Search

Background: The timely initiation of end-of-life (EOL) conversations is considerered best practice for patients with advanced cancer and therefore recommended in oncological guidelines. General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the coordination of EOL-care and often claim that they have also the responsibility to initiate the necessary conversations. Nonetheless, the content of these conversations is rarely a subject of communication between GPs and oncology specialists but crucial for timely integration of palliative care. The aim of this study is to explore the GPs' perspectives on initiation and conduction of EOL-conversations in patients with metastatic lung cancer and how they perceive the interaction with the oncologists of a cancer center., Methods: Qualitative design with in-depth interviews with GPs that refer patients with metastatic lung cancer to a cancer center; thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke., Results: We identified three main themes: timing and conduction of EOL-conversations, factors influencing EOL-conversations, and modes of GP-oncologist interaction. All themes showed important and increasing challenges in regard to communication strategies or procedures within the cancer center and between general practitioners and oncologists. Aside from the elucidated challenges of EOL-communication, new problems arise from the difficulties in keeping pace with advances in oncology and the increasing prognostic uncertainty. Additionally, the lack of standardized communication in EOL-topics between GPs and oncologists is underlined. Options in the mode of interaction include written information in reports or digital platforms and direct phone calls., Conclusions: Because of the growing complexity in modern oncology, strategies for improvement in GP-oncologist interaction have to consider information about therapeutic advances and prognosis of patients. The increasing prognostic uncertainty hazards the adequate provision and conduction of EOL-conversations and thus, the timely integration of palliative care. As a consequence, a trustful personal interaction that includes direct contact via phone calls between GPs and oncologists should be encouraged., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was given by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Heidelberg University (S-478/2020). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and their pseudonymization and confidentiality was ensured throughout the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Sexual dysfunction (SD) prevalence in lung cancer (LC) patients is largely unknown. This study aims to assess the prevalence of SD among LC patients at our center. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 69 patients using a questionnaire on sexual activity and satisfaction. Participants were recruited from 1 July 2023 to 30 September 2024 and had to be diagnosed with LC, age > 18 years, able to read, and with at least 1 month of treatment. A total of 61 patients completed the survey, predominantly male (67.2%) with stage IV LC (68.9%). Less than half (45.9%) reported recent sexual activity, while many expressed little to no interest (55.7%) and minimal satisfaction with their sex life (42.8%). The factors affecting sexual satisfaction included fatigue (37.7%) and feelings of anxiety/stress (24.6%). The reasons for decreased sexual activity included a lack of interest (36.4%), difficulties with erection (24.2%), and issues with partners (24.3%). A significant association was found between SD and the perceived impact of LC on sexual life, with higher dysfunction scores linked to more negative reports. SD is common among LC patients. Implementing assessment strategies and interventions may improve the sexual life of these patients.

Background: Financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) between pharmaceutical companies and clinical practice guideline (CPG) authors can influence guideline recommendations, posing challenges to patient care. Despite global concerns, limited research exists on FCOI awareness among healthcare professionals in lower-middle-income countries like Nepal., Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted between June 2020 and January 2021, aimed to assess FCOI awareness among Nepalese oncologists and identify associated factors. Data were collected through an online survey of 102 oncologists selected from three medical societies. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis., Results: Of the participants, 64 (63%) considered FCOIs between pharmaceutical companies and CPG authors when implementing guidelines. Significant associations were found between FCOI consideration and three factors: type of CPGs used, with higher consideration among users of national (80%) and international guidelines (69%) compared with local guidelines (44%) (p = 0.04); place of medical education, with higher consideration among Nepal-trained physicians (77%) compared with those trained abroad (61%) or both (44%) (p = 0.012); and experience in cancer field, with higher consideration among those with less than 10 years of experience (75%) compared with those having 10-20 years (49%) or more than 20 years (63%) of experience (p = 0.033)., Conclusion: While nearly two-thirds of Nepalese oncologists consider FCOIs when implementing CPGs, enhancing awareness among the remaining one-third is crucial. The findings suggest the need for targeted educational programs and stronger FCOI disclosure mechanisms, particularly as Nepal develops its own CPGs., (© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: There is a need to increase palliative care access for hospitalized older adults with cancer discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) at risk of poor outcomes. Assessing and Listening to Individual Goals and Needs (ALIGN) is a palliative care intervention developed to address this gap. This study gathered perspectives from clinicians across care settings to describe perceptions on serious illness communication and care coordination for patients with cancer after discharge to a SNF to guide ALIGN refinements., Methods: We conducted 37 semistructured interviews with clinicians and leaders in hospital medicine (n = 12), oncology (n = 9), palliative care (n = 12), home health care (n = 6), and hospice (n = 4). Some participants had experience working in more than one specialty. The Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model framework was used to develop the interview guide that explored barriers to care, prognosis discussions, and hospice recommendations. Interviews were coded and analyzed using thematic content analysis., Results: Analysis identified four themes: (1) discharge to a SNF is recognized as a time of worsening prognosis; (2) care silos create communication and information barriers during a period of increasing palliative care need; (3) family caregiver distress escalates following care transitions; and (4) lack of clarity of roles and respect for the patient-oncologist relationship limits prognostic communication and changes in focus of treatment., Conclusion: These findings suggest that acute and postacute care clinicians defer serious illness conversations to the oncologist when patients are on a steep trajectory of decline, experiencing multiple care transitions, and may have limited contact with their oncologist. There is a need to clarify roles among nononcology and oncology clinicians in discussing prognosis and recommending hospice for older adults discharged to SNF.

