Search

Background: Pivotal clinical trials supported survival benefits of liposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who previously received gemcitabine‐based therapy. There are concerns about the benefits of nal‐IRI in patients who received FOLFIRINOX (combined fluorouracil, leucovorin, IRI, and oxaliplatin) because of potential cross‐resistance to IRI. The objective of this meta‐analysis was to characterize the impact of the previous receipt of IRI on the outcomes of nal‐IRI regimens in patients with advanced PDAC. Methods: Real‐world studies evaluating the outcomes of nal‐IRI in patients who had prior IRI exposure published up to April 2023 were searched using electronic databases. The meta‐analysis was conducted using a random effects model to estimate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Eight studies (n = 1368 patients) were included. The pooled median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 2.02 months (95% CI, 1.43–2.57 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 4.26 months (95% CI, 3.03–5.39 months). Patients with prior IRI exposure had PFS (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.94–1.47; p =.17) and OS (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.95–1.42; p =.16) comparable to patients without prior IRI exposure. Likewise, patients who had progressive disease on conventional IRI had PFS (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.73–3.08; p =.24) and OS (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.68–4.27; p =.26) with nal‐IRI comparable to patients who had no progressive disease. Conclusions: Prior IRI exposure does not affect the survival outcomes of nal‐IRI regimens in patients who have advanced PDAC. The selection of later lines of chemotherapy regimens should be based on the differential safety profile, patient status, the cost of treatment, and health‐related quality of life. In this meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence, the authors evaluated the outcomes of liposomal irinotecan in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had prior irinotecan exposure by using electronic databases. The results indicate that prior irinotecan exposure does not significantly affect the survival outcomes of patients who receive regimens containing liposomal irinotecan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately half of the patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) receive subsequent lines of chemotherapy. Recently, the liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen is recommended as subsequent lines of chemotherapy. However, little is known about the predictive factors for the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen, especially in patients with previous irinotecan (IRI) exposure. Objectives: We investigated the predictive factors associated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment in patients with PDAC. Design: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Methods: This study included patients with advanced PDAC who received the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen for palliative purposes. Results: Overall, 268 patients were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.0–8.8), while the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.9–3.2). An albumin level of<4.0 g/dL, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ⩾3.5, liver or peritoneal metastasis, and a history of >3 lines of palliative chemotherapy were associated with worse OS. An NLR of ⩾3.5 and liver metastasis were significant predictive factors for worse PFS. Previous exposure to IRI was not a significant predictor. Patients without prior IRI (no-IRI) treatment showed relatively longer OS and PFS compared to IRI responders and nonresponders, but these differences were not significant when compared specifically to the responders (OS: 8.8 vs 8.1 months, p = 0.388; PFS: 3.6 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.126). Conclusion: An NLR of ⩾3.5 and liver metastasis were associated with worse PFS. Prior IRI exposure was not a significant predictive factor for OS and PFS, especially in IRI responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) represents a rare malignancy within the pancreatic tumor spectrum. Owing to its rarity, the establishment of a standardized chemotherapy regimen for patients presenting with either metastatic disease or recurrence after radical surgery remains elusive. Most previous studies and case reports have used gemcitabine-based and 5-fluorouracil-based regimens, however, no previous study has reported the use of liposomal irinotecan in combination with S-1. In this report, we present a patient with PACC who experienced disease progression with liver metastasis after radical tumor resection followed by chemoradiotherapy. The patient underwent second-line treatment with liposomal irinotecan in conjunction with S-1. Encouragingly, the patient has remained free of recurrence and progression during a follow-up period of 2 years and 3 months.

Summary: Background: This was a multicenter, single-arm dose-ranging phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LY01610, a liposomal irinotecan, at various doses for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: This study (NCT04381910) enrolled patients with relapsed SCLC at 10 hospitals across China, who have failed with previous platinum-based treatments. LY01610 was administered at doses of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and investigator-assessed duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR), investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Findings: From September 3, 2020 to March 3, 2022, a total of 66 patients were enrolled, with 6, 30, and 30 allocated to the 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose groups, respectively, with 68% (45/66) having a chemotherapy-free interval

The approval of novel therapeutic agents remains widely reliant on evidence derived from large phase III randomized controlled trials. Liposomal irinotecan (ONIVYDE®) stands out as the only drug that has demonstrated improved survival both as a first-line therapy in combination with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5FU/LV) (NALIRIFOX) compared to the standard gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in the NAPOLI3 trial, and as a second-line treatment in combination with 5FU/LV compared to the standard 5FU/LV in the NAPOLI1 trial. However, just as the white bear of the Dostoevsky's paradox, the judgment of these results is invariably distracted by the intrusive thought of how different they might be if compared to similar regimens containing standard-free irinotecan as FOLFIRINOX or FOLFIRI, respectively. Here, we present and thoroughly discuss the evidence encompassing the pharmacologic, preclinical, and clinical development of liposomal irinotecan that can dispel any intrusive thoughts and foster a rational and well-considered judgment of this agent and its potential integration into the therapeutic strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The global phase 3 NAPOLI -1 trial of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit from using liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) after treatment with gemcitabine (GEM) compared to 5-FU/LV alone. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in older patients are not well studied. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study to compare the therapeutic efficacy of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between older and younger patients with cutoff ages of 70 and 75 years, respectively. We included patients with a prior history of one or more GEM-based regimens for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC and were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. Results: Of the 115 patients, 54 (47.0%) and 24 (20.9%) were aged ≥ 70 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort were 8.5 and 3.6 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS hazard ratios using age cutoffs of 70 (P = 0.90 and 0.99, respectively) and 75 (P = 0.90 and 0.76, respectively) years. Additionally, no significant differences were found in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between patients aged ≥ 70 and < 70 years or those aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Other than hematological toxicity, no trAEs higher than Grade 4 were observed in either age group. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC are not significantly different for those aged ≥ 70 years compared to younger patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The combination of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is widely acknowledged as the standard regimen for second-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) has demonstrated its activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent studies have investigated the activity of nal-IRI in combination with 5-FU/LV for biliary tract cancer. However, the results have been contradictory. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess survival outcomes and response rates in randomised trials investigating the activity of nal-IRI in previously treated biliary tract cancer patients. We systematically collected potentially relevant findings from PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane library and EMBASE. Abstracts presented at major international oncological meetings were also reviewed. We extracted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for objective response rate. The outcomes of the accessible randomised studies evaluating the activity of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV were analysed. The combination therapy exhibited a statistically significant decrease in the risk of progression (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.50–0.97) when compared with 5-FU/LV alone. Additionally, the dual regimen yielded longer overall survival and a higher objective response rate. Our meta-analysis showed that nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV had a superior activity in comparison with 5-FU/LV. Further investigations are required to elucidate the role of nal-IRI in this setting and to identify subgroups of patients who could derive the greatest benefit from its administration. • No evidence that doublet therapy is more effective than monotherapy in second-line treatment of biliary tract cancer. • FOLFOX demonstrated higher activity compared with active symptom control. • Two studies showed conflicting results assessing the activity of 5-FU/LV ± nal-IRI. • Our meta-analysis supports the role of nal-IRI in biliary tract cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have poor long‐term survival. Rechallenge with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR) based therapy has shown certain activity as late‐line therapy. To further improve clinical outcomes, we evaluated the antitumor efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with camrelizumab and liposomal irinotecan in patients with RASwt mCRC pretreated with anti‐EGFR‐based therapy. Patients with RASwt mCRC who had received at least two prior systemic therapies, including anti‐EGFR‐based treatment in the metastatic or unresectable disease setting, were enrolled in cohort B. Patients were treated with cetuximab (500 mg/m2) and camrelizumab (200 mg) plus liposomal irinotecan (HR070803, 60 mg/m2) intravenously once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. At the data cutoff (23 November 2022), 19 patients were enrolled in the two stages, and 16 were evaluable for efficacy analyses. The ORR was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.2%‐49.5%), and DCR was 75% (95% CI: 50.5%‐89.8%). The median PFS and OS were 6.9 (95% CI: 2.6‐11.2) and 15.1 (95% CI: 6.1‐24.0) months, respectively. Grade 3 treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15.8% (3/19) of patients. No grade ≥4 TRAEs were found in the safety population. Our study suggests that anti‐EGFR retreatment therapy with cetuximab plus camrelizumab and liposomal irinotecan (HR070803) is a promising late‐line treatment option with good antitumor activity and well‐tolerated toxicity in RASwt mCRC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For patients with localized pancreatic cancer with minimal vascular involvement, optimal survivability requires a multidisciplinary approach of surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX is a combination chemotherapy regimen that offers promising results in the perioperative and metastatic settings; however, it can cause significant adverse effects. Such toxicity can negatively impact some patients, resulting in chemotherapy discontinuation or surgical unsuitability. In an effort to reduce toxicities and optimize outcomes, this investigation explores the safety and feasibility of substituting liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) for nonliposomal irinotecan to improve tumor drug delivery and potentially reduce toxicity. This regimen, NALIRIFOX, has the potential to be both safer and more effective when administered in the preoperative setting. For patients with pancreatic cancer with little to no cancer near the blood vessels, the best life expectancy usually requires surgery and chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX is a chemotherapy medicine that offers promising results for both patients getting surgery and for patients with widespread disease. However, it can cause harmful side effects. The side effects can be so bad that the chemotherapy has to be stopped or that surgery is no longer possible. In order to reduce the harmful side effects and improve outcomes, this investigation looks into the safety and practicality of using a different version of one of the medicines. The different version hopes to improve drug delivery and reduce harmful side effects. This regimen, NALIRIFOX, can be safer and more effective in patients awaiting surgery. Clinical Trial Registration: UF-STO-PANC-004 (NCT03483038) (ClinicalTrials.gov) NALIRIFOX, a Phase II clinical trial for the treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The regimen includes novel liposomal irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin. Enrolling in multiple sites (NCT03483038). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Liposomal irinotecan promotes controlled sustained release of irinotecan (CPT-11), therefore, we hypothesize that the therapeutic index (quantitative measurement of the relative efficacy/safety ratio of a drug) will be higher for liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan. Methods We compared the therapeutic indexes of liposomal and non-liposomal irinotecan in mice bearing subcutaneous patient-derived xenograft (PDX) pancreatic tumors under dosing regimens approximating the clinical setting. Following preliminary drug sensitivity/antitumor activity analyses on three PDX tumor models, one model was selected for analyses of efficacy, biomarker, toxicology, pharmacokinetics in mice receiving liposomal irinotecan (2.5, 10, 50 mg/kg/week) or non-liposomal irinotecan (10, 25, 50 mg/kg/week). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for each treatment was 50 mg/kg/week. Results Using the selected IM-PAN-001 model at the MTD (both treatments, 50 mg/kg/week), antitumor activity, phospho-histone gamma-H2AX protein staining in cancer cell nuclei, histological tumor regression, and plasma levels of CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 after 24 h were greater with liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan, but tumor SN-38 levels were similar. At the lowest doses assessed, antitumor activity, histological tumor regression, and jejunum and bone marrow toxicity were similar. Based on these findings, liposomal and non-liposomal irinotecan had therapeutic indexes of 20 and 5, respectively. Conclusion This non-clinical study showed a fourfold broader therapeutic index with liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan in mice bearing IM-PAN-001 PDX pancreatic tumors, even at optimal dosing for the two drugs. These findings support the clinical benefit observed with liposomal irinotecan in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst prognoses of any all cancers. 5-FU/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel regimens have been recognized as global-standard, first-line treatments for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-FU/LV regimen is now included in treatment guidelines as a recommended and approved option for use in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that has progressed after GEM-based therapy and who have a suitable performance status and comorbidity profile. There is no report that nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen was significantly effective, and we will report it because we experienced this time. Case presentation A 69-year-old man presented with epigastric pain, and a contrast computed tomography (CT) revealed an enhanced mass lesion measuring 33 × 27 mm on the pancreatic body with encasement of the common hepatic artery (CHA) and the splenic vein. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was performed and demonstrated cytology consistent with adenocarcinoma. Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The patient received the GEM and S-1 regimen; however, the adverse event was relatively severe. Then, 11 cycles of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen were administered. A CT scan revealed that the tumor had shrunk to 18 × 7 mm in diameter with encasement of the CHA. The encasement of the splenic vein had disappeared, without any distant metastases. From this post-chemotherapy evaluation and intraoperative frozen section of around the celiac artery, gastroduodenal artery and pancreas stump confirmed absence of tumor cells, we performed distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection. A histological examination of the surgical specimen revealed no evidence of residual adenocarcinoma, consistent with a pathological complete response to treatment. Conclusions We present the first case of a pathological complete response with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In the future, nal-IRI may become a key drug for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Introduction: Combination therapeutic mode is likely to be the key to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in a wider range of cancer patients. Herein, we conducted an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial that enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors who had progressed after standard treatments. Methods: Radiotherapy of 24 Gy/3 fractions/3-10 days was given to the targeted lesions. Liposomal irinotecan (80mg/m², dose could be adjusted to 60 mg/m² for intolerable cases) was intravenously (IV) administered once within 48 hours after radiotherapy. Then, camrelizumab (200mg IV, q3w) and anti-angiogenic drugs were given regularly until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in the target lesions evaluated by investigators per RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: Between November 2020 and June 2022, 60 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5-12.5). Of 52 evaluable patients, the overall ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 82.7%, respectively. Fifty patients with target lesions were evaluable, the ORR and DCR of the target lesions were 35.3% and 82.4%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.6, 6.2), and the median overall survival was not reached. TRAEs (all grades) occurred in 55 (91.7%) patients. The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were lymphopenia (31.7%), anemia (10.0%), and leukopenia (10.0%). Conclusion: The combination of radiotherapy, liposomal irinotecan, camrelizumab, and anti-angiogenesis therapy demonstrated promising antitumor activity and well tolerance in various advanced solid tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Liposomal irinotecan promotes controlled sustained release of irinotecan (CPT-11), therefore, we hypothesize that the therapeutic index (quantitative measurement of the relative efficacy/safety ratio of a drug) will be higher for liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan. Methods: We compared the therapeutic indexes of liposomal and non-liposomal irinotecan in mice bearing subcutaneous patient-derived xenograft (PDX) pancreatic tumors under dosing regimens approximating the clinical setting. Following preliminary drug sensitivity/antitumor activity analyses on three PDX tumor models, one model was selected for analyses of efficacy, biomarker, toxicology, pharmacokinetics in mice receiving liposomal irinotecan (2.5, 10, 50 mg/kg/week) or non-liposomal irinotecan (10, 25, 50 mg/kg/week). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for each treatment was 50 mg/kg/week. Results: Using the selected IM-PAN-001 model at the MTD (both treatments, 50 mg/kg/week), antitumor activity, phospho-histone gamma-H2AX protein staining in cancer cell nuclei, histological tumor regression, and plasma levels of CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 after 24 h were greater with liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan, but tumor SN-38 levels were similar. At the lowest doses assessed, antitumor activity, histological tumor regression, and jejunum and bone marrow toxicity were similar. Based on these findings, liposomal and non-liposomal irinotecan had therapeutic indexes of 20 and 5, respectively. Conclusion: This non-clinical study showed a fourfold broader therapeutic index with liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan in mice bearing IM-PAN-001 PDX pancreatic tumors, even at optimal dosing for the two drugs. These findings support the clinical benefit observed with liposomal irinotecan in patients with pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe efficacy of combination chemotherapy beyond the first-line setting remains modest in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). Evidence from recent clinical studies has shown that liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) resulted in survival benefits in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APAC) after progression on gemcitabine-based treatment. However, the survival benefits of nal-IRI in the third and later lines, in which limited options are available, have yet to be extensively studied. Also, some studies have shown conflicting results regarding the impact of prior treatment with conventional IRI on patient outcomes following treatment with nal-IRI. Therefore, this real-world study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI plus 5FU-LV in advanced PAC patients who progressed on conventional IRI-containing regimens.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted between November 2016 to December 2022 on 30 patients diagnosed with advanced PAC who completed at least one cycle of nal-IRI plus 5-FU- LV and were previously treated with conventional IRI. Data regarding survival outcomes were retrieved.ResultsThirty patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 76.7% of the patients received at least two lines of therapy prior to nal-IRI. The median overall duration of nal-IRI treatment was 2.0 months (IQR: 1.3 – 3.9 months). One patient (3.3%) had a partial response, and seven patients (23.3%) had stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.6 - 2.0) and the 6-month PFS rate was 20.0%. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.0 months (95% CI 3.4 – 7.0), and the 6-month OS rate was 36.7%. An interval between conventional IRI and nal-IRI ≥5.5 months was significantly associated with prolonged OS of 10.2 months (95% CI 3.3 – 12.1) versus 4.3 months (95% CI 2.1 – 5.9; p =0.003). Ten patients (33.3%) experienced grade 3 adverse events, most commonly nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, and non-neutropenic fever.ConclusionNal-IRI plus 5FU/LV had modest survival benefits and an acceptable safety profile in patients with prior conventional IRI. A longer interval between conventional IRI and nal-IRI was associated with increased survival outcomes.

Summary: Background: The prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment. Methods: Patients with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67 > 20%; Grade 3) received IV liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) (70 mg/m2 free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m2)/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75 mg/m2), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (80% power to demonstrate one-sided 95% lower confidence interval excluded 15% (target level of efficacy: 30%)). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), median PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03837977). Findings: Of 58 patients (29 each arm); 57% male, 90% ECOG PS 0/1, 10% PS 2, 89.7% Ki-67 ≥ 55%, primary site: 70.7%-gastrointestinal, 18.9%-other, 10.3%-unknown, 91.4%/6.9%/1.7% were resistant/sensitive/intolerant to 1L platinum-based treatment, respectively. The primary end-point of 6-month PFS rate was met by ARM A: 29.6% (lower 95% Confidence-Limit (CL) 15.7), but not by ARM B: 13.8% (lower 95%CL:4.9). ORR, median PFS and OS were 11.1% (95%CI:2.4–29.2) and 10.3% (95%CI:2.2–27.4%); 3 months (95%CI:2–6) and 2 months (95%CI:2-2); and 6 months (95%CI:3–10) and 6 months (95%CI:3–9) in ARMS A and B, respectively. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 51.7% and 55.2% (1 and 6 discontinuations due to toxicity in ARMS A and B), respectively. QoL was maintained in ARM A, but not ARM B. Interpretation: nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicity and maintained QoL, with no difference in OS. ORR and median PFS were similar in both arms. This study provides prospective efficacy, toxicity and QoL data in the 2L setting in a disease group of unmet need, and represents some of the strongest evidence available to recommend systemic treatment to these patients. Funding: Servier.

