Search

To investigate how sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) add-on therapy for metformin affects diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This nationwide population-based study conducted from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018 involved 3,432,911 adults with T2DM in Taiwan. To adjust for potential confounders, data on sex, age, income, comorbidities, diabetes complication severity index score, staging of kidney disease, anti-diabetic medications, and index year were included. The outcome was DR progression, determined by procedure codes or the addition of ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM codes to the medical records of the patients during the study. Sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the findings. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of DR progression was 0.89 for the SGLT2is add-on group, relative to the control group [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.99, P = 0.026]. The Kaplan–Meier curve of the cumulative incidence rate showed that the cumulative incidence of DR progression was considerably decreased in the SGLT2is cohort (log-rank P = 0.0261). The use of SGLT2is for less than 1 year and 1–2 years were associated with a significant increase in the risk of DR progression (aHR 1.56 and 1.88, respectively); however, the risk markedly reduced if the SGLT2is regimen was used for more than 2 years (aHR 0.41, 95% Cl 0.35–0.48; P < 0.001). The serial sensitivity analysis showed consistent findings. The aHR of DR progression was 0.82 for the SGLT2is cohort relative to the non-SGLT2is cohort based on the fundoscopy or indirect ophthalmoscopy findings within 1 year before the outcome date (95% Cl 0.71–0.95; P = 0.009). Co-administration of metformin and SGLT2is may reduce the risk of DR progression. Short-term use of SGLT2is may markedly increase the risk of DR, whereas prolonged use SGLT2is may significantly decrease it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MHC associations of ankylosing spondylitis in East Asians are complex and involve non-HLA-B27 HLA contributions. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a subtype of seronegative spondyloarthropathy, is a common inflammatory disease that affects the spine and sacroiliac joints of the pelvis, resulting in pain, stiffness, and eventually, joint fusion. (B) Percentage of identified major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and non-MHC loci linked with AS. The complicated genetics of AS were decoded using genome-wide association studies (GWAS).[[6]] Through GWAS, approximately 116 major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci and 48 non-MHC loci have been linked with AS (Figure 1B). [Extracted from the article]

To investigate how sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) add-on therapy for metformin affects diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This nationwide population-based study conducted from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018 involved 3,432,911 adults with T2DM in Taiwan. To adjust for potential confounders, data on sex, age, income, comorbidities, diabetes complication severity index score, staging of kidney disease, anti-diabetic medications, and index year were included. The outcome was DR progression, determined by procedure codes or the addition of ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM codes to the medical records of the patients during the study. Sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the findings. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of DR progression was 0.89 for the SGLT2is add-on group, relative to the control group [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.99, P = 0.026]. The Kaplan–Meier curve of the cumulative incidence rate showed that the cumulative incidence of DR progression was considerably decreased in the SGLT2is cohort (log-rank P = 0.0261). The use of SGLT2is for less than 1 year and 1–2 years were associated with a significant increase in the risk of DR progression (aHR 1.56 and 1.88, respectively); however, the risk markedly reduced if the SGLT2is regimen was used for more than 2 years (aHR 0.41, 95% Cl 0.35–0.48; P < 0.001). The serial sensitivity analysis showed consistent findings. The aHR of DR progression was 0.82 for the SGLT2is cohort relative to the non-SGLT2is cohort based on the fundoscopy or indirect ophthalmoscopy findings within 1 year before the outcome date (95% Cl 0.71–0.95; P = 0.009). Co-administration of metformin and SGLT2is may reduce the risk of DR progression. Short-term use of SGLT2is may markedly increase the risk of DR, whereas prolonged use SGLT2is may significantly decrease it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To investigate the association of blepharitis and ischemic stroke. Methods: This nationwide retrospective cohort study used population-based data in Taiwan. Individuals aged 20 and above with diagnosis of blepharitis was included based on electrical medical records. After exclusion of ineligible cases, 424,161 patients were identified between 2008 and 2018. The blepharitis and non-blepharitis cohorts were matched based on sex, age, and comorbidities. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to calculate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) between blepharitis and non-blepharitis cohorts. The incidence of ischemic stroke was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: 424,161 pairs of blepharitis cohort and non-blepharitis cohort were 1:1 propensity score matched for statistical analysis. Patients with blepharitis had significantly increased risk of ischemic stroke compared with the individuals without blepharitis (adjusted hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.29–1.34, P < 0.001). A significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke was observed in blepharitis cohort with a previous diagnosis of cancer than in those without cancer (P for interaction < 0.0001). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed the cumulative incidence of ischemic stroke increased in the blepharitis cohort compared with that in the non-blepharitis cohort in 10 years (log-rank P < 0.001). The follow-up period analysis further indicated 1.41-fold adjusted hazard (95% CI 1.35−1.46, P < 0.001) of ischemic stroke within a year after blepharitis diagnosis. Conclusions: Patients with blepharitis had an elevated risk of developing ischemic stroke. Early treatment and active surveillance are suggested for patients with chronic blepharitis. Further research is required to determine the casual relationship between blepharitis and ischemic stroke, as well as the underlying mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease that causes ocular discomfort and visual impairment on a damaged ocular surface. Lifitegrast, a novel T-cell integrin antagonist, was approved in the United States in July 2016 as a 5% (50 mg/mL) ophthalmic solution for DED management. Currently, no meta-analysis and systemic review based on relevant studies have been conducted. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lifitegrast in patients with DED. We systematically searched Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies evaluating lifitegrast effects on symptomatic DED. Then, inferior corneal staining score, total corneal staining score (TCSS), nasal lissamine staining score (NLSS), total lissamine staining score, ocular discomfort score (ODS), eye discomfort score (visual analog scale (VAS) score), eye dryness score (EDS), ocular surface disease index score (OSDI-S), and tear break-up time (TBUT) were assessed. Clinical global impression and safety profiles were also evaluated. The studies were pooled in a random-effects model. We included five RCTs, one case–control study, and four longitudinal or retrospective studies, comprising 3197 participants. In the meta-analysis, lifitegrast was superior to the placebo because it improved TCSS, NLSS, TBUT, ODS, eye discomfort score, EDS, and OSDI-Sin DED. However, lifitegrast showed higher risks for ocular and non-ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) overall or at a mild or moderate level. Nonetheless, its incidence of adverse events slightly differed from that in the placebo, especially instillation site discomforts and dysgeusia, thereby considered safe and tolerable. Claims of withdrawal during follow-up caused by TEAEs were extremely rare. Lifitegrast improves DED, although dysgeusia, installation site pain, and irritation may be a concern for some. Overall, most of the adverse events are tolerable. Lifitegrast can alleviate refractory DED and improves patients' quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]