Search

Introduction: Asthma is a pathology that remains severe and is inadequately controlled in 4% of patients. Identification of multiple pathophysiological mechanisms has led to the development of biomedicines, of which there are currently five available in France, with a safety profile that appears favorable but remains uncertain due to a lack of real-life experience with these new molecules., State of Knowledge: Although relatively benign, the adverse effects of biologics are diverse. Headache, joint pain, skin reactions at the injection site, fever and asthenia are commonly observed during the different treatments. Ophthalmological complications seem restricted to dupilumab, with numerous cases of keratitis and conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis. Several respiratory complications have also been observed, essentially consisting in pharyngitis and other upper respiratory infections. Hypereosinophilia may occur, mainly with dupilumab, requiring investigation of systemic repercussions or vasculitis. Allergic reactions are uncommon but require careful monitoring during initial injections., Conclusion: Biologics for severe asthma are recent drugs with a favorable safety profile, but with little real-life experience, justifying increased vigilance by prescribing physicians., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on caregivers has rarely been investigated. Our work aims to explore the burden of IBD on the different aspects of caregivers' lives., Methods: We conducted an online survey via the social network of the French IBD patient organization addressed to patients' caregivers who were asked to fill in a questionnaire covering the impact of the disease on different aspects of their lives. Impacts were measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). A VAS score ≥5 of 10 was considered significantly high. We then performed uni- and multivariate analyses of predictors of higher impact on parents and partners, separately., Results: A total of 853 caregivers participated, predominantly women (77%). The mean age was 48.5 years. Their relationship with the patient was mainly parents in 57.1% and partners in 30.6%. The type of IBD was Crohn's disease in 63% and ulcerative colitis in 35%. The psychological burden was the highest among parents and was mainly correlated with a lack of knowledge about IBD and professional compromise (P < .05). The impact on leisure was the highest among partners and was affected by psychological, sexual, and professional burdens (P < .05). About 50% of partners experienced an absent sexual relationship for weeks/months and decreased libido regardless of IBD type. Professional impact was greater in parents compared with partners, and 36% of caregivers needed work arrangements., Conclusions: IBD has a high impact on different aspects of life of patients' caregivers. Therefore, interventions to reduce the disease burden in this population are needed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), no biomarker is available to help the physician to choose the most suitable biotherapy. The primary objective of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of identification of α4β7- and TNF-expressing cells, to predict the response to vedolizumab using confocal laser endoscopy (CLE)., Methods: Patients with moderate-to-severe UC, naïve of biotherapy, received vedolizumab. Clinical evaluation was performed at each infusion. Endoscopic evaluation was performed before inclusion and at week 22. Fresh colonic biopsies were stained using FITC-labelled vedolizumab and Alexa fluor-labelled adalimumab and ex vivo dual-band CLE images were acquired. Blood samples were collected to measure trough concentrations of vedolizumab and to determine absolute counts of T and B cells subpopulations, NK cells and monocytes., Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled in the study and received at least one dose of vedolizumab. Clinical remission and endoscopic improvement were observed in 58% of whom 5 patients (45%) had an endoscopic subscore of 0. In terms of clinical response and remission, endoscopic improvement and histologic response, FITC-conjugated vedolizumab staining tended to be higher in responder patients compared to non-responders at week 22. A threshold value of 6 positive FITC-vedolizumab staining areas detected by CLE seemed informative to discriminate the responders and non-responders. The results were similar in terms of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 85% (p = 0.05). Trough concentrations and blood immune cells were not associated with responses to vedolizumab., Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrate that dual-band CLE is feasible to detect α4β7- and TNF-expressing cells. Positive α4β7 staining seems to be associated with clinical and endoscopic remission in UC patients treated by anti-α4β7-integrin, subject to validation by larger-scale studies. Clinical-trial.gov: NCT02878083., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: CTP (2) has received personal fees from Takeda for lecture and research grant from MSD. MF (2) has received personal lecture fees from Takeda, Abbvie and MSD. GB (5) has received personal fees from Takeda, Abbvie and MSD for lecture and advisory board. AB has received personal fees from Takeda, Abbvie and MSD for lecture and advisory board and research grants from Takeda and Medtronic. LQ (1), AF (3), TD, JB, TO, MA, MD, SBa, SBl, CB, MAV, RJ and MN have declared that no conflict of interest exist. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Quénéhervé et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Facing with an increasing demand for transition to adult care management, our home parenteral nutrition (HPN) team designed an adolescent therapeutic educational program (ATEP) specifically intended for adolescents on long-term HPN. The aim of this study was to report on the first sessions of this program., Methods: The ATEP is designed in three sessions of five consecutive days, during school holidays over the year. It includes group sessions on catheter handling, disconnecting and connecting the PN and catheter dressing, dealing with unforeseen events (e.g., fever or catheter injury), but also sessions with psychologist, social worker, sports teacher, fashion specialist, meeting with adults who received HPN since childhood. Specific course for the accompanying parents were also provided. Six months after the last session, a 3-day trip to the attraction park "le Futuroscope," Poitiers, France, was organized without any parental presence., Results: After 3 ATEP courses, a total of 16 adolescents have been enrolled. They were aged between 13 and 17 years (median 14 IQR: 14-16.25). All were on long term HPN started during the neonatal period except for four who started PN at a median age of 10 years old (IQR: 1-10). At the time of the ATEP, their median PNDI was 105% (IQR: 95.5-120.8) while receiving a median of six infusions per week (IQR: 5-7). Thirteen received Taurolidine lock procedure. After the ATEP, 11 adolescents could be considered as fully autonomous, 4 as partially autonomous and one failed to gain any autonomy. Course evaluation by adolescents or parents was good to excellent., Conclusion: Through the holistic and multiprofessional approach of this training and the group cohesion, the adolescents were not only able to handle catheter care and PN connections but were able to understand and accept better their illness and project themselves into their own future., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. JPGN Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Background: Data and Safety Monitoring is integral to quality assurance of clinical trials. Although monitoring is a core legal component of regulated clinical trials, non-regulated trials are not mandated to incorporate monitoring. Consequently, the monitoring process has been underutilised and underreported in this setting. This research report outlines the development and plans for implementing a bespoke Clinical Monitoring Strategy within the ' Rehabilitation Strategies Following Oesophagogastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (ReStOre II) Trial' , a non-regulated trial comparing a 12-week multidisciplinary programme of rehabilitation to standard care in a cohort of 120 cancer survivors., Methods: This research note provides a detailed overview of the ReStOre II Clinical Monitoring Strategy and describes the development of the strategy pre and post awarding of the grant. The strategy consists of the establishment and implementation of a comprehensive trial governance structure, inclusive of a Trial Management Group, Trial Steering Committee Meeting, and Independent Data Monitoring Committee. In addition, external trial monitoring by the Clinical Research Facility at St James's Hospital. Three monitoring visits will be conducted during the trial; i) site initiation visit, ii) interim monitoring visit, and iii) close our visit., Results: The Clinical Monitoring Strategy has been finalised and is currently being implemented within the ReStOre II Trial. Two site initiation visits and one interim monitoring visit have been completed to date., Conclusion: This research note provides a template for implementation of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy in a non-regulated clinical trial., Registration: ReStOre II Trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03958019., Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed., (Copyright: © 2023 O'Neill L et al.)

Introduction Trauma is one of the leading causes of death and hospitalization in the United States. Head trauma often results in significant morbidity and mortality. This study was undertaken to identify reasons for delay in diagnosis of intracranial trauma. Methods This retrospective study analyzed patients with intracranial trauma between 2016 and 2022, in which there was a delay of two days or more from the date of injury to the date of diagnosis. Results Among 809 patients with head trauma, 140 subjects were identified with delayed diagnosis of intracranial trauma (17.3%). The most common diagnoses were subdural hemorrhage (N = 82; 56%) and intraparenchymal hemorrhage (N = 33; 24%). The most common reasons for delay in diagnosis included patient delay in seeking care (N = 111; 79%), and delayed diagnosis during inpatient hospitalization (N = 16; 11%) (Chi-Square <0.0001) (Table 2). Among inpatients with delayed diagnosis, confounding issues included alcohol intoxication (N = 4; 3%), other injuries (N = 9; 6%), and mental health issues (N = 2; 1%). Conclusions Among patients with delayed diagnosis of intracranial trauma, the majority of delays in diagnosis were due to patient delay in seeking care. Future directions may include improved public education regarding trauma and the importance of seeking timely medical care., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Marco et al.)

