Search

Introduction: Brensocatib is an investigational, oral, reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-1 shown to prolong time to first exacerbation in adults with bronchiectasis. Outlined here are the clinical trial design, and baseline characteristics and treatment patterns of adult patients enrolled in the phase 3 ASPEN trial (NCT04594369)., Methods: The ASPEN trial is a global study enrolling patients with a clinical history consistent with bronchiectasis (cough, chronic sputum production and/or recurrent respiratory infections), diagnosis confirmed radiologically and ≥2 exacerbations in the prior 12 months. It was designed to evaluate the impact of two brensocatib doses (10 mg and 25 mg) on exacerbation rate over a 52-week treatment period versus placebo. Comprehensive clinical data, including demographics, disease severity, lung function, Pseudomonas aeruginosa status and quality of life, were collected at baseline., Results: 1682 adults from 35 countries were randomised from December 2020 to March 2023. Mean age was 61.3 years and 64.7% were female. ∼70% had moderate-to-severe Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) scores, 29.3% had ≥3 exacerbations in the prior 12 months and 35.7% were positive for P. aeruginosa . Mean BSI scores were highest in Australia/New Zealand (8.3) and lowest in Latin America (5.9). Overall, the most common aetiology was idiopathic (58.4%). In P. aeruginosa- positive versus P. aeruginosa- negative patients, lung function was lower, with greater long-term macrolide (21.5% versus 14.0%) and inhaled corticosteroid use (63.5% versus 53.9%). There was wide regional variation in long-term antibiotic use in patients with bronchiectasis and P. aeruginosa ., Discussion: ASPEN baseline characteristics and treatment profiles were representative of a global bronchiectasis population., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports receiving grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Zambon and Insmed Incorporated, a grant from Gilead, and personal fees from Novartis and Chiesi. Conflict of interest: He is an Associate Editor of this journal. P-R. Burgel reports grants from Vertex and GSK, outside the submitted work. P-R. Burgel also reports clinical trials: acting as main investigator and advisory activity for AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Insmed Incorporated, MSD, Viatris, Vertex and Zambon. P-R. Burgel reports substantial financial contributions to the budget of an institution he is responsible for from GSK, Vertex, Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose, Société Française de la Mucoviscidose and Filière MUCO-CFTR. Conflict of interest: C.L. Daley reports grant support, advisory board fees and consulting fees from Insmed Incorporated; grant support from AN2 Therapeutics, Bugworks, Paratek Pharmaceuticals and Juvabis; advisory board work with AN2 Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Cepheid, Hyfe, MannKind, Matinas Biopharma, NobHill, Spero Therapeutics and Zambon; consulting with Genentech and Pfizer; and data monitoring committee work with Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly and Company, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Conflict of interest: A. De Soyza reports grants and fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Chiesi, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Insmed Incorporated and Zambon. Conflict of interest: C.S. Haworth reports receiving consultancy/speaker fees from 30 Technology, CSL Behring, Chiesi, Insmed Incorporated, Janssen, LifeArc, Meiji, Mylan, Novartis, Pneumagen, Shinogi, Teva, Vertex and Zambon. Conflict of interest: D. Mauger reports grants from NHLBI and drugs for NIH-funded clinical trials from Genentech, GSK, OM Pharma and Sanofi-Regeneron. Conflict of interest: Conflict of interest: K. Mange, A. Teper, C. Fernandez and D. Conroy are employees of and shareholders in Insmed Incorporated. Conflict of interest: M. Metersky reports receiving consulting fees from AN2 Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed Incorporated, Renovion, Tactile Inc. and Zambon. