templates were created and implemented in the electronic medical record. Subsequent hospital care E/M (current procedural terminology codes 99231, 99232, 99233) from the years 2015 to 2017 were audited and analyzed for charge capture rates, collections, work relative value units (wRVUs), and billing complexity. Data were compared over time by standardizing CMS values and reimbursement rates. In addition, overall CMI and MI were calculated each year. Results One year following the documentation initiative, E/M charges on the vascular surgery service line increased by 78.5% with a corresponding increase in APP charges from 0.4% of billable E/M services to 70.4% when compared with pre-initiative data. The charge capture of E/M services among all inpatients rose from 21.4% to 37.9%. Additionally, reimbursement from CMS increased by 65% as total work relative value units generated from E/M services rose by 78.4% (797 to 1422). The MI decreased over the study period by 25.4%. Additionally, there was a corresponding 5.6% increase in the cohort CMI. Distribution of E/M encounter charges did not vary significantly. Meanwhile, the prevalence of 14 clinical comorbidities in our cohort as well as length of stay (P = .88) remained non-statistically different throughout the study period. Conclusions Accurate clinical documentation of E/M care and ultimately inpatient acuity is critical in determining quality metrics that serve as important measures of overall hospital quality for CMS value-based payments and rankings. A system-based documentation initiative and expanded role of inpatient APPs on vascular surgery teams significantly improved charge capture and reimbursement outside the GSP as well as CMI and MI in a consistently complex patient population.

There is a lack of adjudicated and prospectively randomized published outcomes on the use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) to treat dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula in Asian patients. This post-hoc subgroup analysis of 112 Japanese participants from the global IN.PACT AV Access trial reports outcomes through 12 months.Participants were treated with DCB (n=58) or standard non-coated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloons (n=54). Outcomes included target lesion primary patency (TLPP), access circuit primary patency, and safety.Through six months, TLPP was 86.0% (49/57) in the DCB group and 49.1% (26/53) in the PTA group (p0.001). Through twelve months, TLPP was 67.3% (37/55) in the DCB group and 43.4% (23/53) in the PTA group (p=0.013).In this post-hoc analysis of Japanese participants from the IN.PACT AV Access trial, participants treated with DCB had higher TLPP through 6 and 12 months compared to PTA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Introduction. Surgical site infection (SSI) of groin incisions after vascular surgery is a significant source of morbidity and is associated with high rates of readmission and reoperation, as well as longer hospital length of stay. The patient-reported health care experiences are diminished for those in whom SSI complications occur. Previous studies have analyzed patients undergoing all types of surgery requiring groin incision. The role of closed incision negative pressure therapy (CiNPT) as an adjunct to the primarily closed femoral incision after vascular surgery is unclear. Materials and Methods. This retrospective single-center study focuses on complex iliofemoral reconstruction with extensive dissection, including profundoplasty. The role of CiNPT and short-term outcomes are analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors that place patients at high risk for SSI. A prediction model was performed to predict high-risk patients. Results. A total of 337 patients who underwent 422 femoral endarterectomies (85 bilateral) were included. The overall SSI rate was 16.1% (9.3% Szilagyi grade II and III), and SSI was associated with a 44% readmission rate, 38% reoperation rate, and longer mean length of stay (8.5 days vs 5.1 days; P =.02). No differences in SSI were evident between the CiNPT (n = 47) and standard dressing cohorts. The final prediction model used 5 variables: obesity (body mass index > 30), insulin use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), immunosuppression, and surgical duration. Conclusions. Patients with obesity, COPD, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for SSI after femoral incisions for peripheral revascularization. A prediction model may assist in identifying patients at high risk for SSI so that targeted risk reduction strategies can be implemented to decrease morbidity and economic costs. Targeted use of CiNPT may help reduce the severity of SSI in these at-risk patients.

