Paolicelli RC, Sierra A, Stevens B, Tremblay ME, Aguzzi A, Ajami B, Amit I, Audinat E, Bechmann I, Bennett M, Bennett F, Bessis A, Biber K, Bilbo S, Blurton-Jones M, Boddeke E, Brites D, Brône B, Brown GC, Butovsky O, Carson MJ, Castellano B, Colonna M, Cowley SA, Cunningham C, Davalos D, De Jager PL, de Strooper B, Denes A, Eggen BJL, Eyo U, Galea E, Garel S, Ginhoux F, Glass CK, Gokce O, Gomez-Nicola D, González B, Gordon S, Graeber MB, Greenhalgh AD, Gressens P, Greter M, Gutmann DH, Haass C, Heneka MT, Heppner FL, Hong S, Hume DA, Jung S, Kettenmann H, Kipnis J, Koyama R, Lemke G, Lynch M, Majewska A, Malcangio M, Malm T, Mancuso R, Masuda T, Matteoli M, McColl BW, Miron VE, Molofsky AV, Monje M, Mracsko E, Nadjar A, Neher JJ, Neniskyte U, Neumann H, Noda M, Peng B, Peri F, Perry VH, Popovich PG, Pridans C, Priller J, Prinz M, Ragozzino D, Ransohoff RM, Salter MW, Schaefer A, Schafer DP, Schwartz M, Simons M, Smith CJ, Streit WJ, Tay TL, Tsai LH, Verkhratsky A, von Bernhardi R, Wake H, Wittamer V, Wolf SA, Wu LJ, and Wyss-Coray T
Microglial research has advanced considerably in recent decades yet has been constrained by a rolling series of dichotomies such as "resting versus activated" and "M1 versus M2." This dualistic classification of good or bad microglia is inconsistent with the wide repertoire of microglial states and functions in development, plasticity, aging, and diseases that were elucidated in recent years. New designations continuously arising in an attempt to describe the different microglial states, notably defined using transcriptomics and proteomics, may easily lead to a misleading, although unintentional, coupling of categories and functions. To address these issues, we assembled a group of multidisciplinary experts to discuss our current understanding of microglial states as a dynamic concept and the importance of addressing microglial function. Here, we provide a conceptual framework and recommendations on the use of microglial nomenclature for researchers, reviewers, and editors, which will serve as the foundations for a future white paper., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests B.A. is the shareholder and member of scientific advisory board of Tranquis Therapeutics. K.B. is an employee and shareholder of AbbVie. M.C. receives research support from Vigil, is a member of the scientific advisory board of Vigil, and has a patent on TREM2. S.C. is a recipient of research funding from Eli Lilly and Company. C.C. is a member of the advisory board of Exalys Therapeutics and is the recipient of a research grant from IONIS therapeutics. B.D.S. is occasionally consulting for different companies. He is founding scientist of Augustin TX and of Muna TX. He is also shareholder of Muna TX. C.H. collaborates with Denali Therapeutics. C.H. is chief advisor of ISAR Bioscience and a member of the advisory board of AviadoBio. J.K. is a scientific advisor and collaborator with PureTech. T.M. is a cofounder of REGAIN Therapeutics, owner of a provisional patent on compositions and methods for treatment and/or prophylaxis of proteinopathies, and owner of a provisional patent on preventing or reverting abnormal amyloid deposition. R.M. has scientific collaborations with Alector, Nodthera, and Alchemab and is a consultant for Sanofi. B.M. has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca. A. Sierra is a recipient of a research grant from Hoffmann La Roche., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)