Background and Aims: Significant burnout and low professional fulfilment are noted among medical oncologists and trainees. The National Oncology Mentorship Programme (NOMP23) was designed to evaluate the impact of a 1-year mentorship program between oncology trainees (mentees) and consultants (mentors) on improving professional fulfilment and burnout., Methods: NOMP23 was a single-arm, prospective cohort study. One hundred twelve participants (56 mentors and 56 mentees) across Australia were recruited. Mentee/mentor pairs were orientated to the program virtually and met at least three times throughout 2023. The primary outcome was improvement in professional fulfilment as assessed using the Stanford Professional Fulfilment Index at conclusion of NOMP23 compared to baseline., Results: A total of 112 participants enrolled. Eighty-six (77%) completed the baseline and 63 (56%) completed the end-of-program survey. At baseline, 82% of mentees and 77% of mentors were classified as burnt out, which reduced to 57% and 51% at the conclusion of NOMP23; a reduction of 25% and 26% (P < 0.01). Baseline professional fulfilment was 0% and 5% for mentees and mentors respectively, which improved to 21% and 34% at the end of NOMP23 (P < 0.01). However, significant reduction in feelings of regret towards oncology as a profession was seen for mentees and mentors between baseline and the conclusion of NOMP23 (40% vs 14% and 29% vs 0% respectively, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: NOMP23 demonstrated that a centrally coordinated, low-cost mentorship program could be feasible and was of high value. Mentorship programs, alongside multifactorial institutional, state-based and national interventions to improve well-being, can help ensure a sustainable workforce., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: This study explores the ethical and moral challenges faced by paediatric oncologists when they are informed of patient genomic results, particularly during molecular tumour boards (MTBs), highlighting the interplay between their clinic, research and expert roles., Methods: This was an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study using a survey distributed to paediatric oncologists in Quebec followed by optional semi-structured interviews. Oncologists' attitudes and comfort levels with six hypothetical germline DNA results identified in a patient from a clinical vignette were assessed using Likert scales. Hypothetical genetic results represented ethical challenges of extended paediatric genomic sequencing. Interviews were conducted with a subgroup of participants to gain insight and context on key survey results., Results: Eighty per cent (n=28) of oncologists in Quebec completed the survey; five participated in the interviews. Comfort levels of oncologists were influenced by the type of genetic result (expected, secondary, incidental finding), whether or not the oncologist was the patient's treating physician, and whether the information disclosed to the patient aligned with the information that they had received. Awareness of a genetic result was sufficient to trigger a feeling of responsibility and liability for that result., Conclusion: Oncologists who take part in genomic sequencing initiatives and who attend MTBs have privileged access to genomic results, above what may be accessible to patients. This imbalance in knowledge contributes to moral discomfort experienced by oncologists who feel responsible for genomic information they are aware of. We propose recommendations applicable to consent processes, policies and pipelines for sharing genomic results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Background: Burnout is a critical factor that can influence the quality of care that doctors provide to their patients. Previous research suggests a link between inadequate communication skills training and burnout, and various approaches to enhance communication skills have been explored as a means to address this issue. However, evidence of the effect of these approaches is lacking. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the novel On-site Supportive Communication Training (On-site SCT) in enhancing communication skills among oncologists and thereby addressing burnout., Methods: This randomized, controlled, multicenter study was conducted across three oncological departments in Denmark. Doctors were eligible if they worked in the outpatient clinic at least four days per month and provided informed consent. Doctors in the intervention group underwent a two-hour introduction followed by three full days of On-site SCT facilitated by in-house psychologists, while those in the control group continued standard practices. Pre- and post-intervention assessments on burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) were conducted, as were assessments of related constructs (job satisfaction and communication self-efficacy). Differences in pre- and post- assessments were analyzed using a paired t-test. Feasibility was assessed descriptively by comparing intervention days with planned schedule, and doctors' satisfaction with the intervention was assessed systematically by questionnaire., Results: Of 101 screened doctors, 89 (88%) consented and were randomized. 65% were female, and the mean age was 46 (range 27 to 75). Due to nine exclusions, data from 39 doctors in the intervention group and 41 doctors in the control group were available for analysis. At baseline, doctors exhibited lower levels of burnout than reported in international literature. No statistically significant improvements in burnout (p > 0.05) were demonstrated post-intervention. Despite non-significant changes, the doctors reported an improvement in communication self-efficacy. The program showed high feasibility and received positive feedback from participating doctors., Conclusions: Our findings caution against assuming a causal relationship between short-term interventions and a complex phenomenon like burnout. On-site SCT demonstrated high feasibility, participation rate and acceptance. This underscores its potential value in clinical settings. Consequently, On-site SCT will be implemented at the Department of Oncology, Vejle University Hospital, to facilitate further refinement based on ongoing feedback and to explore long-term outcomes., Trial Registration: December 2022- The Region of Southern Denmark (22/57137). April 2023- ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05842083). April 2023- The Research Ethics Committee at the University of Southern Denmark (23/19397)., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Research Ethics Committee at the University of Southern Denmark approved the study (23/19397). The Region of Southern Denmark (22/57137) approved the data processing. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05842083). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Background: Although there is clear evidence supporting the beneficial effects of regularly assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the comprehensive integration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine cancer care remains limited. This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers encountered by principal investigators (PIs) (oncologists) and study nurses during the implementation of the Eir ePROM within a cluster randomized trial (c-RCT) in cancer outpatient clinics. Additionally, we sought to examine the influence of Eir on the working routines of the participants., Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews and a focus group were conducted with nine oncologists and study nurses involved in the implementation of the ePROM tool Eir. Interviews elucidated their experiences of barriers and facilitators when implementing Eir through a cluster randomized trial. Data were analysed according to Framework Analysis, using both an inductive and deductive approach. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used in the deductive stages of analysis., Results: Three overarching themes were identified from the data: (1) Willingness to invest; accepting that new eras come with a cost, (2) Management anchoring; changes start at the top, and (3) Creation of a cohesive framework; fostering collective comprehension. We found a notable disparity between oncologists and nurses in their willingness to invest time and effort in implementing the tool. While participants recognized the need to transform patient consultation methods to benefit from digital symptom management, opinions varied on whether the potential benefits justified the associated cost. Furthermore, the degree of management anchoring at various levels significantly impacted the implementation process. At the local level, it was seen as either a facilitator or a barrier, influencing the outcome of the implementation. Additionally, establishing a cohesive framework was crucial, as this fostered a collective understanding among those involved in the implementation., Conclusions: Our study underscores the importance of considering the diverse perspectives of health care professionals and fostering interprofessional collaboration for the successful implementation of ePROMs in healthcare settings. Future research should explore strategies to bridge professional disparities and promote a shared understanding of the value provided by ePROMs., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was provided by SIKT, Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research (reference number 501615). All participants received written and oral information about the study prior to participation. Written, informed consent was obtained before interviews took place. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Aim: The perspectives and practices of healthcare professionals regarding ototoxicity in individuals with head and neck cancers are important for the implementation of ototoxicity monitoring. The current study aims to explore the oncologist's awareness and perspectives of ototoxicity and ototoxicity monitoring for individuals with head and neck cancer in a South-Indian district, using qualitative semi-structured interviews., Method: The COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) Checklist was used to guide the method of the current qualitative study. A conceptual framework was developed for the formulation of the interview guides. Three medical oncologists and six radiation oncologists from cancer care centres participated in the study. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was carried out using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach to present the findings under the respective overarching themes., Results: All oncologists are aware of the ototoxic effects caused by radiation therapy and chemoradiotherapy. It was consistently reported that the severity of the hearing loss was not substantial enough to warrant significant concern. Ototoxicity is not emphasized during the counseling process. All participants reported having awareness and knowledge of ototoxicity monitoring programs and understood their importance. However, none of them reported the implementation of an ototoxicity monitoring program in their facility., Discussion: It is imperative to enhance the knowledge and understanding of the ototoxic nature of cancer treatment modalities among oncologists. It is crucial to raise awareness regarding the significance of ototoxicity monitoring programs among all physicians involved in the treatment of patients with cancer for maximum impact. The barriers to implementing ototoxicity monitoring programs in high- and low-income countries are similar. The models implemented in high-income countries can be adapted for use in low-middle income countries with suitable restructuring., Conclusion: The current study provides valuable insights into the status of ototoxicity monitoring in the South-Indian context. The findings align with the key components of the health belief model, including perceived susceptibility, perceived barriers, and cues to action. Involving oncologists in the planning phase of the ototoxicity monitoring programs can help tailor future research questions and solutions to improve quality of life, foster collaboration among healthcare professionals, and produce actionable outcomes that may influence policy on ototoxicity monitoring., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2025 Shankar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Purpose: The use of social media is transforming physician-patient communication, mainly in the field of medical oncology. The pattern of social media use by medical oncologists is poorly studied. Therefore, we developed a survey to understand the preferences, experiences, opinions, and expectations of Italian medical oncologists and oncology fellows regarding the use of social media in cancer medicine to identify the different profiles of social media users., Materials and Methods: This multicentric, cross-sectional, observational study included oncologists or oncology fellows from Italy, who were surveyed from July to December 2023 on their use of social media. Data were analyzed through K-means clustering, and the Hartigan-Wong algorithm was applied to identify different profiles of social media users among the participants., Results: Of the 245 participants who accepted the invitation, 116 completed the entire survey and were included in the cluster analysis. Three profiles of social media users were identified through clustering: the highly social, the social skeptic, and the moderately social, accounting for 31%, 31%, and 38% of the participants, respectively. In general, older age ( P = .0001), being a specialized oncologist ( P = .003), and a higher mean time spent on social media ( P = .0001) were associated with a greater consideration of the professional use of social media., Conclusion: The use of social media among medical oncologists and oncology fellows represents a spectrum ranging from the social skeptic user to the highly social. Age, professional status (specialist or fellow), and frequency on social media use were associated with different patterns, opinions, and behaviors related to social media use.

