Search

ObjectivesThe Delta variant of the novel beta coronavirus responsible for the current coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) spread across Europe during the summer of 2021. Little is known of vaccine efficacy on this variant. Our aim was to study the prevalence and clinical characteristics of fully vaccinated subjects admitted to hospital for Delta variant COVID-19.MethodsWe identified patients admitted to Cannes hospital for Delta-variant-related Covid-19 infection from July to September 2021. Their main demographic parameters, inflammatory markers, and clinical characteristics were recorded. Differences between fully vaccinated subjects and unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated individuals were analyzed.ResultsWe included 126 patients (57% male, mean age 64 years, mean delay since symptoms onset 7.8 days). Among admitted patients, 94 (75%) were not vaccinated, 11 (8%) incompletely so and 21 (17%) were fully vaccinated. Fully vaccinated patients were older (77 vs. 61 vs. 62 years, p = 0.003), with fewer days since symptoms onset (5.9 vs. 8.0 vs. 9.3 days, p = 0.035) than unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated patients, respectively. Severe pneumonia was less frequent among completely vaccinated subjects (67 vs. 84 vs. 100%, p = 0.038), while rates of transfer to the ICU, mechanical ventilation or death did not differ. Thirteen fully vaccinated patients underwent a thoracic CT scan, revealing involvement of lung parenchyma in four of them.DiscussionPrevalence of hospitalization for Delta-variant COVID-19 in fully vaccinated subjects was low and, despite their age and comorbid conditions, these patients had a high rate of favorable outcome.

Abstract Background While prior Micra trials demonstrated a high implant success rate and favorable safety and efficacy results, changes in implant populations and safety over time is not well studied. The objective of this analysis was to report the performance of Micra in European and Middle Eastern patients and compare to the Micra Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) and Micra Post Approval Registry (PAR) studies. Methods The prospective, single‐arm Micra Acute Performance European and Middle Eastern (MAP EMEA) registry was designed to further study the performance of Micra in patients from EMEA. The primary endpoint was to characterize acute (30‐day) major complications. Electrical performance was analyzed. The major complication rate through 12 months was compared with the IDE and PAR studies. Results The MAP EMEA cohort (n = 928 patients) had an implant success rate of 99.9% and were followed for an average of 9.7 ± 6.5 months. Compared to prior studies, MAP EMEA patients were more likely to have undergone dialysis and have a condition which precluded the use of a transvenous pacemaker (p

Abstract Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is highly effective in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left bundle block branch. In cardiac amyloidosis (CA) patients, left ventricular dysfunction and conduction defects are common, but the potential of CRT to improve cardiac remodelling and survival in this particular setting remains undefined. We investigated cardiovascular outcomes in CA patients after CRT implantation in terms of CRT echocardiographic response and major cardiovascular events (MACEs). Methods and results Our retrospective study included 47 CA patients implanted with CRT devices from January 2012 to February 2020, in nine French university hospitals (77 ± 6 years old, baseline LVEF 30 ± 8%) compared with propensity‐matched (1:1 for age, LVEF at implantation, and CRT indication) DCM patients with a CRT device. CA patients had lower rates of CRT response (absolute delta LVEF ≥ 10%) compared with DCM patients (36% vs. 70%, P = 0.002). After multivariate Cox analysis, CA was independently associated with MACE (hospitalization for heart failure/cardiovascular death) [hazard ratio (HR) 3.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85–7.54, P

Abstract Background Although less common, typical atrial flutter shares similar pathophysiological roots with atrial fibrillation. Following successful cavo‐tricuspid isthmus ablation using radiofrequency, many patients, however, develop atrial fibrillation in the mid‐to‐long‐term. This study sought to assess whether pulmonary vein isolation conducted at the same time as cavo‐tricuspid isthmus ablation would significantly modify the atrial fibrillation burden upon follow‐up in patients suffering from typical atrial flutter. Methods This was a multicenter randomized controlled study involving typical atrial flutter patients with history of non‐predominant atrial fibrillation (1 atrial fibrillation episode only, in 67% of population) who were scheduled for cavo‐tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation. Patients were randomly assigned to either undergo cavo‐tricuspid isthmus ablation alone or cavo‐tricuspid isthmus plus pulmonary vein isolation (CTI+). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed using cryoballoon technology. An outpatient consultation with ECG and 1‐week Holter monitoring was performed at 3, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postprocedure. The primary endpoint was atrial fibrillation recurrences lasting more than 30 s at 2 years postablation. Results Of the patients enrolled, 36 were included in each group. At 2‐year follow‐up, the atrial fibrillation recurrence rate was significantly higher in the CTI vs CTI+group (25/36, 69% vs. 12/36, 33% respectively; P

Background Leadless ventricular permanent pacemakers (leadless VVI or LPM) were designed to reduce lead‐related complications of conventional VVI pacemakers (CPM). The aim of our study was to assess and compare real‐life clinical outcomes within the first 30 days and during a midterm follow‐up with the 2 techniques. Methods and Results This French longitudinal cohort study was based on the national hospitalization database. All adults (age ≥18 years) hospitalized in French hospitals from January 1, 2017 to September 1, 2020, who underwent a first LPM or CPM were included. The study included 40 828 patients with CPM and 1487 with LPM. After propensity score matching 1344 patients with CPM were matched 1:1 with patients treated with LPM. Patients with LPM had a lower rate of all‐cause and cardiovascular death within the 30 days after implantation. During subsequent follow‐up (mean: 8.6±10.5 months), risk of all‐cause death in the unmatched population was significantly higher in the LPM group than in the CPM group, whereas risk of cardiovascular death and of endocarditis was not significantly different. After matching on all baseline characteristics including comorbidities (mean follow‐up 6.2±8.7 months), all‐cause death, cardiovascular death, and infective endocarditis were not statistically different in the 2 groups. Conclusions Patients treated with leadless VVI pacemakers had better clinical outcomes in the first month compared with the patients treated with conventional VVI pacing. During a midterm follow‐up, risk of all‐cause death, cardiovascular death, and endocarditis in patients treated with leadless VVI pacemaker was not statistically different after propensity score matching.