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers, P-R. Burgel, C.L. Daley, A. De Soyza, C.S. Haworth, D. Mauger and M. Metersky served as members of the ASPEN trial steering committee. J.D. Chalmers, P-R. Burgel, C.L. Daley, A. De Soyza, C.S. Haworth and M. Metersky were investigators in the ASPEN trial., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Purpose: Asthma is a clinical syndrome with various underlying pathomechanisms and clinical phenotypes. Genetic, ethnic, and geographic factors may influence the differences in clinical presentation, severity, and prognosis. We compared the characteristics of asthma based on the geographical background by analyzing representative cohorts from the United States, Europe, South America, and Asia using the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP), Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes (U-BIOPRED), Program for Control of Asthma in Bahia (ProAR), and Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea (COREA), respectively., Methods: The clinical characteristics and medications for the SARP (n = 669), U-BIOPRED (n = 509), ProAR (n = 996), and COREA (n = 3,748) were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed for severe asthma., Results: The mean age was highest and lowest in the COREA and SARP, respectively. The asthma onset age was lowest in the ProAR. The mean body mass index was highest and lowest in the SARP and COREA, respectively. Baseline pulmonary function was lowest and highest in the U-BIOPRED and COREA, respectively. The number of patients with acute exacerbation in the previous year was highest in U-BIOPRED. The mean blood eosinophil count was highest in COREA. The total immunoglobulin E was highest in the ProAR. The frequency of atopy was highest in the SARP. The principal component analysis plot revealed differences among all cohorts., Conclusions: The cohorts from 4 different continents exhibited different clinical and physiological characteristics, probably resulting from the interplay between genetic susceptibility and geographical factors., Competing Interests: There are no financial or other issues that might lead to conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology • The Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease.)

Background: The role of IL-13 on the airway epithelium in severe asthma leading to airway remodeling remains poorly understood., Objective: To study IL-13 induced airway remodeling on goblet cells and cilia in the airway epithelium in severe asthma and the impact of an anti-IL4Rα antibody, dupilumab, in vitro ., Methods: Quantitative CT (qCT) lungs and endobronchial biopsies and brushings were obtained in 51 participants (22 severe, 11 non-severe asthma and 18 healthy participants) in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARPIII) and measured for mucin and cilia related proteins. Epithelial cells were differentiated in air-liquid interphase (ALI) with IL-13 +/-dupilumab and assessed for mucin, cilia, cilia beat frequency (CBF) and epithelial integrity (transepithelial electrical resistance, TEER)., Results: Increased Muc5AC (Δ+263.2±92.7 lums/EpiArea) and decreased ciliated cells (Δ-0.07±0.03 Foxj1+cells/EpiArea) were observed in biopsies from severe asthma when compared to healthy (p<0.01 and p=0.047 respectively). RNAseq of epithelial cell brushes confirmed a Muc5AC increase with a decrease in a 5-gene cilia-related mean in severe asthma compared to healthy (all p<0.05). IL-13 (5 ng/mL) differentiated ALI cultures of healthy and asthmatic (severe and non-severe participants) increased Muc5AC, decreased cilia (α-acytl-tubulin) in healthy (Δ+6.5±1.5%, Δ-14.1±2.7%; all p<0.001 respectively) and asthma (Δ+4.4±2.5%, Δ-13.1±2.7%; p=0.084, p<0.001 respectively); decreased epithelial integrity (TEER) in healthy (-140.9±21.3 [ohms], p<0.001) while decreasing CBF in asthma (Δ-4.4±1.7 [Hz], p<0.01). When dupilumab was added to ALI with IL-13, there was no significant decrease in Mu5AC but there was restoration of cilia in healthy and asthma participants (absolute increase of 67.5% and 32.5% cilia, all p<0.05 respectively) while CBF increased (Δ+3.6±1.1 [Hz], p<0.001) and TEER decreased (only in asthma Δ-37.8±16.2 [ohms] p<0.05)., Conclusions: IL-13 drives features of airway remodeling in severe asthma which are partially reversed by inhibiting IL-4Rα receptor in vitro .