Background: The KAP survey evaluates health-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices through a structured questionnaire. By collecting qualitative and quantitative data, it measures the current situation, tests hypotheses, and provides insights for enhancing health behaviors and education. In 2019, the National Health Security Administration (NHSA) initiated DRG payment reforms. This study aims to improve the quality of health insurance and policy implementation by assessing physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the DRG system., Method: This study was a cross-sectional study designed with a questionnaire through simple random sampling method, and respondents were the doctors in the clinical departments of the sampled hospitals. The questionnaire included basic information, knowledge about DRGs, attitude toward DRGs and practice of implementation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis, correlation, path analysis and generalized linear model., Result: A total of 210 questionnaires were included. The majority of respondents aware that their healthcare organizations had already begun to implement the policy. With a mean score of 7.67 for knowledge, respondents basically had a good level of knowledge of DRGs. The mean attitude score of the respondents was 30.20, which was lower than the "positive attitude" criterion, and their main concerns were about matters other than treatment. Knowledge scores were significantly correlated with attitude scores ( P < 0.001), whereas attitude scores were not associated with practice scores. Path analysis and generalized linear modeling indicate that knowledge effectively influences attitudes, whereas attitudes do not have an apparent impact on practice., Conclusion: Oncologists' understanding of DRGs needs to be improved, and their knowledge and attitudes have not yet translated into demonstrable positive practice behaviors. This gap underscores the need for knowledge training and effective incentives., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Xu, Zhang and Yin.)

Purpose: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into survivorship care may improve the comprehensiveness of follow-up. The objective was to engage stakeholders to develop a PRO assessment of survivors' symptoms and concerns for use during breast cancer follow-up., Methods: We convened patient and oncologist stakeholder advisory groups to develop an initial PRO assessment including survivorship domains of importance, measurement instruments, and clinically significant thresholds, and revise the assessment based on feedback from community focus groups and two rounds of iterative pilot testing with survivors., Results: Stakeholders identified key domains and measurement instruments, including recurrence symptoms, treatment side effects, adherence, mental health, and sexual health. Ninety-four survivors completed the PRO assessment in the initial pilot test (median age 62 years, median 2 years from diagnosis). Most (89/93) reported questions were easy to understand. The level of missingness was low. The most common threshold-level symptoms/concerns were hot flashes (46%), fatigue (35%), back pain (31%), joint pain (31%), and anxiety (30%). The PRO assessment was revised to clarify symptom causality and desire to discuss with a provider. In a follow-up pilot study with 20 survivors, the most common symptoms were chest/breast discomfort (50%) and anxiety (25%)., Conclusions: We leveraged stakeholder input to develop a comprehensive PRO assessment to use to assess breast cancer survivors' well-being. Our PRO assessment is acceptable to survivors. Future research will focus on the integration of the PRO assessment into clinical care., Competing Interests: Declarations. Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or WPP. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Early palliative care interventions in oncology, as recommended by international oncology societies, promote patient understanding and support decision-making. At the same time, shared decision-making models are being developed to enhance patient participation as part of a new model of patient-physician relationship. For patients with palliative needs, this participation is essential and helps to avoid futile and aggressive treatments at the end of life. The aim of this study is to observe decision making during meetings between oncology and palliative care professionals, focusing particularly on the components of shared decision-making models, but also on the role played by palliative care professionals., Methods: We conducted a non-participant observation of multidisciplinary meetings and outpatient clinic activities in two Comprehensive Cancer Centres in France. Field notes were then coded using thematic content analysis. Deductive analysis was conducted using the observation grid developed from Elwyn's three-talk model., Results: Only a few elements of the different models of shared decision-making are apparent in the multidisciplinary meetings. Palliative care professionals emphasise the importance of involving patients and providing them with information about the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options. However, patient involvement in decision-making remains difficult in daily practice. Decisions to discontinue oncological treatment are often driven by clinical and biological signs of terminal evolution rather than shared decision-making., Conclusions: There are still cultural and organisational barriers to actual implementation of early integrated onco-palliative care. Promotion of shared decision making can be a strong lever of change which is frequently mobilised by palliative care teams., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study protocol was validated by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Valenciennes Hospital Centre on 24 March 2022 under the reference Ref-CHV-2022–004. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The medical and nursing teams at the observation sites were informed about the study and gave their informed consent to participate. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Widespread adoption of secure messaging (SM) provides patients with cancer with unprecedented access to medical providers at the expense of increased workload for oncologists. Herein, we analyze oncology SM clinical content and acuity and translate these to estimated cost savings from reduced appointments., Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study examined the content of patient-initiated SM threads exchanged through the patient portal website or app over 1 year (June 1, 2021-May 31, 2022) at 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California oncology practices, which typically do not have patient copayments associated with SM. A random sample of 500 SM threads were reviewed and categorized by message content, acuity, and appropriate level of service. Cost and time estimates were used to compare the cost of SM management by oncologists alone versus assisted by medical assistants and nurses., Results: During the study, 41,272 patients initiated 334,053 unique SM threads to 132 oncologists. Of the SM threads reviewed, only 26.8% required oncologist expertise. Based on thread content, the remaining 73.2% may have been better managed by a nurse (38.2%), medical assistant (28.4%), primary care physician (5.4%), or another subspecialty provider (1.2%). Emergency care was recommended in 2.4% of the threads reviewed. Significant medical care was provided to patients in 24.4% of the reviewed threads that would typically require an appointment. We estimate that the SM exchanges provided $11.2 million in care, including $3.6 million in avoided out-of-pocket copayment costs to patients and $7.6 million in missed billing codes., Conclusions: High utilization of SM generates additional workload for oncologists that could mostly be appropriately managed by alternate providers. The magnitude of unreimbursed medical care provided via SM and the use of SM for emergent medical situations creates an urgent need for new practice models. An alternative architecture for triaging, managing, and billing SM could reduce costs and oncologist burnout.

Aim: To understand physicians' attitudes and behaviors regarding EGFR testing and retesting strategies in newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients. Materials & methods: Oncologists and pathologists completed an online, cross-sectional survey. Results: Most oncologists (73.3%) and pathologists (53.4%) agreed that concurrent testing increases sensitivity for detecting EGFR mutations. Upon tissue insufficiency, oncologists and pathologists reported using liquid biopsy 77.0% and 39.0% of the time, respectively. Tumor accessibility, smoking status, patient willingness and age were key drivers of tissue re-biopsy. Most oncologists reported high confidence in proceeding to first-line therapy based solely on liquid biopsy (60.7-80.0%); fewer pathologists (37.9%) were comfortable with this decision. Conclusion: Variation in physicians' perceptions of testing and retesting highlights the need for greater stakeholder consensus.

