Search

Objectives: Antibacterial antifolate drugs might have a wider role in the management of staphylococcal infection. One factor that could potentially limit their use in this context is pre-existing resistance. Here we explored the prevalence and genetic basis for resistance to these drugs in a large collection (n = 1470) of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus aureus., Methods: Strains were subjected to susceptibility testing to detect resistance to trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, co-trimoxazole and the investigational drug, iclaprim. Whole-genome sequences were interrogated to establish the genetic basis for resistance., Results: According to CLSI breakpoints, 15.2% of the strains were resistant to trimethoprim, 5.2% to sulfamethoxazole and 4.1% to co-trimoxazole. Using the proposed breakpoint for iclaprim, 89% of the trimethoprim-resistant strains exhibited non-susceptibility to this agent. Sulfamethozaxole resistance was exclusively the result of mutation in the drug target (dihydropteroate synthase). Resistance to trimethoprim and iclaprim also resulted from mutation in the target (dihydrofolate reductase; DHFR) but was more commonly associated with horizontal acquisition of genes encoding drug-insensitive DHFR proteins. Among the latter, we identified a novel gene (dfrL) encoding a DHFR with ∼35% identity to native and known resistant DHFRs, which was confirmed via molecular cloning to mediate high-level resistance., Conclusions: This study provides a detailed picture of the genotypes underlying staphylococcal resistance to antifolate drugs in clinical use and in development. Prevalence estimates suggest that resistance to the diaminopyrimidines (trimethoprim/iclaprim) is not uncommon among MDR S. aureus, and considerably higher than observed for sulfamethoxazole or co-trimoxazole., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: Whole-cell biosensor strains are powerful tools for antibacterial drug discovery, in principle allowing the identification of inhibitors acting on specific, high-value target pathways. Whilst a variety of biosensors have been described for detecting cell-wall biosynthesis inhibitors (CWBIs), these strains typically lack specificity and/or sensitivity, and have for the most part not been rigorously evaluated as primary screening tools. Here, we describe several Staphylococcus aureus CWBI biosensors and show that specific and sensitive biosensor-based discovery of CWBIs is achievable., Methods: Biosensors comprised lacZ reporter fusions with S. aureus promoters (PgltB, PilvD, PmurZ, PoppB, PORF2768, PsgtB) that are subject to up-regulation following inhibition of cell-wall biosynthesis. Induction of biosensors was detected by measuring expression of β-galactosidase using fluorogenic or luminogenic substrates., Results: Three of the six biosensors tested (those based on PgltB, PmurZ, PsgtB) exhibited apparently specific induction of β-galactosidase expression in the presence of CWBIs. Further validation of one of these (PmurZ) using an extensive array of positive and negative control compounds and conditional mutants established that it responded appropriately and uniquely to inhibition of cell-wall biosynthesis. Using this biosensor, we established, validated and deployed a high-throughput assay that identified a potentially novel CWBI from a screen of >9000 natural product extracts., Conclusions: Our extensively validated PmurZ biosensor strain offers specific and sensitive detection of CWBIs, and is well-suited for high-throughput screening; it therefore represents a valuable tool for antibacterial drug discovery., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Activity-directed synthesis (ADS) is a structure-blind, function driven approach that can drive the discovery of bioactive small molecules. In ADS, arrays of reactions are designed and executed, and the crude product mixtures are then directly screened to identify reactions that yield bioactive products. The design of subsequent reaction arrays is then informed by the hit reactions that are discovered. In this study, algorithms for reaction array design were developed in which the reactions to be executed were selected from a large set of virtual reactions; the reactions were selected on the basis of similarity to reactions known to yield bioactive products. The algorithms were harnessed to design arrays of photoredox-catalysed alkylation reactions whose crude products were then screened for inhibition of growth of S. aureus ATCC29213. It was demonstrated that the approach enabled expansion of a series of antibacterial quinazolinones. It is envisaged that such algorithms could ultimately enable fully autonomous activity-directed molecular discovery.

The first member of the pleuromutilin (PLM) class suitable for systemic antibacterial chemotherapy in humans recently entered clinical use, underscoring the need to better understand mechanisms of PLM resistance in disease-causing bacterial genera. Of the proteins reported to mediate PLM resistance in staphylococci, the least-well studied to date is Sal(A), a putative ABC-F NTPase that-by analogy to other proteins of this type-may act to protect the ribosome from PLMs. Here, we establish the importance of Sal proteins as a common source of PLM resistance across multiple species of staphylococci. Sal(A) is revealed as but one member of a larger group of Sal-type ABC-F proteins that vary considerably in their ability to mediate resistance to PLMs and other antibiotics. We find that specific sal genes are intrinsic to particular staphylococcal species, and show that this gene family is likely ancestral to the genus Staphylococcus. Finally, we solve the cryo-EM structure of a representative Sal-type protein (Sal(B)) in complex with the staphylococcal 70S ribosome, revealing that Sal-type proteins bind into the E site to mediate target protection, likely by displacing PLMs and other antibiotics via an allosteric mechanism., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)