Search

RS mutation profile was tested on pre-treatment cell free DNA. Rate of unmeasurable MRD and impact of mutations and chronic lymphocytic leukemia-RS clonal relation on outcomes will be presented at the meeting. B Introduction: b Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard first line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) variant of Richter syndrome (RS). [Extracted from the article]

Background: The diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) variant of Richter transformation (DLBCL-RT) is typically chemoresistant with poor prognosis. Aiming to explore a chemotherapy-free treatment combination that triggers anti-tumour immune responses, we conducted a phase 2 study of atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with DLBCL-RT., Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm, investigator-initiated, phase 2 study in 15 hospitals in Italy and Switzerland. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma as per the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria with biopsy-proven transformation to DLBCL; had not previously received treatment for DLBCL-RT, although they could have received chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapies; were aged 18 years or older; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. No previous treatment with any of the drugs in the triplet combination was allowed. Patients received 35 cycles of 21 days of intravenous obinutuzumab (100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, 1000 mg on day 8 and day 15 of cycle 1; 1000 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-8) and intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg on day 2 of cycle 1 and 1200 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-18), and continuous oral venetoclax (ramp-up from 20 mg/day on day 15 of cycle 1 according to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia schedule, then 400 mg/day from day 1 of cycle 3 to day 21 of cycle 35). The primary endpoint was overall response rate at day 21 of cycle 6 in the intention-to-treat population. We considered an overall response rate of 67% or more to be clinically active, rejecting the null hypothesis of a response of 40% or less. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04082897, and has been completed., Findings: Between Oct 9, 2019, and Oct 19, 2022, 28 patients were enrolled (12 [43%] male patients and 16 [57%] female patients). Median follow-up was 16·8 months (IQR 7·8-32·0). At cycle 6, 19 of 28 patients showed a response, yielding an overall response rate of 67·9% (95% CI 47·6-84·1). Treatment-emergent adverse events that were grade 3 or worse were reported in 17 (61%; 95% CI 40·6-78·5) of 28 patients, with neutropenia being the most frequent (11 [39%; 21·5-59·4] of 28 patients). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in eight (29%; 14·2-48·7) patients, which were most commonly infections (five [18%; 6·1-36·9] of 28 patients). There were two (7%) deaths attributable to adverse events during the study: one from sepsis and one from fungal pneumonia, which were not considered as directly treatment-related by the investigators. Six (21·4%) patients had immune-related adverse events, none of which led to discontinuation. No tumour lysis syndrome was observed., Interpretation: The atezolizumab, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab triplet combination was shown to be active and safe, suggesting that this chemotherapy-free regimen could become a new first-line treatment approach in patients with DLBCL-RT., Funding: Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AT reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Beigene, and Abbvie; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, and Beigene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Janssen, Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, and AstraZeneca. AMF reports consulting fees from Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca. ACo reports grants or contracts from Gilead, BMS, Beigene, Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Abbvie, and Janssen-Cilag; support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from BMS. MC reports grants or contracts from Johnson & Johnson and Abbvie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, and GSK. RC reports support for the present manuscript from the US National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute (R01CA196703–01). PLZ reports consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, BMS, MSD, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Abbvie, Beigene, Kyowa Kirin, and Janssen. MMot reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events; support for attending meetings or travel; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Abbvie, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. GG reports grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza; consulting fees from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beiene, Hikma, and Johnson & Johnson; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Hikma, Johnson & Johnson, and Lilly. LS reports consulting from Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Merck; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, Octapharma, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Merck; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Beigene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Merck. RCa reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Gilead, Gentilipharma, Pierre Fabre, Celgene, and Menarini stemline; support for attending meetings or travel from Pierre Fabre, Beigene, and Servier; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Celgene, Abbvie, Gentilipharma, and Daichi Samkio. TZ report consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Abbvie. EZ reports consulting fees from Abbvie, Beigene, BMS, Cures, Elly and Lilly, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Miltenyibiomedicine, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, and Gilead; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Merck. DR reports support for the present manuscript from Adaptive; grants or contracts, consulting fees, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Janssen, and Lilly. All other authors declare no competing interests. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship., (Copyright © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option for patients with Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). For many years, the selection of patients to allogeneic HSCT has been largely based on use of the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R). However, the recent broader application of next generation sequencing in clinical practice provided an abundance of molecular data and led to the introduction of molecular prognostic scores as IPSS-Molecular (IPSS-M). In this paper, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 57 consecutive MDS patients treated with allogeneic HSCT in our center. Re-stratification from IPSS-R to IPSS-M occurred in almost half of patients. The application of IPSS-M to our cohort demonstrated a stronger prognostic separation compared to IPSS-R and improved the C-index. Very high-risk IPSS-M patients showed worse outcomes following HSCT compared to high-risk patients. This study provides data supporting the need of integrating molecular information in the transplant decision making of patients with MDS. This allows an earlier and better identification of patients to whom the transplant should be advised., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest AR: Fees for consultancies and participation in meetings, boards, and symposia sponsored by Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, Kite-Gilead, Jazz, Astellas, Abbvie, Incyte, Omeros. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In this retrospective international multicenter study, we describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and related disorders (small lymphocytic lymphoma and high-count monoclonal B lymphocytosis) infected by SARS-CoV-2, including the development of post-COVID condition. Data from 1540 patients with CLL infected by SARS-CoV-2 from January 2020 to May 2022 were included in the analysis and assigned to four phases based on cases disposition and SARS-CoV-2 variants emergence. Post-COVID condition was defined according to the WHO criteria. Patients infected during the most recent phases of the pandemic, though carrying a higher comorbidity burden, were less often hospitalized, rarely needed intensive care unit admission, or died compared to patients infected during the initial phases. The 4-month overall survival (OS) improved through the phases, from 68% to 83%, p = .0015. Age, comorbidity, CLL-directed treatment, but not vaccination status, emerged as risk factors for mortality. Among survivors, 6.65% patients had a reinfection, usually milder than the initial one, and 16.5% developed post-COVID condition. The latter was characterized by fatigue, dyspnea, lasting cough, and impaired concentration. Infection severity was the only risk factor for developing post-COVID. The median time to resolution of the post-COVID condition was 4.7 months. OS in patients with CLL improved during the different phases of the pandemic, likely due to the improvement of prophylactic and therapeutic measures against SARS-CoV-2 as well as the emergence of milder variants. However, mortality remained relevant and a significant number of patients developed post-COVID conditions, warranting further investigations., (© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Clinical or biological parameters useful to predict progression during treatment in real-life setting with ibrutinib, idelalisib and venetoclax in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are still debated. We conducted a multi-center retrospective study on CLL patients treated with ibrutinib and/or idelalisib who were switched to venetoclax for progression or due to adverse events to identify any clinical and/or biological parameters useful to predict progression during treatment with venetoclax. Of all the 128 evaluable patients, 81 had received ibrutinib prior to switching to venetoclax, 35 had received idelalisib and 12 both. When comparing the three subgroups, we did not notice any statistical difference in terms of clinical or biological features. No variable at baseline and at different time points during the follow-up (at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) was found to predict progression nor to have significance for Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the ibrutinib group and in the idelalisib group and in subgroups according to the line of treatment. Analyzing the data of the venetoclax treatment, after a median follow up of 14.3 months, median PFS was not reached and estimated 3-year PFS was 54%. Of the 128 patients treated with venetoclax, 28 (22%) experienced progressive disease. At multivariate analysis for predictive factors for progression, lymph node diameter >56.5 mm before starting treatment emerged as an independent risk factor for progression. The lymph node predictive role for progression during venetoclax treatment could be a new parameter that deserves to be investigate in future studies., (© 2023 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to COVID-19 related poor outcomes, including thrombosis and death, due to the advanced age, the presence of comorbidities, and the disease and treatment-related immune deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19., Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, including patients from 79 centers across 22 countries. Data collection was conducted between April and May 2021. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 on nasal or pharyngeal swabs. Severe cases of COVID-19 were defined by hospitalization and the need of oxygen or admission into ICU. Development and type of thrombotic events, presence and severity of bleeding complications were reported during treatment for COVID-19. Bleeding events were classified using ISTH definition. STROBE recommendations were used in order to enhance reporting., Results: A total of 793 patients from 79 centers were included in the study with 593 being hospitalized (74.8%). Among these, 511 were defined as having severe COVID: 162 were admitted to the ICU while 349 received oxygen supplementation outside the ICU. Most patients (90.5%) were receiving thromboprophylaxis. During COVID-19 treatment, 11.1% developed a thromboembolic event, while 5.0% experienced bleeding. Thrombosis developed in 21.6% of patients who were not receiving thromboprophylaxis, in contrast to 10.6% of patients who were on thromboprophylaxis. Bleeding episodes were more frequent in patients receiving intermediate/therapeutic versus prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) (8.1% vs. 3.8%, respectively) and in elderly. In multivariate analysis, peak D-dimer level and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were poor prognostic factors for thrombosis occurrence (OR = 1.022, 95%CI 1.007‒1.038 and OR = 1.025, 95%CI 1.001‒1.051, respectively), while thromboprophylaxis use was protective (OR = 0.199, 95%CI 0.061‒0.645). Age and LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration were prognostic factors in multivariate model for bleeding (OR = 1.062, 95%CI 1.017-1.109 and OR = 2.438, 95%CI 1.023-5.813, respectively)., Conclusions: Patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19 are at a high risk of thrombosis if thromboprophylaxis is not used, but also at increased risk of bleeding under the LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration., (© 2022. The Author(s).)