Search

To evaluate the right colic vascularity, focusing on the confluences of veins.The subjects of this retrospective study were 100 patients who underwent laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy (Lap-ERHC) between April 2015 and September 2020, at our hospitals. Veins draining into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) included the ileocecal vein (ICV), the right colic vein (RCV), the middle colic vein (MCV), and the gastrocolic trunk of Henle (GCT). Veins draining into vessels other than the SMV were defined as accessory colic veins (aICV, aRCV or aMCV).The GCT, aRCV, and aMCV were found in 86, 89, and 15 patients, respectively. In 66 patients with one aRCV, drainage was split as the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein (ASPDV) in 12, the right gastroepiploic vein (RGEV) in 7, and the GCT in 47. In 23 patients with two aRCVs, drainage was split as the ASPDV in 4, the RGEV in 1, the GCT in 11, and the ASPDV and GCT in 7. In 14 patients with one aMCV, drainage was split as the GCT in 8, the splenic vein in 5, and the first jejunal vein (FJV) in 1. One patient had two aMCVs, draining into the GCT and the FJV.The findings of our evaluation of vascular anatomy, focusing on confluences of the colic veins, provides useful information for colorectal surgeons.

Despite having once been extensively used for cosmetics or pain reduction, the use of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has declined in recent years due to technical difficulties and a reported increase in complications. Since the introduction of SILC in 2009, our hospital has been actively involved with this technique. Our experience suggests that SILC is not a difficult procedure and can be safe and useful, with particularly excellent cosmetic outcomes. This study retrospectively details the outcomes of SILC at our hospital.Data on 1469 cases of SILC performed on a waitlist basis at Osaka Police Hospital from May 2009 to December 2020 were collected and retrospectively analysed.The median operative time and blood loss were 96 min and 0 mL, respectively. A total of 46 patients (3.1%) required conversion surgery, including 36 needing additional ports and 10 requiring laparotomy. Intraoperative complications included common bile duct injury in 1 patient (0.07%) and right hepatic artery injury in 1 patient (0.07%), with no other organ injury. Postoperative Clavien-Dindo 3 or higher complications were observed in 18 patients (1.2%). Incisional hernias occurred in 15 patients (1.0%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days.This study showed that SILC can be performed safely without any increase in complications, as reported previously. Granted that it is performed safely, SILC may be a useful technique due to its superior cosmetic outcomes or pain reduction.

Background: The clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for rectal cancer is unclear. However, SILS is a technically challenging procedure for novice surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of SILS for rectal cancer compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 357 consecutive patients with stage I–III rectal cancer located in the rectosigmoid or upper rectum who underwent SILS or MPLS between January 2012 and December 2016, using propensity score-matched analysis.Results: After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 204 patients (n=102 per group). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in tumor location (p < 0.001). After matching, preoperative clinical factors were similar between groups. SILS was successful in 73.5% of cases, an additional port was required in 23.5% and 2.9% were converted to open surgery. Compared to the MPLS group, the SILS group showed shorter operative time (192 vs. 211 min, p=0.015) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (9 vs. 11 days, p=0.038). Other operative factors and morbidity rates did not differ significantly between groups. The number of harvested lymph nodes was smaller in the SILS group (24) than in the MPLS group (27, p=0.008). Postoperative recurrence did not differ between groups before or after matching. No significant differences in 3-year disease-free, 3-year local recurrence-free or 5-year overall survival were found between groups.Conclusions: SILS is safe, feasible and offers satisfactory oncological outcomes in selected patients with rectosigmoid or upper rectal cancer.

