Search

Massimiliano Salati,1,2 Luigi Marcheselli,1 Carlo Messina,3 Valeria Merz,3,4 Marco Messina,5 Pietro Carotenuto,6 Francesco Caputo,1 Fabio Gelsomino,1 Andrea Spallanzani,1 Luca Reggiani Bonetti,7 Stefania Caramaschi,7 Gabriele Luppi,1 Massimo Dominici,1 Michele Ghidini8 1Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; 2PhD Program Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 3Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy; 4Digestive Molecular Clinical Oncology Research Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 5Oncology Unit, Fondazione San Raffaele-Giglio, Cefalu’, Palermo, Italy; 6Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Pozzuoli, 80078, Napoli, Italy; 7Pathology Section, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; 8Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalyCorrespondence: Massimiliano Salati, PhD Program Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Modena, Modena Cancer Centre, via del Pozzo 71, Modena, 41125, Italy, Tel +39/0594223808, Fax +39/0594222647, Email massimiliano.salati@unimore.itBackground: The role of second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancers (ABCs) has only recently been established in phase III randomized trial and the optimal selection of patients most likely to benefit from it remains challenging.Methods: A cohort of 98 ABC treated second-line chemotherapy was used as a developmental dataset to identify covariates independently associated with overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to investigate the association between variables and OS and those retaining statistically significance were combined in a multiplexed score.Results: The following pretreatment variables were independently associated with OS: ECOG PS > 0, peritoneal disease, LDH > 430 UI/L, albumin < 3.5 gr/dL, gamma-GT > 100 UI/L, sodium < 140 mEq/L, absolute lymphocyte count < 1000/mmc, and PFS to first-line < 6 months. Based on these results, a scoring system was developed that identified three subgroups with statistically different OS: low-risk (mOS 18 months), intermediate-risk (mOS 9.4 months) and high-risk (mOS 2.9 months) (p < 0.001). The prognostic model was both internally and externally validated in a multicentre cohort of 120 ABCs.Conclusion: The Modena score is a multiplexed scoring system capable of accurately risk-stratified ABCs treated with second-line chemotherapy. Based on its reproducibility, usability and generalizability, it has the potential for assisting therapeutic decision-making in the clinic and risk-stratification in future trials.Graphical Abstract: Keywords: biliary tract cancer, chemotherapy, second-line, prognostic score, survival

B Discussion: b MRD analysis and PET scan are independent and complementary prognostic tools in FL: a MRD positivity in the two years after immuno-chemotherapy is predictive of POD24 and dismal PFS independently from the EoI PET result. This means that patients scoring PET- at EoI but showing a persistent or reappearing MRD+ signal during the following 24 months had a dismal PFS, superimposable to that of PET+ patients (Figure 1C). B Introduction: b In follicular lymphoma (FL), FDG-PET is routinely employed to evaluate response at the end of induction (EoI), while minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis is highly reliable in predicting relapse over the entire disease history. [Extracted from the article]

In the whole population of 690 patients, the tMTV threshold to categorized low and high tumor burden was 224 and 194 ml with and without sMTV, respectively. During the segmentation procedure, it has been observed that frequently spleen MTV (sMTV) heavily influenced the tMTV value, particularly in case of diffuse spleen uptake included in tMTV calculation. [Extracted from the article]

B Aim: b To assess the prognostic value of the PET metabolic response using the Deauville Score at the end of induction (EoI) therapy. In the whole population, the 5 yrs PFS (95% CI) in DS1-2, DS 3 ad DS4-5 was 74% (69-78), 55% (44-65; HR1.90 (1.36-2.66) I p i < 0.001) and 37%(26-48; HR 4.01 (2.90-5.54) I p i < 0.001); DS3 patients had an intermediate 5 yrs PFS rates between those of DS1-2 and DS4-5 patients. B Conclusion: b In FOLL12 trial, EoI-PET according DS criteria was a reliable tool to stratify PFS and OS in advanced follicular lymphoma patients treated with immunochemotherapy; in addition, these data showed DS3 patients as a new category with an intermediate prognosis in terms of PFS. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: In the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy, a unique Hub and Spoke model was adopted to recognize BRCA-related breast cancer (BC) patients. Characteristics and outcomes of tumors identified by this model will be presented., Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study involved patients diagnosed with BRCA-related BC identified in the Emilia-Romagna region between January 2000 and December 2013. Seven provinces collected data on patient and tumor characteristics; clinical and gene testing information were also registered. Comparisons between BRCA1 and BRCA2 BC were performed. To balance different variants to identify significant predictors of survival, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis on Cox regression was conducted., Results: From 2000 to 2013, 284 BRCA-related BC were registered (171 BRCA1, 110 BRCA2, and 3 BRCA1 and BRCA2). BRCA1 were diagnosed at an earlier stage compared to BRCA2 (50.1 % vs 30 %, respectively, in stage I, P = 0.0015). BRCA2 patients underwent more up-front surgery (85 % vs. 74.9 %, P = 0.049) and less chemotherapy (69.1 % vs 88.9 %, P = 0.004) than BRCA1 patients. At 11.8 years median follow-up, BRCA1 patients developed more second contralateral BC (P = 0.09), while BRCA2 had more visceral relapses (P = 0.013). No differences in overall survival (OS) between BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients (P = 0.07) were found. An advantage in OS was independently seen for patients who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (P = 0.0001) and oophorectomy (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In conclusion, adopting a homogeneous regional framework provides important information about prevention and treatment strategies of BRCA-related BC and suggests using maximal surgery to improve OS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest LC: speaker honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Gilead, MSD; advisory role for Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, MSD, Amgen, Roche; GC, MV: no conflict of interest to disclose; AT: speaker honoraria from Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Seagen, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo; EB: travel grants from Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo; FT: no conflict of interest to disclose; AM: Honoraria: Eli-Lilly, Pfizer, Macrogenics, Seagen, and Daiichi Sankyo; institutional research funding: Roche, Eli-Lilly; UDG: Advisory Board: MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Bayer, Pfizer, Ipsen, Novartis, and Pharmamar. Institutional Research grants: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Roche; GB, VA: no conflict of interest to disclose; CZ: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events by Roche, Eisai, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Tesaro, Pierre Fabre, Ist. Gentili, Teva, Seagen, Eli Lilly, Celgene, MSD, GSK, Amgen, Daichii, Support for attending meetings and/or travel by Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Tesaro, Pierre Fabre, Ist. Gentili, Celgene, Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board by Roche, Eisai, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Amgen, Tesaro, QuintilesIms, Eli Lilly, Celgene, MSD, GSK, Daichii, Other financial or non-financial interests by Roche, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Amgen, Tesaro, QuintilesIms, MSD, GSK, Daichii. LC, MD: no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of the Deauville score (DS) in therapy response assessment and to define the prognostic value of the metabolic response of end of induction (EOI) [ 18 F]FDG PET (PET) in follicular lymphoma patients., Methods: Adult patients with untreated grade 1-3a FL/ stage II-IV enrolled in the multicentre, prospective, phase III FOLL12 trial (NCT02063685) were randomized to receive standard immunochemotherapy followed by rituximab maintenance (standard arm) versus standard immunochemotherapy followed by response-adapted post-induction management (experimental arm). Baseline and EOI PET were mandatory for the study. All PET scans were centralized on the WIDEN® platform and classified according to DS in a blind independent central review. DS1-3 was considered negative (CMR), whereas DS4-5 was considered positive (not CMR). The primary endpoint was PFS. The main secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS)., Results: Overall, 807 follicular lymphoma patients-52% women, 89% stage III-IV disease, 40% with a high-risk FLIPI-2 score (3-5)-were enrolled in the study; 729 (90.4%) baseline and EOI PET were available for the analysis. EOI PET was positive (DS4-5) in 88/729 (12.1%) cases. Overall inter-reviewer agreement on PET pos/neg result was 0.92, while agreement on positive and negative cases was 0.77 and 0.94, respectively. The median follow-up was 69 months; 247 events were registered in the 5-yr follow-up, with a 5-yr PFS of 67% (95%CI: 63%-70%). The 5-yr PFS rate for PET neg (DS1-3) and PET pos (DS4-5) patients was 71% (95%CI: 67%-75%) and 36% (95%CI: 25%-46%), respectively, with HR 3.49 (95%CI: 2.57-4.72). Five-year PFS was worse as DS increased, with 74% (70%-78%), 58% (48%-67%; HR 1.71; p = 0.001)] and 36% (25%-46%; HR 3.88; p < 0.001) in DS1-2, DS3 and DS4-5, respectively. EOI PET maintained