This multicenter phase I/IIa study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin, and S-1 (NASOX) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease, aged ≥ 19 years, with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 were eligible. The primary endpoints were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I cohort and overall response rate (ORR) in the phase IIa cohort. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included patients who received the RP2D. In phase I, seven patients were screened, and six were assessed for DLT. None experienced DLT during the first cycle. The RP2D was determined as nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–7 every 14 days. For the ITT (N = 41; 7, and 34 from phases I and IIa, respectively), the most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (31.7 %), enterocolitis (9.8 %), anorexia (7.3 %), and diarrhea (2.4 %). The ORR was 58.5 % (1 complete, and 23 partial responses). Two underwent conversion surgery; both achieved R0 resection. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.0–8.1) and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95 % CI, 9.8–15.5). NASOX exhibited a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy outcomes consistent with NALIRIFOX, showing potential to replace infusional 5-fluorouracil with oral S-1 in the triplet regimen. • In this Ph I/IIa trial, patients with advanced PDAC received 1 L NASOX every 2 weeks. • RP2D: nal-IRI 50 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on D1, S-1 40 mg/m2 BID on D1–7. • ORR was 58.5 %, median PFS was 6.5 months, and median OS was 11.4 months. • Safety profiles were manageable. • NASOX may improve patient convenience while showing efficacy comparable to NALIRIFOX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) is a novel regimen for pancreatic cancer, featuring a longer half-life and an increased area under the concentration-time curve. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of nal-IRI as a second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. A systemic literature search was conducted based on articles published before September 26th, 2023 in databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science. The fixed effects model was used to calculate the pooled mean difference for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the pooled odds ratio for the overall response rate (ORR) and the risk of adverse events. A total of 21 studies, including 3044 patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancers, were considered eligible. The use of nal-IRI, combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, resulted in significantly improved PFS (pooled mean difference=1.01 months, 95 % confidence interval [CI]=0.97–1.05, p< 0.01) and OS (pooled mean difference=0.29 months, 95 %CI=0.18–0.39, p <0.01), as well as significantly better ORR (pooled odds ratio=2.06, 95 %CI=1.30–3.27, p =0.002) compared to other second-line regimens. Nonetheless, an increased risk of grade 3 or greater neutropenia, anemia, hypokalemia, diarrhea, and vomiting was also noted. Second-line treatments based on nal-IRI exhibited significantly improved PFS, OS, and ORR compared to other available treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer. Further research is necessary to corroborate these findings and define the role of nal-IRI in both first and later lines of therapy. [Display omitted] • Liposomal irinotecan resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (pooled mean difference=1.01 months, 95 % CI=0.97–1.05). • Liposomal irinotecan showed significantly better overall survival (pooled mean difference=0.29 months (95 % CI=0.18–0.39). • The use of liposomal irinotecan led to better overall response rate (pooled odds ratio=2.06, 95 % CI=1.30–3.27). • Increased risks of neutropenia, anemia, hypokalemia, diarrhea, and vomiting were noted in patients on liposomal irinotecan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately 80% of pancreatic cancer is diagnosed at an advanced stage, due to lack of or vague symptoms when the cancer is still localized, leading to a high mortality rate. Known risk factors for developing pancreatic cancer are family history, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and alcohol and tobacco use. There has been a remarkable development in diagnosis modalities and molecular testing, but early detection is still infrequent. The majority of clinical trials have not shown significant efficacy in pancreatic cancer, and treatment strategy remains limited. Additional prognostic factors should be highlighted to obtain appropriate treatment options, including precision medicine, and improve survival outcomes. After the PRODIGE study in 2011 and the MPAC trial in 2013, a new drug (liposomal irinotecan; Onivyde ®) appeared in the strategy, especially after failure of gemcitabine-based treatment. In 2016, the NAPOLI-1 trial showed evidence of the efficacy of the liposomal irinotecan combination (liposomal irinotecan +5-fluorouracile + folinic acid); now, it is considered the standard treatment for relapsing patients. Since NAPOLI-1, real-world data have provided similar results. Herein, we report the story of a 61-year-old woman who was treated with liposomal irinotecan combination (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV) for 8 months with good surgical response, but treatment was discontinued due to economic burden. After the start of treatment (or 1? cycle of liposomal irinotecan treatment), the patient was in a better condition. The liver metastases had disappeared. The combination with liposomal irinotecan was re-administered with patient’s approval. Upon rechallenge with the liposomal irinotecan combination, she showed a partial response, and the treatment was given for 7 months. In this report, we tried to identify the prognostic factors leading to the efficacy of the liposomal irinotecan combination.

Background: Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst prognoses of any all cancers. 5-FU/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel regimens have been recognized as global-standard, first-line treatments for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-FU/LV regimen is now included in treatment guidelines as a recommended and approved option for use in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that has progressed after GEM-based therapy and who have a suitable performance status and comorbidity profile. There is no report that nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen was significantly effective, and we will report it because we experienced this time. Case presentation: A 69-year-old man presented with epigastric pain, and a contrast computed tomography (CT) revealed an enhanced mass lesion measuring 33 × 27 mm on the pancreatic body with encasement of the common hepatic artery (CHA) and the splenic vein. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was performed and demonstrated cytology consistent with adenocarcinoma. Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The patient received the GEM and S-1 regimen; however, the adverse event was relatively severe. Then, 11 cycles of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen were administered. A CT scan revealed that the tumor had shrunk to 18 × 7 mm in diameter with encasement of the CHA. The encasement of the splenic vein had disappeared, without any distant metastases. From this post-chemotherapy evaluation and intraoperative frozen section of around the celiac artery, gastroduodenal artery and pancreas stump confirmed absence of tumor cells, we performed distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection. A histological examination of the surgical specimen revealed no evidence of residual adenocarcinoma, consistent with a pathological complete response to treatment. Conclusions: We present the first case of a pathological complete response with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In the future, nal-IRI may become a key drug for pancreatic cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The preferred regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer following gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is not well-established. This study compared the efficacy of (ⅰ) liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV) versus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) and (ⅱ) nal-IRI/5-FU/LV versus FOLFIRI, respectively, and the safety of the three regimens each other, as second-line chemotherapies for unresectable pancreatic cancer. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients who were administered nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, mFFX, or FOLFIRI from December 2014 to July 2021 as second-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) of all patients, excluding those with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Regarding safety, we assessed the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events of interest in all patients. A total of 137 patients (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, n = 55; mFFX, n = 39; FOLFIRI, n = 43) were included. The median OS in the nal-IRI/5-FU/LV group, the mFFX group, and the FOLFIRI group was 7.4, 11.8, and 8.4 months, respectively. Compared with the nal-IRI/5-FU/LV group, the mFFX and FOLFIRI groups displayed a hazard ratio of 0.66 [95% confidence interval 0.40–1.08] and 0.87 [95% confidence interval 0.55–1.39], respectively. In the FOLFIRI group, the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events tended to be low among all three groups. Given the trend toward longer OS in the mFFX group and the lower incidence of adverse events in the FOLFIRI group, both mFFX and FOLFIRI, as well as nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, can be treatment options for second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is a kind of malignant tumor that originates in the epithelium of the biliary tract. Although there are several options for second-line treatment for patients without specific genetic mutations, the overall treatment efficacy is disappointing. Second-line treatment which is composed of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin significantly improved the treatment efficacy for advanced biliary tract cancer and extended patient survival. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of cadonilimab with liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced biliary tract cancer., Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to determine the objective response rate. The second objectives of this study are overall survival, progression-free survival, disease control rate, and adverse event incidence rate., Design: The study is a single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial. In all, 51 patients who are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic bile tract cancer will be enrolled., Methods and Analysis: Eligible participants will receive cadonilimab at a dosage of 6 mg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle combined with intravenous liposomal irinotecan at a dosage of 70 mg/m 2 for 90 min on day 1 plus leucovorin at a dosage of 400 mg/m 2 for 30 min on day 1 and fluorouracil at a dosage of 400 mg/m 2 for 46 h every 2 weeks., Discussion: Previous studies have suggested that there is a synergistic effect between the two treatment modalities. However, the potential of cadonilimab in bile tract cancer has not been explored. Hence, this trial is the first to investigate its efficacy and toxicity. In addition, the trial is also willing to explore potential biomarkers in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bile tract cancer., Trial Registration: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with NCT06438822., Ethics: This study protocol and amendments have been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital (2024(791))., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Purpose: While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head., Materials and Methods: We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens., Results: A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p =0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, 95% CI 0.93-2.07, p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, 95% CI 0.92-2.03, p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy., Conclusion: Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Background: This was a multicenter, single-arm dose-ranging phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LY01610, a liposomal irinotecan, at various doses for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC)., Methods: This study (NCT04381910) enrolled patients with relapsed SCLC at 10 hospitals across China, who have failed with previous platinum-based treatments. LY01610 was administered at doses of 60 mg/m 2 , 80 mg/m 2 , and 100 mg/m 2 . Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and investigator-assessed duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR), investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety., Findings: From September 3, 2020 to March 3, 2022, a total of 66 patients were enrolled, with 6, 30, and 30 allocated to the 60 mg/m 2 , 80 mg/m 2 , and 100 mg/m 2 dose groups, respectively, with 68% (45/66) having a chemotherapy-free interval <90 days. In all 66 patients, the ORR was 32% (21/66, 95% confidence interval [CI], 21-44), with a median DoR of 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-8.3). Median PFS and OS were 4.0 (95% CI, 2.9-5.5) and 9.7 (95% CI, 7.2-12.3) months, respectively. The ORR of 60 mg/m 2 , 80 mg/m 2 , and 100 mg/m 2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 33% (10/30), and 30% (9/30), respectively. The median DoR of 60 mg/m 2 , 80 mg/m 2 , and 100 mg/m 2 dose group were 4.2 (95% CI, 2.8-not reached), 6.9 (95% CI, 2.5-9.9), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.7-6.8) months, respectively. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the 60 mg/m 2 , 80 mg/m 2 , and 100 mg/m 2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 47% (14/30), and 50% (15/30), respectively. The most common ≥ grade 3 TRAEs of all 66 patients were neutropenia (27%), leukopenia (24%) and anemia (15%)., Interpretation: LY01610 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with relapsed SCLC, the 80 mg/m 2 dose group had the best benefit-risk ratio., Funding: This study was supported by Luye Pharma Group Ltd., Competing Interests: All the authors declare no conflicting of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Abstract Background According to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to haematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefits and toxicity of this regimen in real-world settings. In this study, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure. Methods We conducted a single institution, retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80 mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to obtain median progression free survival and median overall survival. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a stratified Cox regression model. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify the effects of clinical factors. Results Fifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.8–3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0–7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (58.8%). Most non-haematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1–18.4). Conclusions Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, following gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel is a feasible sequential treatment option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs) can negatively impact the care of patients. The prevention and management of AEs often require additional medications. This study evaluated the percentages of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) undergoing second-line therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens that experienced AEs during treatment and received medication to manage those AEs. We conducted a retrospective observational analysis utilizing the Flatiron Health database of adult patients with mPDAC who started second-line therapy between January 2016 and August 2020. The occurrence of diarrhea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, neuropathy, and hematologic AEs including G3/G4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was assessed. The use of concomitant medications including atropine and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was assessed. Of the 825 eligible patients, 29.0% (n = 239) received FOLFIRINOX, 24.0% (n = 198) received FOLFOX, 6.8% (n = 56) received FOLFIRI, and 40.2% (n = 332) received liposomal irinotecan-based regimens. FOLFIRI and FOLFIRINOX regimens were associated with the highest rates of anemia (16.1% and 15.5%), neutropenia (19.6% and 22.6%), and thrombocytopenia (14.3% and 9.6%). The liposomal irinotecan and FOLFOX regimens were associated with lower rates of anemia (11.8% and 12.1%), neutropenia (12.4% and 14.7%), and thrombocytopenia (2.4% and 8.1%). G-CSF use was observed among 63.6%, 34.9%, 33.9%, and 44.9% of patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and liposomal irinotecan-based regimens, respectively. Diarrhea was observed among 12.5%, 4.5%, 12.5%, and 10.2% of patients who were treated with FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and liposomal irinotecan-based regimens, respectively. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 14.9%, 12.6%, 10.5%, and 13.1% of patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and liposomal irinotecan-based regimens, respectively. Atropine use was higher in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX and FOLFIRI (90.8% and 94.6%, respectively) than in patients treated with liposomal irinotecan-based regimens (75.6%). In patients with mPDAC who received second-line therapy, those who received liposomal irinotecan-based regimens had the lowest rates of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia compared to FOLFIRI, FOLFIRINOX, and FOLFOX, while requiring a similar or lower level of medication to treat and manage those adverse events. Patients treated with FOLFIRI received the highest dose of pegfilgrastim to manage neutropenia. The results of this real-world analysis are consistent with prior evaluations of patients with mPDAC and highlight the importance of managing adverse events and associated cost implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent studies have suggested the suboptimal efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV) in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan. This study investigated the effect of conventional irinotecan treatment in mPDAC patients receiving nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV by analyzing a population‐based dataset. Methods: We reviewed 667 consecutive mPDAC patients treated with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV between August 2018 and November 2020 at Taiwanese medical centers. Eighty‐six patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan were matched to 86 patients not treated with conventional irinotecan, following propensity matching for age, sex, performance status, metastatic organ site, pre‐treatment carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 level, lines of prior chemotherapy treatment, and time from first‐line treatment to nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV therapy. Results: The median overall survival and time‐to‐treatment failure were 4.8 and 2.6 vs 4.1 and 2.1 months, respectively, for patients who were and were not previously treated with conventional irinotecan. The tumor response and disease control rates were 5.8% and 32.6% vs 5.8% and 37.2%, respectively, for patients previously treated and not treated with conventional irinotecan. No significant differences were observed in survival times and tumor response rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Previous conventional irinotecan treatment does not compromise the efficacy of subsequent nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV treatment in mPDAC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: RESILIENT (NCT03088813) is a phase 2/3 study assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan monotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression on/after first‐line platinum‐based therapy. Here, we present results from RESILIENT part 1. Methods: This open‐label, single‐arm, safety run‐in evaluation with dose‐exploration and dose‐expansion phases included patients ≥18 years old with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1; those with asymptomatic central nervous system metastases were eligible. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and recommend a dose for further development. Efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: During dose exploration, 5 patients received intravenous liposomal irinotecan at 85 mg/m2 (deemed not tolerable; dose‐limiting toxicity) and 12 patients received 70 mg/m2 (deemed tolerable). During dose expansion, 13 additional patients received intravenous liposomal irinotecan at 70 mg/m2. Of these 25 patients (median age [range], 59.0 [48.0‐73.0] years, 92.0% with metastatic disease), 10 experienced grade ≥3 treatment‐related treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly diarrhea (20.0%) and neutropenia (16.0%), and 3 had serious treatment‐related TEAEs, of whom 2 died. ORR was 44.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.40‐65.07; 1 complete response, 10 partial responses) and median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 3.98 (1.45‐4.24) months and 8.08 (5.16‐9.82) months, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, no new safety signals were identified with liposomal irinotecan, and antitumor activity was promising. RESILIENT part 2, a randomized, controlled, phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan versus topotecan, is ongoing. Lay Summary: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with few treatment options after platinum‐based therapy.Administering 1 option, irinotecan, as a "liposomal" formulation, may extend drug exposure and improve outcomes.The RESILIENT part 1 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan in 25 adults with SCLC after disease progression despite platinum‐based therapy.No new safety concerns were reported.The most common moderate‐to‐severe side effects were diarrhea (20% of patients) and neutropenia (16%).Tumors responded to treatment in 44% of patients.Average survival was 8.08 months, and time to disease progression was 3.98 months.Liposomal irinotecan trials are ongoing. The phase 1/2 RESILIENT part 1 trial identified no new safety signals with liposomal irinotecan in adult patients with small cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed despite treatment with platinum‐based therapy. The response of tumors to treatment was promising (observed in 44% of patients) and is under further investigation in RESILIENT part 2, a randomized, controlled, phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan versus topotecan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare but aggressive. Due to limited anti-tumor effects of current second- and later-line treatment regimens, novel treatment options are required. Nanoliposomal irinotecan in combination with leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFnal-IRI) achieved promising results as a second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer, warranting further investigation in BTC. In the present study, a retrospective analysis of patients receiving FOLFnal-IRI after initial platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced BTC between January 2016 and August 2020 at the University Hospital Cologne (Cologne, Germany) was performed. A total of 11 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. A total of 4 patients (36.4%) were female and the median age was 54 years. The proportion of patients suffering from gallbladder carcinoma, intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was 18.2, 63.6 and 9.1%, respectively. Furthermore, 7 patients (63.6%) received FOLFnal-IRI as their second-, 3 (27.3%) as third- and one (9.1%) as their fourth-line therapy. The disease control rate was 54.5% and 3 grade III toxicities were recorded. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) after initiation of FOLFnal-IRI was 5.1 and 12.4 months, respectively. OS after initial diagnosis was 24.7 months. FOLFnal-IRI demonstrated promising antitumor potential with an acceptable safety profile as a subsequent therapy regimen in advanced biliary tract malignancies. Further randomized controlled trials of its value as a treatment option for BTC appear justified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is currently the standard second-line treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after previous failed gemcitabine-based therapy. This population-based study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV and the association of pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing with treatment outcomes in patients with PDAC. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 667 consecutive patients with PDAC who received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV treatment between August 2018 and November 2020 at 9 medical centers in Taiwan. Patients were allocated into groups according to pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing (⩾75%, 50–74%, <50%) for comparison of treatment efficacy and safety. Results: The median overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 5.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3–6.5] and 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6–3.0), respectively. The median OS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.7–6.7), 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.4–6.5), and 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.7–5.6), respectively, among the ⩾75%, 50–74%, and <50% pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing groups, whereas the median TTF of the three groups was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6–3.4), 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.3–2.9), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.6–2.2), respectively. Pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing <50% was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and TTF in multivariate analyses. The most common severe adverse events were neutropenia (22.9%), anemia (21.1%), and hypokalemia (15.4%). Patients in the <50% pre-emptive nal-IRI dosing group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia and non-neutropenic infection than those in the other groups. Conclusion: Our results support the use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV as standard clinical practice for treating patients with PDAC based on this large population-based study. Our findings encourage physicians to provide adequate doses of nal-IRI in order to achieve better outcomes without compromising safety profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: According to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who were previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to haematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefits and toxicity of this regimen in real-world settings. In this study, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure.Methods: We conducted a single institution, retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80 mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to obtain median progression free survival and median overall survival. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a stratified Cox regression model. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify the effects of clinical factors.Results: Fifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.8-3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (58.8%). Most non-haematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1-18.4).Conclusions: Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, following gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel is a feasible sequential treatment option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Upfront surgery followed by postoperative treatment is a commonly adopted treatment for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC). However, the risk of positive surgical margins, the poor recovery that often impairs postoperative treatments, and the risk of recurrence might limit the outcome of this strategy. This study evaluated the safety and the activity of liposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m2 + 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 + leucovorin 400 mg/m2 + oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 (NALIRIFOX) in the perioperative treatment of patients with rPDAC. Eligible patients had a rPDAC with < 180° interface with major veins' wall. Patients received 3 cycles before and 3 cycles after resection with NALIRIFOX, days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients undergoing an R0 resection. 107 patients began preoperative treatment. Nine patients discontinued the treatment because of related or unrelated adverse events. Disease-control rate was 92.9%. 87 patients underwent surgical exploration, 11 had intraoperative evidence of metastatic disease, and 1 died for surgical complications. R0 resection rate was 65.3%. 49 patients completed the three postoperative cycles. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were diarrhea and neutropenia. Median overall survival (OS) of ITT patients was 32.3 months (95% CI 27.8–44.3). Median disease-free and OS from surgery of resected patients were 19.3 (95% CI 12.6–34.1) and 40.3 months (95% CI 29-NA), respectively. Perioperative NALIRIFOX was manageable and active, and deserves further investigation in randomized trials comparing it with standard upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. • Improvements in resectable pancreatic cancer (rPDAC) require active perioperative strategies. • nITRO, an investigator-initiated phase 2 study, evaluated NALIRIFOX in patients with rPDAC. • The rate of R0 resections – the primary endpoint – was high at 65.3%. • These results support perioperative NALIRIFOX in patients with rPDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Multiple preclinical studies have shown cytotoxic synergy involving combinations of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) inhibitors, but such combinations have proven too toxic in clinical trials. Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) achieved similar intratumoral exposure with better antitumor activity than the conventional TOP1 inhibitor irinotecan in preclinical models. Tumor targeted delivery of TOP1 inhibitor using nal-IRI and an intermittent schedule of administration of PARP inhibitor may provide a tolerable combination. Methods A phase I study was performed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of nal-IRI and the PARP inhibitor veliparib in patients with solid tumors resistant to standard treatments. Nal-IRI was administered on days 1 and 15 and veliparib on days 5-12 and 19-25 in 28-day cycles. Results Eighteen patients were enrolled across 3 dose levels. Five patients encountered dose–limiting toxicities, including grade 3 diarrhea lasting more than 72 h in 3 patients and 1 patient each with grade 4 diarrhea and grade 3 hyponatremia. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea (50% of patients), nausea (16.6%), anorexia, and vomiting (11.1% each) (Table 1). There was no difference in frequencies of adverse events based on UGT1A1*28 status or prior opioid use (Table 1). Conclusion The clinical trial was terminated due to high frequency of unacceptable gastrointestinal toxicities, which precluded dose escalation of veliparib in combination with nal-IRI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631733). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy of combination chemotherapy beyond the first-line setting remains modest in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). Evidence from recent clinical studies has shown that liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) resulted in survival benefits in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APAC) after progression on gemcitabine-based treatment. However, the survival benefits of nal-IRI in the third and later lines, in which limited options are available, have yet to be extensively studied. Also, some studies have shown conflicting results regarding the impact of prior treatment with conventional IRI on patient outcomes following treatment with nal-IRI. Therefore, this real-world study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI plus 5FU-LV in advanced PAC patients who progressed on conventional IRI-containing regimens., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted between November 2016 to December 2022 on 30 patients diagnosed with advanced PAC who completed at least one cycle of nal-IRI plus 5-FU- LV and were previously treated with conventional IRI. Data regarding survival outcomes were retrieved., Results: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 76.7% of the patients received at least two lines of therapy prior to nal-IRI. The median overall duration of nal-IRI treatment was 2.0 months (IQR: 1.3 - 3.9 months). One patient (3.3%) had a partial response, and seven patients (23.3%) had stable disease as their best response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.6 - 2.0) and the 6-month PFS rate was 20.0%. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.0 months (95% CI 3.4 - 7.0), and the 6-month OS rate was 36.7%. An interval between conventional IRI and nal-IRI ≥5.5 months was significantly associated with prolonged OS of 10.2 months (95% CI 3.3 - 12.1) versus 4.3 months (95% CI 2.1 - 5.9; p =0.003). Ten patients (33.3%) experienced grade 3 adverse events, most commonly nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, and non-neutropenic fever., Conclusion: Nal-IRI plus 5FU/LV had modest survival benefits and an acceptable safety profile in patients with prior conventional IRI. A longer interval between conventional IRI and nal-IRI was associated with increased survival outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Gupta, De Jesus-Acosta, Zheng, Lee, Kamel, Le, Pishvaian and Laheru.)

