Search

Background: Before the development of antithyroid drugs in the 1940s, treatment of Graves' hyperthyroidism was primarily surgical. Surgical mortality was quite variable, but a significant minority of patients died during or after surgery. Summary: In 1936, Karl Compton, President of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in a lecture attended by Massachusetts General Hospital physicians, suggested that artificially radioactive isotopes might be useful for studying metabolism. By 1942, Hertz and Roberts reported on the successful use of radioactive iodine (RAI) to treat Graves' hyperthyroidism. RAI uptake was subsequently demonstrated in well-differentiated thyroid cancer metastases. In 1948, Seidlin demonstrated stimulation of uptake in thyroid cancer metastases by thyrotropin (TSH). By 1990, 69% of endocrinologists in North America recommended RAI for Graves' hyperthyroidism. Currently RAI is less frequently used for Graves' hyperthyroidism, related to concerns about exacerbation of thyroid eye disease, about radiation exposure, and about potential adverse consequences of permanent hypothyroidism. Similarly, RAI was administered to the majority of patients with thyroid cancer for decades, but its use is now more selective. Conclusions: RAI is a remarkable example of interinstitutional cooperation between physicians and scientists to transition from bench to bedside in only three years. It is the model for a theranostic approach to disease (the simultaneous use of a radioactive drug for diagnosis and therapy). The future of RAI is less certain; inhibition of TSH receptor stimulating antibodies in Graves' disease and more precise targeting of genes that drive thyroid oncogenesis may diminish the use of RAI. Alternatively, redifferentiation techniques may improve the efficacy of RAI in RAI-refractory thyroid cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of Graves' disease (GD) in the US is shifting towards increased use of anti‐thyroid drugs (ATD). If patients fail to achieve remission after a standard course of therapy of 12–18 months, long‐term treatment with ATD (≥24 months) may be chosen over definitive therapy with radioiodine (RAI) or surgery. Clinicians will need to contrast this strategy to ablative therapies as they help patients in decision making. Summary: Review of the literature illustrates that long‐term ATD delivers euthyroidism with minimal complications, low financial cost and with an advantageous profile regarding quality of life (QoL) and other biological outcomes. Conclusions: Long‐term ATD is a viable alternative to ablative therapies in the management of GD offering advantages across multiple patient centred outcomes. Decision making must factor differences in this approach compared to ablative therapies and ultimately be tailored to individualized patient situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ATA guidelines, which recommends that patients be rendered euthyroid before surgery whenever possible, are still valid.[3] While the risk of an adverse outcome from operating on a thyrotoxic patient may be quite low, the risk should not be considered negligible. They compared 134 euthyroid patients who had a thyroidectomy after attaining a euthyroid state with medical treatment with 141 patients who were hyperthyroid at the time of surgery. [Extracted from the article]

The majority of patients with hypothyroidism feel better when levothyroxine treatment restores thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations to normal. Increasingly, a significant minority of patients remain symptomatic and are dissatisfied with their treatment. Overzealous treatment of symptomatic patients with subclinical hypothyroidism may contribute to dissatisfaction among hypothyroidism patients, as potential hypothyroid symptoms in patients with minimal hypothyroidism rarely respond to treatment. Thyroid hormone prescriptions have increased by 30% in the United States in the last decade. The diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroidism should be confirmed by repeat thyroid function tests ideally obtained at least 2 months later, as 62% of elevated TSH levels may revert to normal spontaneously. Generally, treatment is not necessary unless the TSH exceeds 7.0-10 mIU/L. In double-blinded randomized controlled trials, treatment does not improve symptoms or cognitive function if the TSH is less than 10 mIU/L. While cardiovascular events may be reduced in patients under age 65 with subclinical hypothyroidism who are treated with levothyroxine, treatment may be harmful in elderly patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. TSH goals are age dependent, with a 97.5 percentile (upper limit of normal) of 3.6 mIU/L for patients under age 40, and 7.5 mIU/L for patients over age 80. In some hypothyroid patients who are dissatisfied with treatment, especially those with a polymorphism in type 2 deiodinase, combined treatment with levothyroxine and liothyronine may be preferred., (© 2021 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.)