Search

LVAD-stem cell combination therapy has only been evaluated as a simultaneous treatment approach (transepicardial cell injections during LVAD surgery) and it failed to show additional benefit of cell therapy, likely due to detrimental effects of surgery-associated systemic inflammation on injected cells. We report a first case of LVAD-stem cell combination therapy using a delayed treatment strategy - applying cell therapy 3 months after LVAD implantation. A 56-year old male with a known non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy was admitted to our center due to worsening heart failure and was stabilized on inotropic support with dobutamine (INTERMACS group 3). Echocardiography showed dilated left ventricle (LVEDD 67 mm) with severely reduced LVEF of 25%. The patient was put on heart transplant waiting list. As inotrope weaning was unsuccessful, we opted for long-term LVAD support using HM3. Additionally, the patient agreed to enrol in LVAD-stem cell study. LVAD implantation was performed through median sternotomy. The perioperative course was unremarkable, and the patient was discharged on day 14. 3 months post LVAD implantation the patient received intracoronary cell therapy: CD34+ cells were collected from peripheral blood using with G-CSF stimulation (5 mcg/kg bid for 5 days), followed by cytapheresis and immunoselection. CD34+ cell suspension was infused in the mid LAD segment using microcatheter (without balloon vessel occlusion). The patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home. We performed biochemical assays, echocardiography with ramp testing, and myocardial perfusion imaging before cell therapy and 3 months thereafter. We were able to demonstrate a decrease in NT-proBNP levels (from 4170 pg/mL to 3620 pg/mL) and an improvement in myocardial perfusion. Left ventricular dimensions on minimal LVAD support on ramp test remained stable (LVEDD 53 mm at baseline and 50 mm at 3 months), however, we found a significant improvement in LVEF (35% at baseline and 45% at 3 months). In advanced chronic heart failure patients undergoing LVAD support, a delayed stem cell treatment strategy appears to be feasible and safe, may be associated with improved perfusion of the target myocardium and could, in association with mechanical unloading, promote reverse remodelling of the failing left ventricle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Allogeneic stem cell therapy is more logistically suitable compared with autologous cell therapy for large-scale patient treatment. We aim to investigate the clinical safety and efficacy profile of the allogeneic adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stromal cell product (CSCC&#95;ASC) as an add-on therapy in patients with chronic non-ischaemic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) < 40%., Methods and Results: This is a single-centre investigator-initiated randomized phase I/II study with direct intra-myocardial injections of 100 million allogeneic CSCC&#95;ASC. A total of 30 HFrEF patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥II despite optimal anticongestive heart failure medication and plasma NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL (>35 pmol/L) were included and randomized 2:1 to CSCC&#95;ASC or standard care. The primary endpoint left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) and other echo related parameters were analysed by an investigator blinded for treatment allocation. No difference in serious adverse events was observed between groups. LVESV decreased significantly from baseline to 6 months follow-up in the ASC group (153.7 ± 53.2 mL and 128.7 ± 45.6 mL, P < 0.001) and remained unchanged in the standard care group (180.4 ± 39.4 mL and 186.7 ± 48.9 mL, P = 0.652). There was a significant difference between the groups in LVESV change (31.3 ± 11.0 mL, P = 0.009). The difference from baseline to follow-up between the two groups in left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) was 18.7 ± 12.4 mL, P = 0.146 and in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) -7.8 ± 2.1%, P = 0.001. Considering the baseline values of LVESV, LVEDV and LVEF as covariates, the difference between groups for change from baseline to follow-up resulted in a P-value of 0.056, 0.076, and 0.738, respectively. NYHA class and self-reported health did also improve significantly in the ASC group compared with the standard care group (0.7 ± 0.2, P = 0.001 and -12.8 ± 5.3, P = 0.025; respectively). There was no difference in NT-proBNP (-371 ± 455 pmol/L, P = 0.422) or in 6 min walk test (12 ± 31 m, P = 0.695) between groups., Conclusions: Intramyocardial injections of allogeneic CSCC&#95;ASC in patients with chronic non-ischaemic HFrEF was safe and improved LVESV, LVEF, NYHA class, and self-reported health compared with standard care group., (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: The clinical relevance of cardiac troponin (cTn) elevation in takotsubo syndrome (TTS) remains uncertain. The present study sought to investigate the role of cardiac troponin (cTn) elevations in mortality prediction of patients with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS)., Methods: Patients enrolled in the International Takotsubo (InterTAK) Registry from January 2011 to February 2020 with available data on peak cTn levels were included in the analysis. Peak cTn levels during the index hospitalization were used to define clinically relevant myocardial injury. The threshold at which clinically relevant myocardial injury drives mortality at 1 year