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may have a modified immune response to SARS-CoV-2. The objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of COVID-19 in patients treated with infliximab or vedolizumab, to analyze the factors associated with the infection, the impact of treatments and trough levels., Methods: Patients with IBD treated with intravenous biologics in 14 French centers were included between March and June 2020 and followed-up for 6 months. Blood samples were collected for serologies and trough levels. The analysis of factors associated with COVID-19 was conducted in a matched 1:1 case-control sub-study with positive patients., Results: In total, 1026 patients were included (74.9% infliximab). Over the follow-up period, 420 patients reported the occurrence of COVID-19 symptoms; 342 had been tested of whom 18 were positive. At the end of follow-up, 38 patients had a positive serology. Considering both nasal tests and serologies together, 46 patients (4.5%) had been infected. The risk of COVID-19 was related neither to the use of treatments (whatever the trough levels) nor to disease activity. Infections were more frequent when using public transport or living in flats in urban areas., Conclusions: The prevalence rate of COVID-19 in this IBD population treated with intravenous infliximab or vedolizumab was the same as the one in the French population before the start of the vaccination campaign. The risk was increased by urban living and was not influenced by disease activity or biologics. Sanitary barrier measures remain the best way to protect against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with IBD in biological therapy., Competing Interests: SN declares counseling, boards, transports or fees from Abbvie, Biogen, HAC-pharma, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Tillots, BMS, Amgen, Galapagos and Fresenius. Prof. Bouguen received lecture fees from Abbvie, Ferring, MSD, Takeda and Pfizer and consultant fees from Takeda, Janssen. MA reports consulting or lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Ferring, Genentech, Gilead, IQVIA, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, and Tillots; and grant support from Innate Pharma, Janssen, Takeda, and Genentech/Roche. MS has received lecture or consulting fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Amgen, Celltrion, Janssen, Ferring, Takeda and Tillotts. LC received board and lecture fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Amgen. CR has received payment for lectures from Abbvie, Biogen and Galapagos. PB has received payment for lectures from Abbvie, Pfizer, Tillotts, Fresenius Kabi and Gilead. DL declares counseling, boards, transports or fees from Abbvie, Biogaran, Biogen, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche, Takeda. LP-B has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Alimentiv, Alma Bio Therapeutics, Amgen, Applied Molecular Transport, Arena, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, CONNECT Biopharm, Cytoki Pharma, Enthera, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, GSK, HAC-Pharma, IAG Image Analysis, Index Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Mopac, Morphic, MSD, Norgine, Novartis, OM Pharma, ONO Pharma, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pandion Therapeutics, Par’Immune, Pfizer, Prometheus, Protagonist, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, Theravance, Thermo Fisher, Tigenix, Tillots, Viatris, Vifor, Ysopia, Abivax; has received payment for lectures from Galapagos, AbbVie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Tillots, Celltrion, Takeda, Pfizer, Sandoz, Biogen, MSD, Amgen, Vifor, Arena, Lilly, Gilead, Viatris, Medac, Sanofi; reports grant support from Takeda, Fresenius Kabi, Celltrion; has received meeting support fees from Galapagos, AbbVie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Tillots, Celltrion, Takeda, Pfizer, Gossamer Bio, Sandoz, MSD, Amgen, Lilly, Gilead, Thermo Fisher, Medac, CONNECT Biopharm. AM has received payment for lectures from Galapagos. CT-P has reveived lecture fees from Ferring, Janssen, Mayoly spindler, Norgine, Abbvie, MSD, and Takeda. AB declares lecture or consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, and Tillotts. CLB has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Janssen and Gilead; has received payment for lectures from Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, and Takeda; reports grant support from Abbvie and Takeda; has received meeting support fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Takeda. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Lelong, Josien, Coste-Burel, Rimbert, Bressollette-Bodin, Nancey, Bouguen, Allez, Serrero, Caillo, Rouillon, Blanc, Laharie, Olivier, Peyrin-Biroulet, Dib, De Maissin, Montuclard, Trang-Poisson, Vavasseur, Gallot, Berthome, Braudeau, Chevreuil, Bourreille and Le Berre.)

Purpose: Collegial support meetings (CSM) have been set up in the Gustave Roussy Cancer Center for inpatients whose complex care requires a multi-professional approach involving many participants: oncologists but also health-caregivers, a member of the palliative care team, an intensivist, and a psychologist. This study is aimed at describing the role of this newly multidisciplinary meeting implemented in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center., Methods: Each week, the health-caregivers decide which situations should be examined, depending on the difficulty of a case. The discussion goes on to include the goal of treatment, the intensity of care, ethical and psychosocial issues, and the patient's life plan. Finally, to obtain feedback from the teams, a survey has been distributed to assess the interest in the CSM., Results: In 2020, 114 inpatients were involved, and 91% were in an advanced palliative situation. During the CSMs, 55% of the discussions focused on whether to continue specific cancer treatment-29% about whether to continue invasive medical care-50% about optimizing supportive care. We estimate that between 65 and 75% of CSMs influenced further decisions. Death occurred during the hospitalization for 35% of the patients that were discussed. The lapse of time between last chemotherapy and death was 24 days (IQR, 28.5). CSMs were well received, since 80% of the teams find these meetings useful., Conclusions: CSMs reach conclusions for medical and nursing staff involved, in order to improve the management of inpatients with cancer in advanced palliative situation and to define the better goals of care., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common adverse effects of antineoplastic agents, ranging in prevalence from 19% to over 85%. Clinically, CIPN is a predominantly sensory neuropathy that may be accompanied by motor and autonomic changes of varying intensity and duration. The high prevalence of CIPN among cancer patients makes it a major problem for both patients and