Search

Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a granulomatous disease that can manifest as conduction defects, ventricular arrhythmias, and heart failure. The diagnosis of CS is inherently difficult due to variable presentations; as such, endomyocardial biopsy is often required but lacks sensitivity due to patchy myocardial involvement. Moreover, the diagnostic criteria of CS and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy overlap, particularly in right-side dominant or biventricular presentations, which further complicates an already challenging differential diagnosis. Case summary A 53-year-old man with no prior chronic medical conditions presented with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. He was found to have biventricular cardiomyopathy and late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, resulting in an initial diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was placed, but he was readmitted for recurrent VT 2 months later. Despite an aggressive VT therapy (combination of antiarrhythmic drugs, epicardial and endocardial ablation, and stellate ganglion block), he continued with refractory VT and developed cardiogenic shock. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated as a bridge to heart transplantation. Pathology of the explanted heart revealed the underlying disease to be CS. Discussion Cardiac sarcoidosis can mimic arrhythmogenic biventricular cardiomyopathy and may be difficult to distinguish by the proposed diagnostic criteria. High clinical suspicion and thorough investigation are necessary for an earlier diagnosis and initiation of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF‐LVADs) is often related to GI angiodysplasia (GIAD). We previously reported data on VEGF inhibition with IV bevacizumab in the treatment of LVAD‐associated GIAD bleeding, and now present follow‐up data on patients treated with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib. Methods: All consecutive adult patients with LVAD‐associated GIB from GIAD treated with bevacizumab or pazopanib, from July 20, 2017 to June 22, 2022, were included in the analysis. Data on hospitalizations, GI endoscopic procedures, and blood transfusions were obtained from first admission for GIB up to a median of 35.7 months following treatment initiation (range 1.3–59.8 months). Results: Eleven patients (91% male, mean 69.5 ± 8.9 years) were included. Eight patients (73%) received IV bevacizumab, two patients (18%) received oral pazopanib, and one patient (9%) received bevacizumab followed by pazopanib therapy. We observed a significantly decreased number of annualized hospitalizations for GIB (median difference − 2.87, p = 0.002), blood transfusions (median difference − 20.9, p = 0.01), and endoscopies (median difference − 6.95, p = 0.007) in patients pre‐ and post‐anti‐angiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and/or pazopanib). Similarly, a significant improvement in these clinical outcomes was noted in the bevacizumab group with decreased annualized hospitalizations (median difference − 2.75, p = 0.014), blood transfusions (median difference − 24.5, p = 0.047), and number of endoscopies (median differences −6.88, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Anti‐angiogenic therapy with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib appears to provide benefits in patients with LVAD‐associated GIB with reduced hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and need for GI endoscopic procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

18F-flurodeoxyglycose (FDG)/13N-ammonia positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is frequently utilized to evaluate cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) but findings can reflect other forms of myocardial inflammation or altered myocardial metabolic activity. Herein, we present five cases where cardiac PET findings suggested CS, but right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy samples revealed ATTR-type cardiac amyloidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Procainamide is a useful agent for management of ventricular arrhythmia, however its disposition and appropriate dosing during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is unknown. We report experience with continuous procainamide infusion in a critically ill adult requiring venoarterial ECMO for incessant ventricular tachycardia. Pharmacokinetic analysis of procainamide and its metabolite, N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), was performed using serum and urine specimens. Kidney function was preserved, and sequencing of the N-acetyltransferase 2 gene revealed the patient was a phenotypic slow acetylator. Procainamide volume of distribution and half-life were calculated and found to be similar to healthy individuals. However, despite elevated serum procainamide concentrations, NAPA concentrations remained far lower in the serum and urine. The magnitude of procainamide and NAPA discordance suggested alternative contributors to the deranged pharmacokinetic profile, and we hypothesized NAPA