was identified using restricted cubic spline analysis., Results: Out of 2'938 patients, 222 (7.6%) patients died during 1-year follow-up. A more than 28.8-fold increase of cTn above the upper reference limit was identified as threshold for clinically relevant myocardial injury. The presence of clinically relevant myocardial injury was significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality at 5 years (adjusted HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.18-2.12, p =.002). Clinically relevant myocardial injury was related to an increased 5-year mortality risk in patients with apical TTS (adjusted HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21-2.03, p =.001), in presence of physical stressors (adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.22-2.11, p =.001), and in absence of emotional stressors (adjusted HR 1.49, 95% CI, 1.17-1.89, p =.001)., Conclusion: This study for the first time determined a troponin threshold for the identification of TTS patients at excess risk of mortality. These findings advance risk stratification in TTS and assist in identifying patients in need for close monitoring and follow-up., (© 2024 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The perception of takotsubo syndrome (TTS) has evolved significantly over the years, primarily driven by increased recognition of acute complications and mortality., Objectives: This study aimed to explore temporal trends in demographic patterns, risk factors, clinical presentations, and outcomes in patients with TTS., Methods: Patients diagnosed with TTS between 2004 and 2021 were enrolled from the InterTAK (International Takotsubo) registry. To assess temporal trends, patients were divided into 6 groups, each corresponding to a 3-year interval within the study period., Results: Overall, 3,957 patients were included in the study. There was a significant demographic transition, with the proportion of male patients rising from 10% to 15% (P = 0.003). Although apical TTS remained the most common form, the diagnosis of midventricular TTS increased from 18% to 28% (P = 0.018). The prevalence of physical triggers increased from 39% to 58% over the years (P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in 60-day mortality over the years (P < 0.001). However, a landmark analysis excluding patients who died within the first 60 days showed no differences in 1-year mortality (P = 0.150)., Conclusions: This study of temporal trends in TTS highlights a transition in patients demographic with a growing prevalence among men, increasing recognition of midventricular TTS type, and increased short-term mortality and rates of cardiogenic shock in recent years. This transition aligns with the rising prevalence of physical triggers, as expression of increased recognition of TTS in association with acute comorbidities., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Templin has received institutional grants from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, and SMT; and has received consulting grants from Biotronik, Microport, and Innova. Dr Airaksinen has received grants or has contracts with the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; and has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. Dr Bauersachs has received grants from or has contracts with Abiomed, CVRx, Norgine, Roche, and Zoll; holds patents PCT/EP2007/008772 and PCT/EP2009/051986 for microRNA and downstream targets for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes; has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, Corvia, CVRx, Edwards, Norgine, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Vifor; and has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardior, CVRx, Norgine, Novartis, Pfizer, and Vifor. Dr Boehm has received grants from or has contracts with Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft research support (DFG, SFB-TTR 219, S-01); has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, and Vifor; and is on the advisory board of Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, ReCor, Servier, and Vifor. Dr Ferreira has received payments for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from A Menarini, Medinfar, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, and Medtronic; and has received payments for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Medtronic. Dr Dichtl has received consulting fees from Reata. Dr Kaiser has received consulting fees from the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Medtronic, Abbott, and Europa Organization. Dr Kobza has received institutional grants on behalf of the Luzerner Kantonsspital from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronik, and Sis-Medical; and has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Dr Koenig has received grants and provision of reagents to the institution from Singulex, Dr.Beckmann Pharma, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics; has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, The Medicines Company, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, OMEICOS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, New Amsterdam Pharma, TenSixteen Bio, Esperion, and Genentech; and has received lecture fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, Berlin-Chemie, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca. Dr Lüscher has received research or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Vifor; is the president elect of the European Society of Cardiology; is chairman of the research committee