its prognostic value in both the standard and experimental arms. In the whole population, 5-yr OS was 94% (95%CI: 92%-96%), with 96% (95%CI: 94-97) and 82% (95%CI: 72%-89%) in EOI PET negative (DS1-3) and positive (DS4-5), respectively (HR 4.48; p < 0.001). When DS was associated with FLIPI-2, patients with DS3 or DS1-2 with high FLIPI-2 (3-5) experienced worse OS than patients with DS1-2 and low FLIPI-2 (1-2) (p = 0.003)., Conclusion: This study shows that DS is a reliable prognostic tool to evaluate EOI PET in follicular lymphoma patients, with prognostic value maintained both in the standard and experimental arms, making metabolic imaging a robust tool to assess response in FL. Moreover, although preliminary, this study provides further information on DS3 patients, who are considered as CMR but show a less favourable PFS than DS1-2 patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Few data are known regarding the use of interim positron emission tomography (iPET) after the first two cycles (iPET2) of chemotherapy in treatment-naïve classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in routine clinical practice, and about the real-life adoption of intensification strategies for iPET positive patients. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study on cHL to investigate the use of iPET in the real-life setting, its prognostic role and outcomes of patients early shifted to intensification. Six hundreds and forty-one patients were enrolled (62% had advanced stage). iPET2 was positive in 89 patients (14%) including 8.7% and 17% early and advanced stage patients, respectively (p = 0.003). Among iPET 2 positive cases treatment was immediately modified in 19 cases; in 14 cases treatment was modified after an additional positive iPET4. Overall 56 iPET2 positive patients never received intensified therapies. Most frequently used intensified therapy was autologous stem cell transplantation followed by BEACOPP. After a median follow-up of 72 months, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 82% with iPET2 positive patients showing a worse PFS compared with iPET2 negative cases: 31% versus 85%. Focusing on advanced stage patients with a positive iPET2, the 5-year PFS was 59% for patients shifted to intensified therapy at any time point versus 61% for patients who never received intensified therapy. Our study confirmed the higher curability of naïve cHL patients in a real-world setting, and the prognostic role of iPET2 in this setting. A poor adherence to response-adapted strategy which however did not translate into a difference in patient outcomes., (© 2024 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), comprised of three unique but related subtypes, lack a unifying prognostic score applicable to all the patients in need for systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy., Methods: Patients from the prospective NF10 study (NCT02904577) with newly diagnosed MZL and receiving frontline systemic therapy at diagnosis or after observation were used to train a prognostic model. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. The model was externally validated in a pooled analysis of two independent cohorts from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource and the University of Miami., Findings: We identified 501 eligible patients. After multivariable modeling, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper normal limit, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 10 9 /L, platelets <100 × 10 9 /L, and MZL subtype (nodal or disseminated) were independently associated with inferior PFS. The proposed MZL International Prognostic index (MZL-IPI) combined these 5 factors, and we defined low (LRG, 0 factors, 27%), intermediate (IRG, 1-2 factors, 57%) and high (HRG, 3+ factors, 16%) risk groups with 5-y PFS of 85%, 66%, and 37%, respectively (c-Harrell = 0.64). Compared to the LRG, the IRG (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% CI 1.39-3.80) and HRG (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.12-9.38) had inferior PFS. Applying the MZL-IPI to the pooled US cohort (N = 353), 94 (27%), 192 (54%), and 67 (19%) patients were classified as LRG, IRG, and HRG, respectively, and the model was validated for PFS (log-rank test p = 0.0018; c-Harrell = 0.578, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). The MZL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in both the training and the external validation sets., Interpretation: MZL-IPI is a new prognostic score for use in all patients with MZL considered for systemic treatment., Funding: The MER was supported by P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568., Competing Interests: LA: Grants or contracts from any entity: My First AIRC grant n. 11,415 2012–2014; Investigator Grant AIRC (2018–2022); Honoraria: EUSA Pharma, Novartis. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Verastem, Incyte, EUSA Pharma, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite/Gilead, ADC Therapeutics, Novartis; Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Roche. CB: Grants or contracts from any entity: INSERM, AvieSan ITMO Cancer, LYSA/ELI: Bertrand Coiffier Prize Institut Servier; Consulting fees: Currety; Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Mayo Clinic. JPA: Grants or contracts from any entity: Lymphoma Research Foundation, US Department of Defense; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: ADC Therapeutics, Regeneron, Genentech. MM: Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Janssen. MJM: Grants or contracts from any entity: BMS, Roche, GenMab; Consulting fees: BMS; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. CV: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Gilead, Takeda, Kyowa-Kirin, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Beigene, Gentili. BKL: Grants or contracts from any entity: Roche/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Genmab, AstraZeneca. OA: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Roche, Janssen, Beigene, Ely Lilli, Amgen, Sanofi. AP: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Roche, Msd, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, Gilead, Bms, Janssen, Beigene; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Takeda, Roche. TMH: All support for the present manuscript (e.g., funding, provision of study materials, medical writing, article processing charges, etc.): Lymphoma SPORE NCI CA 97274; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: Seagen, Eli Lilly & Co. LM: Other financial or non-financial interests: Scientific consultant for Sandoz spa, 2022–2023, free of fee. JRC: All support for the present manuscript (e.g., funding, provision of study materials, medical writing, article processing charges, etc.): National Cancer Institute, Grants P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568 (to Mayo); Grants or contracts from any entity: BMS, Genentech, and Genmab; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board and SMC member: Protagonist Therapeutics. SL: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: Roche, Novartis, Incyte, BMS, Kite, Regeneron, Abbvie, Genmab, Sobi, Beigene; Support for attending meetings and/or travel: Roche, Beigene, Regeneron. NF, MEN, VT, SF, SR, AT, RM, AK, RM, MD, EC, FR, ALF, MDT, MS, AJMF, CS, EP, SH, IMR, ISL: no COI., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in older patients is challenging, especially for those who are not eligible for anthracycline-containing regimens. Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) started the FIL&#95;ReRi study, a 2-stage single-arm trial to investigate the activity and safety of the chemo-free combination of rituximab and lenalidomide (R2) in ≥70-year-old untreated frail patients with DLBCL. Frailty was prospectively defined using a simplified geriatric assessment tool. Patients were administered a maximum of 6 28-day cycles of 20 mg oral lenalidomide from days 2 to 22 and IV rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, with response assessment after cycles 4 and 6. Patients with partial response or complete response (CR) at cycle 6 were administered lenalidomide 10 mg/d from days 1 to 21 for every 28 cycles for a total of 12 cycles or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) after cycle 6; the coprimary end point was the rate of grade 3 or 4 extrahematological toxicity. The ORR was 50.8%, with 27.7% CR. After a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival was 14 months, and the 2-year duration of response was 64%. Thirty-four patients experienced extrahematological toxicity according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3. The activity of the R2 combination was observed in a significant proportion of subjects, warranting further exploration of a chemo-free approach in frail older patients with DLBCL. This trial was registered at EudraCT as #2015-003371-29 and clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02955823., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

We conducted a post hoc analysis of the FOLL12 trial to determine the impact of different initial immunochemotherapy (ICT) regimens on patient outcomes. Patients were selected from the FOLL12 trial, which included adults with stage II-IV follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 1-3a and high tumor burden. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either standard ICT followed by rituximab maintenance (RM) or the same ICT followed by a response-adapted approach. ICT consisted of rituximab-bendamustine (RB) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP), per physician's decision. A total of 786 patients were included in this analysis, 341 of whom received RB and 445 R-CHOP. RB was more frequently prescribed to older subjects, females, patients without bulky disease, and those with grade 1-2 FL. After a median of 56 months of follow-up, R-CHOP and RB had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (Hazard Ratio for RB 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.42, p = 0.392). Standard RM was associated with improved PFS compared to response-adapted management both after R-CHOP and RB. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events were more frequent with R-CHOP during induction treatment and more frequent with RB during RM. Grade 3-4 infections were more frequent with RB. RB was also associated with a higher incidence of transformed FL. R-CHOP and RB showed similar activity and efficacy, but with different safety profiles and long-term events, suggesting that the treating physician should carefully select the most appropriate chemotherapy regimen for each patient based on patient's individual characteristics, choices, and risk profile., (© 2023 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the most commonly used regimen for the upfront treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, it is associated with cardiotoxicity, especially in older patients. Substituting doxorubicin with non-PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (R-COMP) may reduce the risk of cardiac events, but its efficacy has never been demonstrated in prospective trials. We describe the characteristics and outcome of patients with DLBCL aged ≥65 years prospectively enrolled in the Elderly Project by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi and treated with full doses of R-CHOP or R-COMP per local practice. Starting from 1163 patients, 383 (55%) were treated with R-CHOP and 308 (45%) with R-COMP. Patients treated with R-COMP were older (median age, 76 vs 71 years), less frequently fit at simplified geriatric assessment (61% vs 88%; P < .001), and had a more frequent baseline cardiac disorders (grade >1, 32% vs 8%; P < .001). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between R-CHOP and R-COMP (70% and 64%); 3-year overall survival was 77%, and 71% respectively. R-CHOP was associated with better PFS vs R-COMP only in the Elderly Prognostic Index (EPI) low-risk group. The two groups had similar rates of treatment interruptions due to toxicities or of cardiac events (P = 1.00). We suggest R-COMP is a potentially curative treatment for older patients with intermediate- or high-risk EPI, even in the presence of a baseline cardiopathy. R-CHOP is confirmed as the standard therapy for low risk patients., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Up to 10%-15% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are related to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, in particular in elderly patients. The Fondazione Italiana Linfomi has recently published a multicentre prospective observational study, the 'Elderly Project', on the outcome of DLBCL in patients aged ≥65 years, evaluated using a simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment. The aim of this study was to compare biological and clinical features of HCV positive (HCV+) with HCV negative (HCV-) cases. A total of 89 HCV+ patients were identified out of 1095 evaluated for HCV serology (8.1%). The HCV+ patients were older, less fit, and had frequent extranodal involvement. The cell-of-origin determination by Nanostring showed that HCV+ cases less frequently had an activated B-cell profile compared to HCV- patients (18% vs. 43%). In all, 86% of HCV+ patients received rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine (Oncovin) and prednisone (R-CHOP)-like immunochemotherapy. Grade 3-4 liver toxicity occurred in 3% of cases. Among centrally reviewed cases confirmed as DLBCL, the 3-year overall survival of HCV+ patients was very similar to HCV- (63% vs. 61%, p = 0.926). In all, 20 HCV+ patients were treated with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), with good tolerance and sustained virological response in all cases. The 3-year progression-free survival for this subgroup was excellent (77%), suggesting DAAs' possible role in reducing the risk of relapse by eliminating the viral trigger., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Octogenarian patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma are managed mainly with palliation, but recent improvement in their overall condition makes potentially curative treatment a possibility. Studies have shown that half of selected octogenarians may be cured using reduced-dose anthracycline chemoimmunotherapy. However, patients aged >85 (late octogenarians [LO]) were underrepresented, and selection criteria were poorly defined. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of LO enrolled in the FIL Elderly Project in terms of the treatment received (palliative vs. curative) and of their simplified geriatric assessment (sGA), then compared them with early octogenarians (EO) aged 80- 84 and with those aged 65-79 classified as UNFIT or FRAIL according to sGA enrolled in the same study. Of the 1,163 patients, 370 were >80 and 129 LO. Clinical characteristics were similar between LO and EO, but LO more frequently received palliation (50% vs. 23%; P=0.001) and had worse 2-year overall survival (OS) (48% vs. 63%; P=0.001) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (43% vs. 56%; P=0.01). Patients receiving anthracycline did better than patients receiving palliation (P<0.001), without any difference between full or reduced doses. Rituximab within palliation improved outcome (2-yr OS with or without rituximab 42% vs. 22%; P=0.008). Elderly Prognostic Index (EPI) performed better than sGA in identifying different risk categories, and high-risk EPI retained an independent unfavorable effect on OS and PFS, together with treatment without anthracycline. In conclusion, late octogenarians can benefit from a curative approach with reduced-dose anthracycline and from rituximab within palliation. EPI may help in patient selection more than sGA can.

The Elderly Prognostic Index (EPI) is based on the integration of a simplified geriatric assessment, hemoglobin levels and International Prognostic Index and has been validated to predict overall survival in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this study, we evaluated the ability of EPI to predict the risk of early mortality. This study included all patients registered in the Elderly Project for whom treatment details and a minimum follow-up of 3 months were available. Three main treatment groups were identified based on the anthracycline amount administered: cases receiving >70% of the theoretical anthracyclines dose (Full Dose [FD] group), ≤70% (Reduced Dose [RD]) and palliative therapy (PT; no anthracyclines). The primary endpoint was early mortality rate, defined as death for any cause occurring within 90 days from diagnosis. We identified 1150 patients with a median age of 76 years (range 65-94). Overall, 69 early deaths were observed, accounting for 19% of all reported deaths. The cumulative rate of early mortality at 90 days was 6.0%. Comparing early with delayed deaths, we observed a lower frequency of deaths due to lymphoma progression (42% vs. 75%; p < 0.001) and a higher frequency due to toxicity and infections (22% vs. 4%, p < 0.001, and 22% vs. 3%, p < 0.001, respectively) for early events. A multivariable logistic analysis on 931 patients (excluding PT) confirmed an independent association of high-risk EPI (odds ratio [OR] 3.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-11.2) and bulky disease (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.09-3.97) with the risk of early mortality. The cumulative incidence of early mortality for older patients with DLBCL is not negligible and is mainly associated with non-lymphoma related events. For patients receiving anthracyclines, high-risk EPI and bulky disease are associated with a higher probability of early mortality., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: We prospectively treated patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated indolent lymphomas with genotype-appropriate direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with the aim to evaluate virologic and hematologic outcomes. No prospective studies in this setting have been published so far., Methods: FIL&#95;BArT is a prospective, multicenter, phase II trial that evaluated genotype-appropriate DAAs in untreated HCV-positive patients with indolent lymphomas without criteria for immediate conventional antilymphoma treatment. The primary objective was sustained virologic response, whereas the main secondary objectives were overall response rate of lymphoma and progression-free survival., Results: Forty patients were enrolled, including 27 with marginal zone lymphoma. Median age was 68 years. Extranodal sites were involved in 14 cases (35%). Main genotypes were 1 in 16 patients and 2 in 21 patients. All patients received genotype-guided DAAs: 17 ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, eight sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, and 15 sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. All patients achieved sustained virologic response (100%). DAAs were well tolerated, with only two grade 3-4 adverse events. Overall response rate of lymphoma was 45%, including eight patients (20%) achieving complete response and 10 (25%) partial response, whereas 16 exhibited stable disease and six progressed. With a median follow-up of 37 months, two patients died (3-year overall survival 93%; 95% CI, 74 to 98) and three additional patients progressed, with a 3-year progression-free survival of 76% (95% CI, 57 to 87)., Conclusion: HCV eradication by DAAs was achieved in 100% of HCV-positive patients with indolent lymphomas not requiring immediate conventional treatment and resulted in non-negligible rate of lymphoma responses. Treatment with DAAs should be considered as the first-line therapy in this setting.