Background: Quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing surveillance for uveal melanoma (UM) can be affected by psychological sequelae. Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) may be acute especially when prognostication indicates an increased risk of metastatic recurrence. Communication with an ophthalmologist or oncologist can then play a key role in impacting QoL., Methods: In this prospective study co-designed with patient's partners and using a mixed-method approach, 250 patients at high versus low risk of metastatic recurrence are recruited in a national UM reference centre in France. At T1, after the 6-months post-treatment surveillance visit, dyads of clinicians and eligible patients complete a questionnaire to assess their respective experience of the communication during that consultation. Patients also complete questionnaires assessing their health literacy, information preference, and satisfaction with the information received (EORTC QLQ-INFO25), genomic testing knowledge, genomic test result receipt, satisfaction with medical care (EORTC PATSAT-C33), perceived recurrence risk, anxiety and depression (HADS), fear of cancer recurrence (FCRI) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OPT30). At 12-months post-treatment (T2), patients complete again the HADS, FCRI, EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OPT30. Multilevel analyses will assess the effect of satisfaction with the information received on FCR and QoL accounting for the clinicians' and patients' characteristics. In-depth interviews planned sequentially with ≈25 patients will deepen understanding of patients' care experience., Discussion: As information on prognosis based on medical parameters becomes widely integrated into oncology practice, this study will highlight UM survivors' information expectations and satisfaction with communication, and its effect on FCR and QoL. Culturally adapted recommendations for doctor-patient communication will be provided for contexts of oncology surveillance involving poor prognosis in cases of recurrence., Trial Registration: NCT06073548 (October 4, 2023)., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The project was validated on 01/09/2023 by the institutional review board (IRB) from Institut Curie, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Number DATA230157. Furthermore, it has been registered to clinicaltrial.gov, Nr. NCT06073548. Consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication N/A: this paper does not contain any patient or physician data. Competing interests Bernhard Holzner holds IPRs on the CHES software tool used in the study. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Goals of care conversations are essential to delivery of goal concordant care. Infrequent and inconsistent goals of care documentation potentially limit delivery of goal concordant care., Methods: At Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Cancer Center, a standardized documentation template was designed and implemented to increase goals of care documentation by oncologists. The centralized, prompt-based template included value clarification of the goals and values of advanced cancer patients beyond treatment preferences. Documented conversations using the template during the initial pilot period were reviewed to characterization the clinical context in which conversations were recorded. Common goals and motivators were also identified., Results: A total of 178 advanced cancer patients had at least 1 documented conversation by a medical oncologist using the goals of care template. Oncologists consistently documented within the template goals of therapy and motivating factors in decision making. The most frequently documented goals of care were "Avoiding Pain and Suffering," "Physical Independence," and "Living as Long as Possible." The least recorded goal was "Comfort Focused Treatment Only.", Conclusions: Review of oncologist documented goals of care conversations using a prompt-based template allowed for characterization of the clinical context, therapy goals and motivators of advanced cancer patients. Communication of goals of care conversations by oncologists using a standardized prompt-based template within a centralized location has the potential to improve delivery of goal concordant care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: This study investigated the prevalence, methods and factors leading carers of childhood cancer patients to seek second opinions., Methods: A prospective, questionnaire-based study was conducted among families attending oncology clinics at Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick. Participants were asked whether they had sought a second opinion for their child and if so, their motivations. Factors including cancer diagnosis, carer demographics and online health seeking behaviours were evaluated in association with second opinions. A separate online questionnaire invited paediatric oncologists worldwide to indicate the frequency of, and their approach to, second opinion requests via email., Results: Fourteen out of 126 carers (11.1%) sought a second opinion from another oncologist to confirm diagnoses (64.3%), explore treatment options (64.3%) or receive additional information (57.1%). A brain cancer diagnosis was the most significant predictor for second opinion seeking in univariate (p = 0.009) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.015). Among carers who reported using the internet for health information seeking (n = 98), second opinions were independently associated with social media use (p = 0.014) and frequent health-related searches (p = 0.027). Most paediatric oncologists (71/89, 79.8%) had received second opinion requests via email, with 21.3% (19/89) reporting that these occur at least weekly. Surveyed oncologists provided a second opinion for some (59.2%) or all (33.8%) requests they received, with 68.5% supporting guideline development for second opinions in paediatric oncology., Conclusions: Second opinions are regularly sought by carers of childhood cancer patients, with many paediatric oncologists approached over email. International guidelines may be warranted to assist paediatric oncologists and families in navigating these requests., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Can an oncologist doing shared decision making connect with patients via treatment recommendations?

Background: There are missed opportunities to discuss goals and preferences for care with seriously ill patients in the acute care setting. It is unknown which factors most influence clinician decision-making about communication at the point of care., Objective: This study utilized a cognitive-interviewing technique to better understand what leads clinicians to decide to have a goals of care (GOC) discussion in the acute care setting., Methods: A convenience sample of 15 oncologists, intensivists and hospitalists were recruited from a single academic medical center in a large urban area. Participants completed a cognitive interview describing their thought process when deciding whether to engage in GOC discussions in clinical vignettes., Results: 6 interconnected factors emerged as important in determining how likely the physician was to consider engaging in GOC at that time; (1) the participants' mental model of GOC, (2) timing of GOC related to stability, acuity and reversibility of the patient's condition, (3) clinical factors such as uncertainty, prognosis and recency of diagnosis, (4) patient factors including age and emotional state, (5) participants' role on the care team, and (6) clinician factors such as emotion and communication skill level., Conclusion: Participants were hesitant to commit to the present moment as the right time for GOC discussions based on variations in clinical presentation. Clinical decision support systems that include more targeted information about risk of clinical deterioration and likelihood of reversal of the acute condition may prompt physicians to discuss GOC, but more support for managing discomfort with uncertainty is also needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Providers oftentimes need to have difficult conversations with patients facing a poor prognosis. Research indicates that providers generally feel ill prepared for these conversations and that bad conversations may lead to more anxiety for patients. Communication skills development training programs have shown improvement in providers' skills. Our cancer center embarked on skills development training to help providers improve their skills and comfort in having serious illness conversations. During our phased approach, about 500 physicians and advanced practice providers in the Division of Oncology were trained for over a year. Their level of comfort with serious illness conversations was measured before and after the training by using both quantitative and qualitative methods. We found that mean and median comfort scores increased from pre-training to post-training. The findings suggest that the improved comfort and confidence observed among providers who undergo communications skills training can lead to better provider-patient communication, more patient-centered care, and improved patient satisfaction., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.)

Purpose: To develop and implement a continuing professional development (CPD) activity focused on geriatric assessment (GA) in oncology for oncologists and geriatricians. We evaluated the impact of this activity on knowledge, skills, and performance regarding GA in oncology, as well as its feasibility and acceptability., Methods: We included teams composed of an oncologist and a geriatrician working in Mexico. Curriculum content was selected from geriatric oncology guidelines. We used Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcome (ECHO)'s model to create a 12-week online course. A one-group pretest post-test quasi-experimental design was used to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness. At baseline, participants answered a multiple-choice knowledge assessment, a survey on self-perceived competence in GA, and an adaptation of the Association for Community Cancer Centers Geriatric Oncology Gap Assessment Tool, evaluating self-perceived performance in conducting geriatric interventions. These assessments and a satisfaction questionnaire were also completed postintervention. Baseline and postintervention scores were compared using paired t -tests., Results: We included 40 participants (20 oncologists and 20 geriatricians). Median attendance was 10 sessions (range 2-12). Thirty-eight participants completed the satisfaction questionnaire, with a median score of 10/10 (range 8-10). The mean baseline and postintervention knowledge scores were 59.5 ± 12.8 and 74.4 ± 9.7, respectively ( P < .001, effect size 1.14). The mean baseline and postintervention competence scores were 6.42 ± 2.5 and 9.02 ± 0.8, respectively ( P < .001, effect size 1.03). The mean baseline and postintervention performance scores were 2.58 ± 0.65 and 3.29 ± 0.5, respectively ( P < .001, effect size 1.64)., Conclusion: A CPD activity for oncologists and geriatricians on the basis of the Project ECHO model was feasible and acceptable, leading to increased knowledge, competence, and performance in geriatric oncology. This could represent a novel method for increasing the geriatric competence of the cancer care workforce in Latin America and globally.

