Search

Background: To determine what thickness of 5 mol% yttria zirconia (5Y-Z) translucent crowns cemented with different cements and surface treatments would have equivalent fracture resistance as 3 mol% yttria (3Y-Z) crowns. Methods: The study included 0.8 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.2 mm thickness 5Y-Z (Katana UTML) crowns and 0.5 and 1.0 mm thickness 3Y-Z (Katana HT) crowns as controls. The 5Y-Z crowns were divided among three treatment subgroups (n = 10/subgroup): (1) cemented using RMGIC (Rely X Luting Cement), (2) alumina particle-abraded then luted with the same cement, (3) alumina particle-abraded and cemented using a resin cement (Panavia SA Cement Universal). The 3Y-Z controls were alumina particle-abraded then cemented with RMGIC. The specimens were then loaded in compression at 30° until failure. Results: All 5Y-Z crowns (regardless of thickness or surface treatment) had a similar to or higher fracture force than the 0.5 mm 3Y-Z crowns. Only the 1.2 mm 5Y-Z crowns with resin cement showed significantly similar fracture force to the 1 mm 3Y-Z crowns. Conclusion: In order to achieve a similar fracture resistance to 0.5 mm 3Y-Z crowns cemented with RMGIC, 5Y-Z crowns may be as thin as 0.8 mm. To achieve a similar fracture resistance to 1.0 mm 3Y-Z crowns cemented with RMGIC, 5Y-Z crowns must be 1.2 mm and bonded with resin cement.

Purpose: To evaluate early preventive dental services (PDS) provided by primary care providers (PCPs) in reducing future caries treatments among Alabama Medicaid recipients. Methods: Data from 2009 to 2019 Alabama Medicaid were used to evaluate effectiveness of 1st Look Program on PDS before age three years and incidence of caries treatments after age three years. PDS groups consisted of 1st Look-involved (PDS claims from PCPs), dentist-only (PDS claims from dental providers), and no early fluoride treatment participants (no PDS claims before age three years). Outcomes included frequency and expenditures of fluoride applications, simple restorations, and extensive treatments. Regression models were used to evaluate associations between PDS groups and outcomes while controlling for covariates. Results: Children in 1st Look-involved received more fluoride (3.0 versus 2.1 times; P<0.001) and were applied earlier (12.1 versus 22.9 months old; P<0.001) than dentist-only group. After adjusting for covariates, compared to dentist-only, 1st Look-involved group received earlier fluoride (beta value equals -11.1 months; 95 percent confidence interval [95% Cl] equals -11.25 to -10.97) with greater frequency (incident rate ratio equals 1.49; 95% Cl equals 1.47 to 1.51). Caries treatment counts were highest in dentist-only followed by 1st Look-involved and no early fluoride treatment groups in both simple restorations (2.7 versus 2.0 versus 0.2 times; P<0.001) and extensive treatments (2.8 versus 23 versus 0.2 times; P<0.001), which were consistent after adjusting for covariates. Conclusions: PDS were provided earlier by PCPs in Medicaid-qualified children, with reduced caries treatments on primary teeth, compared to PDS by dental providers only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]