Background: Improvement in the prognosis of lymphomas in recent decades has allowed focus on reducing long-term toxicity of treatment, including infertility. The aim of this study was to assess the fertility preservation knowledge and practices among hematologic centers affiliated with Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) in Italy., Methods: A survey questionnaire was provided to 152 FIL centers between December 2019 and December 2020., Results: Responses from 58 centers (38%) were received. All respondents reported informing patients about treatment-related gonadotoxicity. A minority of patients (10% female, 20% male) refused fertility preservation due to personal reasons. The most common fertility preservation options offered to female patients were mature oocyte cryopreservation (43.1%), ovarian tissue cryopreservation (6.9%), and mature oocyte or ovarian tissue cryopreservation (39.7%). Six centers (10.3%) did not perform any procedures. All centers offered sperm cryopreservation for male patients. Challenges regarding the time intervals between lymphoma diagnosis and fertility consultation (up to 20 days) as well as between consultation and fertility preservation procedure (up to 40 days) were revealed., Conclusions: This survey provides insight into fertility preservation practices among Italian hematologic centers and points out an urgent need to improve close cooperation between hematologists and fertility preservation specialists in order to avoid unacceptable delays in lymphoma treatment.

Purpose: We compared 2 years of rituximab maintenance (RM) with a response-adapted postinduction approach in patients with follicular lymphoma who responded to induction immunochemotherapy., Methods: We randomly assigned treatment-naïve, advanced-stage, high-tumor burden follicular lymphoma patients to receive standard RM or a response-adapted postinduction approach on the basis of metabolic response and molecular assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). The experimental arm used three types of postinduction therapies: for complete metabolic response (CMR) and MRD-negative patients, observation; for CMR and MRD-positive (end of induction or follow-up) patients, four doses of rituximab (one per week, maximum three courses) until MRD-negative; and for non-CMR patients, one dose of ibritumomab tiuxetan followed by standard RM. The study was designed as noninferiority trial with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary end point., Results: Overall, 807 patients were randomly assigned. After a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 1-92 months), patients in the standard arm had a significantly better PFS than those in the experimental arm (3-year PFS 86% v 72%; P < .001). The better PFS of the standard versus experimental arm was confirmed in all the study subgroups except non-CMR patients (n = 65; P = .274). The 3-year overall survival was 98% (95% CI, 96 to 99) and 97% (95% CI, 95 to 99) in the reference and experimental arms, respectively ( P = .238)., Conclusion: A metabolic and molecular response-adapted therapy as assessed in the FOLL12 study was associated with significantly inferior PFS compared with 2-year RM. The better efficacy of standard RM was confirmed in the subgroup analysis and particularly for patients achieving both CMR and MRD-negative., Competing Interests: Stefano LuminariConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Genmab, Regeneron, IncyteTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen, Celgene Sara GalimbertiSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis Italy, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Oncology, Incyte, Novartis Italy Annibale VersariConsulting or Advisory Role: NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis Alessandra TucciConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sandoz Luigi MarcheselliUncompensated Relationships: Sandoz SpA Simone FerreroConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, EUSA Pharma, Clinigen Group, IncyteSpeakers' Bureau: Janssen-Cilag, Servier, EUSA Pharma, GentiliResearch Funding: Gilead Sciences (Inst), MorphoSys (Inst), Janssen (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Servier, Sanofi, Janssen-Cilag, EUSA Pharma, Gentili Luca ArcainiConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Verastem, Incyte, EUSA Pharma, Celgene/Bristol Myers SquibbSpeakers' Bureau: EUSA PharmaResearch Funding: Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, EUSA Pharma Federica CavalloHonoraria: ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Tetiana SkrypetsHonoraria: Takeda Ilaria del GiudiceConsulting or Advisory Role: Tolero Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Stephane ChauvieStock and Other Ownership Interests: DixitHonoraria: Sirtex MedicalSpeakers' Bureau: TERUMO, Sirtex MedicalResearch Funding: Roche Antonello PintoHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Servier, IncyteConsulting or Advisory Role: Servier, Roche/Genentech, Merck, TakedaSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech Marco LadettoHonoraria: AbbVie, Amgen, ADC Therapeutics, BeiGene, Celgene, Gentili, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Janssen, Regeneron, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, IncyteSpeakers' Bureau: IncyteResearch Funding: ADC Therapeutics (Inst), Janssen (Inst) Annalisa ChiarenzaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech Annalisa ArcariConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-CilagTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Cilag, Takeda Massimo FedericoConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, Menarini, Erytech Pharma, MedivationTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda Pharmaceutical Taiwan, LTDNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The standard management for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This strategy allows almost 50% of patients to be cured. Post-ASCT maintenance treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) confers improved progression-free survival (PFS) to cHL patients at high risk of relapse. We investigated the outcome of 105 cHL patients receiving post-ASCT BV maintenance in the real-life setting of 23 Italian hematology centers. This population included naïve patients and those previously exposed to BV. Median follow-up was 20 months. Patients presented a median of two lines of treatment pre-ASCT, with 51% receiving BV. Twenty-nine percent of patients had at least two high-risk factors (refractory disease, complete response [CR] less than 12 months, extranodal disease at relapse), while 16% presented none. At PET-CT, a Deauville score (DS) of 1-3 was reported in 75% and 78% of pre- and post-ASCT evaluations, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), mainly peripheral neuropathy, were observed in 16% of patients. Three-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 62% and 86%, respectively. According to BV exposure, 3-year PFS and OS were 54% and 71%, respectively, for naïve and 77% and 96%, respectively, for previously exposed patients. Refractory disease (hazard ratio [HR] 4.46; p = 0.003) and post-ASCT DS 4-5 (HR 3.14; p = 0.005) were the only two factors significantly associated with PFS reduction in multivariable analysis. Post-ASCT BV maintenance is an effective, safe treatment option for cHL naïve patients and those previously exposed to BV., (© 2021 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Lymphoma represents a heterogeneous hematological malignancy (HM), which is characterized by severe immunosuppression. Patients diagnosed of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the course of HM have been described to have poor outcome, with only few reports specifically addressing lymphoma patients. Here, we investigated the clinical behavior and clinical parameters of a large multicenter cohort of adult patients with different lymphoma subtypes, with the aim of identifying predictors of death. The study included 856 patients, of whom 619 were enrolled prospectively in a 1-year frame and were followed-up for a median of 66 days (range 1-395). Patients were managed as outpatient (not-admitted cohort, n = 388) or required hospitalization (n = 468), and median age was 63 years (range 19-94). Overall, the 30- and 100-days mortality was 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11% to 15%) and 23% (95% CI, 20% to 27%), respectively. Antilymphoma treatment, including anti-CD20 containing regimens, did not impact survival. Patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma had the more favorable survival, but this was partly related to significantly younger age. The time interval between lymphoma diagnosis and COVID-19 was inversely related to mortality. Multivariable analysis recognized 4 easy-to-use factors (age, gender, lymphocyte, and platelet count) that were associated with risk of death, both in the admitted and in the not-admitted cohort (HR 3.79 and 8.85 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively). Overall, our study shows that patients should not be deprived of the best available treatment of their underlying disease and indicates which patients are at higher risk of death. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352556., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)