Search

Purpose: To evaluate ovarian stimulation response in couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-M) for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) METHODS: Retrospective, observational, multicentric study. Parameters of ovarian response and PGT-M outcomes were compared according to the DM1-affected patient (female or male). A total of 229 couples underwent at least one controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle for the PGT-M procedure. Overall, 678 COS cycles were started, leading to 560 cycles with oocyte retrievals and subsequent PGT-M analysis., Results: At the time of the first PGT-M attempt, affected DM1 females were 1 year older and their serum AMH level was significantly lower than that of the healthy partner of affected DM1 males. After higher starting and total doses of exogenous gonadotropins, the number of mature oocytes was not statistically different between both groups (9 [6-13] vs 9 [6-13] mature oocytes, p=0.73). The FORT index was similar in both groups (35.2% [19.2-52.8] vs 33.3% [19.6-50.0], p=0.09), suggesting that antral follicle responsiveness to FSH is not altered. The live birth rate per fresh embryo transfer was 23.8% in the affected females group and 27.6% for the affected males., Conclusion: After adapted controlled ovarian stimulation protocol and starting dose, a similar response (number of mature oocytes) and sensitivity (FORT index) was observed in DM1 females when compared to healthy partners of DM1 males undergoing PGT-M., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To describe the use, efficacy and safety profile of follitropin delta in women undergoing IVF/ICSI in routine clinical practice after one treatment cycle., Study Design: This was a French multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in 14 fertility centers between June 2020 and June 2021. During this period, 248 women undergoing IVF or ICSI were treated with follitropin delta for the first time. Women were followed up to 10-11 weeks after the first fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The main outcomes were use of dosing algorithm, follitropin delta dosing patterns, ovarian response, pregnancy, and adverse drug reactions in routine clinical practice., Results: The analyzable population consisted of 223 patients with mean ± SD age of 33.0 ± 4.4 years, body weight of 65.7 ± 11.8 kg, and the median (IQR) AMH level was 2.6 (1.5-4.0) ng/mL. For 193 patients (86.5 %) it was the first IVF/ICSI cycle and for 30 (13.5 %) the second. The algorithm was used for the calculation of the starting dose for 88.3 % of the patients. The mean daily starting dose of follitropin delta was 11.4 ± 4.1mcg for the whole analyzable population and 14.4 ± 5.2 mcg for the sub-group of 26 patients dosed without the algorithm. The mean duration of stimulation with follitropin delta was 10.8 ± 5.2 days. The mean total dose of follitropin delta administered was 122.2 ± 80.0 mcg. An antagonist protocol was used in 90.3 % of patients. The mean ± SD number of oocytes retrieved among patients that started stimulation was 11.3 ± 6.8 and 46.1 % of patients achieved the targeted response of the algorithm of 8-14 oocytes retrieved. A fresh transfer was performed for 77.6 % of patients; the mean ± SD number of embryos transferred was 1.3 ± 0.5. The implantation rate was 36.0 %. Per started cycle, clinical pregnancy was reported in 35.0 % of the patients and ongoing pregnancy in 29.6 %. In total, 5 patients (2.2 %) reported an event of OHSS., Conclusion: Clinical results as collected in routine clinical practice are promising, showing a favorable effectiveness-safety profile of follitropin delta for a very varied patient population (including anovulatory PCOS, very poor responders, or non-IVF naïve patients). These real-world data complement results from clinical trials and provide useful information for usual clinical practice within a heterogeneous population group., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To improve the reliability of prediction models for ovarian response to stimulation in ART., Design: A multicenter retrospective cohort study., Setting: Twelve reproductive centers., Patients: A total of 25,854 controlled ovarian stimulations between 2005 and 2016, including cycles cancelled for inadequate response, were included., Intervention(s): None., Main Outcome Measure(s): Precision of the prediction of the number of oocytes at ovarian pickup and of cancellation rate for poor ovarian response., Results: Both AMH and antral follicle count exhibit a non-linear effect on the oocyte yield, with a linear relationship after log-transformation. After adjustment for age, BMI, and center, ovarian response observed in a previous stimulation was found to be the best predictor, followed by AMH and AFC. The zero-inflated binomial negative model showed that predictors of cycle cancellation and number of oocytes at retrieval were different, and assimilating cancellation to zero oocyte greatly reduces the determination of the model. Our model was characterized by the best ever reached determination (R 2 =0.505 for non-naïve women, 0.313 for all the women) and provided evidence of a very strong difference among centers. The results can be easily converted in the prediction of response levels (poor-medium-good-high). Finally, in case of partial report of the above predictors, we show that the univariate prediction based on the best predictor provides a good approximation., Conclusion(s): A substantial improvement of the ovarian response prediction is possible in modelling the possible cancellation decision, followed by the oocyte retrieval itself, according to an appropriate model based on previous stimulation and non-linear effects of AMH and AFC., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) are correlated with the ovarian response, but their reliability and reproducibility are questionable. This large multicenter study describes their distribution, inter-cycle and inter-center variability, and their correlation., Methods: A total of 25,854 IVF cycles among 15,219 patients were selected in 12 ART centers. Statistical distribution of AMH and AFC was studied by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro goodness of fit test. The reproducibility of AFC and AMH was measured using a mixed model regressing the logarithmic transformation of AFC with age., Results: The distribution of AMH and AFC was characterized by a wide dispersion of values, twice more important for AFC, and a logarithmic distribution. The faster decline in AMH than in AFC with age suggests that their correlation changes with age. AMH and AFC showed a very low proportion of concordance in the range of expected poor responders according to Bologna cutoffs. The heterogeneity for AMH and AFC across centers was small, but much larger across patients within each center. Concerning the patients with several successive cycles, the reproducibility for AMH seemed much better than for AFC. Comparing respective performances of AMH and AFC for the prediction of ovarian response depended on the local conditions for measuring these indicators and on the reproducibility of results improved over time., Conclusion: Distribution of AMH and AFC was characterized by the wide dispersion of values, and a logarithmic distribution. Establishing cutoffs or a direct relationship AMH/AFC without considering age seems hazardous. Correlation between AMH and AFC was very poor in the range of poor responders., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)