8 results on '"Ruiz-Montero R"'
Search Results
2. Impact of the first superspreading outbreak of COVID-19 related to a nightlife establishment in Andalusia, Spain
- Author
-
Delgado-Sánchez, S., Serrano-Ortiz, Á., Ruiz-Montero, R., Lorusso, N., Rumbao-Aguirre, J.M., and Salcedo-Leal, I.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Psychiatry resident physician duty hours, resting times and European Working Time Directive compliance in Spain.
- Author
-
Carrasco Picazo, J. P., Sánchez Martínez, D. A., Estrella Porter, P., Ruiz-Montero, R., Aginagalde Llorente, A. H., García-Camacho, E., Navarro, J., and Cerame del Campo, A.
- Subjects
EMPLOYEE vacations ,WORKING hours ,DEMOGRAPHIC characteristics ,PHYSICIANS ,REST periods - Abstract
Introduction: There is a growing interest in understanding the impact of duty hours and resting times on training outcomes and the well-being of resident physicians. Psychiatry resident's duty hours in Spain comprise a regular working schedule of 37.5h per week and a minimum of 4 mandatory on-call shifts. The most recent duty hours regulations in Spain were transposed from the European Working Time Directive (EWTD). According to Spanish Law, doctors cannot work for more than 48h per week and need to have resting times per day (at least 12h), per week (at least 36h) as well as annual leave (at least a month). However, there is practically no data on this situation in psychiatry resident physicians. Objectives: Our aim is firstly, to describe the number of shifts performed by psychiatry resident physicians in Spain. Secondly, to describe compliance with the daily and weekly rests compared to those set in national and European law. Finally, to analyse the difference by demographic variables (gender and year of residency), in both the number of on-call duty shifts and compliance with rests. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was designed through an online survey adapted from the existing literature. The target population were Spanish psychiatry resident physicians undergoing PGT who started their specialist training during the years 2018–2021. The survey was disseminated through the Spanish regional medical councils to all active psychiatry resident physicians by mail as well as through informal communication channels. The study was authorised by the Spanish Medical Organization's General Assembly which is the highest ethical and deontological body of physicians in Spain. Results: 55 responses were obtained, of which 61.82% identified as females. The mean number of on-call shifts in the last 3 months was 14.05. This mean was highest in women 14,32 and in the cohort of 2020 15.46 (first year of residency). Among the resident physicians surveyed, 66.07% exceeded the 48h per week limit set by the EWTD and 7% of them did not rest after a 24-h on-call shift. Furthermore, 22% of respondents did not have a day-off after a Saturday on-call shift. The mean working hours when not resting after an on-call-shift were 7 hours. The comparison by gender and year of residency of the main variables can be seen in figures 1 and 2 respectively. Image: Image 2: Conclusions: Psychiatry resident physicians in Spain greatly exceed the established 48 h/week EWTD limit. Likewise, non-compliance with labour regulations regarding mandatory rest after on-call duty and minimum weekly rest periods are observed. Differences can be seen by gender and year of residency. The situation described could potentially create a high-risk situation for the health and psychosocial well-being of resident physicians, hinder learning outcomes and could lead to suboptimal patient care. Disclosure of Interest: None Declared [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Risk Factors for Severe Outcomes through Machine Learning Techniques: A Real-World Data Study in Andalusia, Spain.
- Author
-
Serrano-Ortiz Á, Romero-Cabrera JL, Monserrat Villatoro J, Cordero-Ramos J, Ruiz-Montero R, Ritoré Á, Dopazo J, Del Diego Salas J, García Sánchez V, Salcedo-Leal I, Armengol de la Hoz MÁ, Túnez I, and Guzmán MÁ
- Subjects
- Humans, Spain epidemiology, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Aged, Adult, Vaccine Efficacy statistics & numerical data, Intensive Care Units statistics & numerical data, Aged, 80 and over, Young Adult, Adolescent, COVID-19 prevention & control, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 mortality, COVID-19 Vaccines administration & dosage, Machine Learning, SARS-CoV-2, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: COVID-19 vaccination has become a pivotal global strategy in managing the pandemic. Despite COVID-19 no longer being classified as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, the virus continues affecting people worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors and vaccine effectiveness on COVID-19-related hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality within the Andalusian population throughout the pandemic., Methods: From March 2020 to April 2022, 671,229 individuals, out of 9,283,485 with electronic health records in Andalusia, experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection and were included in the analysis. Data on demographics, medical history, vaccine administration, and hospitalization records were collected. Associations between medical history, COVID-19 vaccines, and COVID-19 outcomes were assessed., Results: Our study identified 48,196 hospital admissions, 5,057 ICU admissions, and 11,289 deaths linked to COVID-19. Age, male sex, and chronic diseases were identified as risk factors, while the COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated protective effects, although with reduced effectiveness during the omicron variant period. However, the risk for these outcomes increased over time after receiving the last vaccine dose, particularly after six months, especially among those aged 60 or older., Conclusion: The global health challenge of COVID-19 persists, marked by emerging variants with higher virulence and severity, particularly among the unvaccinated and those beyond six months post-vaccination, especially those aged 60 and above. These findings highlight the need for robust surveillance systems targeting new variants and administering booster doses, particularly for individuals aged 60 or older with underlying health conditions, to mitigate the global burden of COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics Approval: The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Andalusia (CCEIBA in Spanish) approved the research protocol for this study (010722 (Act 07/22), FPS-VAC-2022-01). This study was an epidemiological study including anonymized data, and the analysis was performed in Andalusian servers of the public healthcare system, and was not required to obtain informed consent from the patients. We conducted this study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Spanish Law on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights (3/2018 of December 5). Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Effectiveness of a Meningococcal Group B Vaccine (4CMenB) in Children.