survivors, as well as for their health care providers, especially because there is currently no single effective method of preventing CIPN; moreover, the options for treating this syndrome are very limited. Phycocyanin, a biliprotein pigment and an important constituent of the blue-green algae Spirulina platensis, has been reported to possess significant antioxidant and radical-scavenging properties, offering protection against oxidative stress, which is one of the hypothetic mechanisms, between others, of CIPN occurrence., Methods: Our hypothesis is that phycocyanin may give protection against oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. Our trial will be a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with 110 randomized patients suffering from metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma including esogastric, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. Patients are being followed up in the gastroenterology or oncology departments of seven French hospitals., Discussion: Due to the neuropathy, patients need to avoid injury by paying careful attention to home safety; patients' physicians often prescribe over-the-counter pain medications. If validated, our hypothesis should help to limit neurotoxicity without the need to discontinue chemotherapy., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05025826. First published on August 27, 2021., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Objective: Anti-TNFs have been shown to significantly improve the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate to what extend the patients' preferences for these intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) treatments differ based on respondents' quality of life. An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to understand patient trade-offs in treatment choice., Methods: Fifty-seven Crohn's disease anti-TNF naïve patients were asked to choose between two different scenarios, considering the following attributes: mode of administration (MODE), total availability for injection (TIME), speed of onset (DELAY), risk of anti-TNF administration despite a contraindication (RISK) and total monthly out-of-pocket expenses (COST). At the same time, patients completed the IBDQ-32 questionnaire. Conditional logit models without and with interaction terms were estimated to evaluate attribute weights., Results: Patients preferred to self-administer SC anti-TNF rather than have a primary care nurse do it, whereas the preference for IV route was negative. After adding interaction terms however, the IV route became preferred for patients with impaired HRQoL, this preference having decreased as HRQoL increased. Surprisingly, patients with impaired HRQoL were less willing to spend more time on treatment, and this effect diminished as HRQoL (overall and in each dimension) became higher., Conclusions: HRQoL level changed patients' preferences for the anti-TNF treatment. The results suggest the need to optimise the management of IV infusions in the hospital and reinforce the importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) as a common practice to improve shared medical decision making.

Background: The prevalence of obesity and the number of bariatric surgeries in both the general population and in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased significantly in recent years. Due to small sample sizes and the lack of adequate controls, no definite conclusions can be drawn from the available studies on the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with IBD. Our aim was to assess safety, weight loss, and deficiencies in patients with IBD and obesity who underwent BS and compare findings to a control group., Methods: Patients with IBD and a history of BS were retrospectively recruited to centers belonging to the Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). Patients were matched 1:2 for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hospital of surgery, and type of BS with non-IBD patients who underwent BS. Complications, rehospitalizations, weight, and deficiencies after BS were collected in cases and controls., Results: We included 88 procedures in 85 patients (64 Crohn's disease, 20 ulcerative colitis, 1 unclassified IBD) with a mean BMI of 41.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Bariatric surgery included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 3), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 73), and gastric banding (n = 12). Eight (9%) complications were reported, including 4 (5%) requiring surgery. At a mean follow-up of 34 months, mean weight was 88.6 ± 22.4 kg. No difference was observed between cases and controls for postoperative complications (P = .31), proportion of weight loss (P = .27), or postoperative deficiencies (P = .99)., Conclusions: Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective procedure in patients with IBD and obesity; outcomes in this patient group were similar to those observed in a control population., (© 2021 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aims: In Crohn's disease (CD), a composite therapeutic target was recently recommended, including both objective measurement (endoscopic remission) and Patient-Reported Outcomes (resolution of abdominal pain and normalization of bowel function). All dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are impacted: not only bowel symptoms but also systemic symptoms, emotional wellbeing and social function. Thus, understanding the predictors of each HRQoL dimension would improve patient management. However, analysis of these factors has only been found in a few publications, with some limitations. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the evolution of the HRQoL of CD patients during six months after initiation of anti-TNF and to identify its predictors., Methods: We analyzed data of 56 patients included in a multicenter prospective cohort study (COQC-PIT). HRQoL measures (using IBDQ-32) and data related to patient, disease and treatment characteristics were collected every two months. Generalized estimating equations were used., Results: Overall HRQoL was significantly improved 2 months after anti-TNF initiation, and then stagnated. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics have differentiated impacts on the overall score and on each dimension of quality of life. Subcutaneous anti-TNF had no significant effect on overall HRQoL, improving only emotional function and bowel symptoms. Concomitant use of corticosteroids and/or immunomodulators impaired almost all dimensions. Having children or working altered bowel symptoms. Disease duration and active smoking negatively impact emotional function and systemic symptoms., Conclusions: Each HRQoL dimension, not only bowel symptoms, and their influencing factors should therefore be considered in medical decision-making, especially in months following the initiation of a new treatment such as anti-TNF.