Vascular surgery integrated residency (VSIR) programs are highly competitive; however, criteria for resident selection remain opaque and non-standardized. The already unclear selection criteria will be further impacted by the impending transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 from numeric scores to a binary pass/fail outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the historical and anticipated selection criteria of VSIR applicants.This was a cross-sectional, nationwide, 59-item survey that was sent to all VSIR program directors (PDs). Data was analyzed using the Fisher exact test if categorical and the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test if ordinal.Forty of 69 PDs (58%) responded to the survey. University-based programs constituted 85% of responders. Most VSIR PDs (65%) reported reviewing between 101 to 150 applications for 1 to 2 positions annually. Forty-two percent of the responding PDs reported sole responsibility for inviting applicants to interview, whereas 50% had a team of faculty responsible for reviewing applications. On a five-point Likert scale, letters of recommendation (LOR) from vascular surgeons or colleagues (a person the PD knows) were the most important objective criteria. Work within a team structure was rated highest among subjective criteria. The majority of respondents (72%) currently use the Step 1 score as a primary method to screen applicants. Regional differences in use of Step 1 score as a primary screening method were: Midwest (100%), Northeast (76%), South (43%), and West (40%) (P = .01). PDs responded that that they will use USMLE Step 2 score (42%) and LOR (10%) to replace USMLE Step 1 score. The current top ranked selection criteria are letters from a vascular surgeon, USMLE Step 1 score and overall LOR. The proposed top ranked selection criteria after transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail include LOR overall followed by Step 2 score.This is the first study to evaluate the selection criteria used by PDs for VSIR. The landscape of VSIR selection criteria is shifting and increasing transparency is essential to applicants' understanding of the selection process. The transition of USMLE Step 1 to a pass/fail report will shift the attention to Step 2 scores and elevate the importance of other relatively more subjective criteria. Defining VSIR program selection criteria is an important first step toward establishing holistic review processes that are transparent and equitable.

This study reports the results of a prospective, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the polymer based Endologix Alto Stent Graft System in treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), with sealing 7 mm below the top of the fabric in aortic neck diameters from 16 to 30 mm.Seventy-five patients were treated with Alto devices between March 2017 and February 2018 in 16 centers in the United States for infrarenal AAAs (max diameter ≥5.0 cm in diameter or size increase by 0.5 cm in 6 months or diameter ≥1.5 times the adjacent normal aorta). Patients were followed for 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year by clinical evaluation and computed tomography and abdominal x-ray imaging. Treatment success was defined as technical success and freedom from AAA enlargement, migration, type I or III endoleak, AAA rupture or surgical conversion, stent graft stenosis, occlusion, kink, thromboembolic events, and stent fracture attributable to the device requiring secondary intervention through 12 months. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative variables, follow-up clinical evaluations, and radiographic examination results through the first 1 year were analyzed.The mean patient age was 73 years, with 93% of patients being male. The 30-day major adverse event rate was 5.3%. At 1 year, the primary endpoint was met with a treatment success rate of 96.7%. Through 1-year post-treatment, all-cause mortality was 4.0%. No AAA-related mortality occurred. AAA enlargement was 1.6%, type I endoleak rate was 1.4%, with 100% freedom from type III endoleaks, device migration, device fracture, stent occlusion, or AAA rupture. The device-related secondary intervention rate was 2.7%.This prospective study demonstrates the Endologix Alto is safe and effective in treating AAAs with appropriate anatomy at 1 year. The safety endpoint is met by a 5.3% 30-day major adverse event rate, whereas the effectiveness endpoint is met by a treatment success rate of 96%.

Objective Hypogastric coverage may be required for occlusive disease at the iliac arterial bifurcation. In this study, we sought to determine patency rates of common-external iliac artery (C-EIA) bare metal stents (BMS) spanning the hypogastric origin in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). In addition, we sought to identify predictors of C-EIA BMS patency loss and major adverse limb events (MALE) in patients requiring hypogastric coverage. We hypothesized that worsening stenosis of the hypogastric origin would negatively influence C-EIA stent patency and freedom from MALE. Methods This is a single center, retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing elective, endovascular treatment of aortoiliac disease (AIOD) between 2010 and 2018. Only patients with C-EIA BMS coverage of a patent IIA origin were included in the study. Hypogastric luminal diameter was determined from preoperative CT angiography. Analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, univariable and multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operator characteristics (ROC). Results There were 236 patients (318 limbs) who were included in the study. AIOD was TASC C/D in 236/318 (74.2%) of cases. C-EIA stent primary patency was 86.5% (95% confidence interval: 81.1, 91.9) at 2 years and 79.7% (72.8, 86.7) at 4 years. Freedom from ipsilateral MALE was 77.0% (71.1, 82.9) at 2 years and 68.7% (61.3, 76.2) at 4 years. Luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin was most strongly associated with loss of C-EIA BMS primary patency in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.81, p = .02). Insulin-dependent diabetes, Rutherford’s class IV or above, and stenosis of the hypogastric origin were significantly predictive of MALE in both univariable and multivariable analyses. In ROC analysis, luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin was superior to chance in prediction of C-EIA primary patency loss and MALE. Hypogastric diameter >4.5 mm had a negative predictive value of 0.94 for C-EIA primary patency loss and 0.83 for MALE. Conclusions Patency rates of C-EIA BMS are high. Hypogastric luminal diameter is an important and potentially modifiable predictor of C-EIA BMS patency and MALE in patients with AIOD.