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that the upper airway bacterial microbiota is implicated in asthma inception, severity, and exacerbation. Unlike bacterial microbiota, the role of the upper airway fungal microbiome (mycobiome) in asthma control is poorly understood., Research Question: What are the upper airway fungal colonization patterns among children with asthma and their relationship with subsequent loss of asthma control and exacerbation of asthma?, Study Design and Methods: The study was coupled with the Step Up Yellow Zone Inhaled Corticosteroids to Prevent Exacerbations (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02066129) clinical trial. The upper airway mycobiome was investigated using Internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequencing of nasal blow samples collected from children with asthma when asthma was well controlled (baseline, n = 194) and during early signs of loss of asthma control (yellow zone [YZ], n = 107)., Results: At baseline, 499 fungal genera were detected in the upper airway samples, with two commensal fungal species, Malassezia globosa and Malassezia restricta, being most dominant. The relative abundance of Malassezia species varies by age, BMI, and race. Higher relative abundance of M globosa at baseline was associated with lower risk of future YZ episodes (P = .038) and longer time to development of first YZ episode (P = .022). Higher relative abundance of M globosa at YZ episode was associated with lower risk of progression from YZ episode to severe asthma exacerbation (P = .04). The upper airway mycobiome underwent significant changes from baseline to YZ episode, and increased fungal diversity was correlated highly with increased bacterial diversity (ρ = 0.41)., Interpretation: The upper airway commensal mycobiome is associated with future asthma control. This work highlights the importance of the mycobiota in asthma control and may contribute to the development of fungi-based markers to predict asthma exacerbation., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Type 1 (T1) inflammation (marked by IFN-γ expression) is now consistently identified in subsets of asthma cohorts, but how it contributes to disease remains unclear., Objective: We sought to understand the role of CCL5 in asthmatic T1 inflammation and how it interacts with both T1 and type 2 (T2) inflammation., Methods: CCL5, CXCL9, and CXCL10 messenger RNA expression from sputum bulk RNA sequencing, as well as clinical and inflammatory data were obtained from the Severe Asthma Research Program III (SARP III). CCL5 and IFNG expression from bronchoalveolar lavage cell bulk RNA sequencing was obtained from the Immune Mechanisms in Severe Asthma (IMSA) cohort and expression related to previously identified immune cell profiles. The role of CCL5 in tissue-resident memory T-cell (TRM) reactivation was evaluated in a T1 high murine severe asthma model., Results: Sputum CCL5 expression strongly correlated with T1 chemokines (P < .001 for CXCL9 and CXCL10), consistent with a role in T1 inflammation. CCL5 high participants had greater fractional exhaled nitric oxide (P = .009), blood eosinophils (P < .001), and sputum eosinophils (P = .001) in addition to sputum neutrophils (P = .001). Increased CCL5 bronchoalveolar lavage expression was unique to a previously described T1 high /T2 variable /lymphocytic patient group in the IMSA cohort, with IFNG trending with worsening lung obstruction only in this group (P = .083). In a murine model, high expression of the CCL5 receptor CCR5 was observed in TRMs and was consistent with a T1 signature. A role for CCL5 in TRM activation was supported by the ability of the CCR5 inhibitor maraviroc to blunt reactivation., Conclusion: CCL5 appears to contribute to TRM-related T1 neutrophilic inflammation in asthma while paradoxically also correlating with T2 inflammation and with sputum eosinophilia., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Asthma and allergic disease impact millions of patients and are associated with high costs. Up to 30% of all medical care involves wasted spending. Across the spectrum of care provided by the allergist-immunologist, there are opportunities to improve value and reduce medical waste. Several examples highlight this reality. Evidence suggests that most patients may receive cost-effective care in the management of chronic spontaneous urticaria without the need for laboratory testing. For patients with asthma, although a single maintenance and reliever therapy approach may be cost-effective, insurance-mandated therapy changes are not, and may harm patients. Biologics may be very effective in improving asthma control but are too expensive for this indication-as demonstrated by cost-effectiveness analyses and highlighted by the Institute of Clinical and Economic Review, which concluded that the value-based price for asthma biologics ranges between $6500 and 14,3000 per year. Early introduction may prevent food allergy, but screening before first introduction is neither necessary nor cost-effective, although early salvage food oral immunotherapy may result in improved quality of life and cost savings. Evidence does not support the presence of allergic disease