Search

To explore the efficacy and value of personalized surgical schemes in the repair of maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula based on the size of the maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula. A total of 28 patients with maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula who were admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatology Hospital of Kunming Medical University from July 2017 to May 2020 were included to conduct a prospective case clinical study. After the inflammation in the maxillary sinus was controlled, a proper surgical repair method was selected according to the size of the perforation and fistula based on the double-layer closure technique. The diameter of the perforation and fistula was measured with the assistance of cone-beam CT. After that, the platelet rich fibrin (PRF) repair was performed on the perforation and fistula with 3 mm≤diameter7 mm in size in 14 patients. The PRF repair and buccal flap repair were performed on the perforation and fistula with 7 mm ≤diameter15 mm in size in 7 patients. The adjacent buccal pad repair, palatine flap repair, and buccal flap repair were performed on the perforation and fistula with 15 mm≤ diameter25 mm in size in 4 patients. The nasolabial axial flap repair and nasolabial free flap repair were performed on the perforation and fistula with a diameter ≥25 mm in size in 3 patients. The medical follow-up was conducted in all patients in the 1st, 2nd, and 4th week after surgery, with an overall success rate reaching 96.4% (27/28) after the initial intervention. The relapse of disease occurred in one patient (4.6%) with diabetes and a smoking history in the 2nd week after surgery. Identifying a proper surgical repair method according to the size of the oral and maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula based on the double-layer closure technique can improve the one-time cure rate in these patients under the premise that the inflammation in the maxillary sinus can be controlled.根据患者上颌窦穿孔及上颌窦瘘孔大小，选择个性化手术方案，探索在口腔上颌窦穿孔及上颌窦瘘修复中的应用疗效和意义。纳入2017年7月至2020年5月就诊于昆明医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科的口腔上颌窦穿孔及上颌窦瘘患者28例，进行前瞻性病例临床研究。在保证上颌窦内炎症得以控制的情况下，以双层封闭技术为核心，根据穿孔及瘘孔的大小选择相应的手术修复方法。通过锥形束CT测量穿孔和瘘孔直径大小，对直径≥3 mm且7 mm的14例患者，采用富血小板纤维蛋白（platelet rich fibrin，PRF）填充修复法；对直径≥7 mm且15 mm 的7例患者，采用PRF+颊侧组织瓣修复方法；对直径≥15 mm且25 mm的4例患者，采用邻位颊脂垫组织瓣+腭侧组织瓣+颊侧组织瓣重叠修复法；对直径≥25 mm的3例患者，采用鼻唇沟轴型皮瓣或鼻唇沟任意皮瓣修复法。所有患者在术后第1、2、4周随访检查，初次干预后总成功率为96.4%（27/28）；1例（4.6%）患者术后第2周复发。在保证上颌窦内炎症得以控制的情况下，以双层封闭技术为核心，根据穿孔及瘘孔的大小程度选择相应的手术修复方法，可提高口腔与上颌窦穿孔及上颌窦瘘的一次性治愈率。.