Search

This study discusses a computer simulation for the equivalent ambient dose due to photons, H*(10)p, and neutrons, H*(10)n, in the patient's plane undergoing radiation therapy. A standard radiotherapy room with an additional shielding made by one lead or steel tenth-value layer was considered. A Varian 2100/2300 C/D linear accelerator head operating at 18 MV was modeled. Jaw openings of 5 cm × 5 cm, 10 cm × 10 cm, 20 cm × 20 cm, and 30 cm × 30 cm, as well as the multileaf collimator under eight different angles of gantry inclination, were also modeled. The use of steel in the shield generates a slightly raised average value of H*(10)p (0.527%) compared to when using lead. This finding can be interpreted as that the use of lead or steel coating makes no difference to the additional shield calculations when only photons are considered. When considering the contribution to H*(10)n, there is a significant difference (11.7% increase) for using lead compared to steel shielding., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This study focusses on the risk of potential exposure to radiation for personnel driving a truck as well as illegal individuals being transported in cargo containers. Inspection facilities usually use a high energy linear accelerator (linac) in order to inspect the cargo. Since this type of equipment has associated health risks due to potential unwanted exposure, the occupational and public dose limits should be calculated in order to develop safer work conditions. This work used a computation model running the code MCNPX to simulate a typical cargo inspection facility which used a linac operating at 4.5 MeV. Two scenarios were considered: (1) exposure of the driver to the primary beam due to a potential failure of the safety sensors; and (2) dose received by an illegal individual being transported inside the cargo container. The results show a dose of 0.8514 mSv per scan for the driver exposed to the primary X-ray beam, and 0.1997 mSv per scan for an individual transported in the cargo box. In conclusion, both the individual and the driver received a dose below the acceptable limit considered safe for an individual (1 mSv/year). However, that was the value of one scan; in a case in which multiple scans would be performed, the dose limit can be quickly exceeded. In that case, the limit would be exceeded by the driver faster than by the individual in the cargo., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)