as a risk factor for anaphylaxis to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination, and risk-stratified vaccination approaches do not appear cost-effective. Allergen immunotherapy is a very cost-effective treatment option. The practice of allergy-immunology has continued to evolve in recent years and can provide a leading example of high-value practice., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) 2 terminates bronchoconstrictive Gαq signaling; murine RGS2 knockout demonstrate airway hyperresponsiveness. While RGS2 promoter variants rs2746071 and rs2746072 associate with a clinical mild asthma phenotype, their impact on human airway smooth muscle (HASM) contractility and asthma severity outcomes is unknown., Objective: We sought to determine whether reductions in RGS2 expression seen with these 2 RGS2 promoter variants augment HASM contractility and associate with an asthma severity phenotype., Methods: We transfected HASM with a range of RGS2-specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) concentrations and determined RGS2 protein expression by Western blot analysis and intracellular calcium flux induced by histamine (a Gαq-coupled H1 receptor bronchoconstrictive agonist). We conducted regression-based genotype association analyses of RGS2 variants from 611 patients from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Severe Asthma Research Program 3., Results: RGS2-specific siRNA caused dose-dependent increases in histamine-stimulated bronchoconstrictive intracellular calcium signaling (2-way ANOVA, P < .0001) with a concomitant decrease in RGS2 protein expression. RGS2-specific siRNA did not affect Gαq-independent ionomycin-induced intracellular calcium signaling (P = .42). The minor allele frequency of rs2746071 and rs2746072 was 0.46 and 0.28 among African American/non-Hispanic Black patients and was 0.28 and 0.27 among non-Hispanic White patients, among whom these single nucleotide polymorphisms were in stronger linkage disequilibrium (r 2  = 0.97). Among non-Hispanic White patients, risk allele homozygotes for rs2746072 and rs2746071 each had nearly 2-fold greater asthma exacerbation rates relative to alternative genotypes with wild-type alleles (P additive  = 2.86 × 10 -5 /P recessive  = 5.22 × 10 -6 and P additive  = 3.46 × 10 -6 /P recessive  = 6.74 × 10 -7 , respectively) at baseline, which was confirmed by prospective longitudinal exacerbation data., Conclusion: RGS2 promoter variation associates with a molecular and clinical phenotype characterized by enhanced bronchoconstrictive stimulation in vitro and higher asthma exacerbations rates in non-Hispanic White patients., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) is a national prospective study of adults comprising 14 established US prospective cohort studies. Starting as early as 1971, investigators in the C4R cohort studies have collected data on clinical and subclinical diseases and their risk factors, including behavior, cognition, biomarkers, and social determinants of health. C4R links this pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) phenotyping to information on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and acute and postacute COVID-related illness. C4R is largely population-based, has an age range of 18-108 years, and reflects the racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic diversity of the United States. C4R ascertains SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 illness using standardized questionnaires, ascertainment of COVID-related hospitalizations and deaths, and a SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey conducted via dried blood spots. Master protocols leverage existing robust retention rates for telephone and in-person examinations and high-quality event surveillance. Extensive prepandemic data minimize referral, survival, and recall bias. Data are harmonized with research-quality phenotyping unmatched by clinical and survey-based studies; these data will be pooled and shared widely to expedite collaboration and scientific findings. This resource will allow evaluation of risk and resilience factors for COVID-19 severity and outcomes, including postacute sequelae, and assessment of the social and behavioral impact of the pandemic on long-term health trajectories., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 2022. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

Background: Pharmacogenetic studies in asthma cohorts, primarily made up of White people of European descent, have identified loci associated with response to inhaled beta agonists and corticosteroids (ICSs). Differences exist in how individuals from different ancestral backgrounds respond to long-acting beta agonist (LABA) and ICSs. Therefore, we sought to understand the pharmacogenetic mechanisms regulating therapeutic responsiveness in individuals of African descent., Methods: We did ancestry-based pharmacogenetic studies of children (aged 5-11 years) and adolescents and adults (aged 12-69 years) from the Best African Response to Drug (BARD) trials, in which participants with asthma uncontrolled with low-dose ICS (fluticasone propionate 50 μg in children, 100 μg in adolescents and adults) received different