Search

Introduction: The poorest in Burkina Faso face numerous barriers to healthcare access, including financial and geographic obstacles, as well as a high burden of chronic conditions and multimorbidity. This study estimates the average cost of providing curative outpatient consultations at first-level healthcare facilities to the poorest in Burkina Faso. It also estimates the budgetary impact of scaling up free access to these services nationwide. The findings provide essential evidence on cost structures to inform decision-makers in developing policies aimed at achieving universal health coverage and ensuring that no one is left behind. Methods: We conducted a micro-costing study to estimate the economic costs of providing curative outpatient healthcare services to the poorest at first-level healthcare facilities, considering a health system perspective. We measured the consumption of capital costs (building and equipment) using survey data from 32 primary health facilities and recurrent costs (drugs and consumables) from medical records of 1380 poor patients in Diébougou district. These individuals were targeted and exempted from user fees through a community-based targeting approach. We obtained unit costs from official price lists, pharmacy registries, and expert interviews. We calculated the national budget for providing curative care services to the exempted poorest based on the average cost per first-level consultation. Results: The estimated capital and recurrent costs of providing curative care services ranged between USD 0.59 - USD 0.61 and USD 2.58 - USD 5.00, respectively. The total cost ranged between USD 3.17 - USD 5.61 per first-level consultation. Providing curative care to the bottom 20% of the population, assuming 0.25 healthcare contacts per person per year, would result in an annual expense ranging from USD 2.77 M to USD 5.38 M (0.74-1.43% of the healthcare budget in 2019). With 2 healthcare contacts per person per year, costs increase to USD 22.19 M to USD 43.05 M (5.91-11.45% of the healthcare budget). Conclusion: The results can inform policies aimed at expanding access to curative care for the poorest in Burkina Faso, contributing to the goals of universal health coverage and leaving no one behind. Further research is needed to enhance cost estimation and budgeting for higher-level care in the country. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID‐19 pandemic has triggered unprecedented governmental responses worldwide, revealing weaknesses in health systems and public health policies due to lack of "complex thought" required to manage complex adaptive systems. Understanding COVID‐19 response strategies' multiple effects is particularly important now that pandemic preparedness and response (PPR) is on top of the global health political agenda. Here, we adopt a complex adaptive systems approach to critically analyze the literature and draw lessons from the COVID‐19 response to inform future PPR strategies. We observe that in many contexts, strategies implemented in response to COVID‐19 were poorly effective, inefficient, and inequitable. We explain the limitations of these prevailing measures and propose approaches and strategies to manage pandemics arising from a "systems thinking" perspective. PPR demands the adoption of an evolving, evidenced‐informed, and context‐specific strategy based on comprehensive approaches reflecting the complexities of health crises. This means moving away from single‐focused health security paradigms to consider the full range of health problems facing populations and adopting a package of interventions chosen via participatory and deliberative processes that are context‐specific and sensitive, as well as evidence‐driven, to ensure a fair balance between various pillars of pandemic responses: health promotion, non‐pharmaceutical interventions, prophylaxis, vaccines, and treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Burkina Faso has implemented a nationwide free healthcare policy (gratuité) for pregnant and lactating women and children under 5 years since April 2016. Studies have shown that free healthcare policies can increase healthcare service use. However, the emerging coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, escalating insecurity and the political situation in recent years might have affected the implementation of such policies. No studies have looked at whether the gratuité maintained high service use under such changing circumstances. Our study aimed to assess the effects of gratuité on the utilization of facility-based delivery and curative care of children under 5 years in light of this changing context. We employed a controlled interrupted time series analysis using data from the Health Management Information System and annual statistical reports of 2560 primary health facilities from January 2013 to December 2021. We focused on facility-based deliveries and curative care for children under 5 years, with antenatal care and curative care for children over 5 years as non-equivalent controls. We employed segmented regression with the generalized least square model, accounting for autocorrelation and monthly seasonality. The monthly utilization rate among children under 5 years compared to those above 5 years (controls) immediately increased by 111.19 visits per 1000 children (95% CI: 91.12, 131.26) due to the gratuité. This immediate effect declined afterwards with a monthly change of 0.93 per 1000 children (95% CI: −1.57, −0.29). We found no significant effects, both immediate and long-term, on the use of maternal care services attributable to the gratuité. Our findings suggest that free healthcare policies can be instrumental in improving healthcare, yet more comprehensive strategies are needed to maintain healthcare utilization. Our findings reflect the overall situation in the country, while localized research is needed to understand the effect of insecurity and the pandemic at the local level and the effects of gratuité across geographies and socioeconomic statuses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]