Background: The prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment., Methods: Patients with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67 > 20%; Grade 3) received IV liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) (70 mg/m 2 free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m 2 )/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75 mg/m 2 ), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (80% power to demonstrate one-sided 95% lower confidence interval excluded 15% (target level of efficacy: 30%)). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), median PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03837977)., Findings: Of 58 patients (29 each arm); 57% male, 90% ECOG PS 0/1, 10% PS 2, 89.7% Ki-67 ≥ 55%, primary site: 70.7%-gastrointestinal, 18.9%-other, 10.3%-unknown, 91.4%/6.9%/1.7% were resistant/sensitive/intolerant to 1L platinum-based treatment, respectively. The primary end-point of 6-month PFS rate was met by ARM A: 29.6% (lower 95% Confidence-Limit (CL) 15.7), but not by ARM B: 13.8% (lower 95%CL:4.9). ORR, median PFS and OS were 11.1% (95%CI:2.4-29.2) and 10.3% (95%CI:2.2-27.4%); 3 months (95%CI:2-6) and 2 months (95%CI:2-2); and 6 months (95%CI:3-10) and 6 months (95%CI:3-9) in ARMS A and B, respectively. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 51.7% and 55.2% (1 and 6 discontinuations due to toxicity in ARMS A and B), respectively. QoL was maintained in ARM A, but not ARM B., Interpretation: nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicity and maintained QoL, with no difference in OS. ORR and median PFS were similar in both arms. This study provides prospective efficacy, toxicity and QoL data in the 2L setting in a disease group of unmet need, and represents some of the strongest evidence available to recommend systemic treatment to these patients., Funding: Servier., Competing Interests: Mairéad G McNamara: has received research grant support from Servier, Ipsen, NuCana and Astra Zeneca. She has received travel and accommodation support from Advanced Accelerator Applications (UK and Ireland) Ltd, and Ipsen, and speaker honoraria from Advanced Accelerator Applications (UK and Ireland) Ltd.. She has served on advisory boards for Incyte and Astra Zeneca. Jayne Swain: reports grants and non-financial support from Servier, during the conduct of the study. Zoe Craig: reports grants and non-financial support from Servier, during the conduct of the study. Rohini Sharma: has received grant support from AAA, Incyte, Boston Scientific, Bayer and Terumo. She has received speaker honoraria from Roche and Esai. Olusola Faluyi: no conflicts of interest to declare. Jonathan Wadsley: reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, speaker and advisory board honoraria from Astrazeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Ipsen, Roche, Bayer, Esteve, Lilly and Eisai. Carys Morgan: no conflicts of interest to declare. Lucy R Wall: no conflicts of interest to declare. Ian Chau: reports advisory role for Eli-Lilly, Bristol Meyers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Roche, Merck-Serono, Five Prime Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Oncologie International, Pierre Fabre; research funding from Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi Oncology, Merck-Serono; honorarium from Eli-Lilly. Nick Reed: no conflicts of interest to declare. Debashis Sarker: reports personal fees from MSD, personal fees and non-financial support from EISAI, personal fees and non-financial support from Ipsen, personal fees from Bayer, non-financial support from Mina Therapeutics, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis. Jane Margetts: no conflicts of interest to declare. Daniel Krell: no conflicts of interest to declare. Judith Cave: reports educational support from Amgen. Sharmila Sothi: no conflicts of interest to declare. Alan Anthoney: no conflicts of interest to declare. Chris Bell: no conflicts of interest to declare. Alkesh Patel: no conflicts of interest to declare. Jamie B Oughton: reports grants and/or non-financial support from Servier, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Bayer. David Cairns: reports grants and non-financial support from Servier, during the conduct of the study. Wasat Mansoor: no conflicts of interest to declare. Angela Lamarca: has received travel and educational support from Ipsen, Pfizer, Bayer, AAA, SirtEx, Novartis, Mylan and Delcath; speaker honoraria from Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen, Incyte, AAA, QED and Servier; advisory honoraria from EISAI, Nutricia Ipsen, QED, Roche and Servier; she is a member of the Knowledge Network and NET Connect Initiatives funded by Ipsen. Richard A Hubner: has served on the advisory boards for Roche, BMS, Eisai, Celgene, Beigene, Ipsen and BTG. He has received speaker fees from Eisai, Ipsen, Mylan, PrimeOncology and has received travel and educational support from Bayer, BMS and Roche. Juan W Valle: has had consulting or advisory roles for Agios, AstraZeneca, Delcath Systems, Keocyt, Genoscience Pharma, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Mundipharma EDO, Novartis, PCI Biotech, Pfizer, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, QED and Wren Laboratories. He is on speakers’ bureaus for Imaging Equipment Limited, Ipsen, Novartis and Nucana; and has received travel grants from Celgene and Nucana., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Combination therapeutic mode is likely to be the key to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in a wider range of cancer patients. Herein, we conducted an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial that enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors who had progressed after standard treatments., Methods: Radiotherapy of 24 Gy/3 fractions/3-10 days was given to the targeted lesions. Liposomal irinotecan (80mg/m 2 , dose could be adjusted to 60 mg/m 2 for intolerable cases) was intravenously (IV) administered once within 48 hours after radiotherapy. Then, camrelizumab (200mg IV, q3w) and anti-angiogenic drugs were given regularly until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in the target lesions evaluated by investigators per RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)., Results: Between November 2020 and June 2022, 60 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5-12.5). Of 52 evaluable patients, the overall ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 82.7%, respectively. Fifty patients with target lesions were evaluable, the ORR and DCR of the target lesions were 35.3% and 82.4%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.6, 6.2), and the median overall survival was not reached. TRAEs (all grades) occurred in 55 (91.7%) patients. The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were lymphopenia (31.7%), anemia (10.0%), and leukopenia (10.0%)., Conclusion: The combination of radiotherapy, liposomal irinotecan, camrelizumab, and anti-angiogenesis therapy demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity and well tolerance in various advanced solid tumors., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home, identifier NCT04569916., Competing Interests: HL and YL are employed by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer (SW) declared a shared parent affiliation with the authors (JS, JY, JD, JW, QL, XW, XC, ZD, WS, CL, SZ, JG, RL and BL) to the handling editor at the time of the review., (Copyright © 2023 Shen, Yan, Du, Li, Wei, Liu, Yong, Wang, Chang, Ding, Sun, Liu, Zhu, Guo, Li, Liu, Zhang, Liu, Li and Liu.)

