Search

Introduction: Our study aimed to investigate the effect of zonisamide (ZNS) on bone metabolism in the rat model. Methods: Eight-week-old rats were divided into four groups. The sham-operated control group (SHAM) and the control group after orchidectomy (ORX) received the standard laboratory diet (SLD). The experimental group after orchidectomy (ORX+ZNS) and the sham-operated control group (SHAM+ZNS) received SLD enriched with ZNS for 12 weeks. Bone marker concentrations in serum of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, PINP, and osteoprotegerin, and the levels of sclerostin and bone alkaline phosphatase in bone homogenate, were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The femurs were used for biomechanical testing. Results: We found a statistically significant reduction in BMD and biomechanical strength 12 weeks after orchidectomy of the rats (ORX). After ZNS administration to orchidectomized rats (ORX+ZNS) and the sham-operated control rats (SHAM+ZNS), there were no statistically significant changes in BMD, bone turnover markers, or biomechanical properties as compared with the ORX group and SHAM group. Conclusions: The results suggest that administration of ZNS to rats exerts no negative effect on BMD, bone metabolism markers, or biomechanical properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate off-label high-dose ceftazidime population pharmacokinetics in cancer patients with suspected or proven extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and then to compare the achievement of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target after standard and off-label high-dose regimens using population model-based simulations. A further aim was to clinically observe the occurrence of adverse effects during the off-label high-dose ceftazidime treatment. Methods: In patients treated with off-label high-dose ceftazidime (3 g every 6 h), blood samples were collected and ceftazidime serum levels measured using LC–MS/ MS. A pharmacokinetic population model was developed using a nonlinear mixedeffects modelling approach and Monte Carlo simulations were then used to compare standard and high-dose regimens for PK/PD target attainment. Results: A total of 14 cancer patients with serious infection suspected of XDR P. aeruginosa aetiology were eligible for PK analysis. XDR P. aeruginosa was confirmed in 10 patients as the causative pathogen. Population ceftazidime volume of distribution was 13.23 L, while clearance started at the baseline of 1.48 L/h and increased by 0.0076 L/h with each 1 mL/min/1.73 m² of eGFR. High-dose regimen showed significantly higher probability of target attainment (i.e., 86% vs. 56% at MIC of 32 mg/L). This was translated into a very low mortality rate of 20%. Only one case of reversible neurological impairment was observed. Conclusion: We proved the superiority of the ceftazidime off-label high-dose regimen in PK/PD target attainment with very low occurrence of adverse effects. The off-label high-dose regimen should be used to optimize treatment of XDR P. aeruginosa infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels <25 nmol/l in umbilical cord blood versus VLBW infants with 25(OH)D levels in cord blood >25 nmol/l. The secondary objective was to evaluate umbilical cord vitamin D as a risk factor for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. We examined 25(OH)D levels in umbilical cord blood and in infants' serum at discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. We evaluated the associations between severe vitamin D deficiency and various laboratory findings and clinical outcomes. Eighty one infants with birth weight less than 1500 g met the entry criteria for this study and were divided to groups according to umbilical cord blood vitamin D [Group A: 25(OH)D < 25 nmol/l; 10 ng/ml and Group B: 25(OH)D > 25 nmol/l; 10 ng/ml]. Overall, 81.5% of the infants had a 25(OH)D level <50 nmol/L and 44.4% had a level <25 nmol/L. The laboratory findings and the subsequent clinical outcomes were comparable in infants in both groups (non-significant difference). Only the infants in the 25(OH)D 25 nmol/L group had a lower calcium in urine at age 28 d (p=.0272). In addition, we found in this study that umbilical cord vitamin D level does not lead to a higher or lower risk of RDS (odds ratio 1.044; 95% confidence interval 0.349–0.88; p=.0771). In our prospective cohort study, we found no significant association between vitamin D status and selected clinical outcomes when using a cut-off of 25 nmol/l (severe vitamin D deficiency) in preterm infants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]