Purpose: Clinical specialists are supposed to inform childhood cancer patients of infertility risk and conduct fertility preservation (FP). However, little is known about whether doctors in China are fully prepared. This study aimed to investigate behavior, attitude, perception, and knowledge regarding FP among pediatric oncological specialists in a nation wide survey, to set the stage for improvements in current clinical practice patterns., Methods: This study was conducted on physicians and surgeons specialized in pediatric oncology using a questionnaire through the WeChat platform. The behavior, attitude, perception, and knowledge were assessed by Likert questions and results were quantified to obtain scores. Data were then described and analyzed using R and GraphPad., Results: Totally 373 specialists in pediatric tumors were included in the analysis. Hematologists, oncological surgeons, and reproductive medicine specialists won most trusts to be responsible for FP job. Most respondents did not have habits of delivering FP information or cooperating with FP specialists during treatment though they were well equipped with FP knowledge and desired for uniform national guideline for FP procedures. The severity of illness was regarded as the primary barrier of FP delivery. When a doctor was more educated and experienced, he was more likely to have better performance in FP. The total score, the knowledge score, and the single score concerning frequency of patients' inquiry showed aggregational trend on geographic distribution., Conclusion: Chinese pediatric oncologists demonstrated unsatisfactory practice behaviors based upon this self-reporting survey, although their attitude towards FP was generally positive., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Journeying with patients throughout their cancer trajectory and caring for them at the end of life can lead to emotional and moral distress in oncologists, negatively impacting their personal and professional identities. A better understanding of how transitions in care goals affect oncologists can shed light on the challenges faced and the support required. This study explored the impact of care transitions on oncologists' professional identity formation (PIF)., Methods: From September to December 2023, semi-structured interviews were conducted with oncologists in a palliative care center in Singapore. The Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) was used as a framework to capture the effects of experiences with patients transitioning from curative to palliative care on the oncologists' sense of self and identity. Data were analyzed using both inductive and deductive qualitative analysis., Results: Participants included six female and six male physicians, aged 30 to 53 years (mean 38 years), with an average of 9.75 years of experience as oncologists. The main domains identified were 1) challenges faced in transitioning patients to palliative care, 2) the impact of dealing with dying patients on oncologists, and 3) coping mechanisms., Conclusion: Oncologists experience self-doubt and moral distress as they manage transitions in care. The PIF of oncologists can be supported through reflection and introspection, peer support, and interventions to promote self-care - ultimately enabling them to make meaning of their experiences, renew family ties, and reaffirm their commitment to the profession., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Healthcare providers should be well prepared to fight the COVID-19 pandemic and protect their patients and themselves as frontline workers. The aim of this study was to assess oncologists' and health care workers (HCWs) knowledge, attitude, and practice in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on them., Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among Egyptian oncologists and HCWs in the oncology department at Suez Canal University Hospitals, Egypt. Participants were reached through a Google Form questionnaire. The questionnaire was shared on social media (Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp) over four months, from June 1 st to September 30, 2022. All physicians and HCWs in the oncology department were invited to participate in the survey. Researchers intended to enroll all physicians and HCWs within the study period., Results: Out of the 110 participants included in the study, there was a female predominance, and the majority were oncology nurses and clinical oncologists. Knowledge with significant participants' characteristics showed that knowledge significantly varied by age. The level of knowledge was significantly higher among participants between 30 and 40 years old (OR = 5.111; 95% CI, 1.202-21.738; P = 0.027). 65.5% of the participants had poor knowledge, with a mean ± SD of 4.9 ± 1.4. About 43.6% of the participants experienced more burnout than before the COVID-19 pandemic, with a negative emotional impact. 63.7% reported a negative financial impact due to the pandemic. 62.7% had support from their family, even though their job increases their risk of infection. 7.3% only reported a positive impact regarding their friend's relationship., Conclusion: COVID-19 pandemic has a negative impact on oncologists' personal and professional lives. Interventions should be implemented to lessen the negative impact and better prepare oncologists to handle future crises with greater efficiency and resilience., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: People with cancer experience heightened levels of stress and anxiety, including psychological or physical. In recent years, digitally delivered complimentary therapies, such as meditation, have gained attention in cancer research and advocacy communities for improving quality of life. However, most digital meditation resources are commercially available and are not tailored to the unique needs of cancer patients (addressing fears of recurrence). As such, this study lays the foundation to co-design a publicly available digital meditation program called iCANmeditate that contains cancer-specific meditation content., Aims: To understand: (1) cancer patients' perceptions and practices of meditation, as well as their needs in addressing the stress that accompanies their cancer diagnosis and (2) current knowledge of meditation and prescribing trends amongst oncologists in Canada., Methods and Analysis: A mixed-methods design comprised of online patient and oncologist surveys and interviews with patients will be used. Survey data analysis will use multivariate logistic regressions to examine predictors of: (1) interest in using a meditation app among patients and (2) prescribing meditation among oncologists. Patient interviews will gather insights about the contexts of daily living where meditation would be most beneficial for people with cancer; this data will be analyzed thematically., Discussion: The results of this study will inform iterative co-design workshops with cancer patients to build the digital meditation program iCANmeditate; interview results will be used to develop vignettes or "personas" that will supply the initial stimulus material for the iterative co-design workshops. Once the program has been finalized in partnership with cancer patient participants, a usability and pilot study will follow to test the functionality and efficacy of the tool. Results from the oncologist survey will form the basis of knowledge mobilization efforts to facilitate clinical buy-in and awareness of the benefits of meditation to cancer patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Lalani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: The perception of oncologists could impact the attractiveness of the specialty and dialogue between oncologists and other physicians. The aim of the study was to describe and understand the stereotypes and social representation (SR) associated with oncologists among medical students, residents and physicians in France., Methods: This nationwide web-based survey conducted in 2021 was based on hierarchical evocation methods. Qualitative analyses were based on the Reinert method with factorial analyses. Each respondent's SR was graded from 1 to 5 (from 1: very positive SR to 5: very negative SR)., Results: Oncologists suffer from a rather negative SR. The negative representation was mostly related to difficulties in practising and the proximity with death and end of life. Oncologists were also associated with more positive notions like interdisciplinarity or intellectual complexity. Attendance to an oncology course was associated with a better SR of oncology (p=0.036), whereas having someone in the family practising oncology had a negative impact (p=0.028)., Conclusions: SR of oncologists is rather contrasted. It was positively influenced by attendance to an oncology course, which could be an option to correct stereotypes and update on this rapidly evolving specialty., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: This qualitative study aimed to investigate communication about death in consultations with patients undergoing chemotherapy with no curative intent. Specifically, we examined (i) how the topic of death was approached, who raised it, in what way, and which responses were elicited, (ii) how the topic unfolded during consultations, and (iii) whether interaction patterns or distinguishing ways of communicating can be identified., Methods: The data consisted of 134 audio-recorded follow-up consultations. A framework of sensitizing concepts was developed, and interaction patterns were looked for when death was discussed., Results: The subject of death and dying was most often initiated by patients, and they raised it in various ways. In most consultations, direct talk about death was initiated only once. We identified 4 interaction patterns. The most frequent consists of indirect references to death by patients, followed by a direct mention of the death of a loved one, and a statement of the oncologists aiming to skip the subject., Significance of Results: Patients and oncologists have multiple ways of raising, pursuing, addressing and evacuating the subject of death. Being attentive and recognizing these ways and associated interaction patterns can help oncologists to think and elaborate on this topic and to facilitate discussions.

