Search

Objective: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, renal function, and duration of surgery with and without temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) in live donor liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Secondary objectives were postoperative early graft dysfunction, morbidity, mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay. Background: Blood loss during recipient hepatectomy for LT remains a major concern. Routine use of TPCS during LT is not yet elucidated. Methods: This study is a single-center, open-label, randomized control trial. The sample size was calculated based on intraoperative blood loss. After exclusion, a total of 60 patients, 30 in each arm (TPCS vs no TPCS) were recruited in the trial. Results: The baseline recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between the groups. The median intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.004) and blood product transfusions (P < 0.05) were significantly less in the TPCS group. The TPCS group had significantly improved intraoperative hemodynamics in the anhepatic phase as compared with the no TPCS group (P < 0.0001), requiring significantly less vasopressor support. This led to significantly better renal function as evidenced by higher intraoperative urine output in the TPCS group (P = 0.002). Because of technical simplicity, the TPCS group had significantly fewer inferior vena cava injuries (3.3 vs 26.7%, P = 0.026) and substantially shorter hepatectomy time and total duration of surgery (529.4 ± 35.54 vs 606.83 ± 48.13 min, P < 0.0001). The time taken for normalization of lactate in the immediate postoperative period was significantly shorter in the TPCS group (median, 6 vs 13 h; P = 0.04). Although postoperative endotoxemia, major morbidity, 90-day mortality, total intensive care unit, and hospital stay were comparable between both groups, tolerance to enteral feed was earlier in the TPCS group. Conclusions: In live donor LT, TPCS is a simple and effective technique that provides superior intraoperative hemodynamics and reduces blood loss and duration of surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Post-operative hyperamylasemia (POH) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may play a key role in pathogenesis of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Aim of the current study was to evaluate efficacy of perioperative administration of indomethacin in preventing POH. Methods: Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted on consecutive patients undergoing PD. Patients received either 100 mg of indomethacin per-rectally at induction of anesthesia or standard care. Primary endpoint was incidence of POH in the two arms. POH was defined as postoperative day (POD) 1 serum amylase (S. amylase) levels greater than the upper limit of normal. Results: After exclusion 44 patients were randomized. The two arms were comparable for preoperative and intraoperative parameters. POH was noted in 20/44 (45.5%) with significantly lower incidence of POH (60.9% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.032) in intervention arm (IA). Median S. amylase, POD 1, 3, and 5 drain amylase, and incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) were lower in IA but failed to reach statistical significance (30.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.18). The severity of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was significantly lower in the IA (grade B/C DGE 23.8% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.023). Evaluation of risk factors for POH showed IA to confer an independent protective effect and increased risk with soft pancreas. Conclusion: Perioperative per-rectal indomethacin administration is effective in decreasing the incidence of POH following pancreatoduodenectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis following live liver donor hepatectomy (LDH) is not known. Methods: This is a double‐blind equivalence trial. All consecutive LDH were randomized into: group A (three doses) and group B (nine doses) of perioperative antibiotics (piperacillin + tazobactam − 4.5 g intravenous) at fixed 8 hourly intervals. Primary end point was incidence of infective complications as per CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) criteria. Secondary end points were liver function tests, total leukocyte count, international normalized ratio, hospital stay, morbidity, and cost analysis. Results: One hundred and twenty‐six LDHs were enrolled. A total of 19.8% (n = 25) experienced postoperative complications, 11 (17.7%) in group A and 14 (21.9%) in group B (P =.561). Infective complications were seen in 11 donors (8.1%), five in group A and six in group B (P =.79). A total of 8.1% of donors required continuation/up‐gradation of antibiotics in group A and 9.4% in group B. Return to soft diet was delayed in group B (P =.039). Median hospital stay and cost were similar. Conclusion: Three doses of perioperative antibiotic are equally effective in preventing infective complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis following live liver donor hepatectomy (LDH) is not known., Methods: This is a double-blind equivalence trial. All consecutive LDH were randomized into: group A (three doses) and group B (nine doses) of perioperative antibiotics (piperacillin + tazobactam - 4.5 g intravenous) at fixed 8 hourly intervals. Primary end point was incidence of infective complications as per CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) criteria. Secondary end points were liver function tests, total leukocyte count, international normalized ratio, hospital stay, morbidity, and cost analysis., Results: One hundred and twenty-six LDHs were enrolled. A total of 19.8% (n = 25) experienced postoperative complications, 11 (17.7%) in group A and 14 (21.9%) in group B (P = .561). Infective complications were seen in 11 donors (8.1%), five in group A and six in group B (P = .79). A total of 8.1% of donors required continuation/up-gradation of antibiotics in group A and 9.4% in group B. Return to soft diet was delayed in group B (P = .039). Median hospital stay and cost were similar., Conclusion: Three doses of perioperative antibiotic are equally effective in preventing infective complications., (© 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected health in all domains i.e., physical, mental, and social aspects. Liver transplant (LT) recipients faced a multitude of challenges during the first wave of lockdown. The aim was to identify the psychosocial difficulties and quality of life during the first year of the pandemic., Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on LT recipients with a predefined structured questionnaire that included clinical, COVID-19 anxiety scale, and Post-Transplant Quality of life questionnaire (pLTQ)., Results: A total of 109 patients were studied; with a mean age of 50.5 ± 11.1 years, with a median post-transplant follow-up of 52.4 months and a live donor transplant in the majority (79.8%). Almost all (99.1%) could come to the hospital for regular follow-up, prior to the pandemic. But during the first wave only 57% could maintain planned hospital visits and about 88% could not pursue their regular activities, and 39% missed their routine exercise because of imposed restrictions. Similarly, financial implications were responsible for 4% defaulting from treatment; while 7.3% managed by curtailing supportive drugs (on their own) leading to deranged liver tests in 4.6%; requiring immediate attention. The psychosocial difficulties raised the stress of pandemic (median score 18), and impacted quality of life (mean total pLTQ score 4.7 ± 0.9)., Conclusions: For LT recipients, the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic affected their physical, mental, financial, and social wellbeing; in addition to the disease itself. Awareness, psychosocial support, and comprehensive care are some unmet needs for this special group; especially when it is expected that subsequent waves may continue to occur., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.)