step-up combination therapies. The hierarchal composite outcome of pairwise superior responsiveness in BARD was based on asthma exacerbations, a 31-day difference in annualised asthma-control days, or a 5% difference in percentage predicted FEV 1 . We did whole-genome admixture mapping of 15 159 ancestral segments within 312 independent regions, stratified by the two age groups. The two co-primary outcome comparisons were the step up from low-dose ICS to the quintuple dose of ICS (5 × ICS: 250 μg twice daily in children and 500 μg twice daily in adolescents and adults) versus double dose (2-2·5 × ICS: 100 μg twice daily in children, 250 μg twice daily in adolescents and adults), and 5 × ICS versus 100 μg fluticasone plus a LABA (salmeterol 50 μg twice daily). We used a genome-wide significance threshold of p<1·6 × 10 -4 , and tested for replication using independent cohorts of individuals of African descent with asthma., Findings: We included 249 unrelated children and 267 unrelated adolescents and adults in the BARD pharmacogenetic analysis. In children, we identified a significant admixture mapping peak for superior responsiveness to 5 × ICS versus 100 μg fluticasone plus salmeterol on chromosome 12 (odds ratio [OR local African ] 3·95, 95% CI 2·02-7·72, p=6·1 × 10 -5 ) fine mapped to a locus adjacent to RNFT2 and NOS1 (rs73399224, OR allele dose 0·17, 95% CI 0·07-0·42, p=8·4 × 10 -5 ). In adolescents and adults, we identified a peak for superior responsiveness to 5 × ICS versus 2·5 × ICS on chromosome 22 (OR local African 3·35, 1·98-5·67, p=6·8 × 10 -6 ) containing a locus adjacent to TPST2 (rs5752429, OR allele dose 0·21, 0·09-0·52, p=5·7 × 10 -4 ). We replicated rs5752429 and nominally replicated rs73399224 in independent African American cohorts., Interpretation: BARD is the first genome-wide pharmacogenetic study of LABA and ICS response in clinical trials of individuals of African descent to detect and replicate genome-wide significant loci. Admixture mapping of the composite BARD trial outcome enabled the identification of novel pharmacogenetic variation accounting for differential therapeutic responses in people of African descent with asthma., Funding: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests VEO reports consulting fees from Sanofi and fees for serving on independent data monitoring committees for Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. SJS reports receiving consulting fees, paid to his institution, from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Moderna, Propeller Health, Regeneron, and Sanofi, as well as a research grant from Propeller Health. ERB reports receiving consulting fees and donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, donated drugs from Merck and Teva Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi–Regeneron, and participating in trials as an employee of Wake Forest School of Medicine and the University of Arizona for AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon–Teva Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Novartis, and Sanofi–Regeneron. VMC reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. WP reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. DM reports receiving grant support and donated drugs from GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Vifor Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, grant support from Sanofi and AstraZeneca, fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Novartis, and donated drugs from Merck. FDM reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, grant support from Johnson & Johnson, and consulting fees from Copeval and Commence. EH-L reports a fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities. MP-Y reports grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness, the State Research Agency and the European Regional Development Funds from the European Union (MICIU/AEI/FEDER, UE), and grant support from GlaxoSmithKline, Spain. SJK reports receiving donated drugs from Merck–Organon, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, and Regeneron and owning stock in Merck. LBB reports receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from Aerocrine, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech–Novartis, and AstraZeneca, advisory board fees and donated drugs from Merck, fees for serving on a data safety monitoring board from DBV Technologies, consulting fees, lecture fees, and donated drugs from Teva Pharmaceuticals and Boehringer Ingelheim, honoraria from WebMD–Medscape, advisory board fees and lecture fees from Sanofi–Regeneron, advisory board fees and consulting fees from Vectura, and advisory board fees from Circassia. MDC reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, and consulting fees from Genentech and Novartis. JCC reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. MC reports receiving grant support, lecture fees, and donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, donated drugs from Merck, consulting fees, lecture fees, and donated drugs from Teva Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees and lecture fees from Boston Scientific and Genentech, consulting fees from Nuvaira, Aviragen, 4D Pharma, VIDA