- Author
-
Castilla J, García Cenoz M, Abad R, Sánchez-Cambronero L, Lorusso N, Izquierdo C, Cañellas Llabrés S, Roig J, Malvar A, González Carril F, Boone ALD, Pérez Martín J, Rodríguez Recio MJ, Galmés A, Caballero A, García Rojas A, Juanas F, Nieto M, Viloria Raymundo LJ, Martínez Ochoa E, Rivas AI, Castrillejo D, Moreno Pérez D, Martínez A, Borràs E, Sánchez Gómez A, Pastor E, Nartallo V, Arteagoitia JM, Álvarez-Fernández B, García Pina R, Fernández Arribas S, Vanrell J, García Hernández S, Mendoza RM, Méndez M, López-Tercero MM, Fernández-Rodríguez Á, Blanco Á, Carrillo de Albornoz FJ, Ruiz Olivares J, Ruiz-Montero R, Limia A, Navarro-Alonso JA, Vázquez JA, and Barricarte A
- Subjects
- Child, Humans, Infant, Case-Control Studies, Neisseria meningitidis, Spain, Meningococcal Infections microbiology, Meningococcal Infections prevention & control, Meningococcal Vaccines therapeutic use, Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B
- Abstract
Background: In September 2015, the four-component, protein-based meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero) became available for private purchase in Spain., Methods: We conducted a nationwide matched case-control study to assess the effectiveness of 4CMenB in preventing invasive meningococcal disease in children. The study included all laboratory-confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal disease in children younger than 60 months of age between October 5, 2015, and October 6, 2019, in Spain. Each case patient was matched with four controls according to date of birth and province. 4CMenB vaccination status of the case patients and controls was compared with the use of multivariate conditional logistic regression., Results: We compared 306 case patients (243 [79.4%] with serogroup B disease) with 1224 controls. A total of 35 case patients (11.4%) and 298 controls (24.3%) had received at least one dose of 4CMenB. The effectiveness of complete vaccination with 4CMenB (defined as receipt of at least 2 doses, administered in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations) was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57 to 87) against invasive meningococcal disease caused by any serogroup, and partial vaccination was 54% (95% CI, 18 to 74) effective. Complete vaccination resulted in an effectiveness of 71% (95% CI, 45 to 85) against meningococcal serogroup B disease. Vaccine effectiveness with at least one dose of 4CMenB was 64% (95% CI, 41 to 78) against serogroup B disease and 82% (95% CI, 21 to 96) against non-serogroup B disease. With the use of the genetic Meningococcal Antigen Typing System, serogroup B strains that were expected to be covered by 4CMenB were detected in 44 case patients, none of whom had been vaccinated., Conclusions: Complete vaccination with 4CMenB was found to be effective in preventing invasive disease by serogroup B and non-serogroup B meningococci in children younger than 5 years of age., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Socioeconomic differences in COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation and mortality in urban areas in a region in the South of Europe.
- Author
-
Fernández-Martínez NF, Ruiz-Montero R, Gómez-Barroso D, Rodríguez-Torronteras A, Lorusso N, Salcedo-Leal I, and Sordo L
- Subjects
- Humans, Socioeconomic Factors, Bayes Theorem, Spain epidemiology, Cities epidemiology, COVID-19 epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: To analyse differences in confirmed cases, hospitalisations and deaths due to COVID-19 related to census section socioeconomic variables. METHODS: Ecological study in the 12 largest municipalities in Andalusia (Spain) during the first three epidemic waves of the COVID-19 (02/26/20-03/31/21), covering 2,246 census sections (unit of analysis) and 3,027,000 inhabitants. Incidence was calculated, standardised by age and sex, for infection, hospitalisation and deaths based on average gross income per household (AGI) for the census tracts in each urban area. Association studied using a Poisson Bayesian regression model with random effects for spatial smoothing., Results: There were 140,743 cases of COVID-19, of which 12,585 were hospitalised and 2,255 died. 95.2% of cases were attributed to the second and third waves, which were jointly analysed. We observed a protective effect of income for infection in 3/12 cities. Almeria had the largest protective effect (smoothed relative risk (SRR) = 0.84 (0.75-0.94 CI 95%). This relationship reappeared with greater magnitude in 10/12 cities for hospitalisation, lowest risk in Algeciras SRR = 0.41 (0.29-0.56). The pattern was repeated for deaths in all urban areas and reached statistical significance in 8 cities. Lowest risk in Dos Hermanas SRR = 0.35 (0.15-0.81)., Conclusions: Income inequalities by geographical area were found in the incidence of COVID-19. The strengths of the association increased when analysing the severe outcomes of hospitalisations and, above all, deaths., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Listeriosis outbreak caused by contaminated stuffed pork, Andalusia, Spain, July to October 2019.
