Search

Introduction: Driving while intoxicated (DWI) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Ignition interlock devices (IID) decrease the risk of drinking and driving while installed, but DWI rates increase after the IID is removed. Efforts are needed to maintain change after the IID is removed; engaging concerned family members (CFMs) is an untested strategy. Smartphones may provide a promising platform to support DWI offenders with IIDs and their CFMs; the purpose of the present study was to develop such a smartphone-web app., Methods: Formative work occurred in two sequential phases. Phase 1 included key informant interviews with DWI offenders and CFMs, development of one app module, and usability testing. Phase 2 included focus groups with DWI offenders and CFMs, development of three more app modules, and usability testing. The Bangor System Usability Scale was used to rate app usability and navigability., Results: Results of key informants and focus groups indicated that offenders and CFMs lacked information and were frustrated by the IID, experienced financial burden from the DWI and IID, viewed supportive communication and positive shared activities as important, and were positive about the app. Four modules were developed, Life with Interlock, Supporting Changes in Drinking, Doing Things Together, and Effective Communication. Usability testing indicated that the B-SMART modules were easy to use and informative., Conclusions: Careful formative work resulted in an app responsive to the concerns of DWI offenders with IIDs and their CFMs. Controlled research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of the app., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although modestly effective treatments exist for alcohol use disorder (AUD), many individuals return to heavy drinking after treatment, suggesting the need for better understanding of factors that contribute to maintaining abstinence or drinking reductions. Whereas past studies identified what treatments work for AUD, recent studies focus more on why particular treatments work, and the mechanisms by which treatment leads to change. This focus on mechanisms of behavior change (MOBC) may inform the process by which treatment leads to better outcomes, and also may lead to new treatments or modifications of existing treatments that target empirically supported mechanisms known to lead to change. There is a paucity of studies examining MOBC from a neurocognitive perspective., Method: To address this gap in knowledge, the study described here is examining emotional reactivity, alcohol cue reactivity, and cognitive control as potential MOBC at three levels of analysis - self-report, behavior, and neural., Results: One hundred ten treatment-seeking individuals with an AUD are being randomized to receive 8 sessions of either Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) or Mindfulness Based Treatment (MBT) after up to 4 sessions of a platform treatment focused on enhancing motivation to change. To establish the temporal relationship between changes in drinking and changes in MOBC, patients are assessed at baseline, during and immediately after treatment, and 9- and 15-months post-baseline. Relationships between changes in drinking and changes in the proposed MOBC will be examined using advanced mixed modeling techniques., Conclusions: Results should advance AUD treatment by targeting treatments to neurocognitive MOBC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A standard component of service delivery in alcohol treatment clinics is evidence-based assessment (EBA). Although EBA is essential for selecting appropriate treatment modalities for alcohol use and associated problems, there are limitations in existing EBAs concerning evidence of cultural equivalence and utility among individuals seeking alcohol treatment. However, training in EBA, addictions, and clinical applications with diverse populations all are gaps in clinical training in doctoral programs in clinical psychology. The present work used the clinical science model to review the psychometric properties, cross-cultural utility, and measurement invariance of measures in an assessment battery used in an alcohol treatment training clinic. This article describes the results of that review, recommendations for retaining or replacing common assessment measures used in alcohol treatment clinics, and recommendations for alcohol treatment clinics interested in engaging in similar processes. Findings suggested that more research is needed to evaluate the psychometric properties of EBAs utilized in an alcohol treatment assessment battery, particularly among American Indian and Alaska Native people, and to test measurement invariance across race/ethnicity and other identity groups in alcohol treatment-seeking populations. Overall, routine reviews of cultural relevance are needed in clinical settings to stay current with the emerging literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: Involving family members in a patient's treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) leads to more positive outcomes, but evidence-based family-involved treatments have not been adopted widely in AUD treatment programs. Study aims the following: (a) modify an empirically supported 12-session AUD treatment, alcohol behavioral couple therapy (ABCT) to make it shorter and appropriate for any concerned family member and (b) conduct a small clinical trial to obtain feasibility data and effect size estimates of treatment efficacy., Method: ABCT content was adapted to three-sessions following input from clinicians, patients, and family members. Patient and family member dyads were recruited from an inpatient treatment program and randomized to the new treatment, brief family-involved treatment (B-FIT), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Drinking was assessed using the Form-90; family support and family functioning were assessed using the Family Environment Scale Conflict and Cohesion subscales and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV, Communication scale. Dyads ( n = 35) were assessed at baseline and 4-month follow-up., Results: On average, dyads received one of three B-FIT sessions with 6 dyads receiving no sessions due to scheduling conflicts or patient discharge. At follow-up, there was a large-to-medium effect size estimate favoring B-FIT for proportion drinking days (patient report, n = 22; Hedges' g = 1.01; patient or family report, n = 28; Hedges' g = .48). Results for family support or family functioning measures favored TAU., Conclusions: Implementation of brief family-involved treatment in inpatient AUD treatment was challenging, but preliminary data suggest the potential value of B-FIT in impacting drinking outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).