Search

Objective: The aim of the present study is to determine similarities between patients with type 2 diabetes not on metformin therapy compared to patients on metformin therapy at a resident-led primary care clinic. Methods: An exploratory, single-center retrospective chart review was performed on patients 18 years and older with a documented diagnosis of type 2 diabetes seen at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Family Medicine Clinic in Little Rock, Arkansas. Of the 2452 patients who met criteria for the study, 1085 patients did not have a documented metformin allergy. A subset of 216 patients who were not currently prescribed metformin and had no documented metformin allergy were further examined and compared to the 869 patients who were prescribed metformin. We sought to determine reasons for nonuse by evaluating their EPIC electronic health record. Information on these patients such as race, gender, hemoglobin A1c (A1c), kidney function, stated metformin intolerance, and comorbid disease states such as neuropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), ulcerative colitis, and irritable bowel syndrome were collected. Further examination was performed to determine why patients were not on metformin therapy and potential similarities between metformin intolerant patients. Results: The results of the study indicated a significant difference between metformin users and non-users in relation to body mass index (BMI) and diagnosis of CKD. Metformin non-users were found to have significantly lower mean BMI (30.87 vs. 35.43; p-value <0.0001), and significantly higher rates of CKD (25.93% vs 14.73%; p-value <0.0001) as compared to metformin users. BMI value of patients (coefficient: 0.2033, p value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and positively correlated with metformin use, and CKD (coefficient: - 0.1191, p-value: <0.0001) was found to be significantly and negatively correlated with metformin use. A1c levels for patients not on metformin therapy were evaluated. Most non-metformin patients fell in prediabetic A1c levels ranging from 5-6.4% (84 patients; 38.89%), and 31 patients (14.35%) should be on insulin therapy according to guidelines. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that patients with lower BMI, CKD, or A1c in the prediabetic range were less likely to be prescribed metformin., (© Individual authors.)

Gastrectomy and esophagectomy are the most performed surgeries in the treatment of both esophageal and gastric cancers. The type of esophagectomy depends on the type of malignancy, site of the tumor, criteria of resection, and field of resection. The three standard approaches to esophagectomy are the transhiatal approach, the left thoracoabdominal approach, and a three-stage procedure. The transhiatal approach involves abdominal and cervical incisions, while the left thoracoabdominal approach is a one-stage procedure that utilizes a single incision exposing the dissection field. The Ivor Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies are two-stage and three-stage surgeries that include laparotomy with right thoracotomy. Malabsorption often emerges as a significant postoperative complication following esophagectomy and gastrectomy surgeries. Malnutrition linked with these cancers has detrimental effects, including heightened rates of postoperative complications, elevated infection risks, delayed wound healing, reduced tolerance to treatment, diminished quality of life, and heightened mortality rates. Our narrative review summarizes and sheds light on solutions to treat malabsorption disorders and malnutrition after gastric bypass surgery. These solutions include methods such as adjustments, supplements, and treatment. Although more research is needed to confirm their effectiveness, these methods indicate potential for lowering the impact on patients' diets. By considering the beneficial implications of these effects and considering solutions, we aim to improve the management of these adverse effects, ultimately improving the overall health and postoperative outcomes of patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Daniel et al.)

Purpose: This study assessed real-world survival among older patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs) at diagnosis (synchronous BM [SBM]) receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with chemotherapy only., Methods: Patients with NSCLC and SBM age 65 years or older at diagnosis from 2010 to 2019 SEER-Medicare database and received US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICIs (pembrolizumab/nivolumab/ipilimumab/atezolizumab/durvalumab/cemiplimab) and/or chemotherapy (platinum-based doublets/taxane/pemetrexed/gemcitabine) as first-line systemic treatment were included, excluding those with no cranial radiation or ever being treated with targeted therapies. Overall survival time was from the start of systemic treatment (ICI/chemotherapy) to death, censored at disenrollment from Medicare part A/B, enrollment in part C, or end of the study period (December 31, 2019). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were compared between treatment groups using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) between groups, adjusting for patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics., Results: The study included 1,481 patients (1,303 chemotherapy and 178 ICI). The median (range) age was 71 (65-91) years. First-line ICI patients were more likely to be older, live in urban areas, and less likely to be non-White than the chemotherapy group. KM estimates showed that survival curves initially overlapped but diverged approximately 6 months after initiating first-line systemic treatment (median survival [95% CI]: ICI, 190 [131 to 303] days versus chemotherapy, 189 [177 to 201] days), with ICI showing a better survival than the chemotherapy group (log-rank test P < .0001). First-line ICI was associated with a lower risk of death compared with chemotherapy in adjusted CPH model (HR [95% CI], 0.67 [0.55 to 0.80]; P < .0001)., Conclusion: Among older patients with NSCLC and SBM, first-line ICI use was associated with improved survival occurring 6 months after treatment initiation compared with chemotherapy only.