Search

Abstract The potential risks associated with organs from COVID-19-infected donors were unclear. To determine the SARS-CoV-2 infection status of corneas transplanted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the corneal preservation solution that was used for corneal transplantation. We also examined the postoperative health status of the recipients. This study included 144 transplants in 143 eyes. Ninety-nine eyes of imported corneas and 10 of the 14 corneas donated in the prefecture were PCR tested at our hospital, and all were SARS-CoV-2 negative. All corneal transplants were performed after confirming their SARS-CoV-2 negativity by a PCR using a corneal preservation solution at our hospital or a nasopharyngeal swab at a previous facility. Despite postoperative steroid administration, no patient developed COVID-19 infection until discharge. Hence, if the donor's nasopharyngeal swab test is SARS-CoV-2 negative, COVID-19 infection in the recipient due to corneal transplantation may be prevented. Since corneal transplant recipients are susceptible to infection due to prolonged steroid administration and are at high risk for severe diseases if infection occurs, SARS-CoV-2 detection testing using nasopharyngeal swabs in donors should be performed.

Abstract Background Pharmaceutical companies do not sell formulations for all diseases; thus, healthcare workers have to treat some diseases by concocting in-hospital preparations. An example is the high-concentration 2% cyclosporine A (CyA) ophthalmic solution. Utilizing a filter in sterility operations is a general practice for concocting in-hospital preparations, as is the case for preparing a 2% CyA ophthalmic solution. However, whether filtering is appropriate concerning the active ingredient content and bacterial contamination according to the post-preparing quality control of a 2% CyA ophthalmic solution is yet to be verified. Methods We conducted particle size, preparation concentration, and bacterial contamination studies to clarify aforementioned questions. First, we measured the particle size of CyA through a laser diffraction particle size distribution. Next, we measured the concentration after preparation with or without a 0.45-µm filter operation using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Finally, bacterial contamination tests were conducted using an automated blood culture system to prepare a 2% CyA ophthalmic solution without a 0.45 μm filtering. Regarding the pore size of the filter in this study, it was set to 0.45 μm with reference to the book (the 6th edition) with recipes for the preparation of in-hospital preparations edited by the Japanese Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Results CyA had various particle sizes; approximately 30% of the total particles exceeded 0.45 μm. The mean ± standard deviation of filtered and non-filtered CyA concentrations in ophthalmic solutions were 346.51 ± 170.76 and 499.74 ± 76.95ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.011). Regarding bacterial contamination tests, aerobes and anaerobes microorganisms were not detected in 14 days of culture. Conclusions Due to the results of this study, the concentration of CyA may be reduced by using a 0.45-µm filter during the preparation of CyA ophthalmic solutions, and furthermore that the use of a 0.45-µm filter may not contribute to sterility when preparing CyA ophthalmic solutions.

Background: Patients with hepatitis virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (viral HCC) are decreasing as hepatitis control improves, but those with non-viral-related HCC (non-viral HCC) are increasing in Japan. No established surveillance system exists for patients with non-viral HCC, so they are often diagnosed at an advanced stage. To address this, we performed this study. Methods: We collected serum samples from 516 participants (154 healthy subjects, 93 chronic liver disease [CLD] patients without HCC, and 269 HCC patients). Participants were divided into a control group comprising healthy subjects and patients with CLD and an HCC group. We evaluated serum methylated HOXA1 (m-HOXA1) copy numbers using modified combined restriction digital PCR (CORD) assay (1-step CORD assay). We assessed diagnostic performance of m-HOXA1 compared to HCC tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) and created a novel index to improve HCC prediction. Results: Serum m-HOXA1 level was significantly higher in each HCC stage group versus the control group. Its sensitivity was 69.1% and specificity was 78.5% for diagnosing HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) of m-HOXA1 was superior to that of AFP and equal to that of DCP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed independent contributions of m-HOXA1, DCP, and AFP, in that order of strength, to diagnose HCC after adjustment for age and sex. We designated the predictive probability of HCC based on the regression model as the ASDAm-H1 (Age, Sex, DCP, AFP, and m-HOXA1) index. Its diagnostic accuracy was 0.96 by AUC with a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 93.9%. Sensitivity was identical for viral and non-viral HCCs. When limited to early-stage HCC, sensitivity of the ASDAm-H1 index was 76.3%. Conclusions: We showed distinguished performance of the ASDAm-H1 index to detect viral and non-viral HCC even at an early stage. This index might have potential as a non-viral HCC surveillance system.