Background: Adults and children with cancer are referred to palliative care infrequently or late. Oncologists often gatekeep these referrals. Social exchange theory is used to explain physician referral behaviour in various clinical settings. Its utility in a cancer palliative care setting is not known., Methods: We used Karl Popper's hypothetico-deductive approach to test the hypothesis. The hypothesis was that social exchange theory is a helpful framework for explaining oncologists' palliative care referral behaviour in a cancer setting. The utility of the theoretical framework was tested against the empiric findings of a systematic review and original research., Results: Most components of social exchange theory known to explain physician referral behaviour like beliefs about the provider or service, emotions triggered during the professional engagement, its symbolism and stigma, the complexity of the referral task, efforts needed to achieve it, its cost, benefit, and value were similar in a cancer setting. Empirical findings suggest that oncologists provided strategies and solutions to better palliative care integration instead of comparing their existing engagement with potential alternatives and choosing them., Conclusion: Social exchange theory was found to be helpful in explaining oncologists' palliative care referral behaviour. To further develop the social exchange theory based on the data used to test it, it is recommended to include feedback and solutions as a component of the theoretical framework alongside a comparison level for alternatives., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This study surveyed South Australian medical oncologists to capture their perceptions, willingness to participate and perceived barriers and motivations to participation in voluntary assisted dying (VAD) activities. Approximately 70% of surveyed medical oncologists reported familiarity with VAD legislation. Less than half of physicians (39.1%) reported willingness to participate in any VAD activities, and the rate of conscientious objection was 22%. The top barriers to participation were lack of time and uncertainty given no prior experience. These results demonstrate both a low rate of conscientious objection and a low rate of willingness to participate at the point of VAD implementation in South Australia, and identify barriers to participation that are largely logistical., (© 2024 The Author(s). Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: Evidence demonstrates that physical exercise confers several psycho-physical benefits on patients with cancer. This study aims to investigate the role of oncologists in exercise promotion., Patients and Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire to patients with cancer. The questionnaire enclosed demographic, health, and exercise variables. The exercise-related questions included in the study used the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire to measure the amount of physical exercise. In addition, the survey gathered information on whether exercise was discussed with patients, and whether oncologists followed the assess, advise, reinforce, and refer (AARR) process regarding exercise. The survey also asked if patients preferred that exercise be discussed during their consultations. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were applied., Results: With a response rate of 75%, a total of 549 patients completed the survey. Regarding the exercise discussion, 38% of patients stated that their oncologist initiated an exercise discussion, 14% started the discussion themselves, and 48% said that the issue was not considered. Overall, 35% of patients reported that the oncologist assessed their exercise level, 22% and 42% received advice or reinforcement to increase their exercise, respectively, and 10% were referred to a dedicated service. Regarding preferences, 72% of patients thought that the oncologists should initiate an exercise discussion, 2% that only patients should start the discussion, and 26% thought that the issue should not be discussed. Similarly, 74% of patients are willing to receive the exercise assessment, 59% and 75% the advice and reinforcement to increase their exercise, and 46% to be referred to an exercise service., Conclusions: Although exercise promotion rates are low, patients are willing to receive exercise information. Dedicated strategies should be developed to support oncologists in promoting exercise to their patients., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Oncologists' psychological health is a major challenge due to the consequential concerning the quality of the care they provide. However, only critical states of their health have been really examined by scientists. This study sought to plug this gap by investigating the mediating role of psychological flourishing in the relationship between the perception of the professional social context (i.e., perceived workplace isolation and organizational support) and positive attitudes at work among oncologists (i.e., work engagement, task adjustment and empathy)., Methods: The study was a cross-sectional, including 541 French oncologists. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire. Structural Equation Modeling was employed to test the hypotheses., Results: The analysis revealed that workplace isolation and organizational support perceptions were related to oncologists' work engagement, task adjustment and empathy. Additionally, psychological flourishing acted as a partial mediator between these perceptions of professional social context and oncologists' work-related attitudes., Conclusions: This research underlined the potential of enhancing the psychological flourishing of oncologists by improving organizational support and mitigating their sense of isolation, and in turn, to enhance some dimensions of their positive attitudes at work., (© 2024 The Author(s). Psycho‐Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Although virtual care (VC) has become an integral part of oncology care and healthcare delivery, clinicians' perspectives on and satisfaction with this modality are not well understood., Methods: Using a National Network Forum framework and expert panel review, we developed a questionnaire to measure oncologists' satisfaction with VC. The questionnaire was distributed to Canadian oncologists through medical society email lists (n = 1541). We used a 5-point Likert scale to capture their responses, which included strongly disagree (1), disagree (2), undecided (3), agree (4), and strongly agree (5)., Results: A total of 61 oncologists and/or oncology trainees, of 768 (7.9%) who opened their email, completed questionnaires between October 2022 and January 2023. Every questionnaire item had a response rate greater than 98%. Seventy-two percent of the respondents were satisfied with VC. Oncologists who were less comfortable with technology were more likely to report lower levels of satisfaction ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum). The questionnaire items that received the highest levels of agreement were related to VC reducing costs and improving access for patients and concerns about missing a diagnosis and assessing patients' functional status. The questionnaire items that received the greatest disagreement were related to VC improving access for patients with language barriers, VC being associated with time-savings for clinicians, improvements in clinical efficacy, and more readily available lab tests., Conclusions: Most of the oncologists surveyed are satisfied with VC; however, there are some concerns with VC that need to be addressed. Future research on optimizing VC should address clinicians' concerns, in addition to addressing the patient experience.

To better understand what makes cost-of-care communication between oncologists and cancer patients more or less successful, we conducted in-depth interviews with 32 oncologists (22 male, 10 female) who were board-certified in medical, surgical, or radiation oncology. Through qualitative descriptive analysis by four coders, we found that oncologists used six broad strategies to discuss cost with patients: open discussion, avoidance, reassurance, warning, outsourcing, and educating. We also found that oncologists invoked certain meanings of cost conversations: cost conversations as holistic care, coercion, a matter of timing, risking patient suspicions, advocacy, unwanted distraction, transparency, bad news delivery, problem-solving, pointless, informed decision making, or irrelevant. These meanings appeared to be linked to oncologists enacting certain strategies (e.g., oncologists who invoked cost conversations as holistic care tended to enact open discussion, those who saw cost conversations as risky tended to use avoidance). Theoretically, our results suggest that the invoked meaning of a difficult conversation may be a key explanatory mechanism for differentiating high-quality from low-quality communication in cost conversations. Practically, our findings suggest that oncologists should consider how well the invoked meaning of the cost conversation is serving their own and their patients' goals.

Introduction: Shared decision making (SDM) has become a crucial element on the political agenda and represents a vital aspect of modern healthcare. However, successful implementation of SDM highly depends on the attitude of clinicians towards SDM. The overall aim of our study was to explore the experience of oncologists and nurses with SDM using the Decision Helper, an in-consultation decision aid, at four Danish radiotherapy departments., Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 clinicians. The participants were selected using purposive sampling to include nurses and oncologists, male and female, with different levels of experience with SDM and clinical work. The analysis was a data-driven, iterative process with inductive coding of all interviews and meaning condensation., Results: Two main themes emerged: "Using the Decision Helper changes the consultation" and "Change of attitude among Danish oncologists." Each of the two themes included four elaborative subthemes, which are reported with supporting citations in this paper. In brief, the use of SDM and the Decision Helper should ideally be adjusted to the individual patient and depends highly on the oncologist. The participants described ambitions towards "making the right decision for this patient at this time." The healthcare system, however, has pitfalls that may hinder SDM, e.g., rigid interpretation of guideline-based recommendations., Conclusion: Using an in-consultation Decision Helper has the potential for individualized, structured patient engagement in decision making. There is a need for patient decision aids in clinical guidelines to ensure patient engagement in decision making., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: For children with advanced cancer and their families, communication about prognosis is critical. Unfortunately, data demonstrate that prognostic communication occurs infrequently and inconsistently across advancing illness. Prior to developing an intervention to improve prognostic communication, we aimed to (1) characterize parent and oncologist perspectives on "best" approaches for prognostic communication, and (2) explore similarities and differences between parent and oncologist perspectives., Methods: Children with poor-prognosis solid tumors, their parents, and oncologists were followed prospectively for 24 months or until death. Matched semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents and oncologists 0-7 days after medical encounters at timepoints of disease progression or relapse. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to describe parent and oncologist impressions of communication quality., Results: A total of 68 interviews were conducted following serial disease reevaluation encounters involving 13 parents and five oncologists. Nine main themes were identified as "best" approaches: (1) speaking with honesty and clarity, (2) leaving room for hope, (3) leaning into a long-standing relationship, (4) personalizing language, (5) empowering the patient and family, (6) collaborating with the multidisciplinary team, (7) providing anticipatory guidance, (8) setting the scene, and (9) creating a therapeutic space. Parents and oncologists generally agreed on themes related to helpful communication approaches, while parents more explicitly described communication pitfalls., Conclusion: Parents and oncologists described clear recommendations for helpful communication strategies and pitfalls to avoid during difficult prognostic disclosure. Future work should integrate patient perspectives in the design and testing of an intervention to improve prognostic communication in advanced childhood cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Patients with advanced cancer who misunderstand their prognosis and chance of cure tend to overestimate the likely benefits of palliative systemic therapy., Aim: To determine patient perceptions of palliative systemic therapy benefits in advanced cancer., Methods: We surveyed 104 outpatients with advanced cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy and their treating oncologists. Patients recorded their understanding of treatment impact on chance of cure and symptoms. Life expectancy was estimated by patients and oncologists. A visual analogue scale (0-10) was used to record how patients and oncologists valued quality of life (QOL) and length of life (LOL) (<4 QOL most important; 4-7 QOL and LOL equal; >7 LOL most important). Patient-oncologist discordance was defined as a ≥4-point difference., Results: The main reasons patients selected for receiving treatment were to live longer (54%) and cure their cancer (36%). Most patients reported treatment was very/somewhat likely to prolong life (84%) and improve symptoms (76%), whereas 20% reported treatment was very/somewhat likely to cure their cancer. 42% of patients selected a timeframe for life expectancy (choice of four timeframes between <1 year and ≥5 years); of these, 62% selected a longer timeframe than their oncologist. When making treatment decisions, 71% of patients (52% of oncologists) valued QOL and LOL equally. Patient-oncologist discordance was 21%, mostly because of oncologists valuing QOL more than their patients (70%)., Conclusion: At least 20% of patients receiving systemic therapy for advanced cancer reported an expectation of cure. Most patients and oncologists value QOL and LOL equally when making treatment decisions., (© 2024 The Authors. Internal Medicine Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Diverse factors and beliefs define treatment decisions of culturally and linguistically diverse patients. Recognizing, understanding and respecting these enable us to walk with them on their cancer journey, even if it may be the road less traveled.