sequestration by the ECMO circuit. Ultimately, the patient received orthotopic cardiac transplantation and was discharged home in stable condition. Procainamide should be used cautiously during ECMO, with close therapeutic drug monitoring of serum procainamide and NAPA concentrations. The achievement of therapeutic NAPA concentrations while maintaining safe serum procainamide concentrations during ECMO support may be challenging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current guidelines present varying classes of recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) utilization in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%., Objective: To investigate the ventricular arrhythmia risk in CS patients with ICDs and varying degrees of LV systolic dysfunction., Methods: We included CS patients with an ICD and LVEF <50% at index evaluation. The primary outcome was survival free of sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) after ICD implantation and was assessed comparatively for LVEF ≤35 vs 36-49% and for primary vs secondary prevention ICD indication., Results: We included 61 patients (median age 57 years, 61% male) with LVEF 36-49% (n=23) or LVEF ≤35% (n=38). An ICD was implanted for secondary prevention in 24% and 44% of the LVEF ≤35% and 36-49% groups, respectively (p=0.11). The primary outcome did not differ between the two groups in univariable analysis (LVEF ≤35% vs 36-49% HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.39, 1.82], p=0.67). In multivariable analysis, secondary prevention ICD indication was the only significant predictor of incident sustained VT/VF (HR 2.86 [95% CI 1.23, 6.67], p=0.015). The mean sustained VT/VF event burden was higher in the secondary as compared with the primary prevention ICD patients (0.47 vs 0.11 events/patient-year, p=0.005) but did not differ significantly between LVEF ≤35% and 36-49% patients., Conclusions: CS patients with ICD indications and LVEF 36-49% carry similarly high arrhythmic risk as those with LVEF ≤35%. Patients with secondary prevention ICDs have the highest overall risk., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Axillary artery intra-aortic balloon pump (axIABP) placement has been implemented as a bridging solution before heart transplantation. This study evaluates complications associated with axIABP support and describes an approach to minimize adverse events. We previously described a percutaneous approach for axIABP placement. However, patients receiving axIABP between September 1, 2017, and September 26, 2019 (n = 32) demonstrated a high rate of balloon pump malfunction (8/32; 25%) and other complications (totaling 15/32; 47%). Sixty-four patients were sequentially treated under a revised protocol. Compared to the initial cohort, no significant differences in demographics were noted. A significant reduction in rate of balloon malfunction (8/32, 25% vs. 1/64, 2%; p < 0.001) and total complications (15/32, 47% vs. 10/64, 16%; p = 0.0025) during the period of support were noted after intervention. Subsequent analysis of total complications per device size (40 vs. ≤ 34 ml balloon) revealed significantly reduced complications in patients with smaller devices (40% vs. 13%, respectively; p = 0.0022). This study provides guidelines to limit complications in patients supported with axIABP, facilitating a protracted period of bridging support., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Background: Biomarkers to monitor disease activity and predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in CS have not been described previously. We aimed to identify biomarkers to predict MACE in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS)., Methods: Patients (N=232) diagnosed with CS were retrospectively enrolled. Biomarkers including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin T, and creatinine levels were evaluated against a primary end point of left ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, or death, and a secondary end point of cardiac hospitalization-free survival., Results: Troponin T (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06 per 0.01 ng/mL; P =.006), NT-proBNP (HR, 1.31 per 1,000 pg/mL; P <.001), and creatinine (HR, 4.02 per mg/dL; P =.01) were associated with the primary end point, even after adjusting for ejection fraction. NT-proBNP, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), creatinine, albumin, and calcium were associated with the secondary end point ( P <.05). ACE levels were associated with presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (mean difference, 14.7; P =.03); 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-OHVit-D) was associated with uptake on cardiac 18 F-flurodeoxyglucose position emission tomography (FDG-PET, P =.03)., Conclusions: Troponin T, NT-proBNP, and creatinine predict clinically significant outcomes in CS. ACE levels correlated with LGE on CMR, and 1,25-OHVit-D levels correlated with FDG-PET activity., Competing Interests: Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (Copyright: © 2021 SARCOIDOSIS VASCULITIS AND DIFFUSE LUNG DISEASES.)