Search

Jordana K McLoone,1,2 Ursula M Sansom-Daly,1,2 Alexia Paglia,1,2 Jessica Chia,1,2 Hanne Bækgaard Larsen,3 Lorna A Fern,4 Richard J Cohn,1,2 Christina Signorelli1,2 1Behavioural Sciences Unit, Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 3Department for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, The Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark & Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UKCorrespondence: Jordana K McLoone, Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, UNSW Medicine & Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Email J.McLoone@unsw.edu.auAbstract: Childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors are at risk of developing late effects associated with their cancer and its treatment. Survivors’ engagement with recommended follow-up care to minimize these risks is suboptimal, with many barriers commonly reported. This scoping review aims to summarize the barriers to accessing follow-up care, using the dimensions of Levesque’s framework for accessing healthcare. We retrieved quantitative studies addressing barriers and facilitators to accessing survivorship care in CAYA survivors from PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL. Data was categorized into the five healthcare access dimensions outlined in Levesque’s framework: i) approachability, ii) acceptability, iii) availability and accommodation, iv) affordability, and v) appropriateness. We identified 27 quantitative studies in our review. Commonly reported barriers to accessing care included a lack of survivor and provider knowledge of cancer survivorship, poor health beliefs, low personal salience to engage in follow-up care, high out-of-pocket costs and survivors living long distances from clinical services. Many studies reported increased barriers to care during the transition from paediatric to adult-oriented healthcare services, including a lack of developmentally appropriate services, lack of appointment reminders, and a poorly defined transition process. Healthcare-related self-efficacy was identified as an important facilitator to accessing follow-up care. The transition from pediatric to adult-oriented healthcare services is a challenging time for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors. Optimizing CAYAs’ ability to access high-quality survivorship care thus requires careful consideration of the quality and acceptability of services, alongside financial and physical/practical barriers (eg distance from available services, appointment-booking mechanisms). Levesque’s model highlighted several areas where evidence is well established (eg financial barriers) or lacking (eg factors associated with engagement in follow-up care) which are useful to understand barriers and facilitators that impact access to survivorship for CAYA cancer survivors, as well as guiding areas for further evaluation.Keywords: pediatric, adolescent and young adult, cancer, survivorship care, barriers, access to care

Joseph Elliot Alchin,1,2 Christina Signorelli,1,2 Jordana Kathleen McLoone,1,2 Claire Elizabeth Wakefield,1,2 Joanna Elizabeth Fardell,1,2 Karen Johnston,1 Richard J Cohn1,2 1Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 2School of Women’s and Children’s Health,UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCorrespondence: Christina Signorelli, Kids Cancer Centre, Level 1 South, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High St, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia, Tel +61 431 547 350, Fax +61-2-9382-1789, Email c.signorelli@unsw.edu.auPurpose: Ongoing survivorship care allows childhood cancer survivors the opportunity to address treatment-related health problems and improve their quality of life. However, many survivors do not adhere to their healthcare professionals’ recommendations and the factors supporting their adherence remain unclear.Patients and Methods: Long-term childhood cancer survivors completed the “Re-engage” program, which assessed survivors’ heath needs and provided individualised recommendations for health interventions and surveillance developed by an expert multi-disciplinary team (MDT). We measured survivors’ recall of, and adherence to, their individualised healthcare recommendations at one and six months post-intervention. We conducted a series of univariate negative binomial regressions to investigate factors associated with the total number of recommendations that were correctly recalled and adhered to.Results: We analysed the data of 25 childhood cancer survivors who participated in Re-engage (mean age = 31.9 years). On average, survivors were provided with 6.6 recommendations (range = 1– 11). Survivors accurately recalled receiving 3.0 recommendations at one month post-intervention and 1.9 at six months. Survivors had adhered to an average of 1.3 recommendations by six-month follow-up. In total, 56% of participants reported that they did not adhere to any recommendations. By six-month follow-up, greater adherence to MDT recommendations was associated with having a history of a second cancer (B = 1.391; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.686 to 2.097; p

Background: Survivors of childhood neuroblastoma are at risk of multiple treatment-related health problems (late effects), impacting their quality of life. While late effects and quality of life among Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) childhood cancer survivors have been reported, the outcomes of neuroblastoma survivors specifically have not been reported, limiting critical information to inform treatment and care., Methods: Young neuroblastoma survivors or their parents (as proxy for survivors <16 years) were invited to complete a survey and optional telephone interview. Survivors' late effects, risk perceptions, health-care use, and health-related quality of life were surveyed and analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses. In-depth interviews explored participants' experiences, knowledge, and perception of late effects and information needs. Thematic content analysis was used to summarize the data., Results: Thirty-nine neuroblastoma survivors or parents completed questionnaires (median age = 16 years, 39% male), with 13 also completing interviews. Thirty-two participants (82%) reported experiencing at least 1 late effect, most commonly dental problems (56%), vision/hearing problems (47%), and fatigue (44%). Participants reported high overall quality of life (index = 0.9, range = 0.2-1.0); however, more participants experienced anxiety/depression compared to the population norm (50% met criteria versus 25%, χ 2  = 13, p  < 0.001). Approximately half of participants (53%) believed they were at risk of developing further late effects. Qualitatively, participants reported knowledge gaps in understanding their risk of developing late effects., Conclusion: Many neuroblastoma survivors appear to experience late effects, anxiety/depression and have unmet cancer-related information needs. This study highlights important areas for intervention to reduce the impact of neuroblastoma and its treatment in childhood and young adulthood.