Diagnostics, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Theravance, Therabron, and Vectura, grant support, consulting fees, and lecture fees from Sanofi-Aventis, grant support and lecture fees from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, grant support from Chiesi and Novartis, and lecture fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. LCD reports receiving grant support and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, and consulting fees from Sanofi–Regeneron. FH reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. DJJ reports grant support from GlaxoSmithKline, consulting fees from Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Vifor Pharma, and AstraZeneca, and fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Pfizer. NJ reports receiving honorarium for consulting from GlaxoSmithKline pharmaceuticals and Pulmocide. MK reports receiving grant support from Chiesi and Sanofi. JAK reports personal fees for independent data monitoring committee participation from Sanofi and research funding from the American Lung Association—Airway Clinical Research Centers Network. SCL reports grant funding from the American Lung Association—Airway Clinical Research Centers Network. RFL reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, and lecture fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific. JJL reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. NL reports receiving grant support, advisory board fees, and donated drugs from GlaxoSmithKline, grant support, consulting fees, and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, consulting fees, advisory board fees, and donated drugs from Teva Pharmaceuticals, grant support from Genentech, grant support and advisory board fees from Sanofi–Regeneron, and donated drugs from Merck and Boehringer Ingelheim. WCM reports receiving grant support and donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, donated drugs from Merck and Teva Pharmaceuticals, grant support and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi–Regeneron, and grant support from Novartis, Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, and Gossamer Bio. SPP reports receiving advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Mylan, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi–Regeneron, and Theravance, fees for serving as clinical trial adjudicator from Quintiles, fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Genentech, fees for serving as chair of a data and safety monitoring board from Novartis, and honoraria from PRIME. JAP reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and GlaxoSmithKline. LJS reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim and Teva Pharmaceuticals, and fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board and donated drugs from Merck. JS reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, advisory board fees from PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, advisory board fees, honoraria, and travel support from Regeneron–Sanofi–Genzyme, holding patents #6 090 618, #6 114 311, #6 284 743, #6 291 211, #6 297 221, #6 331 527, and #7 169 764 on a smooth-muscle gene promoter (SM22 alpha), holding pending patent PCT/US2014/032186 on a method for determining respiratory physiological parameters, holding pending patent 62/872,980 on remodilins for airway remodelling and organ fibrosis, and holding pending patent 62/828,122 on remodilins to prevent or treat cancer metastasis, glaucoma, and hypoxia. CAS reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. SW reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, grant support and consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Sanofi, and consulting fees from Pieris Pharmaceuticals. DAM reports receiving donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. EI reports receiving grant support and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Genentech, consulting fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Bird Rock Bio, Nuvelution Pharmaceuticals, Vitaeris, Sanofi Genzyme, Entrinsic Health Solutions, Pneuma Respiratory, 4D Pharma, Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, and Equillium, grant support, consulting fees, and donated drugs from Merck, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, and GlaxoSmithKline, serving as a consultant for Vorso, receiving grant support and donated drugs from Vifor Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, grant support from Sanofi and AstraZeneca, and donated drugs from Circassia. MEW reports receiving grant support and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, and GlaxoSmithKline, consulting fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Mylan, Genentech, Restorbio, Equillium, Boston Scientific, Genzyme, Gala Therapeutics, and Pulmatrix, fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Sentien Biotechnologies, grant support, consulting fees, advisory board fees, and donated drugs from Teva Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees and donated drugs from Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck. MD, GAH, EJA CC, CE, AMF, DH, AM, ETN, SPS, MAS, SRW, EGB, and KB declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)