Search

Objectives: The objective is to assess the impact of the quality of tissue fixation in surgical pathology on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and DNA degradation. Materials and methods: Twenty-five non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection specimens were analyzed. After resection, all tumors were processed according to the protocols in our center. In haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue slides, adequately- and inadequately fixed tumor areas were microscopically demarcated, based on basement membrane detachment. In 10 IHC stains ALK (clone 5A4), PD-L (clone 22C3), CAM5.2, CK7, c-Met, KER-MNF116, NapsinA, p40, ROS1, TTF1) the immunoreactivity in H-scores was determined in adequately- and inadequately fixed, and necrotic tumor areas. From the same areas DNA was isolated, and DNA fragmentation in base pairs (bp) was measured. Results: H-scores were significantly higher in H&E adequately fixed tumor areas in IHC stains KER-MNF116 (H-score 256 vs 15, p=0.001) and p40 (H-score 293 vs 248, p=0.028). All other stains showed a trend towards higher immunoreactivity in H&E adequately fixed areas. Independent of H&E adequatelty- or inadequately fixed areas, all IHC stains showed significant different IHC staining intensity within tumors, suggesting heterogeneous immunoreactivity (H-scores: PD-L1 123 vs 6, p = 0.001; CAM5.2 242 vs 101, p=16 h) and short fixation time (24 h). Conclusions: Impaired tissue fixation of resected lung tumors results in decreased IHC staining intensity in some parts of the tumor. This may impact the reliability of IHC analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is the only approved predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, predictive PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is subject to interobserver variability. We hypothesized that a pathologist's personality influences the interobserver variability and diagnostic accuracy of PD-L1 immunoscoring.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen pathologists performed PD-L1 immunoscoring on 50 resected NSCLC tumors in three categories (RESULTS: The overall agreement among pathologists for a series of 47 tumors was substantial (kappa = 0.63). Of these, 23/47 (49%) tumors were entirely negative or largely positive, resulting in a kappa value of 0.93. The remaining 24/47 (51%) tumors had a PD-L1 score around the cutoff value, generating a kappa value of 0.32. Pathologists with high scores for conscientiousness (careful, diligent) had the least interobserver variability (r = 0.6, p = 0.009). Also, they showed a trend towards higher sensitivity (74% vs. 68%, p = 0.4), specificity (86% vs. 82%, p = 0.3) and percent agreement (83% vs. 79%, p = 0.3), although not significant. In contrast, pathologists with high scores for neuroticism (sensitive, anxious) had significantly lower specificity (80% vs. 87%, p = 0.03) and percent agreement (78% vs. 85%, p = 0.03). Also, a trend towards high interobserver variability (r = -0.3, p = 0.2) and lower sensitivity (68% vs. 74%, p = 0.3) was observed, although not significant. Pathologists with relatively high scores for conscientiousness scored fewer tumors PD-L1 positive at the ≥ 1% cut-off (r = -0.5, p = 0.03). In contrast, pathologists with relatively high scores for neuroticism score more tumors PD-L1 positive at ≥ 1% (r = 0.6, p = 0.017) and ≥ 50% cut-offs (r = 0.6, p = 0.009).CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate the impact of a pathologist's personality on the interobserver variability and diagnostic accuracy of immunostaining, in the context of PD-L1 in NSCLC. Larger studies are needed for validation of these findings.