of the Swiss Heart Foundation; is President of the Board of the Zurich Heart House; and is Trustee of the London Heart House. Dr Karakas has received grants or has contracts with Vifor Pharma and Daiichi-Sankyo; has received consulting fees or payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Vifor, Pharmacosmos, and Sphingotec; and has received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Sphingotec and Vifor Pharma. Dr Niederseer has received consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gerson Lehmann Group (GLG) Consulting, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Zoll; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Roffi has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific, Cordis, Terumo, Biotronik, and Medtronic. Dr Ruschitzka has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers in the last 3 years; the Department of Cardiology (University Hospital of Zurich/University of Zurich), however, reports research, educational, and/or travel grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, At the Limits Ltd, Bayer, Berlin Heart, B. Braun, Biosense Webster, Biosensors Europe AG, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bracco, Cardinal Health Switzerland, Concept Medical, Corteria, CSL, Daiichi-Sankyo, Diatools AG, Edwards Lifesciences, Guidant Europe NV, Hamilton Health Sciences, IHF, Innosuisse, Johnson/Johnson, Kaneka Corporation, Kantar, Kiniksa, Labormedizinisches Zentrum, MedAlliance, Medical Education Global Solutions, Medtronic, MicroPort, MSD, Mundipharma Medical Company, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Quintiles Switzerland Sarl, RecorMedical, Roche Diagnostics, Roche Pharma, Sahajanand IN, Sanofi, Sarstedt AG, Servier, SIS Medical, Sorin CRM SAS, SSS International Clinical Research, Stromal, Terumo Deutschland, Trama Solutions, V-Wave, Vascular Medical, Vifor, Wissens Plus, and ZOLL. Prof Ruschitzka has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers in the last 3 years; remuneration for the time spent in the following consulting activities were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: AstraZeneca (IMC), Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Citi Research, Klub Class, Novo Nordisk, Radcliffe Group, Stiftung Pfizer Forschungspreis, and Vifor; remuneration for the following lectures were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca (A+ Science AB), Bayer (At the Limits), Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific (CCE Services), Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, C.T.I GmbH, FomF, Hôpitaux Universitaires des Genève (GECORE), Luzerner Kantonsspital, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Medcon, Medscape (WebMD), Medtronic, Medworld, Novartis, Roche, Ruwag, Swiss Heart Failure Academy, The Hong Kong Heart Failure Society, Trama Solutions SL, Inselspital Bern, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Medical Education Global Solutions), Romanian Society of Cardiology, ÖKG Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, and Zoll; has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca (IMC/A+ Science AB), Boehringer Ingelheim, Centro Hospitaler de Vila Nova de Gaia, C.T.I. GmbH (Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf), European Society of Cardiology, Monocle, Novartis, Spektar Putovanja, Austrian Heart Failure Association, and Heart Failure Association of the ESC; remuneration for following Advisory Boards were made directly to the University of Zurich and do not impact on his personal remuneration: Bayer, Roche, IMC/AstraZeneca, and Amgen; and he has received secretarial and administrative support of the HFA for his role as President/Past-President for 2018 to 2020. Dr Schunkert has received consulting fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Servier; has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Servier, and Synlab; and has received honoraria for his participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and Amgen. Dr Wolfrum has received consulting fees from NVT/Biosensors as well as payments for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from NVT/Biosensors; and has equities in Hi-D Imaging, Winterthur, Switzerland. Dr Crea has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Menarini, Chiesi, and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside of the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is associated with a substantial rate of adverse events. We sought to design a machine learning (ML)-based model to predict the risk of in-hospital death and to perform a clustering of TTS patients to identify different risk profiles., Methods and Results: A ridge logistic regression-based ML model for predicting in-hospital death was developed on 3482 TTS patients from the International Takotsubo (InterTAK) Registry, randomly split in a train and an internal validation cohort (75% and 25% of the sample size, respectively) and evaluated in an external validation cohort (1037 patients). Thirty-one clinically relevant variables were included in the prediction model. Model performance represented the primary endpoint and was assessed according to area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. As secondary endpoint, a K-medoids clustering algorithm was designed to stratify patients into phenotypic groups based on the 10 most relevant features emerging from the main model. The overall incidence of in-hospital death was 5.2%. The InterTAK-ML model showed an AUC of 0.89 (0.85-0.92), a sensitivity of 0.85 (0.78-0.95) and