Purpose: Conflicts of interest (COIs) between oncologists and industry might considerably influence how the presentation of the research results is delivered, ultimately affecting clinical decisions and policy-making. Although there are many regulations on reporting COI in high-income countries (HICs), little is known about their reporting in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Oncology Transparency Under Scrutiny and Tracking (ONCOTRUST-1) is a pilot global survey to explore the knowledge and perceptions of oncologists regarding COI., Materials and Methods: We designed an online 27-question-based survey in the English language to explore the perceptions and knowledge of oncologists regarding COI, with an emphasis on LMICs. Descriptive statistics and the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines were used to report the findings., Results: ONCOTRUST-1 surveyed 200 oncologists, 70.9% of them practicing in LMICs. Median age of the respondents was 36 (range, 26-84) years; 47.5% of them were women. Of the respondents, 40.5% reported weekly visits by pharmaceutical representatives to their institutions. Regarding oncologists' perceptions of COI that require disclosure, direct financial benefits, such as honoraria, ranked highest (58.5%), followed by gifts from pharmaceutical representatives (50%) and travel grants for attending conferences (44.5%). By contrast, personal or institutional research funding, sample drugs, consulting or advisory board, expert testimony, and food and beverage funded by pharmaceutical industry were less frequently considered as COI. Moreover, only 24% of surveyed oncologists could correctly categorize all situations representing a COI., Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of clear guidelines, education, and transparency in reporting COI in oncology. This hypothesis-generating pilot survey provided the rationale for ONCOTRUST-2 study, which will compare perceptions of COI among oncologists in LMICs and HICs.

Purpose: Little is known about the shared decision-making (SDM) needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital. Understanding this may improve SDM and cancer care quality in this vulnerable population., Methods: A single-site, mixed-methods study of hospitalized patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer, caregivers, and oncologists was conducted. After discharge, patient ± caregiver semi-structured interviews exploring SDM needs, barriers, and facilitators regarding their most important upcoming cancer-related decision were conducted. Oncologists were surveyed about patient knowledge and SDM needs using closed- and open-ended questions, respectively. Thematic analysis was performed for qualitative data with a focus on themes unique to or amplified by hospitalization. Descriptive statistics and the Chi-squared test were performed for quantitative data., Results: Patients and caregivers reported high SDM needs surrounding treatment and prognostic information, leading to decisional conflict. Eight themes emerged: anticipated cancer treatment decisions, variable control preferences in decision-making, high cancer-related information needs and uncertainty, barriers and facilitators to information gathering during and post hospitalization, and decision-making facilitators. Among 32 oncologists, most (56%) reported patients were poorly informed about treatment and prognosis. Oncologists reported variable expectations about patient knowledge after hospitalization, facilitators to patient decision-making, and patient uncertainty while awaiting an outpatient oncologist appointment., Conclusion: Patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer in the hospital have high SDM needs and experience decisional conflict. This may be due to barriers unique to or exacerbated by hospitalization. Further research is needed to develop strategies to address these barriers and enhance the facilitators identified in this study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Many associations have recently recommended early integration of oncology and palliative care for more standard cancer care and better quality of life. We aimed to create a questionnaire to assess the opinion of medical oncologists and nurses about the clinical impact of the integrated palliative care and oncology (PCO) program., Methods: A novel semi-structured questionnaire called Impact of Early Integration of Palliative Care Oncology (IEI PCO) questionnaire was developed and tested for validity and reliability then distributed to the oncologists and nurses working in Kuwait Cancer Control Center., Results: After the pilot stage, testing the final questionnaire for validity and reliability was done with satisfactory results. Finally, the complete questionnaires were 170 out of 256 (response rate 66.41%). More awareness about the available palliative care services and the new available PCO services (p-value < 0.001 for all). Most of the oncologists and nurses agreed with the currently available structure of PCO, appreciated the patients' discharge plan and continuity of care of palliative medicine, admitted less work burden, a better attitude, and higher satisfaction (p-value for all < 0.001) toward palliative care. Significant improvements in symptoms were appreciated by oncologists and nurses after the integration of palliative care (p-value for all < 0.001. Oncologists and nurses valued repeated honest communication, discussion of the goals of care, dealing more effectively with ending active treatment, and higher acceptance of patients and families of PC policy of transfer, and significant progress in the care of end-of-life symptoms (p-value for all < 0.001)., Conclusions: The IEI PCO questionnaire demonstrated the psychometric criteria for content, face, and construct validity and reliability. It provides a valuable tool to assess the impact of PCO integration. The opinion of medical oncologists and nurses was significantly positive toward the early integration of PCO in Kuwait in most aspects of care. This integration led to improved symptom control, end-of-life care, communication, and planned discharge and follow-up plans. Moreover, decreases the work burden, improves attitude, higher satisfaction of the oncology staff, and continuity of care., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To compare the details, oncologists include in discharge letters with what home care physicians need. Although discharge letters are important to share patients' information for home palliative care, few studies have compared the details, especially patients' emotions, regarding what oncologists include in discharge letters and home care physicians' needs., Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by sending anonymous, self-administered questionnaires to 500 certified oncologists (OCs) and 500 directors of home care supporting clinics (HCs) in Japan between March and May 2023. The survey considered 20 potential items found in discharge letters, and compared rates of OCs including these items and HCs needs., Results: Of 310 valid responses, 186 were from OCs (average age: 47.7; 29 females) and 124 from HCs (average age: 55.4; 9 females). Major items with lower inclusion rates for OCs included patients' emotions regarding medical conditions (58.4% in OCs vs. 92.6% in HCs, p < 0.001), families' emotions regarding medical conditions (60.0 vs. 92.6%, respectively, p < 0.001), patients' perceptions regarding medical conditions (84.9 vs. 94.3%, respectively, p = 0.011), families' perceptions regarding medical conditions (84.3 vs. 95.1%, respectively, p = 0.004), and potential late-onset treatment-related adverse events (79.3 vs. 92.6%, respectively, p = 0.002). Conversely, OCs included patients' activities of daily living more frequently (96.2 vs. 90.2%, respectively, p = 0.031)., Conclusion: Transitioning to home-based palliative care may necessitate accurate information and consideration of patients' and families' perceptions and emotions regarding medical conditions in discharge letters for continuous provision of high-quality care., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

This article explores an oncologist's journey from emotional vulnerability to practised detachment. A transformative moment, prompted by a poignant photograph of a patient in a scarlet saree, confronts the author with the emotional intricacies of patient care. The narrative delves into the human stories woven into the medical landscape, capturing the delicate balance between clinical detachment and maintaining a genuine connection. It prompts reflection on the emotional dynamics within the decision-making fabric of healthcare.