Purpose: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for descending colon cancer (DCC) is a technically challenging procedure with unclear clinical impact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SILS for DCC compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS).Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 137 consecutive patients with stage I–III DCC who underwent SILS or MPLS at two high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary hospitals between April 2008 and December 2018, using propensity score-matched analysis.Results: After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 88 patients (n=44 in each group). Median follow-up period was 48 months. The completion rate for SILS was 98.1% in the overall cohort and 97.7% in the matched cohort. One patient was converted to open surgery in the MPLS group. Compared with the MPLS group, the SILS group showed significantly less blood loss and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes in both the entire patient cohort and the matched cohort. Morbidity rates did not differ significantly between groups before and after matching. R0 resection was achieved in the entire patient cohort. In terms of the incidence of recurrence, both groups were similar before and after matching. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates in either the entire patient cohort or the matched cohort.Conclusions: SILS appears safe and feasible and can provide satisfactory oncological outcomes for selected patients with DCC.

136 Background: Although clinical outcomes of chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have improved over the last decade, the standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens for patients with unresectable RAS wild-type CRC remain to be discussed. The aim of this study was to compare S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) + bevacizumab (B-mab) with SOX + cetuximab (C-mab) in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic CRC with wild-type KRAS. Methods: This phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of SOX+B-mab with SOX+C-mab in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic CRC with wild-type KRAS. Forty-five patients were enrolled in this study between February 2012 and October 2016. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) for the SOX+B-mab group was 59.1%, whereas that for the SOX+C-mab group was 43.5% (p = 0.29). The disease control rate (DCR) for the SOX+B-mab group was 90.9%, whereas that of the SOX+C-mab group was 91.3% (p = 0.96). For all patients, median OS were 25.3 months (95% CI: 16.5–39.4 months) in the SOX+B-mab group and 15.5 months (95% CI: 7.30–30.4 months, p = 0.167) in the SOX+C-mab group. Median PFS were 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.37–18.2 months) in the SOX+B-mab group and 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.36–10.1 months, p = 0.077) in the SOX+C-mab group. In the SOX+B-mab group, OS and PFS were not significantly different with and without early tumor shrinkage (ETS). However, in the SOX+C-mab group, patients with ETS had significantly better OS (30.4 months [95% CI: 8.0–44.3 months, p = 0.032]) and PFS (12.0 months [95% CI: 5.1–19.7 months, p = 0.003]) than those without ETS. Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab as initial treatment for unresectable CRC with wild-type KRAS were almost the same. ETS was more correlated with PFS in the SOX+C-mab group than in the SOX+B-mab group, suggesting consideration of treatment strategy based on ETS may improve patient prognosis, especially in patients receiving the SOX+C-mab regimen. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006706 .

This phase II study (MCSGO-1202) aimed to evaluate the initial dose reduction of oxaliplatin in XELOX plus bevacizumab therapy.This was a phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective, study conducted at 14 Japanese institutions. The study included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with performance status (PS) of 1 or 2 who had not undergone chemotherapy. Patients received oxaliplatin (100 mg/mBetween April 2012 and March 2016, 56 patients were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range=44-85 years), and the majority (90.6%) had a PS of 1. A complete response was observed in three patients (5.7%), partial response in 24 (45.3%), stable disease in 22 (43.4%), and progressive disease in one (1.9%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 11.4 and 26.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (15.1%), neutropenia (9.4%), neuropathy (9.4%).The dose-reduction strategy of oxaliplatin was effective for elderly or vulnerable patients with mCRC.

With the advancement of endoscopic resection(ER)of colorectal cancer, surgical resection after ER has been increasing. This study evaluated the effects of initial ER on short- and long-term outcomes in T1b colorectal cancer. This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with pathological T1b colorectal cancer who underwent colorectal surgical resection between 2008 and 2018. A total of 239 eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: patients initially treated using surgical resection with lymph node dissection(LND)(surgery alone, n=142)and patients treated using initial ER and additional surgical resection with LND(surgery after ER, n=97). No significant differences were observed in short-term outcomes(ie, operative time, blood loss, or postoperative complications)or the long-term outcomes(ie, recurrence rate, overall survival rate, or recurrence free survival rate)between groups.