a specificity of 0.76 (0.74-0.79) in the internal validation cohort and an AUC of 0.82 (0.73-0.91), a sensitivity of 0.74 (0.61-0.87) and a specificity of 0.79 (0.77-0.81) in the external cohort for in-hospital death prediction. By exploiting the 10 variables showing the highest feature importance, TTS patients were clustered into six groups associated with different risks of in-hospital death (28.8% vs. 15.5% vs. 5.4% vs. 1.0.8% vs. 0.5%) which were consistent also in the external cohort., Conclusion: A ML-based approach for the identification of TTS patients at risk of adverse short-term prognosis is feasible and effective. The InterTAK-ML model showed unprecedented discriminative capability for the prediction of in-hospital death., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: The aim of the SCIENCE trial was to investigate whether a single treatment with direct intramyocardial injections of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (CSCC&#95;ASCs) was safe and improved cardiac function in patients with chronic ischaemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Methods and Results: The study was a European multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial using allogeneic CSCC&#95;ASCs from healthy donors or placebo (2:1 randomization). Main inclusion criteria were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45%, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels >300 pg/ml. CSCC&#95;ASCs or placebo (isotonic saline) were injected directly into viable myocardium. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 6-month follow-up measured by echocardiography. A total of 133 symptomatic HFrEF patients were included. The treatment was safe without any drug-related severe adverse events or difference in cardiac-related adverse events during a 3-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences between groups during follow-up in LVESV (0.3 ± 5.0 ml, p = 0.945), nor in secondary endpoints of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-2.0 ± 6.0 ml, p = 0.736) and LVEF (-1.6 ± 1.0%, p = 0.119). The NYHA class improved slightly within the first year in both groups without any difference between groups. There were no changes in 6-min walk test, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein or quality of life the first year in any groups., Conclusion: The SCIENCE trial demonstrated safety of intramyocardial allogeneic CSCC&#95;ASC therapy in patients with chronic HFrEF. However, it was not possible to improve the pre-defined endpoints and induce restoration of cardiac function or clinical symptoms., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

It has now been almost 20 years since first clinical trials of stem cell therapy for heart repair were initiated. While initial preclinical data were promising and suggested that stem cells may be able to directly restore a diseased myocardium, this was never unequivocally confirmed in the clinical setting. Clinical trials of cell therapy did show the process to be feasible and safe. However, the clinical benefits of this treatment modality in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure have not been consistently confirmed. What is more, in the rapidly developing field of stem cell therapy in patients with heart failure, relevant questions regarding clinical trials' protocol streamlining, optimal patient selection, stem cell type and dose, and the mode of cell delivery remain largely unanswered. Recently, novel approaches to myocardial regeneration, including the use of pluripotent and allogeneic stem cells and cell-free therapeutic approaches, have been proposed. Thus, in this review, we aim to outline current knowledge and highlight contemporary challenges and dilemmas in clinical aspects of stem cell and regenerative therapy in patients with chronic ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure.

Decompensation episodes in chronic heart failure patients frequently result in unplanned outpatient or emergency room visits or even hospitalizations. Early detection of these episodes in their pre-symptomatic phase would likely enable the clinicians to manage this patient cohort with the appropriate modification of medical therapy which would in turn prevent the development of more severe heart failure decompensation thus avoiding the need for heart failure-related hospitalizations. Currently, heart failure worsening is recognized by the clinicians through characteristic changes of heart failure-related symptoms and signs, including the changes in heart sounds. The latter has proven to be largely unreliable as its interpretation is highly subjective and dependent on the clinicians' skills and preferences. Previous studies have indicated that the algorithms of artificial intelligence are promising in distinguishing the heart sounds of heart failure patients from those of healthy individuals. In this manuscript, we focus on the analysis of heart sounds of chronic heart failure patients in their decompensated and recompensated phase. The data was recorded on 37 patients using two types of electronic stethoscopes. Using a combination of machine learning approaches, we obtained up to 72% classification accuracy between the two phases, which is better than the accuracy of the interpretation by cardiologists, which reached 50%. Our results demonstrate that machine learning algorithms are promising in improving early detection of heart failure decompensation episodes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Susič, Poglajen and Gradišek.)