Background: High rates of burnout are observed among health care professionals worldwide, which could have negative consequences on personal and organizational levels. We aimed to evaluate the burnout prevalence and factors associated with burnout among oncologists in Poland., Materials and Methods: An online survey was conducted using the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) and additional work/lifestyle questions. Descriptive statistics, parametric and nonparametric tests, and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with burnout., Results: A total of 228 physicians participated in the survey, including 168 medical oncologists, 43 radiation oncologists, and 17 from other specialties. Data collected from 211 medical and radiation oncologists were included in the final analyses. Most participants were female (71.6%) and ≤40 years of age (70.1%). A self-reported feeling of burnout was present in 65.9% of participants. Based on the MBI-HSS, 74.9% showed evidence of burnout with burnout subdomains as follows: depersonalization 37.0%; emotional exhaustion 64.5%; low accomplishment 43.1%. There were no differences in burnout rates based on specialization (oncology/haematology-75.6%, radiotherapy-72.1%), career stage, gender, or age groups. Lack of work-life balance was the only significant factor associated with the risk of burnout in the logistic regression (relative risk 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3-5.4). Only 20.9% of physicians had access to psychological support in their workplace; however, 70.1% desired such support. Three main factors impacting burnout in cancer care workers were: bureaucracy and administrative duties overload, admissions of many patients, and poor work culture., Conclusions: Burnout is common among medical and radiation oncologists in Poland. There is a high demand for psychological support and organizational changes in the workplace to reduce risk and mitigate the adverse effects of burnout among health care professionals., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: While shared decision making (SDM) is advocated for ethical reasons and beneficial outcomes, SDM might also negatively affect patients with incurable cancer. The current study explored whether SDM, and an oncologist training in SDM, are associated with adverse outcomes (i.e., patient anxiety, tension, helplessness/hopelessness, decisional uncertainty, and reduced fighting spirit)., Design: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of SDM interventions in the context of advanced cancer. The relations between observed SDM (OPTION12), specific SDM elements (4SDM), oncologist SDM training, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. We modeled adverse outcomes as a multivariate phenomenon, followed by univariate regressions if significant., Results: In total, 194 patients consulted by 31 oncologists were included. In a multivariate analysis, observed SDM and adverse outcomes were significantly related. More specifically, more observed SDM in the consultation was related to patients reporting more tension ( P  = 0.002) and more decisional uncertainty ( P  = 0.004) at 1 wk after the consultation. The SDM element "informing about the options" was especially found to be related to adverse outcomes, specifically to more helplessness/hopelessness ( P  = 0.002) and more tension ( P  = 0.016) at 1 wk after the consultation. Whether the patient consulted an oncologist who had received SDM training or not was not significantly related to adverse outcomes. No relations with long-term adverse outcomes were found., Conclusions: It is important for oncologists to realize that for some patients, SDM may temporarily be associated with negative emotions. Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and whether and how burden may be minimized for patients., Highlights: Observed shared decision making was related to more tension and uncertainty postconsultation in advanced cancer patientsHowever, training oncologists in SDM did not affect adverse outcomes.Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and how burden may be minimized., Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: LFvdW received research funding from the Dutch Cancer Society. DWB–vdH received research funding from ZonMw. HWMvL received research funding and/or medication supply from Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Incyte, Eli Lilly, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Philips, Roche, and Servier; has a consultant or advisory role at Amphera, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Daiichy-Sankyo, Dragonfly, Eli Lilly, MSD, Nordic Pharma, and Servier; and has a speaker role at Astellas, Benecke, Daiichy-Sankyo, JAAP, Medtalks, Novartis, and Travel Congress Management BV. FYFdV received research funding from Foundation STOPbraintumors.org, BMS, Novartis, and EORTC Sponsor drive clinical research; participates on the advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb; and servers on the other following boards and committees: faculty member, ESMO CNS tumors, quality of care commission of the Dutch Society of Medical Oncology, and quality assurance commission of EORTC. IH received research funding from the Dutch Cancer Society. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Financial support for this study was provided entirely by grants from the Dutch Cancer Society (DCS-UVA 2013-5949, UVA 2014-7000) and ZonMw (844001514). The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. The following authors are employed by the sponsor: Dutch Cancer Society, LFvdW; ZonMw, DWB–vdH.

Objective: During the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been a substantial uptake of telemental health interventions. Consequently, the objective of this study was to assess psycho-oncologists' attitudes toward and experiences with video consultations (VC) since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. Additionally, we sought to investigate psycho-oncologists' perspectives on the benefits and drawbacks of VC and its' potential implementation beyond the pandemic., Methods: We used a multi-methods study design. First, semi-structured interviews with psycho-oncologists (N = 6) were conducted to inform the development of a cross-sectional online survey, which represented the quantitative part of our study. We invited psycho-oncologists, working in different settings, from all over Germany to participate., Results: Data of N = 217 participants (88% female, 49% over 10 years work experience) of the online survey was analyzed. Psycho-oncologists' acceptance toward VC was average to high. In their daily practice, they preferred in-person consultations. Improved access to care and enhanced flexibility were seen as main advantages. The most significant disadvantages included technical issues, privacy concerns at home, loss of non-verbal cues and absence of physical presence for emotional support. Nevertheless, on average, psycho-oncologists wanted to continue seeing approximately 25% of their patients via VC in the future., Conclusions: Given the average to high acceptance of VC among psycho-oncologists and their desire to continue using VC flexibly even after the pandemic, it may be beneficial to implement VC into future psycho-oncology services. Still, future research should focus on the patients' perspective and the effectiveness of VC in psycho-oncology services., (© 2023 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and the military conflicts in Ukraine suggest that workrelated stressors increased during these crises increases work-related stress reactions. Burnout as a long-term consequence of insufficiently compensated for workloads. The regional prevalence of burnout is particularly high among oncologists. The aim of this study was to assess the current risk of burnout within this group of physicians and to examine gender differences through gender-based analysis., Material and Methods: Thirtyseven oncologists (17 men and 20 women aged 46.5±13.6 years [range 26-74 years]) in Kharkiv, Ukraine, participated. The Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MBI-GS) questionnaire was used to determine the extent of occupational., Results: Gender, age, and work experience had no effect on the following results. Women demonstrated higher scores in emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment of the MBI than men. In contrast, men offered higher cynicism scores. The MBI total score was also higher for the male oncologists. Only 1 person of the total sample had risk of burnout., Conclusions: The results showed a high prevalence of burnout symptoms among Ukrainian oncologists without gender differences. From occupational health perspective behavioral and behavior-preventive measures are needed for clinics and oncologists to counteract the burnout symptoms, e.g. exhaustion or cyniscism. Further studies are needed here to examine the effectiveness of these measures. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(6):717-3., (This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a CC BY-NC 3.0 PL license.)

Background: Cancer recurrence after treatment is a concern for patients and oncologists alike. The movement towards treatment optimization, with trials testing less than the current standard of care (SoC), complicates this experience. Our objective was to assess oncologists' psychological response to patient recurrence on optimization-focused trials and identify factors that influence those experiences., Methods: Clinical oncologists participated in a semi-structured interview regarding patient enrollment in treatment optimization trials. We identified factors that influence the degree of psychological response that the oncologist may feel after patient recurrence. Residual agreement analysis was used to identify whether differences in reported psychological response was associated with alternative emphases on identified factors., Results: Thirty-six oncologists identified 20 factors spanning five major themes that affected their psychological response to patient recurrence. All oncologists expressed willingness to enroll patients in treatment optimization clinical trials; however, half indicated that they were more likely to experience a negative psychological response after a treatment optimization trial than after a traditional intensification trial, and a quarter reported that patient recurrence on an optimization trial would impact their recommendations for future trial enrollment. Oncologists who reported more negative psychological responses to patient recurrence after participation in an optimization trial were more likely to emphasize introspective factors, while those who reported no difference in response emphasized patient- and process-focused factors., Conclusions: Although most oncologists recognize the importance of treatment optimization trials, a significant proportion indicated a greater potential for psychological distress following patient recurrence in such trials and offered insight into how trial design and the process of patient enrollment can be improved to minimize those negative psychological responses., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)