The Gore Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE; W.L. GoreAssociates, Flagstaff, AZ) is the only iliac branch device approved in the United States to preserve blood flow to the external and internal iliac arteries (IIAs). Some surgeons have used the Gore Viabahn VBX balloon expandable endoprosthesis (VBX; W.L. GoreAssociates) in the IIA rather than the self-expanding endograft designed for the IBE, the internal iliac component (IIC). The objective of the present study was to examine the outcomes for patients treated for aortoiliac artery aneurysms using the IBE with either the IIC or VBX stent.We performed a retrospective, single-center review of patients treated for aortoiliac artery aneurysms using the Gore IBE device, with either the IIC or VBX stent into the IIA, from February 2016 to March 2021. The patient demographics, procedure details, 30-day morbidity and mortality, and 6-month and 1-year outcomes and mortality were analyzed. The categorical factors are summarized using frequencies and proportions. Continuous measures are summarized as the mean ± standard deviation. A significance level of P = .05 was assumed for all test results. The analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).A total of 62 patients (64 arteries) had undergone elective aortoiliac artery aneurysm repair with the IBE. The IIC was used exclusively in 35 cases (55%) and the VBX in 29 (45%). The patients who had received the VBX had had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = .006). Upper extremity access was used for VBX delivery in 24.1% of the procedures. No return to the operating room was required in either group. No differences were found in technical success (IIC, 97.1%; VBX, 93.1%; P = .59), the presence of endoleak on completion (20.0% vs 6.9%; P = .17), readmission (97.1% vs 93.1%; P = .59), or mortality (1.6% vs 0%; P = .45) at 30 days. No differences were found in the requirement for any IBE reintervention after 30 days. No type Ia, Ib, or III endoleaks had occurred in either group at any follow-up point. No significant difference was found in internal iliac limb primary patency (IIC, 100%; VBX, 96.3%) between groups. A nonstatistically significant trend was found toward fewer trunk-ipsilateral leg type II endoleaks in the VBX group during follow-up.These data suggest that the VBX is a reasonable substitute for the IIC, with a comparable safety and efficacy profile. Given its inherent conformability, greater range of diameters, and longer working length, the VBX stent offers expanded IIA branch options with the IBE.

Small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) surveillance intervals remain controversial and difficult to standardize. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines lack quality evidence. The objective of this study is to examine patients followed in a high volume non-invasive vascular laboratory, determine if the current guidelines are fitting in clinical practice, and attempt to further identify risk factors for accelerated aneurysm growth.A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent at least two ultrasounds for AAA in the vascular laboratory during 2008 -2018 with baseline diameter less than 5.0 cm was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. Groups were then created for comparison using the size criteria according to SVS guidelines. In addition, we compared overall growth rates specifically evaluating rapid growth (rate of at least 1.0 cm/year and size change of at least 0.5 cm from previous imaging), expected growth (any growth below 1.0 cm/year and of at least 0.5 cm from baseline) and no growth.A total of 1581 patients (1232 male and 349 female) were identified with a total of 5945 ultrasound studies. The median age was 73 years and mean follow-up was 27.8 months. Baseline AAA size was 3.0 -3.9 cm in 986 patients and 4.0 -4.9 cm in 595 patients. The average maximum growth rate was 0.18 cm/year for AAAs 3.0 -3.9 cm and 0.36 cm/year for AAAs 4.0 -4.9 cm (P0.001). Patients with AAA 4.0 -4.9 cm at baseline were more likely to be white, male, hypertensive and have chronic kidney disease (P0.05). 1078 patients (68.2%) demonstrated no growth over the observed time period with 342 patients (21.6%) demonstrating expected growth and 161 (10.2%) rapid growth. Male gender and baseline AAA size of 4.0 -4.9 cm were more likely to demonstrate rapid growth (P = 0.002) and eventual repair (P0.001). Metformin use was more common in the AAA group with no growth (P0.05). Freedom from rapid growth and repair indication at 2 years was significantly lower in those patients with baseline aneurysms 3.0 -3.9 cm (P0.001).The overall low rate of events in small AAAs supports continued surveillance every 3 years for AAAs 3.0-3.9 cm and yearly for male patients with AAAs 4.0 -4.9 cm as recommended by the SVS Guidelines. Female gender may have less rapid growth than previously reported but likely merit more rigorous surveillance particularly as the AAAs approach 5.0 cm. Metformin use continues to demonstrate it may abrogate aneurysmal growth. Lastly, there is a subset of patients that exhibit more rapid growth of their small AAAs, and further study will be required to classify these patients.