Introduction: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) is the fastest way to restore circulation in refractory cardiogenic shock, however it cannot unload the failing left ventricle. There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal approach to left ventricular venting in V-A ECMO patients with severely depressed or absent left ventricular function., Methods: A computer model was developed in Matlab Simulink R20016b (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) to analyze different venting options as well as atrial septostomy in the setting of cardiogenic shock and V-A ECMO., Results: The model has shown an inverse linear relationship between left atrial pressure and either vent, Impella or atrial septum defect flow rate. The minimum vent flow required to prevent pulmonary edema in complete loss of left ventricular function needed to be higher than the bronchial blood flow. Atrial septostomy restored normal pulmonary blood flow with low left atrial pressure but induced stasis in the left ventricle. Venting the pulmonary artery induced stasis in the entire pulmonary circulation as well as left atrium and left ventricle. Venting the left ventricle directly with a cannula or Impella device avoided blood stasis., Conclusion: Our data suggest that reduction of left atrial pressure is linearly related to the vent, Impella or atrial septal defect flow rate. The preferred vent location is the left ventricle as it avoids stasis in the pulmonary circulation and cardiac chambers.

Patients with advanced heart failure (HF) have reduced cardiac output and impaired peripheral blood flow, which diminishes endothelial shear stress and consequently flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). The aim of our study was to find out whether endothelial dysfunction is associated with the number of CD34+ cells and TNF-α levels in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic HF after stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We included 56 patients with advanced HF (LVEF < 35%). Eighteen patients (32.14%) had ischemic and 38 (67.86%) patients had non-ischemic HF. FMD of the brachial artery was performed before the patients underwent 5-day bone marrow stimulation with daily subcutaneous injections of G-CSF (5 μg/kg bid). On the fifth day peripheral blood CD34+ cell count was measured. No statistically significant differences were found between the patient groups in NT-proBNP levels ((1575 (425−2439) vs. 1273 (225−2239)) pg/mL; p = 0.40), peripheral blood CD34+ cell count ((67.54 ± 102.32 vs. 89.76 ± 71.21) × 106; p = 0.32), TNF-α ((8.72 ± 10.30 vs. 4.96 ± 6.16) ng/mL; p = 0.13) and FMD (6.7 ± 5.4 vs. 7.2 ± 5.9%; p = 0.76). In a linear regression model, only FMD (p = 0.001) and TNF-α (p = 0.003) emerged as statistically significant predictors of CD34+ cells counts. Our study suggests that TNF-α is a good predictor of impaired endothelial function and of CD34+ cells mobilization after G-CSF stimulation in patients with advanced HF of ischemic and non-ischemic origin.

Background and Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to use coronary computed tomography in patients with normal tricuspid aortic valves to perform detailed aortic root and aortic valve geometric analysis with a focus on the asymmetry of the three leaflets., Methods: Retrospective analysis of anonymized coronary computed tomography angiograms was performed using dedicated software, where manual aortic root segmentation and marking of several points of interest were followed by automated measurements of aortic root and leaflets. Asymmetry of the three leaflets in individual patients was assessed by calculating absolute and relative differences between the largest and the smallest of the three leaflets., Results: We analyzed 70 aortic valves, the mean patient age was 53 ± 11 years, and 50% (n = 35) of patients were female. All aortic valves were tricuspid, without calcifications and aortic roots were of normal dimensions. Some degree of asymmetry was present in all analyzed valves. Absolute and relative differences for free margin length were 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 9.3 ± 3.8%, respectively. The largest relative difference was noted in the coaptation area (36.5 ± 16.5%) and the smallest in leaflet effective height (6.1 ± 4.8%). Using predefined cutoff criteria for absolute differences in leaflet dimensions, 86% of the valves were classified as asymmetric., Conclusions: Most normal tricuspid aortic valves show some degree of asymmetry. Equal free margin length of the three leaflets is not needed for normal tricuspid aortic valve function. Leaflet effective height showed the least amount of asymmetry confirming its importance in keeping the aortic valve