Search

Introduction: The relative citation ratio (RCR) is a bibliometric index utilized to assess research productivity. Mean relative citation ratio (m-RCR) and weighted relative citation ratio (w-RCR) can be utilized to assess individual research quality as well as career-long productivity, respectively. We sought to determine differences in academic productivity between genders and identify demographic variables associated with increased academic productivity., Methods: A list of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery residency programs was compiled utilizing the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website. Each program department's website was utilized to generate a list of practicing surgeons and respective demographic information. Both mean and weighted RCR were obtained using the iCite, a National Institutes of Health bibliometric tool. Surgeons were excluded if any demographic or RCR data was not accessible. Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multivariable linear regressions were performed., Results: A total of 785 academic plastic surgeons met the criteria and were included in the analysis, 186 of whom were women and 599 men. Both academic rank and model of residency training were significantly associated with gender in chi-squared analysis (P < 0.05). Mean relative citation ratio was higher among men in departments. Mean w-RCR was higher among men of assistant professor status, chief/chairperson status, integrated model of residency training, faculty size ≥six and in departments and divisions. Academic rank and faculty size were associated with higher w-RCR upon multivariable linear regression., Conclusions: Although differences exist in mean w-RCR between men and women in plastic surgery, gender is not a predictor of increased academic productivity. RCR is an accurate means of assessing gender differences in academic productivity as it comprehensively considers both quality and quantity of research and may be superior to other, older bibliometric indices., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Twenty three years after the first successful upper extremity transplantation, the role of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) in the world of transplantation remains controversial. Face and upper extremity reconstruction via transplantation have become successful options for highly selected patients with severe tissue and functional deficit when conventional reconstructive options are no longer available. Despite clear benefit in these situations, VCA has a significant potential for complications that are more frequent when compared to visceral organ transplantation. This study intended to perform an updated systematic review on such complications., Materials and Methods: MEDLINE database via PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched. Face and upper extremity VCA performed between 1998 and 2021 were included in the study. Relevant media and press conferences reports were also included. Complications related to face and upper extremity VCA were recorded and reviewed including their clinical characteristics and complications., Results: One hundred fifteen patients underwent facial (43%) or upper extremity (57%) transplantation. Overall, the surgical complication rate was 23%. Acute and chronic rejection was identified in 89% and 11% of patients, respectively. Fifty eight percent of patients experienced opportunistic infection. Impaired glucose metabolism was the most common immunosuppression-related complication other than infection. Nineteen percent of patients ultimately experienced partial or complete allograft loss., Conclusions: Complications related to VCA are a significant source of morbidity and potential mortality. Incidence of such complications is higher than previously reported and should be strongly emphasized in patient consent process. Strict patient selection criteria, complex preoperative evaluation, consideration of alternatives, and thorough disclosure to patients should be routinely performed prior to VCA indication., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Abdominal wall allotransplantation following intestinal and multivisceral transplant procedures has proven to be successful in achieving adequate closure in patients in whom other techniques have proven inadequate. Thus far, the focus of these abdominal wall allotransplants has been on graft and overall patient survival following surgery and the implementation of immunosuppression. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of abdominal wall allotransplantation reported in the literature., Methods: The PubMed database was queried, and 2595 articles were found. Search criteria used were "abdominal wall transplant" and "abdominal wall allotransplant." Of these, eight met inclusion/exclusion criteria., Results: In the present study, eight publications were identified reporting abdominal wall allotransplants, for a total of 38 full-thickness abdominal wall allotransplantations performed worldwide. All studies reported abdominal wall allotransplantation in combination with visceral organ allotransplantation. Abdominal wall allotransplantations reported thus far have been nonneurotized. Abdominal wall allotransplantations have proven to be beneficial both in terms of abdominal wall closure and acting as a sentinel marker for rejection for underlying visceral organ allotransplantation. The success of abdominal wall allotransplants and their long-term survival has introduced the question of functionality and long-term durability. Cadaveric studies have shown that it is possible to neurotize abdominal wall allotransplants, and future direction toward neurotized abdominal wall allotransplantation requires tools to assess functional outcomes of these transplants., Conclusions: Abdominal wall allotransplantation is an important reconstructive option when abdominal wall closure is challenging and should be considered in combination with visceral organ allotransplantations. There may be potential benefit in neurotizing the abdominal wall allotransplant for functional use, and future studies should aim to include functional outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure:The authors have no financial interest or conflicts of interest to declare ., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

This report presents a case in which oral soft tissue lesions were the first signs of multiple myeloma (MM) following a solid-organ transplantation. A 75-year-old man presented with bilateral primary oral gingival masses in the posterior mandible approximately 2 months after tooth extractions. A panoramic radiograph appeared normal and did not reveal "punched-out" lytic lesions of the bone, a classic sign of MM. A biopsy of the gingival masses was performed, and the resulting diagnosis was a plasma cell neoplasm. After a hematologic screening, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and bone marrow biopsy, the diagnosis of MM with extensive disease was confirmed. Oral manifestations of MM are common, making the patient's oral health history an integral part of diagnosis. Although the isolated gingival hypertrophy observed in the present case is an atypical oral presentation, an understanding of the maxillofacial manifestations of MM is important to ensure diagnosis in the early stages of disease.