Background: Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) was recently authorized in Japan for unresectable pancreatic cancer after disease progression following chemotherapy. Physicians now consider certain aspects of nal-IRI safety profile as slightly different from conventional irinotecan. This report aims to explore additional aspects of the nal-IRI safety in Japanese phase 2 study., Methods: We analyzed the incidence, time to first onset, and time to resolution for adverse events that require special attention and other selected toxicities in the nal-IRI combination group (n = 46)., Results: Leukopenia/neutropenia (76.1%/71.7%), diarrhea (58.7%) and hepatic dysfunction (41.3%) were the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events, with a median time to onset of 21.0 days (range: 8, 97), 9.0 days (1, 61) and 22.0 days (2, 325), respectively, and a median time to resolution of 8.0 days (95% confidence intervals: 8, 9), 4.0 days (4, 8) and 40.0 days (9, -), respectively. Eight patients experienced Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea and their symptoms were well controlled by dose modification except one patient who had drug withdrawal. The median time to resolution for Grade ≥ 3 and Grade ≤ 2 diarrhea was 17.5 days (95% confidence intervals: 1, 31) and 4 days (3, 7), respectively. Anorexia occurred in 28/46 patients (60.9%) with a median time to onset of 4.0 days (range: 2, 132) and a median time to resolution of 12.0 days (95% confidence intervals: 6, 26)., Conclusions: We explored safety profile of nal-IRI combination regimen recognized as effective and tolerable treatment for Japanese unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. Although the treatment-emergent adverse events occurred were controllable, patients with prolonged toxicities should be closely managed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) treatment has demonstrated survival benefits but noticeable side effects in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that is refractory to gemcitabine-based therapy. This study aimed to explore whether combining albumin with the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), herein known as the albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio score (ANS), could be utilized as a simple tool to predict survival and safety profiles in such patient groups. We retrospectively enrolled 434 consecutive PDAC patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between 2018 and 2020 at nine medical centers in Taiwan. Patients were divided into three groups: ANS 0 (high albumin and low NLR), ANS 1 (low albumin or high NLR), and ANS 2 (low albumin and high NLR), for comparison. The median overall survival times for the ANS 0, 1, and 2 groups were 8.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0-10.3 months), 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-6.0 months), and 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.3 months), respectively. The ANS was found to be an independent variable for overall survival and time-to-treatment failure in multivariate analyses. Patients in the ANS 2 group had significantly higher incidences of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events than those in the other two groups. The present study showed that the ANS was an independent prognosticator in PDAC patients receiving nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy. The ANS can be a simple predictor of survival outcome and safety profiles in PDAC patients treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV., Competing Interests: Author Sz-Chi Chiu was employed by the company PharmaEngine, Inc. The remaining authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (AJCR Copyright © 2022.)

Background: The preferred regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer following gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is not well-established. This study compared the efficacy of (ⅰ) liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV) versus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) and (ⅱ) nal-IRI/5-FU/LV versus FOLFIRI, respectively, and the safety of the three regimens each other, as second-line chemotherapies for unresectable pancreatic cancer., Methods: This was a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients who were administered nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, mFFX, or FOLFIRI from December 2014 to July 2021 as second-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) of all patients, excluding those with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Regarding safety, we assessed the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events of interest in all patients., Results: A total of 137 patients (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, n = 55; mFFX, n = 39; FOLFIRI, n = 43) were included. The median OS in the nal-IRI/5-FU/LV group, the mFFX group, and the FOLFIRI group was 7.4, 11.8, and 8.4 months, respectively. Compared with the nal-IRI/5-FU/LV group, the mFFX and FOLFIRI groups displayed a hazard ratio of 0.66 [95% confidence interval 0.40-1.08] and 0.87 [95% confidence interval 0.55-1.39], respectively. In the FOLFIRI group, the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events tended to be low among all three groups., Conclusions: Given the trend toward longer OS in the mFFX group and the lower incidence of adverse events in the FOLFIRI group, both mFFX and FOLFIRI, as well as nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, can be treatment options for second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have no known competing financial interests, personal relationships, or competing interests that could have influenced the work reported in this study., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent studies have suggested the suboptimal efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan. This study investigated the effect of conventional irinotecan treatment in mPDAC patients receiving nal-IRI+5-FU/LV by analyzing a population-based dataset., Methods: We reviewed 667 consecutive mPDAC patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV between August 2018 and November 2020 at Taiwanese medical centers. Eighty-six patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan were matched to 86 patients not treated with conventional irinotecan, following propensity matching for age, sex, performance status, metastatic organ site, pre-treatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, lines of prior chemotherapy treatment, and time from first-line treatment to nal-IRI+5-FU/LV therapy., Results: The median overall survival and time-to-treatment failure were 4.8 and 2.6 vs 4.1 and 2.1 months, respectively, for patients who were and were not previously treated with conventional irinotecan. The tumor response and disease control rates were 5.8% and 32.6% vs 5.8% and 37.2%, respectively, for patients previously treated and not treated with conventional irinotecan. No significant differences were observed in survival times and tumor response rates between the two groups., Conclusions: Previous conventional irinotecan treatment does not compromise the efficacy of subsequent nal-IRI+5-FU/LV treatment in mPDAC patients., (© 2022 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)