competent., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: We investigated the effects of CD34 + cell therapy in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)., Methods and Results: In a prospective pilot study, we enrolled 30 patients with HFpEF. In Phase 1, patients were treated with medical therapy for 6 months. Thereafter, all patients underwent CD34 + cell transplantation. Using electroanatomical mapping, we measured local mechanical diastolic delay and myocardial viability to guide the targeting of cell injections. Patients were followed for 6 months after cell transplantation (Phase 2), and the primary endpoint was the difference in change in E/e' between Phase 1 and Phase 2. In Phase 1, the decrease in E/e' was significantly less pronounced than in Phase 2 (-0.33 ± 1.72 vs. -3.77 ± 2.66, p = 0.001). During Phase 1, there was no significant change in global systolic strain (GLS; from -12.5 ± 2.4% to -12.8 ± 2.6%, p = 0.77), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; from 1463 ± 1247 pg/ml to 1298 ± 931 pg/ml, p = 0.31), or 6-min walk test (6MWT; from 391 ± 75 m to 402 ± 93 m, p = 0.42). In Phase 2, an improvement was noted in NT-proBNP (from 1298 ± 931 pg/ml to 887 ± 809 pg/ml, p = 0.02) and 6MWT (from 402 ± 93 m to 438 ± 72 m, p = 0.02). Although GLS did not change significantly in Phase 2 (from -12.8 ± 2.6% to -13.8 ± 2.7%, p = 0.36), we found improved local systolic strain at cell injection sites (-3.4 ± 6.8%, p = 0.005)., Conclusions: In this non-randomized trial, transendocardial CD34 + cell therapy in HFpEF was associated with an improvement in E/e', NT-proBNP, exercise capacity, and local myocardial strain at the cell injection sites., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02923609., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common cause of hospitalisation for heart failure. However, only limited effective treatments are available. Recent evidence suggests that HFpEF may result from a systemic proinflammatory state, microvascular endothelial inflammation and microvascular rarefaction. Formation of new microvasculature in ischaemic tissues is dependent on CD34+ cells, which incorporate into the newly developing vasculature and produce pro-angiogenic cytokines. In HFpEF patients, worsening of diastolic function appears to correlate with decreased numbers of CD34+ cells. Therefore, it is plausible that increasing the myocardial numbers of CD34+ cells could theoretically lead to improved microvascular function and improved diastolic parameters in HFpEF. In accordance with this hypothesis, recent pilot clinical data suggest that CD34+ cell therapy may indeed be associated with improved diastolic function and better functional capacity in HFpEF patients and could thus represent a promising novel therapeutic modality for this patient population., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022, Radcliffe Cardiology.)

Background: Ethnic disparities have been reported in cardiovascular disease. However, ethnic disparities in takotsubo syndrome (TTS) remain elusive. This study assessed differences in clinical characteristics between Japanese and European TTS patients and determined the impact of ethnicity on in-hospital outcomes., Methods: TTS patients in Japan were enrolled from 10 hospitals and TTS patients in Europe were enrolled from 32 hospitals participating in the International Takotsubo Registry. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between Japanese and European patients., Results: A total of 503 Japanese and 1670 European patients were included. Japanese patients were older (72.6 ± 11.4 years vs. 68.0 ± 12.0 years; p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (18.5 vs. 8.4%; p < 0.001) than European TTS patients. Physical triggering factors were more common (45.5 vs. 32.0%; p < 0.001), and emotional triggers less common (17.5 vs. 31.5%; p < 0.001), in Japanese patients than in European patients. Japanese patients were more likely to experience cardiogenic shock during the acute phase (15.5 vs. 9.0%; p < 0.001) and had a higher in-hospital mortality (8.2 vs. 3.2%; p < 0.001). However, ethnicity itself did not appear to have an impact on in-hospital mortality. Machine learning approach revealed that the presence of physical stressors was the most important prognostic factor in both Japanese and European TTS patients., Conclusion: Differences in clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes between Japanese and European TTS patients exist. Ethnicity does not impact the outcome in TTS patients. The worse in-hospital outcome in Japanese patients, is mainly driven by the higher prevalence of physical triggers., Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT01947621., (© 2021. The Author(s).)