Objectives: Childhood cancer survivors are at risk of developing primary recurrences and new second cancers. Experiencing a recurrence and/or second cancer can be highly distressing for survivors and families. We aimed to understand the psychological impacts of experiencing a recurrence or second cancer and how this potentially influences survivors' engagement with survivorship care., Methods: We invited childhood cancer survivors or their parents if survivors were ≤16 years of age from 11 tertiary pediatric oncology hospitals across Australia and New Zealand to complete interviews. We conducted a thematic analysis facilitated by NVivo12., Results: We interviewed 21 participants of whom 16 had experienced a recurrence, 3 had a second cancer, and 2 had both a recurrence and second cancer. Participants reported that a recurrence/second cancer was a stressful sudden disruption to life, accompanied by strong feelings of uncertainty. Participants tended to be less aware of their second cancer risk than recurrence risk. Some participants reported feelings of anxiousness and despair, describing varying responses such as gratitude or avoidance. Participants shared that the fear of cancer recurrence either motivated them to adopt protective health behaviors or to avoid information and disengage from survivorship care., Significance of Results: Some survivors and their parents have a poor understanding and expressed reluctance to receive information about their risk of second cancer and other treatment-related late effects. Improving the delivery of information about late effects to families may improve their engagement with survivorship care and surveillance, although care must be taken to balance information provision and survivors' anxieties about their future health.

