Search

In emergency departments (EDs), one of the major reasons behind long waiting times and crowding overall is the time it takes to move admitted patients from the ED to an appropriate bed in the main hospital. In "Using Hospital Admission Predictions at Triage for Improving Patient Length of Stay in Emergency Departments," Chen et al. develop a methodology that can be used to shorten these times by predicting the likelihood of admission for each patient at the time of triage and starting the process of identifying a suitable hospital bed and making preparations for the patient's eventual transfer to the bed right away if the predicted probability of admission is deemed high enough. A simulation study suggests that the proposed methodology, particularly when it takes into account ED census levels, has the potential to shorten average waiting times in the ED without leading to too many false early bed requests. Long boarding times have long been recognized as one of the main reasons behind emergency department (ED) crowding. One of the suggestions made in the literature to reduce boarding times was to predict, at the time of triage, whether a patient will eventually be admitted to the hospital and if the prediction turns out to be "admit," start preparations for the patient's transfer to the main hospital early in the ED visit. However, there has been no systematic effort in developing a method to help determine whether an estimate for the probability of admit would be considered high enough to request a bed early, whether this determination should depend on ED census, and what the potential benefits of adopting such a policy would be. This paper aims to help fill this gap. The methodology we propose estimates hospital admission probabilities using standard logistic regression techniques. To determine whether a given probability of admission is high enough to qualify a bed request early, we develop and analyze two mathematical decision models. Both models are simplified representations and thus, do not lead to directly implementable policies. However, building on the solutions to these simple models, we propose two policies that can be used in practice. Then, using data from an academic hospital ED in the southeastern United States, we develop a simulation model, investigate the potential benefits of adopting the two policies, and compare their performances with that under a simple benchmark policy. We find that both policies can bring modest to substantial benefits, with the state-dependent policy outperforming the state-independent one particularly under conditions when the ED experiences more than usual levels of patient demand. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants CMMI-1234212 and CMMI-1635574]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2405. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]