Search

BackgroundUnrelieved chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) occurs 48% of patients undergoing chemotherapy and is one of the most debilitating symptoms that patients report.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles and determine how these subgroups differed on demographic and clinical characteristics; severity, frequency, and distress of CIN; and the co-occurrence of common gastrointestinal symptoms.MethodsPatients (n = 1343) completed demographic questionnaire and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale 6 times over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles. Differences among these subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric statistics.ResultsFour distinct CIN profiles were identified: none (40.8%), increasing-decreasing (21.5%), decreasing (8.9%), and high (28.8%). Compared with the none class, patients in the high class were younger, had a lower annual household income, had child care responsibilities, had a lower Karnofsky Performance Status score and a higher Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire score, and were more likely to have received chemotherapy on a 14-day cycle and a highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimen. In addition, patients in the high class reported high occurrence rates for dry mouth, feeling bloated, diarrhea, lack of appetite, abdominal cramps, difficulty swallowing, mouth sores, weight loss, and change in the way food tastes.ConclusionsThat 60% of the patients reported moderate to high CIN occurrence rates confirms that this unrelieved symptom is a significant clinical problem.Implications for practiceNurses need to evaluate patients' level of adherence to their antiemetic regimen and make appropriate referrals for physical therapy, psychological services, and dietary counseling.

Summary: Introduction: To examine whether within‐person changes in total, regional and organ fat were associated with within‐person changes in type 2 diabetes (T2D)‐related biomarkers following interventions. Methods: A secondary analysis from a randomised trial among Latino youth (30 males, 25 females) aged 12–16 years with obesity. The study sample combined participants randomised to either lifestyle intervention (N = 39) or usual care (N = 16). Total body composition was assessed by DEXA. Hepatic and pancreatic fat fractions were assessed using MRI. T2D risk factors included insulin sensitivity, beta‐cell function and post‐challenge glucose. Results: Significant changes in %body fat, lean mass, insulin sensitivity and 2‐h glucose were observed. Changes in fat mass were associated with changes in insulin sensitivity (β = −0.45, p < 0.001), while changes in lean mass were associated with changes in 2‐h glucose concentrations (β = −0.50, p = 0.02). No association between changes in total, regional, or organ fat and beta cell function were noted. Conclusions: Our study revealed that within‐person changes in fat mass and lean mass were associated with increased insulin sensitivity and reduced 2‐h glucose concentrations, respectively, among high‐risk Latino youth. The impact of reductions in regional and organ fat deposition on T2D risk factors warrants further examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects Latinos disproportionately. One of the reasons underlying this disparity may be type 2 diabetes (T2D) that is a risk factor for AD. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations of T2D and AD blood biomarkers and the differences in these associations between Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Whites. This study was a secondary analysis of baseline data from the observational Health and Aging Brain Study: Health Disparities (HABS-HD) that investigated factors underlying health disparities in AD in Mexican Americans in comparison to non-Hispanic Whites. HABS-HD participants were excluded if they had missing data or were large outliers (z-scores >|4|) on a given AD biomarker. Fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were measured from clinical labs. T2D was diagnosed by licensed clinicians. Plasma amyloid-beta 42 and 40 (Aβ42/42) ratio, total tau (t-tau), and neurofilament light (NfL) were measured via ultra-sensitive Simoa assays. The sample sizes were 1,552 for Aβ42/40 ratio, 1,570 for t-tau, and 1,553 for NfL. Mexican Americans were younger (66.6±8.7 vs. 69.5±8.6) and had more female (64.9% female vs. 55.1%) and fewer years of schooling (9.5±4.6 vs. 15.6±2.5) than non-Hispanic Whites. Mexican Americans differed significantly from non-Hispanic Whites in blood glucose (113.5±36.6 vs. 99.2±17.0) and HbA1c (6.33±1.4 vs. 5.51±0.6) levels, T2D diagnosis (35.3% vs. 11.1%), as well as blood Aβ42/40 ratio (.051±.012 vs..047±.011), t-tau (2.56±.95 vs. 2.33±.90), and NfL levels (16.3±9.5 vs. 20.3±10.3). Blood glucose, blood HbA1c, and T2D diagnosis were not related to Aβ42/40 ratio and t-tau but explained 3.7% of the variation in NfL (p <.001). Blood glucose and T2D diagnosis were not, while HbA1c was positively (b = 2.31, p <.001, β = 0.26), associated with NfL among Mexican Americans. In contrast, blood glucose, HbA1c, and T2D diagnosis were negatively (b = -0.09, p <.01, β = -0.26), not (b = 0.34, p =.71, β = 0.04), and positively (b = 3.32, p <.01, β = 0.33) associated with NfL, respectively in non-Hispanic Whites. To conclude, blood glucose and HbA1c levels and T2D diagnosis are associated with plasma NfL levels, but not plasma Aβ and t-tau levels. These associations differ in an ethnicity-specific manner and need to be further studied as a potential mechanism underlying AD disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cultural stereotypes that equate aging with decreased competence and increased forgetfulness have persisted for decades. Stereotype threat (ST) refers to the psychological discomfort people experience when confronted by a negative, self-relevant stereotype in a situation where their behavior could be construed as confirming that belief. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships of ST on memory performance in older adults over 24 months. The ST levels on average significantly declined, or improved in the memory training, but not the health training group. Although not significant at the.01 level, the bivariate correlation indicated that change in ST was moderately related to change in verbal memory, suggesting the possibility that improvements (or reductions) in ST may be related to increases in verbal memory scores. We discovered that the unique contribution of ST into the memory performance of healthy older adults offers a possible malleable trait. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) disproportionately affects Mexican Americans, however, reasons underlying this health disparity remain unknown. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for AD and may contribute to AD pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between T2D and AD blood biomarkers among Mexican Americans and non‐Hispanic Whites. Methods: This study analyzed baseline data from the Health and Aging Brain Study: Health Disparities (HABS‐HD) that investigated AD differences among Mexican Americans and non‐Hispanic White. HABS‐AD participants were excluded from this study if they had missing data or were outliers (z‐scores >|4|) on a given AD biomarker (N = 1,552 for Aβ42/40 ratio, 1,570 for t‐tau, and 1,553 for NfL). AD biomarkers included plasma Aβ42/42 ratio, total tau (t‐tau), and neurofilament light (NfL) analyzed using Simoa. Predictors were blood glucose, HbA1c, and T2D diagnosis. Data were analyzed with regression analyses controlling for covariates (e.g., demographics, smoking, BMI, health status, diseases, cognition) and treating missing predictor data using Bayesian MCMC estimation. Results: Mexican Americans differed significantly from non‐Hispanic Whites in age (66.6±8.7 vs. 69.5±8.6), sex (64.9% female vs. 55.1%), education (9.5±4.6 vs. 15.6±2.5), blood glucose (113.5±36.6 vs. 99.2±17.0), HbA1c (6.33±1.4 vs. 5.51±0.6), T2D diagnosis (35.3% vs. 11.1%), Aβ42/40 ratio (.051±.012 vs..047±.011), t‐tau (2.56±.95 vs. 2.33±.90), and NfL (16.3±9.5 vs. 20.3±10.3). The models with the covariates and predictors accounted for 6% (p<.001), 15% (p<.001), and 36% (p<.001) of the variation in Aβ42/40 ratio, t‐tau, and NfL, respectively. Blood glucose, HbA1c, and T2D diagnosis were not related to Aβ42/40 ratio and t‐tau but explained 3.7% of the variation in NfL (p<.001). Among non‐Hispanic Whites, blood glucose, HbA1c, and T2D diagnosis were negatively (b = ‐0.09, p<.01, β = ‐0.26), not (b = 0.34, p =.71, β = 0.04), and positively (b = 3.32, p<.01, β = 0.33) associated with NfL, respectively. In contrast, blood glucose and T2D diagnosis were not, while HbA1c was positively (b = 2.31, p<.001, β = 0.26), associated with NfL among Mexican Americans. Conclusion: Blood glucose, HbA1c, and T2D may contribute to differences in NfL levels, but not Aβ42/40 ratio and t‐tau, in an ethnicity‐specific manner. Future studies are needed to corroborate our findings in longitudinal cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To identify subgroups of patients with distinct chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) profiles; determine how these subgroups differ on several demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics; and evaluate factors associated with chemotherapyinduced nausea and CIV profiles. SAMPLE & SETTING: Adult patients (N = 1,338) receiving cancer chemotherapy. METHODS & VARIABLES: Data were collected on demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics. Differences among subgroups of patients with distinct CIV profiles were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Three CIV profiles (None, Decreasing, and Increasing) were identified. Compared with the None class, Decreasing and Increasing classes were more likely to have lower household income and a higher comorbidity burden, as well as to report higher rates of dry mouth, nausea, diarrhea, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, morning fatigue, and pain interference. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians need to assess common and distinct risk factors for CIV and chemotherapy-induced nausea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in the severity of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress, resilience, and common neuropsychological symptoms among four subgroups of patients with distinct chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN) profiles. SAMPLE & SETTING: Adult patients with cancer (N = 1,343) receiving chemotherapy. METHODS & VARIABLES: Patients completed stress, resilience, and neuropsychological symptom severity measures. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was used to assess CIN occurrence six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were used to evaluate differences among subgroups of patients with distinct CIN profiles. RESULTS: The high class had significantly higher levels of global, cancer-specific, and cumulative life stress; significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, morning and evening fatigue, and pain; and lower levels of morning and evening energy and cognitive dysfunction. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians need to evaluate CIN occurrence across each cycle of chemotherapy and assess patients for various types of stress and common neuropsychological symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impact on infant sleep (IS) is understudied. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between family impact and distress from COVID-19 pandemic stressors, parental insomnia symptoms, infant temperamental negative affectivity, and parent-reported IS., Methods: Parents from the Phoenix metropolitan area with a full-term healthy infant (<1 year) were recruited from February 27, 2021, to August 7, 2021. A sample of 70 parents (baby age 5.5 ± 3.5 months; parental age: 31.7 ± 5.0 years) completed the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Survey (CEFIS) Impact and Distress scales, the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Infant Behavioral Questionnaire-Revised Negative Affectivity subscale (IBQ-R-NA), and the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire-Revised (BISQ-R). Based on the transactional model of IS, path analyses were conducted to identify the direct effect of CEFIS scores and the indirect effects of parental ISI and infant IBQ-R-NA scores on BISQ-R scores., Results: The parent sample was predominantly female (94.3%), white (72.9%), and married or in a domestic partnership (98.6%). Although COVID-19 pandemic impact and distress were not directly related to parent-reported IS, pandemic distress was negatively related to parent-reported IS indirectly through infant negative affectivity, including BISQ-R total score (β = -0.14, 95% CI [-0.32, -0.01]) and IS subscale score (β = -0.12, 95% CI [-0.27, -0.01])., Conclusions: Heightened COVID-19 pandemic family distress was related to poorer parent-reported IS through greater parent-reported infant negative affectivity, suggesting the importance of addressing family stress and emotional regulation during crises., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society.)