- Author
-
Fernández-Martínez NF, Ruiz-Montero R, Briones E, Baños E, García San Miguel Rodríguez-Alarcón L, Chaves JA, Abad R, Varela C, and Lorusso N
- Subjects
- Animals, Female, Humans, Swine, Pregnancy, Male, Spain epidemiology, Food Microbiology, Disease Outbreaks, Pork Meat, Red Meat, Listeriosis epidemiology, Listeria monocytogenes, Gastroenteritis epidemiology, Foodborne Diseases epidemiology
- Abstract
Between 1 July and 26 October 2019 in Andalusia, Spain, a large outbreak with 207 confirmed cases of listeriosis was identified. Confirmed cases had a median age of 44 years (range: 0-94) and 114 were women (55.1%). Most cases (n = 154) had mild gastroenteritis, 141 (68.1%) required hospitalisation and three died; five of 34 pregnant women had a miscarriage. The median incubation period was 1 day (range: 0-30), and was significantly shorter in cases presenting with gastroenteritis compared to those presenting without gastroenteritis (1 day vs. 3 days, respectively, p value < 0.001). Stuffed pork, a ready-to-eat product consumed unheated, from a single producer contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes ST388 was identified as the source of infection. The outbreak strain was identified in 189 human samples and 87 non-human (82 food and 5 environmental) samples. Notification of new cases declined abruptly after control measures were implemented. These included contaminated food recall, protocols for clinical management of suspected cases and for post-exposure prophylaxis in pregnant women and communication campaigns with concise messages to the population through social media. Given that there were 3,059 probable cases, this was the largest L. monocytogenes outbreak ever reported in Europe.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Long COVID 12 months after discharge: persistent symptoms in patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 and patients hospitalised due to other causes-a multicentre cohort study.
- Author
-
Rivera-Izquierdo M, Láinez-Ramos-Bossini AJ, de Alba IG, Ortiz-González-Serna R, Serrano-Ortiz Á, Fernández-Martínez NF, Ruiz-Montero R, and Cervilla JA
- Subjects
- Adult, Cohort Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Patient Discharge, Prospective Studies, SARS-CoV-2, Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome, COVID-19 complications
- Abstract
Background: Long-term-specific sequelae or persistent symptoms (SPS) after hospitalisation due to COVID-19 are not known. The aim of this study was to explore the presence of SPS 12 months after discharge in survivors hospitalised due to COVID-19 and compare it with survivors hospitalised due to other causes., Methods: Prospective cohort study, the Andalusian Cohort of Hospitalised patients for COVID-19 (ANCOHVID study), conducted in 4 hospitals and 29 primary care centres in Andalusia, Spain. The sample was composed of 906 adult patients; 453 patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 (exposed) and 453 hospitalised due to other causes (non-exposed) from March 1 to April 15, 2020, and discharged alive. The main outcomes were (1) the prevalence of SPS at 12 months after discharge and (2) the incidence of SPS after discharge. Outcome data at 12 months were compared between the exposed and non-exposed cohorts. Risk ratios were calculated, and bivariate analyses were performed., Results: A total of 163 (36.1%) and 160 (35.3%) patients of the exposed and non-exposed cohorts, respectively, showed at least one SPS at 12 months after discharge. The SPS with higher prevalence in the subgroup of patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 12 months after discharge were persistent pharyngeal symptoms (p<0.001), neurological SPS (p=0.049), confusion or memory loss (p=0.043), thrombotic events (p=0.025) and anxiety (p=0.046). The incidence of SPS was higher for the exposed cohort regarding pharyngeal symptoms (risk ratio, 8.00; 95% CI, 1.85 to 36.12), confusion or memory loss (risk ratio, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.16 to 10.55) and anxiety symptoms (risk ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.28 to 4.34)., Conclusions: There was a similar frequency of long-term SPS after discharge at 12 months, regardless of the cause of admission (COVID-19 or other causes). Nevertheless, some symptoms that were found to be more associated with COVID-19, such as memory loss or anxiety, merit further investigation. These results should guide future follow-up of COVID-19 patients after hospital discharge., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.