Background: Childhood cancer survivors are vulnerable to long-term treatment-related health conditions, which can lead to poor quality of life. Little data exist on the overall health of long-term Australian and New Zealand childhood cancer survivors or on survivors' motivations for attending survivorship clinics., Methods: This study administers a cross-sectional questionnaire to long-term survivors ≥5 years from their primary diagnosis. We compared participant-reported number of late effects by a cancer diagnosis, and identified clinical (eg, treatment) and demographic (eg, age) factors that were associated with late effects burden and engagement in cancer survivorship care., Results: A total of 634 participants completed questionnaires (48% male, mean age = 21.7 years). Most participants (79%) reported at least one cancer-related late effect, most commonly fatigue (40%) and memory/learning difficulties (34%). Brain tumor survivors reported a higher total number of late effects than survivors with other diagnoses (mean = 5.7 vs. 3.2, P < .001). Participants' most commonly reported motivators for engaging in care were to understand problems that may occur later in life because of their cancer and/or treatment (98.5%) and to get reassurance about one's health (97.4%). The proportion of survivors endorsing each motivating factor was similar across cancer diagnoses, with the exception of learning more about insurance and pensions (highest in brain tumor survivors = 80%). In multivariable analyses, survivors were more likely to report being engaged in survivorship care if they were younger (P < .001), less time had elapsed since their diagnosis (P < .001), or they reported a higher number of motivating factors (P = .016)., Conclusion: Survivors report a range of health problems decades after treatment completion. Understanding the burden of late effects, and motivators for seeking survivorship care to manage these health problems, is important for ensuring that tailored interventions or services are available to meet the needs of this growing population and to design effective models of survivorship care., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: An increasing number of children diagnosed with both low- and high-risk neuroblastoma are surviving. Yet, treatment can be intensive and often multimodal, especially for high-risk neuroblastoma, resulting in significant long-term health problems. We aimed to describe neuroblastoma survivors' pediatric hospitalizations, readmissions, and their associated costs., Method: We conducted a population-based study of all children (<18 years) residing in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and hospitalized with a recorded diagnosis of neuroblastoma during 2001-2020. We used linked NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection and death registration data to examine the frequency, length of stay, and readmissions following the first admission when neuroblastoma was diagnosed (i.e., the index admission), and the associated hospitalization costs by age and timing postindex admission discharge., Results: In total, 300 children (64% aged <3 years) were hospitalized for neuroblastoma over the study period. The median number of readmissions and length of stay within 2 years postdischarge were 17 (interquartile range IQR: 5.5-25) and 45.5 (IQR: 10-125) days, and median cost per child was AUD$124,058 (IQR $34,217-$264,627). Following discharge from the index admission, there were 7088 readmissions (median: 20 per child, IQR: 7-29). Fifty-eight percent of readmissions occurred within 1-year postdischarge, primarily due to fever, nausea, abdominal pain, and respiratory conditions., Conclusion: The burden of health problems requiring hospitalization among neuroblastoma survivors results in significant associated healthcare costs, warranting further efforts to optimize health care for neuroblastoma survivors that focuses on early intervention and long-term monitoring., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Many survivors are disengaged from follow-up, mandating alternative models of survivorship-focused care for late effects surveillance. We explored survivors' barriers to accessing, and preferences for survivorship care., Methods: We invited Australian and New Zealand survivors of childhood cancer from three age groups: <16 years (represented by parents), 16-25 years (adolescent and young adults (AYAs)) and >25 years ('older survivors'). Participants completed questionnaires and optional interviews., Results: 633 survivors/parents completed questionnaires: 187 parents of young survivors (mean age: 12.4 years), 251 AYAs (mean age: 20.6 years) and 195 older survivors (mean age: 32.5 years). Quantitative data were complemented by 151 in-depth interviews. Most participants, across all age groups, preferred specialised follow-up (ie, involving oncologists, nurses or a multidisciplinary team; 86%-97%). Many (36%-58%) were unwilling to receive community-based follow-up. More parents (75%) than AYAs (58%) and older survivors (30%) were engaged in specialised follow-up. While follow-up engagement was significantly lower in older survivors, survivors' prevalence of late effects increased. Of those attending a follow-up clinic, 34%-56% were satisfied with their care, compared with 14%-15% of those not receiving cancer-focused care (p<0.001). Commonly reported barriers included lack of awareness about follow-up availability (67%), followed by logistical (65%), care-related beliefs (59%) and financial reasons (57%). Older survivors (p<0.001), living outside major cities (p=0.008), and who were further from diagnosis (p=0.014) reported a higher number of barriers., Conclusions: Understanding patient-reported barriers, and tailoring care to survivors' follow-up preferences, may improve engagement with care and ensure that the survivorship needs of this population are met., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Childhood cancer survivorship care is a complex specialty, though it is increasingly being integrated into the general practitioner's (GP) remit. Establishing the essential components of tertiary- and primary-led care, to maximize the benefits and overcome the challenges inherent to each, is essential to inform the development of survivor-centered, sustainable care models., Methods: We used the qualitative principles of semi-structured interviewing, verbatim transcription, coding (supported by NVivo12) and thematic analysis, to collect and evaluate the views and preferences of pediatric oncologists, survivorship nurse coordinators, and GPs currently caring for childhood cancer survivors., Results: Seventy healthcare providers (19 oncology staff and 51 GPs) from 11 tertiary hospitals and 51 primary practices across Australia and New Zealand participated. Participants reported specialist expertise and holistic family-centered care as the key benefits of tertiary and primary care respectively. Participants reported that tertiary-led survivorship care was significantly challenged by a lack of dedicated funding and costs/travel burden incurred by the survivor, whereas primary-led survivorship care was challenged by insufficient GP training and GPs' reliance on oncologist-developed action plans to deliver guideline-based care. GPs also reported a need for ongoing access to survivorship expertise/consultants to support care decisions at critical times. The discharge of survivors into primary care limited late-effects data collection and the rapid implementation of novel research findings., Conclusions: Healthcare professionals report that while a risk-stratified, collaborative model of survivor-centered care is optimal, to be implemented successfully, greater provisions for the ongoing engagement of GPs and further access to GP education/training are needed., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 McLoone, Chen, Wakefield, Johnston, Bell, Thornton-Benko, Cohn and Signorelli.)

Objective: We assessed the acceptability of, and perceived benefits/barriers to, using Electronic health (eHealth) technology for childhood cancer survivorship care., Methods: We interviewed survivors, their parents, and their nominated GP. We described a hypothetical eHealth tool to manage survivorship care and asked their likely use of, and perceived benefits/concerns for, the use of the tool., Results: 31 survivors (mean age = 27.0), 29 parents (survivors' mean age = 12.6), and 51 GPs (mean years practising = 28.2) participated. Most survivors/parents (85%) and GPs (75%) indicated that they would be willing to use an eHealth tool. Survivors/parents reported that an eHealth tool would increase their confidence in their ability, and their GP's ability, to manage their survivorship care. GPs agreed that an eHealth tool would provide easier access to survivors' medical information and increase their capacity to provide support during survivorship. Some GPs (7%) and survivors (43%) reported being hesitant to use eHealth tools due to privacy/security concerns., Conclusion: Overall, eHealth tools appear acceptable and may help to improve the management of late effects for childhood cancer survivors and assist their GPs to coordinate their care., Innovation: Concerns raised by key stakeholders should be addressed in the design of eHealth technologies to optimise their uptake and effectiveness., Competing Interests: No author has any conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this manuscript., (© 2021 The Author(s).)