Search

Egg-laying performance is of great economic importance in poultry, but the underlying genetic mechanisms are still elusive. In this work, we conduct a multi-omics and multi-tissue integrative study in hens with distinct egg production, to detect the hub candidate genes and construct hub molecular networks contributing to egg-laying phenotypic differences. We identifiy three hub candidate genes as egg-laying facilitators: TFPI2, which promotes the GnRH secretion in hypothalamic neuron cells; CAMK2D, which promotes the FSHβ and LHβ secretion in pituitary cells; and OSTN, which promotes granulosa cell proliferation and the synthesis of sex steroid hormones. We reveal key endocrine factors involving egg production by inter-tissue crosstalk analysis, and demonstrate that both a hepatokine, APOA4, and an adipokine, ANGPTL2, could increase egg production by inter-tissue communication with hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Together, These results reveal the molecular mechanisms of multi-tissue coordinative regulation of chicken egg-laying performance and provide key insights to avian reproductive regulation. Egg-laying performance is an important phenotype for breeding chicken. Here, the authors explore the regulatory networks driving phenotypic differences in egg-laying, and identify laying-related variants and endocrine factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast muscle growth rate and intramuscular fat (IMF) content show apparent differences between fast-growing broilers and slow-growing indigenous chickens. However, the underlying genetic basis of these phenotypic characteristics remains elusive. In this study, we investigate the dynamic alterations of three-dimensional genome architecture and chromatin accessibility in breast muscle across four key developmental stages from embryo to starter chick in Arbor Acres (AA) broilers and Yufen (YF) indigenous chickens. The limited breed-specifically up-regulated genes (Bup-DEGs) are embedded in breed-specific A compartment, while a majority of the Bup-DEGs involving myogenesis and adipogenesis are regulated by the breed-specific TAD reprogramming. Chromatin loops allow distal accessible regions to interact with myogenic genes, and those loops share an extremely low similarity between chicken with different growth rate. Moreover, AA-specific loop interactions promote the expression of 40 Bup-DEGs, such as IGF1, which contributes to myofiber hypertrophy. YF-specific loop interactions or distal accessible regions lead to increased expression of 5 Bup-DEGs, including PIGO, PEMT, DHCR7, TMEM38B, and DHDH, which contribute to IMF deposition. These results help elucidate the regulation of breast muscle growth and IMF deposition in chickens. A Hi-C study reveals the dynamic chromatin architecture of breast muscle and gene expression affected by breed-specific 3D genome architecture that may influence muscle growth and intramuscular fat deposition between fast-growing and slow-growing chickens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. LncRNAs, which are defined as non-coding RNAs more than 200 bp in length, are involved in key biological processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, epigenetic regulation, and gene transcriptional translation. Recent studies have shown that lncRNAs also play major regulatory roles in the reproduction of mammals. However, knowledge of the roles of lncRNAs in the chicken ovary lacking. In this study, we performed RNA-seq analyses of ovarian tissue from Hy-Line brown laying hens at four physiological stages [15, 20, 30, and 68 weeks of age (W)]. We identified 657 lncRNA transcripts that were differentially expressed during ovarian development, the number of down-regulated lncRNAs was higher than the number of up-regulated lncRNAs during development. We predicted the cis and trans target genes of the DE lncRNAs and constructed a lncRNA-mRNA interaction network, which indicated that the DE genes (DEGs) and the target genes of the DE lncRNAs are mainly involved in signaling pathways associated with ovarian development, including oocyte meiosis, calcium signaling pathways, ECM-receptor interactions, and ribosome and focal adhesion. Overall, we found that twelve lncRNAs were strongly involved in ovarian development: LNC_013443, LNC_001029, LNC_005713, LNC_016762, ENSGALT00000101857, LNC_003913, LNC_013692, LNC_012219, LNC_004140, ENSGALT00000096941, LNC_009356, and ENSGALT00000098716. In summary, our study utilized RNA-seq analysis of hen ovaries to explore key lncRNAs involved in ovarian development and function. Furthermore, the comprehensive analysis identified the target genes of these lncRNAs providing a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying ovarian development in hens and a theoretical basis for further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Serum biochemical indicators are often regarded as direct reflections of animal metabolism and health. The molecular mechanisms underlying serum biochemical indicators metabolism of chicken (Gallus Gallus) have not been elucidated. Herein, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify the variation associated with serum biochemical indicators. The aim of this research was to broaden the understanding of the serum biochemical indicators in chickens. Results: A GWAS of serum biochemical indicators was carried out on 734 samples from an F2 Gushi× Anka chicken population. All chickens were genotyped by sequencing, 734 chickens and 321,314 variants were obtained after quality control. Based on these variants, a total of 236 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on 9 chicken chromosomes (GGAs) were identified to be significantly (-log10(P) > 5.72) associated with eight of seventeen serum biochemical indicators. Ten novel quantitative trait locis (QTLs) were identified for the 8 serum biochemical indicator traits of the F2 population. Literature mining revealed that the ALPL, BCHE, GGT2/GGT5 genes at loci GGA24, GGA9 and GGA15 might affect the alkaline phosphatase (AKP), cholinesterase (CHE) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) traits, respectively. Conclusion: The findings of the present study may contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of chicken serum biochemical indicator regulation and provide a theoretical basis for chicken breeding programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]